REGULAR BOARD MEETING
Santa Rosa City Schools
June 10, 2026
Hybrid: Santa Rosa City Hall Council Chambers
4:00 p.m. – Closed Session
5:00 p.m. – Study Session
6:00 p.m. – Open Session
Hybrid: Zoom / Santa Rosa City Hall
*** streamed ***
Video Board Meetings through a link on this district webpage. (It is often changed right before the meeting.)
Please take time to review the following abbreviated version of the agenda. Click here to see the entire agenda. It has live links on many items with more information. If you want to comment to the board about any upcoming items, email agendacomments@srcs.k12.ca.us. Please CC wearesrta@gmail.com on your email.
Members attending online are encouraged to add SRTA to the front of their Zoom client name.
Closed Session Items:
A.1. Public Comment On Closed Session Agenda Items To comment, email Melanie Martin at mmartinsrcs.k12.ca.us.
This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak to the board on Closed Session items only.
Without specifics on closed session agenda items, it is impossible for the public to know when to provide insights for items being reviewed.
B.1. Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release [Gov. Code § 54957]
B.2. Conference With Labor Negotiator Name of designated rep attending: Dr. Vicki Zands (SRCS); name of organization: Santa Rosa Teachers Association, CSEA Santa Rosa 75, Teamsters Union 665)
B.3. Conference With Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation (Case No. 2026-110/26CV03377 )
B.4. Conference With Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation (Number of potential cases: 1)
B.5. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Title of employee being reviewed: Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent, Principals, Vice Principals, Assistant Principals, Directors, Coordinators)
C. RECONVENE TO OPEN STUDY SESSION: SPECIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT RESTRUCTURE AND SELPA PROGRESS UPDATE (5:00 p.m.)
C.1. Public Comment on the Study Session Calendar
C.2. (Discussion) Special Services Restructure and SELPA Formation Progress Update
Special Services Updates The Special Services Department is proposing a restructuring plan aimed at creating a more sustainable and organized leadership system focused on districtwide consistency, compliance, and student support.
The new model would shift away from managing programs by school site and instead assign leaders to specific functional areas, including:
- Compliance, data, and legal requirements
- Non-public and out-of-district placements
- Tier 3 behavior supports
- Early childhood education
- Extensive support needs
- Districtwide mental health services
- Section 504 coordination and implementation
The district says the restructure is part of broader Special Education System Improvement efforts focused on:
- Clarifying staff roles and responsibilities
- Improving communication between schools and district supports
- Strengthening MTSS and SST intervention systems
- Creating more consistent procedures for behavior, discipline, placements, and 504 plans
The proposal also aims to expand support services beyond students with IEPs by providing earlier intervention and consultation for general education students, including multilingual learners.
ReorganizationThis specifies district officejobs and their area of focus
Department Leadership
● Executive Director of Special Services
Functional Leadership
● Compliance, IEP Quality, and Data Systems
● NPS, Out-of-District, and Program Placement
● Behavior and Intensive Student Support
● ESN, Nursing, and K–12 Transition Continuum
● 504 Coordinator
● Coordinator of Mental Health
● ECE Leadership
Core Department Infrastructure and Implementation Supports
● 2 IEP Compliance and Case Management Coaches
● 2 Instruction and Access Coaches
● Full-time Special Education Substitute
● SEIS Technicians
● Data / Reporting Support Specialist
Summer and fall, board appoints CAC and bylaws are developed
Local Plan Committee convenes to review and revise Local Plan (Is this separate from CAC?)
SRTA members insist on systemic improvements to our Special Services systems. Students deserve to be supported, and costs must be controlled.
D. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION (6 pm)
D.8. Special Presentation for 2025 – 2026 Santa Rosa City Schools Retirees
This year’s retirees represent classified, certificated, and administrative staff.Altogether, our 53 retirees represent over 1,192 years of service to our students, staff, and community.
Honoring Certificated Retirements (posted Aug – June)
Mary Anna Maloney, Janet Fisher, Christina Gravelle, Corinne Naro, Gail Gagliano, Michelle Meislahn, Steven Carpenter, Cynthia McDaniel, Carol Forrest, Valerie Johnson, Joseph Davis, William Huntsinger, Carla Forchini, Linda McCoy-Hernandez, Gale Ligotti, Diane Holly, Abby Walls, Kyle Hart, Joy Schermer, Janice Rodeck, Lisa DeCarbo, Cheryl Brooks, Page Willson, Rosalinda Brady, Mary Cain, Michael Persinger, Anthony Slaten, Linda Kastanis, Daniel Bartholome, and Richard Johnstone.
