REGULAR BOARD MEETING

Santa Rosa City Schools

October 14, 2026

Hybrid: Santa Rosa City Hall Council Chambers

4:00 p.m. – Closed Session

5:00 p.m. – Study Session

7:30 p.m. – Open Session

Hybrid: Zoom / Santa Rosa City Hall

*** streamed ***

Video Board Meetings through a link on this district webpage. (It is often changed right before the meeting.)

Please take time to review the following abbreviated version of the agenda. Click here to see the entire agenda. It has live links on many items with more information. If you want to comment to the board about any upcoming items, email agendacomments@srcs.k12.ca.us. Please CC wearesrta@gmail.com on your email.

Members attending online are encouraged to add SRTA to the front of their Zoom client name.

Closed Session Items: 

A.1. Public Comment On Closed Session Agenda Items To comment, email Melanie Martin at mmartinsrcs.k12.ca.us.

This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak to the board on Closed Session items only. 

B.1. Student Expulsions (Case Nos: 2026/27-01, 2026/27-02, 2026/27-03, 2026/27-06, 2026/27-07, 2026/27-09, 2026/27-10, 2026/27-11, 2026/27-13 ) [Ed. Code § 48918]

B.2. Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release [Gov. Code § 54957]

B.3. Conference With Property Negotiator [Gov. Code § 54956.8]

B.4. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Title of employee being reviewed: Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent, Principals, Vice Principals, Directors, Coordinators) [Gov. Code § 54957]

C. STUDY SESSION (6:00 P.M.)

C.1. Public Comment on the Study Session Calendar

C.2. Discussion: Update on Fiscal Stabilization-Initial Impacts of School Closures in 25-26

SRCS_Fiscal_Stabilization_Study_Session_Executive_Summary

Financial picture: progress, with important caveats

$9.2M Estimated first-year school-site savings in 2025–26, above the $8.6M projection.

$3.0M Additional reported savings from staffing analysis, internal fiscal controls, and district-office support changes.

8.5% Increase in revenue from all sources per ADA, from $17,601 in 2024–25 to $19,097 in 2025–26. The figure includes one-time funds.

The district says these are estimates and that year-to-year changes can reflect enrollment declines, one-time adjustments, transition costs, and other factors. Revenue per ADA and cost per student are different measures and should not be subtracted to claim a surplus or deficit.

The district reports that many 7th- and 8th-grade students have described positive experiences with the junior/senior high model, while many staff—especially at combined secondary sites—have reported less positive experiences. The summary acknowledges that the first-year mergers had a short planning timeline and insufficient time for planning and collaboration.

Issues the report says still need attention: staff collaboration; safety and belonging; conditions that support effective teaching and student services; and access to specialized spaces, including science labs, art rooms, and athletics facilities. The summary does not quantify staff workload, class sizes, vacancies, or retention impacts.

Implications for teachers and union members

• Consolidation may change staffing assignments, schedules, facilities use, and how student services are delivered; the summary does not detail the specific effects at each site.

• Separate school reporting identities can require extra planning, reporting, and governance work, creating an opportunity cost for staff time.

• The district intends to review academics, attendance, discipline, school climate, staff recruitment and retention, community feedback, staffing costs, and funding restrictions each year.

Questions to put to district leadership

• How will the district verify recurring savings and distinguish them from one-time changes, enrollment effects, transition costs, and costs avoided?

• What measures, timelines, and public reporting will show whether staff working conditions and student experiences are improving at merged sites?

• How will teachers and classified staff be involved in decisions about staffing, schedules, workload, safety, collaboration time, and specialized learning spaces?

• What are the actual site-level effects on staffing, class sizes, student services, recruitment, and retention—and where is the baseline data?

• Before changing school identities or reporting structures, how will the district verify potential funding impacts and compare them with administrative savings and workload?

Bottom line: Fiscal stabilization is a meaningful first step, not proof that the new model is fully successful. Financial claims should be transparent and verifiable, and continued implementation should be guided by student outcomes, staff experience, collaboration, and annual evidence.

10.14.26 SRCS Board Study Session Presentation

Presentation 10.5.26 School Closure_Consolidation Savings from Finance Subcommittee meeting.

SRTA members appreciate that this item is being discussed, and the plan to continue to monitor the full impact of these changes is appreciated. There is acknowledgement that it is difficult to discern other budget cutting measures from consolidation impacts. 

SRCS stated that declining enrollment cost the district approximately $1.1 Million in the first year implementation. This is enormously concerning. Only 40-60% of the students in SRCS boundaries typically attend SRCS schools. It is time for a systematic plan to address enrollment. These efforts could create positive financial shifts. 

Including the voice of site staff in decisions about staffing, schedules, workload, safety, collaboration time, and specialized learning spaces is a long requested and refreshing idea. What is the timeline to create these types of feedback loops?

D. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION (7:30 p.m.)

E. REPORTS (Bargaining Units, Sup, and Board)

E.7. Board President Report

1. Creation of Teaching and Learning Board Standing Committee

Board Teaching and Learning Standing Committee

SRTA members appreciate the board addressing district needs. Historically there was a committee of board members and bargaining unit members to delve into these topics. The district office inserted themselves into these meetings, and then entirely co-opted the purpose. All board subcommittees were disbanded. 

The formation of board committees to be able to deep dive into different areas has potential. How is the teacher’s voice included in these meetings? Will these meetings take place when schools are still in session? 

2. Appointment of Board Member to the City of Santa Rosa Violence Prevention Partnership (VPP) Committee

Approval of Appointment of Trustee De La Torre as Board Representative to the Violence Prevention Partnership

3. Review Appointments of Board Members to Current Standing Committees

Are calendar year appointments made in December, after the new board is seated?

F. Public Comment on Non Agenda and Consent Items

SRTA members are invited to complete ‘blue cards’ at the board meeting in order to make public comments. Online comments have been suspended. Comments will often be limited to 60 seconds. Only items NOT on the agenda are addressed at this time, with the exception of consent items.

Comments are requested at the board meeting to bring a member’s perspective and share real experiences of the impact of district policies and practices on students and staff. 

Speakers are limited to just those in person (unless a board member attends online without prior notice.)

Comments are most impactful when they are well spoken, composed and reasonable.

G. CONSENT ITEMS 

All consent items are enacted by the Board in one motion, unless a Board member requests that an item be removed and discussed separately. 

G.1. Approval of Personnel Transactions

Personnel Transactions 10-14-26

EdJoin shows a total of one hundred current postings for two hundred-ten jobs in SRCS. There are twenty-six certificated opening postings (six less than the last meeting). There are seventy-six current classified postings for one hundred eighty-two job openings (thirty-seven less than the last meeting.) There is one certificated and one classified management position posted. 

Welcome to these 1.6 new FTE: Christophe Fournier (FACS) and Nicholas Silva (PHS).

Good bye to the resigning Kelan Bradley (EAHS) after 10 years.

Classified has five new hires, two rehire, and two resignations. 

There is one supervisory new hire and one rehire.

G.2. Approval of Vendor Warrants

Warrant Register 9-30-26

G.3. Approval of Donations and Gifts

Donations_Gifts Detail ending 9-30-2026 (1).xlsx – Donations (1) Current month donations total $ 8,203.62. About $8,000 is from parents for Art Quest.

Donations _Gifts Year to Date Summary_ ending 9-30-2026 $256,000 in prior months donations of which $237,000.00 is tagged District Wide – SR District/Foundation Donations.

G.4. Approval of Contracts

October 14, 2026 Contracts Summary October 14, 2026 Contracts

The total cost of contracts is $88,361.00.