These thirty certificated folks amazingly gave over seven hundred one years of service to the students and families of SRCS.
We thank each of them for their dedication, passion, and service.
E. REPORTS (Bargaining Units, Sup, and Board)
E.5.a. Formation of Board Facilities Ad Hoc Committee
SRTA Members areready for transparent systems around facility decisions that incorporate site staff.
F. Public Comment on Non Agenda and Consent Items
SRTA Members are invited to complete ‘blue cards’ at the board meeting in order to make public comments. Online comments have been suspended. Comments will be limited to 60 seconds. Only items NOT on the agenda are addressed at this time, with the exception of consent items (See section G.)
Comments are requested at the board meeting to bring a member’s perspective and share real experiences of the impact of district policies and practices on students and staff.
Speakers are limited to just those in person (unless a board member attends online without prior notice.)
Comments are most impactful when they are well spoken, composed and reasonable.
- There is great concern about the looming cost of overages for next year due to the lack of allocated sections. Teachers are not willing to take on last minute 0.2 FTE because SRCS was insistent on releasing employees beyond what is needed for next year.
- Special education teachers left for the summer without any clarity on the plan for their assignments for next year. They have not been able to prepare their students or update IEP paperwork without knowing the plan. This includes being unable to set secondary schedules. The counselors are off after this week. Leaving this scheduling workfor the days before school starts, when counselors return is creating an impossible task.
- “Additional information and documents will be uploaded prior to the meeting.” It is impossible to prepare for board meetings without the appropriate documents. This has become all too regular an occurrence, especially with weighty items like the budget and the LCAP.
- Edjoin shows 17 elementary and 7 secondary RISE program assistant positions, 40 elementary and 29 secondary ESN assistants, 7 secondary CEP program assistants, 3 health aide positions, 6 transition program assistant positions, as well as multiple special ed assistant positions in mild/moderate programs. How will we staff the push in model that requires special ed assistants when we are already short 109 assistant positions? The new special ed model being touted by the district office requires the use of instructional assistants to support students moving from SDC to Gen Ed and from Co-taught to push in. Where will we get these assistants? Will we have to pay outside agencies at exorbitant rates, exasperating one of the major special ed costs that has consistently pushed our budget past what we can afford.
G. CONSENT ITEMS
All consent items are enacted by the Board in one motion, unless a Board member requests that an item be removed and discussed separately.
G.2. Approval of Personnel Transactions
EdJoin shows a total of sixty-three current postings for one hundred, ninety-one jobs in SRCS. There are fifteen certificated opening postings (three less than last meeting). There are some positions posted for next year. There are forty-eight current classified postings for one hundred seventy-four job openings (fifteen less than the last meeting.) There are one certificated and one classified management position posted.
Welcome aboard Adam White (LBES.)
Changes to classified staff includes three resignations and two retirements. They leave taking with them fifty-five and a half years of knowledge and service to our staff and students.
Waiting until August or later to add sections costs us valuable colleagues now and adds even more chaos to our student’s experience. To encourage SRCS to properly allocate sections now, secondary SRTA Teachers will decline taking on additional sections that would place them above full time (1.2 FTE) after the end of the 2025-26 school year. SRTA members that have caseload caps (Special Ed, etc) will decline waiving those caps. SRTA demands that the district add the necessary sections now to avoid extreme overage costs and keep teachers from being laid off due to a lack of sections.
Honoring Resignations (posted Aug – June)
Dan Evans, Sydney Miller, Danielle Ullyott, Annamarie Robustellini, Cody Martin, Nathan Murray, Donna Fernandez, Anthony Henderson, Clinton Magdaleno Sweek, Sharon Stevens, Brandi Ramos, Gino Beccaria, Alison Peoples, Aimee Ouellette, Meghan McDonnell, Gabrielle Licata, Alexandra Evans, Olivier Begue, Antoine Machillot, Emilie Carret Machillot, Manon Czuckermand, Armando Flores Partida, Dawn Rash, Andrea Munguia, Florian Mahe, Nicolette Elliott, Juan Trejo Gonzalez, Ellisa Beamish, Barbara Shelton, Marcus Dunseth, Beatriz Vera Mejia, Colette Ufholtz, Ryan Branche, Glenda Lowery, Madeline Daniels, Marie-Pierre Prieur, April Lombardo, Kaitlyn Watts, Debra Morrow, Elizabeth Parady, Cindy Beurtheret, Paulina Guadalupe Lopez Javalois, Tina Peretz, Cassie Kubiak, Christina Frost, Matthew Bowker, Stephanie Hsu, Danielle Yount, Andrew Hathaway, Kristen Barnes, Adrienne Mancilla, Macy Sharif, Madison Winslow, Nora Parajon, Khen Hirshberg, Brett Kovacs, Martine Merino, Lacey Helming, Danielle Yount, Michael Weldon, Emilie Pierce, Bianca LeMaster, Edward Vulpe, Genevieve Lilligren and Cynthia Gutierrez Garcia.