#	Provider	Cost	Description
District
2	Lucid Partnerships, Inc. (Luz T. Cázares)	$38,000	Biweekly meetings with the Superintendent and Governing Board, as appropriate, to provide coaching and guidance on their respective roles and responsibilities related to fiscal oversight and financial stability and qualitative year end review.
Charter
1	CodeRev Kids	$50,361	Adventures in Coding course and a Rev Robotics course for FACS students, summer and after school programs. This is for $9,361 more than last year, over a 22% increase.

SRTA members are concerned with the Lucid Partnership contract. Sixteen biweekly meetings $38,000/16 = $2,375 per meeting, plus expenses. Where is this $38,000 being diverted from? SRCS staff and students are enduring daily grief and untenable working conditions due to lack of implementation plans with the cuts made under the guidance of this consultant. This consultant causes hesitation in utilizing this contract for acquiring necessary wisdom for the new Superintendent and the board. 

G.5. Approval of Contracts – Bond

2026-10-14 Bond Contracts Summary 2026-10-14 Bond Contracts

#	Provider	Site	Description	Cost	Total Cost
Elementary
1	Greystone West Company	ALES	Construction management for fencing	$16,988	$247,500
2	RGH Consultants	ELA	Geotech and Special Inspection Services for modernization	$2,898	$5,000,000

The total cost of contracts is by measure:

Measure C = $ 0

Measure G = $19,885

Total = $19,885

G.6. Facilities Master Plan (FMP) Update for Prop 2 Requirements and Five Year Deferred Maintenance Plan

Resolution 2026-27-28 (1) to meet the requirements for Five-Year School Facilities Master Plans as a condition of participating in the State School Facility Program.

Deferred Maintenance Plan 2026_27

States plans for spending $38 million over the next five years on Flooring, HVAC Systems, Painting, Paving, Plumbing and Asbestos. 

20260929_SRCS 2025 FMP_COMBINED+APPENDICES 1 This plan is dated April 2026, but there are many items that were not updated. 

G.7. Adjustments to the already approved 2025-26 Unaudited Actuals Fiscal Report

Updated 10.14.26 2025-26 Unaudited Actuals Fiscal Report

Sped Changes Include:

• Program Managers (Certificated Administration): Reclassifying costs to reflect a 70% Special Education / 30% General Education split. This shifts $427,193.69 from Resource 6500 and $185,993.05 from Resource 6546 into Unrestricted General Fund Resource 0000 (Total: $613,186.74).
• Special Services Clerical Staff: Reclassifying costs to reflect a 70% Special Education / 30% General Education split. This moves $165,428.30 from Resource 6500 into Resource 0000.
• Custodial Operations: Reclassifying $46,725.46 from a Special Education Goal to a General Education Goal within Resource 0000 (Goal update only).
• School-Based Therapists: Reclassifying $362,809.83 for personnel working exclusively in general education settings. $92,730.17 within Resource 0500 (Goal update only) and $270,079.66 transferred from Resource 6546 to Resource 0000.

Boys and Girls Club Changes Include:

• Recognized Revenue: Reversed the $240,000 balance out of previously booked Unearned Revenue and recognized an additional Accounts Receivable entry of $60,000, bringing total recognized 2025–26 program revenue to $300,000.
• Expenditure Posting: Applied the matching $300,000 expenditure invoice paid to Boys & Girls Clubs of Sonoma-Marin for the 2025-2026 summer expansion for students at the two target schools, Lincoln Elementary and Monroe Elementary.

SRTA members request the justification for Program Managers and General Education Special Services Clerical Staff being charged as 30% General Ed. 

H. FIRST READ AND POSSIBLE WAIVE OF SECOND READ OF UPDATED BOARD BYLAWS

These are not posted with changes noted for comparison purposes. They were not part of the recent Board Policy Subcommittee Agendas. Bylaw 9320: Meetings And Notices was discussed. A search of GAMUT shows no existing policies with these numbers.