These sixty-five certificated folks amazingly gave over two-hundred, seventy-four years of service to the students and families of SRCS. We appreciate all you have done, and wish you all the best.
SRTA members are especially distraught witnessing talented staff choosing to leave SRCS for better working conditions.
G.5. Approval of Contracts over $15,000
The total cost of contracts is $522,556.34.
| # | Provider | Cost | Description |
| District | |||
| 2 | Incident IQ, LLC | $50,519.00 | platform for Facilities Management and IT Help Desk/Repairs |
| 3 | CDW-G | $70,274.14 | Google Workspace for Education Plus |
| 4 | CLASSLINK, Inc. | $50,170.20 | Software management platform |
| 6 | King Consulting | $180,000.00 | Help SRCS apply for modernization funding from the state (Fund 40) |
| 9 | Softchoice Corporation | $15,498.00 | 315 Microsoft MS365 licenses at $49.20 each |
| Elementary | |||
| 8 | Stepping Stones Group, LLC | $25,000.00 | Additional contract to cover therapy for non-insured elementary students at $105/hour. |
| Secondary | |||
| 1 | MINGA | $83,520.00 | digital hall passes, student ID, and communication platform (includes charter) |
| 5 | Imagine Learning | $22,575.00 | Edgenuity learning platform for ISP. |
| 7 | Keystone Therapy & Training Services | $25,000.00 | Additional contract to cover therapy for non-insured secondary students at $165/hour. |
G.6. Approval of Contracts – Bond
| # | Provider | Site | Description | Cost | Total Cost |
| District | |||||
| 4 | Uline | DO | Storage Tables and Racking | $111,040 | $9,500,000 |
| Elementary | |||||
| 2 | Crawford & Associates, Inc. | LBES | Materials Testing & Inspection | $16,965 | $2,800,000 |
| Secondary | |||||
| 1 | Crawford & Associates, Inc. | SRHS | Materials Testing & Inspection | $5,386 | $8,000,000 |
| 3 | Consolidated Engineering Laboratories | PHS | Materials Testing & Inspection | $57,474 | $27,633,236 |
The total cost of contracts is by measure:
Measure C = $145,030.14
Measure G = $45,835.34
Total =$190,865.48
SRTA members notice that the turf fields appear to be installed right over the old turf. Are there assurances that the problems with the original turf won’t continue to cause problems for athletes if this cost saving effort is employed?
G.7. Approval of California Interscholastic Federation Representatives
High school reps for the year to CIF, by title not name.
G.8. Approval of Resolution to Appoint Alisa Haley to the Adult Education Program Member Participation and Sonoma County Adult Education Consortium Oversight Committee
G.9. Approval of Amendment No.1 to the Lease-Leaseback Agreement with Wright Contracting LLC, for the Electronic Access Control Phase Three Project
Elsie Allen High School, Santa Rosa French-American Charter School (SRMS), Santa RosaLanguage Academy (CCLA), Ridgway High School, Hidden Valley Elementary School, and Santa Rosa Charter School for the Arts Electronic Access Controls Phase Three Project.
Fund 21: $9,925,524.00
SRTA members have been frustrated with the implementation of these locks. It is impossible to know from inside a classroom if a door is locked or unlocked. Doors can only be locked from outside the classroom. This seems like we have gone backwards from the previous round of Columbine locks which are being removed.
There is a hope that with this contractor timelines and plans will be better communicated with all staff. Outside agency staff still are not consistently given access to keycards, limiting their access to parking lots, work spaces, bathrooms, gates, and the classrooms they work. The lack of access is more than just an inconvenience, it’s a safety concern.