1. Public Comment on Board Bylaws

2. Board Bylaw 9100 Organization

BB 9100_Clean

3. Board Bylaw 9322 Agenda/Meeting Materials

BB 9322_Clean

4. Board Bylaw 9323 Meeting Conduct

BB 9323_Clean

I. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEMS

I.1. Human Resources Calendar

1. Public Comment on the Educational Services Calendar

2. (Action) Approval of Provisional Internship Permit Application (PIP) Kasey Olenberger

PIP Application K. Olenberger 10-14-26

3. (Action) Approval of Correction to Certificated Guest Teacher and Classified Substitute Salary Schedule Rates for 2026–2027 School Year

Previous 26-27 Guest Teacher and Classified Sub Rates (Final Copy Board Approved 9-9-26)

26-27 Guest Teacher and Classified Sub Rates (Revisions Pending Board Approval 10-14-26)

4. (Action) Approval of Waiver Request for Resource Teacher overages for more than 28 students for Administrator

Resource specialist overage administrator form

5. (Action) Approval of Waiver Request for Resource Teacher overages for more than 28 students for Teacher

Resource specialist overage teacher form

Following concerns raised by SRTA, SRCS is bringing the required caseload overage waiver process before the Board. California law limits caseloads to 28 students. Exceeding this limit requires voluntary teacher consent, explicit documentation of Union consent, usually in the form of the signature of the bargaining unit President, Board approval, a minimum of five hours of daily instructional aide support, and ultimately, state approval or denial. State waivers do not supersede negotiated SRTA contractual caseload limits.

SRTA has raised concerns about caseload overage compliance with Special Education leadership for many years. We appreciate that the current leadership team is taking these longstanding concerns seriously and making meaningful efforts to comply with the Education Code.

The waiver process also requires districts to identify the circumstances creating overages and develop a plan to resolve them. SRTA sees this as an opportunity to collaborate on more proactive staffing practices, ensuring Education Specialists begin the school year with reasonable caseload capacity for new enrollments, transfers, and referrals rather than already approaching contractual limits.

We look forward to continued collaboration to ensure overages remain temporary exceptions rather than routine staffing practices, while protecting contractual rights and supporting educators and students.

I.2. Finance Calendar

1. Public Comment on the Finance Calendar

2. (Action) Resolution No. 2026/27-29 Supporting Proposition 3 for Permanent Funding

Resolution 2026_27-29 Prop 3 Support

SRTA members are actively canvassing with CTA for Prop 3. We join the board in supporting this proposition. 

J. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

September 23, 2026 Minutes and Supporting Documents

K. BOARD MEMBER REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION

L. INFORMATION ITEMS

L.1. Future Board Discussion Items

The following are future board update items:

• Approval of Resolution for September as Attendance Awareness Month
• Approval of Resolution for Suicide Prevention Month
• Board Policy Updates 

SRTA looks to the future scheduling of the following items:

Own SELPA projection at first interim (October)

FCMAT follow up report at first interim (October)

Review of Graduation Committee Pathway Options (October)

Prop 28 plan for the year (26-27) with details by site

Medina- AP instruction data with number of years of experience of Teachers

-Clarification about board policy adoption requiring a majority of board membership versus a majority of those present/voting

– consider E-sports clubs or teams 

Caston- Site funding finance report with various amounts and sources

-update 3510 policy around reducing waste as a discussion item

– Communication plan. 

Prak – Info about a non voting teacher on the board. 

Kirby – add an assistant wrestling coach for women? 

– Copies of the panorama and youth truth survey questions. 

DeLaTorre- Info on how we identify College and Career readiness.

 Agendize MCHS and RVMS plan. 

Jenkins – marketing plan update as committed to last year.