G.10. Approval of Amendment No. 2 to the Alternate Design-Build Agreement with Arntz Builders, Inc. for the James Monroe Elementary School (JMES) TK Classroom Buildings Project
For additional fencing and security improvements, modifications to the site entry configuration, replacement of existing playground equipment and surfacing, and related site improvements necessary to support the Project and enhance campus functionality. Amendment No. 2 increases the Contract Sum by $841,738.65, resulting in a revised GMP amount of $13,316,174.86.
Fund 21 Measure G: $841,738.65
Unfortunately, no TK or kindergarten teachers were consulted in the design of these new buildings. Because of this the new kinder rooms have extremely inadequate storage available in the classrooms. There are concerns regarding some of the landscaping design choices that may be unsafe for kindergarteners during less structured recess play.
H. SECOND READ: BOARD BYLAW UPDATES
Omitting public comments on these items because there has been another option for commenting is wrong. It is not possible for most employees to comment at the Finance Sub Committee, as the comments must be made in person, at the beginning of the meeting while most employees are still working. This excludes one of the major groups of constituents from participating. Furthermore, those comments are made before discussion when the details of the policy are disclosed. So actually, there is currently no time to comment on these proposed policies.
H.1. Second Read: Board Bylaw 9150: Student Board Members
The Board Finance Subcommittee proposed the following:
The student Board member(s) shall receive monthly compensation of $50. 00 per meeting.
There are 26 scheduled regular and special Board meetings for 2026/27; should the students attend the majority of meetings, the cost is estimated at $2,500 for two student board members.
Deletions of BP language: Red
Insertion of BP language: Blue
Move of BP language: Grey
Students cannot double dip. If students receive compensation they can not claim the time served for volunteer community service. Perhaps student board members could be given an option between compensation or volunteer community service hours .
H.2. Second Read: Board Bylaw 9250: Remuneration, Reimbursement and Other Benefits
The current stipend amount is $536.04.Should the Board take action to increase to the new maximum allowable amount of $2,000/month, the estimated impact is approximately $122,973 annually.
It is concerning that the finance sub-committee, the body with the most awareness of the financial plight of the district, is suggesting quadrupeling the board stipend.What would be set aside to make these funds available?This estimated financial impact is large enough to pay for another teacher or counselor to reduce class sizes or impact counselor availability.
There was talk of creating an inclusive system to advise on decisions for additional spending, and restoring programs. This item, and the $76,000 raise at the board’s prior meeting make it appear that there are no longer financial concerns. If SRCS is ready to increase spending, where is the transparent process to collaborate on those decisions to ensure we are centering our student experience?
I. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEMS
I.1. Charter School Calendar
I.1. a. (Public Hearing / Action) Public Hearing on CCLA Renewal Petition and Material Revision Request and Consideration/Action on Resolution No. 2025/26-88 to Approve Renewal Petition and Material Revision Request
CCLA is a middle-performing charter school and is seeking a five-year charter term, from July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2031. SRCS has determined that the CCLA qualifies for a five-year renewal of its charter term. SRCS staff have also reviewed the Material Revision Request and recommend approval.
Response ten points for improvement
Recommending elementary counselors for these students while eliminating this service for non charter sites is a gut punch.
Many of the shortfalls cited are district wide, and deserve solutions led from a district level.
I.1. b. (Public Hearing / Action) Public Hearing on Santa Rosa Accelerated Charter School Renewal Petition and Consideration/Action on Resolution No. 2025/26-87 to Approve Renewal
Draft Resolution No. 2025/26-87 recommends a seven-year term, though the Board may choose any of the three options SRACS is eligible for based on the school’s high-performing status.
Response ten points for improvement
Recommending elementary counselors for these students while eliminating this service for non charter sites is a gut punch.
Many of the shortfalls cited are district wide, and deserve solutions led from a district level.
SRTA members have watched a contorted process for renewal, including threatening the existence of a comprehensive middle school at CCLA, and confusion around the definition of a 9-12 program. District staff have not provided the vision, focus and support this process calls for.
I.1.c. Public Hearing for CCLA LCAP
Supplemental and Concentration Grant funding in the LCAP $3,113,116.