• SRCS Sunshine Openers for SRTA (Sept 9, 2026)
• Approval of Joint Use MOU’s for School Site Facility Use (pulled from June 22 agenda)
• Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) Update (Dec 2025)
• Panorama and Youth Truth Survey Data (August 2025)
• Plan and timeline for implementation of Dr. Gillespie’s recommendations around Special Services (January 2025), Requesting of New FCMAT Study on SRCS SpEd Program
• First Draft of the District Safety Plan (delayed from September 2024)
• Sharing the Library Master Plan with implementation expectations and timeline
• Officially Closing Learning House, Brookhill Elementary, Biella Elementary, and Steele Lane
• Plan for Staff Housing support program from the proceeds of Fir Ridge

Until the district makes a decision, the proceeds from the sale of the Fir Ridge property are just sitting and losing value as the cost of housing continues to rise. Getting a program started could help SRCS attract and retain CSEA staff. The potential impact of the funds continues to diminish as time passes.

• Student Voice Policy
• Long standing request for site budgets including all sources as well as enrollment and unduplicated numbers.

L.2. Educational Acronyms and Abbreviations

L.3. Board Subcommittee Meeting Dates

SRTA and CSEA practice Union Tuesdays. Our regular meetings are all on Tuesdays. There is no reason for district meetings that should have input from teachers and classified staff to be scheduled on a Tuesday.

Schools are in session until 3:35pm. With school traffic and travel time, teachers are not able to attend in person and provide public comment to meetings that begin at 3:30. By scheduling meetings that actively prohibit teachers and classified staff from attending the District disenfranchises stakeholders and eliminates feedback from those who work at school sites.

In order to ensure that the District receives necessary feedback and support please schedule meetings that all district employees are able to attend.

Board Finance Subcommittee Meeting Dates (Brown Act Meeting):

• Tuesday, November 3, 2026 (3:30-5:30)
• Monday, December 7, 2026 (3:30-5:30) Tentative 

Facilities Use Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Dates (not subject to the Brown Act):

• Monday, November 2, 2026 (3:30-5:00) 
• December, 2026 TBD

L.4. Special Board Meeting Dates

The following dates are upcoming Special Board Meetings:

• Wednesday, October 21, 2026: Awards Recognition Night (5:30 at ELA Campus, 2140 Jennings Ave.)
• Wednesday, November 18, 2026: Special Study Session: ELOP, ASES, Community Schools (Santa Rosa HS Auditorium) 
• Wednesday, December 16, 2026: Annual Board Reorganization and Strategic Priority 4- Teaching and Learning Environment and Resources (Santa Rosa HS Auditorium) 

L.5. 2026/27 Board Meeting Schedule

NEW_ 2026_27 Board of Education Meeting Calendar

L.6. Updated SRCS LCAP and Approval Letter from SCOE

2026_Local_Control_and_Accountability_Plan_Santa_Rosa_City_Schools_20260911

SCOE Letter _26-27 LCAP

SCOE accepted the LCAP on September 11, 2026. 

L.7. Williams Settlement Quarterly Report

1st Quarter Williams Uniform Complaint Report Cover Sheet 26-27 SY

SRCS states there was one resolved Williams Facilities Complaint during the quarter.

M. ADJOURNMENT

---

 

REUNIÓN ORDINARIA DE LA JUNTA DIRECTIVA

Escuelas de la ciudad de Santa Rosa

14 de octubre de 2026

Híbrido: Salón de plenos del Ayuntamiento de Santa Rosa

4:00 PM – Sesión a puerta cerrada

5:00 PM- Sesión de estudio

7:30 PM – Sesión abierta

Híbrido: Zoom / Ayuntamiento de Santa Rosa

*** transmitido ***

Reuniones de la junta directiva por videoconferencia a través de un enlace en la página web de este distrito. (Suele modificarse justo antes de la reunión).

Por favor, tómese un tiempo para revisar la siguiente versión abreviada del programa.Haga clic aquí para ver el programa completo. Contiene enlaces directos a muchos temas con más información. Si desea hacer algún comentario a la junta directiva sobre algún tema próximo, envíe un correo electrónico agendacomments@srcs.k12.ca.us Por favor, incluya una copia.wearesrta@gmail.com en su correo electrónico.

Se recomienda a los miembros que asistan en línea que añadan SRTA al principio de su nombre de usuario de Zoom.

Temas de la sesión a puerta cerrada:

A.1. Comentarios del público sobre los puntos del orden del día de la sesión a puerta cerrada Para comentar, envíe un correo electrónico a Melanie Martin a mmartinsrcs.k12.ca.us.

Esta es una oportunidad para que los miembros del público se dirijan a la junta directiva únicamente sobre los temas que se traten en sesión a puerta cerrada.

B.1. Expulsiones de estudiantes (Números de caso: 2026/27-01, 2026/27-02, 2026/27-03, 2026/27-06, 2026/27-07, 2026/27-09, 2026/27-10, 2026/27-11, 2026/27-13) [Código de Educación § 48918]

B.2. Disciplina/Despido/Liberación de Empleados Públicos [Código Gubernamental § 54957]

B.3. Reunión con el negociador de la propiedad [Código Gubernamental § 54956.8]

B.4. Evaluación del desempeño de los empleados públicos (Título del empleado evaluado: Superintendente, Superintendente asociado, Superintendente adjunto, Directores, Subdirectores, Directores de departamento, Coordinadores) [Código Gubernamental § 54957]

C. SESIÓN DE ESTUDIO (18:00)

C.1. Comentarios del público sobre el calendario de sesiones de estudio.

C.2. Debate: Actualización sobre la estabilización fiscal: impactos iniciales del cierre de escuelas en 2025-2026.

Resumen ejecutivo de la sesión de estudio sobre estabilización fiscal del SRCS

Panorama financiero: progreso, con importantes salvedades.

Se estima un ahorro de 9.2 millones de dólares en las instalaciones escolares durante el primer año académico 2025-26, cifra superior a la proyección de 8.6 millones de dólares.

Se reportaron ahorros adicionales de $3 millones provenientes del análisis de personal, los controles fiscales internos y los cambios en el apoyo a las oficinas distritales.

Incremento del 8.5 % en los ingresos procedentes de todas las fuentes por ADA, pasando de 17,601 dólares en 2024-25 a 19,097 dólares en 2025-26. Esta cifra incluye fondos extraordinarios.

El distrito indica que estas cifras son estimaciones y que las variaciones interanuales pueden reflejar la disminución de la matrícula, ajustes puntuales, costos de transición y otros factores. Los ingresos por alumno promedio diario (ADA) y el costo por alumno son medidas diferentes y no deben restarse para determinar si existe un superávit o un déficit.

El distrito informa que muchos estudiantes de séptimo y octavo grado han tenido experiencias positivas con el modelo de escuela secundaria integrada, mientras que muchos miembros del personal, especialmente en los centros de secundaria combinados, han reportado experiencias menos positivas. El resumen reconoce que las fusiones del primer año tuvieron un plazo de planificación muy ajustado y un tiempo insuficiente para la planificación y la colaboración.

El informe señala que aún se necesitan atención a los siguientes aspectos: colaboración del personal; seguridad y sentido de pertenencia; condiciones que favorezcan una enseñanza eficaz y servicios estudiantiles; y acceso a espacios especializados, como laboratorios de ciencias, aulas de arte e instalaciones deportivas. El resumen no cuantifica la carga de trabajo del personal, el tamaño de las clases, las vacantes ni el impacto en la retención estudiantil.

Repercusiones para los profesores y los afiliados sindicales.

• La consolidación puede modificar la asignación de personal, los horarios, el uso de las instalaciones y la forma en que se prestan los servicios a los estudiantes; el resumen no detalla los efectos específicos en cada centro.

• La creación de identidades de presentación de informes separadas para cada escuela puede requerir trabajo adicional de planificación, elaboración de informes y gobernanza, lo que genera un costo de oportunidad para el tiempo del personal.