I.1.d. Public Hearing for Santa Rosa Accelerated Charter School LCAP
Supplemental and Concentration Grant Funding in the LCAP year – $61,518
I.1.e. Public Hearing for Santa Rosa Charter School for the Arts LCAP
Supplemental and Concentration Grant funding in the LCAP $445,723
I.1.f. Public Hearing for Santa Rosa French American Charter School LCAP
Supplemental and Concentration Grant Funding in the LCAP year $596,321
I.2. Student Services Calendar
I.2.a. Public Hearing for Santa Rosa City Schools LCAP
Elementary School District Supplemental & Concentration = $10,695,610
High School District Supplemental & Concentration =$15,871,183
Additional information and documents will be uploaded prior to the meeting.
SRTA leadership was invited to the table to ask for general input prior to the development of the LCAP. There were no specific plans for the LCAP shared. A follow up meeting to consult on the actual plan was promised but did not happen.
The system for reviewing and revising the LCAP is wanting. By the time staff admits that the system is flawed, and promises systemic improvements will be made ‘next year’ staff is moving on from SRCS, and there are no changes.
Transparency on what funding is being provided to sites, inclusive of LCAP, Lottery, Title and other funds, as well as enrollments and number of unduplicated students would assist the process of rebuilding trust.
I.3. Finance Calendar
I.3. a. Public Comment
Comments will be limited to 60 seconds. Only items on I.3. agenda are addressed at this time
I.3.b. Public Hearing for Santa Rosa City Schools 2026-27 Proposed Budget
Supporting documents will be attached prior to the Board Meeting.
SRTA members are still waiting on a report clarifying the savings from the closures and consolidations of sites. So far the district has not proved that a single dollar was saved by closing school sites. The primary objective of these changes were financial.It is past time for transparent evaluation of the fiscal impact.
SRTA members demand the inclusion of details on all funding sources for each school site as well as current, accurate enrollment and unduplicated counts. This has been promised at every interim, and then pushed to the next report. This is the end of the line. Financial transparency is a necessary piece of trust building.
I.3.c. (Action) Approval of Newly Established Fund 20: Special Revenue Funds
Establish a fund known as the Special Reserve for Postemployment Benefits, Fund 20, and such fund is authorized to account for amounts the LEA has earmarked for the future cost of retiree benefits.
SRTA members wonder about the wisdom in setting aside funds when they are confined to accounts that just keep up with COLA. This seems contrary to the idea that the funds would grow and become a sustaining income source for the post employment benefits in any reasonable timeline.
I.4. Human Resources Calendar
I.4. a. Public Comment
Comments will be limited to 60 seconds. Only items on I.3. agenda are addressed at this time
I.4.b. (Action) Approval of California School Employee Association, Chapter 75 (CSEA 75) 25-26 #1 MOU 2026-2027 Classified Employee Calendar
I.4.c. (Action) Approval of California School Employees Association, Chapter 75 25-26 #2 MOU Job Description Updates
CSEA 25-26 MOU #2 Job Descriptions (Reclass 2023-2026)
Administrative Assistant, Secondary-Middle and Continuation Schools Job Description
Culinary Coordinator Job Description
District Data Specialist I Job Description
HR Recruiting Technician Job Description
SIS Coordinator Job Description
College and Career Technician Job Description
CNS Warehouse Keeper_Driver Job Description
Human Resources Technician III Job Description Program Account Tech III Job Description
I.4.d. (Action) Approval of Santa Rosa Teachers Association (SRTA) 25-26 #6 MOU Elsie Allen Junior Senior High School Instructional Minutes Schedule (Bell Schedule)
I.4.e. (Action) Oral Recommendation Regarding Assistant Superintendent of Student Support Salary and Fringe Benefits; Discussion and Board Vote on Assistant Superintendent Employment Agreement
- The Assistant Superintendent’s contract states that the Assistant Superintendent’s salary for the 2026-2027 fiscal year will be $59,565.
- The 2026-2027 work year for the Assistant Superintendent shall be 69.5 days.
- The contract provides the Assistant Superintendent with the same access to health, dental, and vision benefits as other management employees.
SRTA members celebrate Dr. McCarty’s dedication to SRCS.
For transparency and to prevent later confusion, is this position being budgeted at 100% of the typical compensation, or at the contracted amount?
I.4.f. (Action) Oral Recommendation Regarding Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources Salary and Fringe Benefits; Discussion and Board Vote on Assistant Superintendent Employment Agreement
- The Assistant Superintendent’s contract states that the Assistant Superintendent’s salary for the 2026-2027 fiscal year will be $191,591.31.
- The 2026-2027 work year for the Assistant Superintendent shall be 224 days.