• El distrito tiene previsto revisar anualmente el rendimiento académico, la asistencia, la disciplina, el clima escolar, la contratación y retención de personal, las opiniones de la comunidad, los costes de personal y las restricciones de financiación.

Preguntas que se deben plantear a los responsables del distrito

• ¿Cómo verificará el distrito los ahorros recurrentes y cómo los distinguirá de los cambios puntuales, los efectos de la matriculación, los costes de transición y los costes evitados?

• ¿Qué medidas, plazos e informes públicos mostrarán si las condiciones laborales del personal y las experiencias de los alumnos están mejorando en los centros fusionados?

• ¿Cómo participarán los profesores y el personal no docente en las decisiones sobre reclutamiento de personal, horarios, carga de trabajo, seguridad, tiempo de colaboración y espacios de aprendizaje especializados?

• ¿Cuáles son los efectos reales a nivel de centro en cuanto el personal, tamaño de las clases, servicios a los alumnos, captación y retención, y dónde se encuentran los datos de referencia?

• Antes de cambiar la identidad de los centros o las estructuras jerárquicas, ¿cómo verificará el distrito los posibles impactos en la financiación y los comparará con el ahorro administrativo y la carga de trabajo?

En resumen: la estabilización fiscal es un primer paso importante, pero no prueba que el nuevo modelo sea un éxito rotundo. Los datos financieros deben ser transparentes y verificables, y la implementación continua debe basarse en los resultados de los estudiantes, la experiencia del personal, la colaboración y la evidencia anual.

14/10/2026 Sesión de estudio de la junta directiva de SRCS Presentación

Presentación 10.5.26 Cierre de escuelas_Ahorros por consolidación de la reunión del Subcomité de Finanzas.

Los miembros de SRTA agradecen que se esté debatiendo este tema y valoran el plan para seguir supervisando el impacto total de estos cambios. Se reconoce que es difícil distinguir otras medidas de recorte presupuestario de los efectos de la consolidación.

SRCS declaró que la disminución de la matrícula le costó al distrito aproximadamente $1.1 millones durante el primer año de implementación. Esto es sumamente preocupante. Solo entre el 40% y el 60% de los estudiantes dentro de los límites de SRCS suelen asistir a las escuelas de SRCS. Es hora de implementar un plan sistemático para abordar la matrícula. Estos esfuerzos podrían generar cambios financieros positivos.

Incluir la opinión del personal en las decisiones sobre el reclutamiento de personal, horarios, carga de trabajo, seguridad, tiempo de colaboración y espacios de aprendizaje especializados es una idea largamente solicitada y muy alentadora. ¿Cuál es el plazo para establecer este tipo de mecanismos de retroalimentación?

D. REANUDAR LA SESIÓN PRINCIPAL (19:30 h)

E. INFORMES (Unidades de Negociación, Superintendente y Junta Directiva)

E.7. Informe del Presidente de la Junta Directiva

1. Creación del Comité Permanente de la Junta de Enseñanza y Aprendizaje

Comité Permanente de Enseñanza y Aprendizaje de la Junta Directiva

Los miembros de SRTA agradecen que la junta atienda las necesidades del distrito. Históricamente, existía un comité integrado por miembros de la junta y del sindicato encargado de analizar estos temas. La oficina del distrito se inmiscuyó en estas reuniones y, posteriormente, se apropió por completo de su propósito. Todos los subcomités de la junta fueron disueltos.

La creación de comisiones del consejo para poder analizar en profundidad diferentes ámbitos tiene potencial. ¿Cómo se tiene en cuenta la opinión del profesorado en estas reuniones? ¿Se celebrarán estas reuniones mientras las escuelas sigan en funcionamiento?

2. Nombramiento de un miembro de la junta directiva del Comité de la Alianza para la Prevención de la Violencia (VPP) de la ciudad de Santa Rosa

Aprobación del nombramiento del fideicomisario De La Torre como representante de la junta directiva ante la Alianza para la Prevención de la Violencia.