- The contract provides the Assistant Superintendent with the same access to health, dental, and vision benefits as other management employees.
- Finally, the contract provides for $1,800 as annual reimbursement for automobile-related expenses.
This contract includes concessions of a reduction of one (1) workday, a 50% reduction in the automobile stipend, a reduction of ten (10) vacation days, and the suspension of vacation payout provisions.
SRTA members wonder about employee absences when there are no vacation days.
If the employee is released without cause, the district shall pay for the remainder of the unexpired term of this Agreement, or a sum equal to three (3) months of the gross monthly base salary at the salary rate in effect at the termination.
I.4.g. (Action) Oral Recommendation Regarding Superintendent Salary and Fringe Benefits; Discussion and Board Vote on Superintendent Employment Agreement
- The Superintendent’s contract states that the Superintendent’s salary for the 2026-2027 fiscal year will be $275,000.
- The 2026-2027 work year for the Superintendent shall be 222 days.
- The contract provides the Superintendent with the same access to health, dental, and vision benefits as other management employees.
SRTA Members wonder if there were any other expenses agreed to, such as a moving allowance, or if this list is complete.
I.5. Governance Calendar
I.5. a. Public Comment
Comments will be limited to 60 seconds. Only items on I.5. agenda are addressed at this time
I.5.b. (Action) Approval of a Resolution for Governing Board Elections November 2026
The three (3) Board seats coming up for election will be from Trustee Areas 2, 4, and 6.The terms of Shaun Du Fosse, Omar Medina, and Donna Prak will be expiring this year.
J. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
April 27, 2026 Minutes and Supporting Documents
June 3, 2026 Minutes and Site Presentation Bellflower Visit, CAPS Presentation , CAPS Year 1, Dashboard
K. BOARD MEMBER REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION
L. INFORMATION ITEMS
L1. Future Board Discussion Items
The following are future board update items:
- Approval of SRCS LCAP (June 24, 2026)
- Approval of LCAP for All Charter Schools (June 24, 2026)
- Adoption of SRCS and Charter Budget for 2026/27 (June 24, 2026)
- Request to include details on all funding sources for each school site as well as enrollment and unduplicated counts.
- Action Special Services Restructure (June 24, 2026)
- Action SRC SELPA Related Item(s) (June 24, 2026)
SRTA looks to the future scheduling of the following items:
Plan for pivoting from A-G for all.
Medina- AP instruction data with number of years of experience of Teachers
-Clarification about board policy adoption requiring a majority of board membership versus a majority of those present/voting
– consider E-sports clubs or teams
Caston- Site funding finance report with various amounts and sources
-update 3510 policy around reducing waste as a discussion item
– Communication plan.
Prak – Info about a non voting teacher on the board.
Kirby – add an assistant wrestling coach for women?
– Copies of the panorama and youth truth surveys.
DeLaTorre- facility fee, possible reductions?
– Data on waiver’s impact on graduation rates.
– Info on how we identify College and Career readiness.
Jenkins — projected enrollment for next year.
– marketing plan update as committed to last year.
- Approval of Mental Health Coordinator Position (delayed from Feb 2026)
- Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) Update (Dec 2025)
- Panorama and Youth Truth Survey Data (August 2025)
- Restorative Practices Data (March 2025)
- Plan and timeline for implementation of Dr. Gillespie’s recommendations around Special Services (January 2025), Requesting New FCMAT Study on SRCS SpEd Program
- First Draft of the District Safety Plan (delayed from September 2024)
- Sharing the Library Master Plan with implementation expectations
- Officially Closing Learning House, and other sites
- Plan for Staff Housing support program from the proceeds of Fir Ridge
Until the district makes a decision, the proceeds from the sale of the Fir Ridge property are just sitting and losing value as the cost of housing continues to rise. Getting a program started could help SRCS attract and retain CSEA staff. The potential impact of the funds continues to diminish as time passes.
- Student Voice Policy
- Long standing request for site budgets including all sources as well as enrollment and unduplicated numbers.
L.3. Board Subcommittee Meeting Dates
- Thursday, June 18, 20265:00-7:00) Board Policy Subcommittee
- Wednesday, July 22, 2026 (tentative) Special Board Meeting
- There is so much work to be done to run the district. It is hard to understand how to get everything done without a July board meeting.
- Monday, August 3, 2026 (3:30-5:30)Board Finance Subcommittee
SRTA members are appreciative of this transparency.
M. Adjournment