3. Revisión de los nombramientos de los miembros de la Junta Directiva en los Comités Permanentes Actuales

¿Los nombramientos para el año calendario se realizan en diciembre, después de que se haya constituido la nueva junta directiva?

F. Comentarios del público sobre asuntos no incluidos en el orden del día y temas de trámite urgente.

Se invita a los miembros de SRTA a completar las tarjetas azules durante la reunión de la junta directiva para realizar comentarios públicos. Los comentarios en línea están suspendidos. Los comentarios generalmente se limitarán a 60 segundos. Solo se tratarán los temas que no figuren en el orden del día, con la excepción de los puntos que requieran aprobación por consentimiento.

Se solicitan comentarios en la reunión de la junta directiva para aportar la perspectiva de cada miembro y compartir experiencias reales sobre el impacto de las políticas y prácticas del distrito en los estudiantes y el personal.

Solo podrán participar ponentes presenciales (a menos que un miembro de la junta directiva asista en línea sin previo aviso).

Los comentarios resultan más impactantes cuando están bien expresados, redactados con coherencia y son razonables.

G. ARTÍCULOS DE CONSENTIMIENTO

Todos los puntos que requieren consentimiento son aprobados por la Junta en una sola moción, a menos que un miembro de la Junta solicite que un punto sea retirado y discutido por separado.

G.1. Aprobación de transacciones de personal

Transacciones de personal 14-10-26

EdJoin Se muestran un total de cien ofertas de empleo vigentes para doscientos diez puestos en SRCS. Hay veintiséis ofertas para personal certificado (seis menos que en la última reunión). Hay setenta y seis ofertas para personal clasificado para ciento ochenta y dos puestos (treinta y siete menos que en la última reunión). Hay una oferta para un puesto de gestión certificado y otra para un puesto clasificado.

Les damos la bienvenida a estos 1.6 nuevos empleados a tiempo completo: Christophe Fournier (FACS) y Nicholas Silva (PHS).

Adiós a Kelan Bradley (EAHS), quien renuncia después de 10 años.

El departamento de clasificados tiene cinco nuevas contrataciones, dos recontrataciones y dos renuncias.

Hay un nuevo empleado en un puesto de supervisión y una recontratación.

G.2. Aprobación de garantías de proveedores

Registro de órdenes judiciales 30-09-26

G.3. Aprobación de donaciones y obsequios

Donaciones_Regalos Detalle finalizado el 30-09-2026 (1).xlsx – Donaciones (1) Las donaciones del mes actual ascienden a 8,203.62 dólares. Aproximadamente 8,000 dólares provienen de padres de familia destinados al programa Art Quest.

Donaciones _Resumen de donaciones hasta la fecha_ finalizado el 30/09/2026 Donaciones de meses anteriores por un total de $256,000, de los cuales $237,000.00 están etiquetados como Donaciones a nivel de distrito – Donaciones del distrito/fundación SR.

G.4. Aprobación de contratos

Resumen de contratos del 14 de octubre de 2026Contratos del 14 de octubre de 2026

El coste total de los contratos es de 88.361,00 dólares.

#	Proveedor	Costo	Descripción
Distrito
2	Lucid Partnerships, Inc. (Luz T. Cázares)	$38,000	Reuniones quincenales con el Superintendente y la Junta Directiva, según corresponda, para brindarles asesoramiento y orientación sobre sus respectivas funciones y responsabilidades relacionadas con la supervisión fiscal, la estabilidad financiera y la revisión cualitativa de fin de año.
Carta
1	CodeRev Kids	$50,361	Curso de programación y curso de robótica Rev para estudiantes de FACS, programas de verano y extraescolares. Esto supone un aumento de 9,361 dólares con respecto al año pasado, lo que representa un incremento de más del 22 %.

Los miembros de SRTA están preocupados por el contrato con Lucid Partnership. Dieciséis reuniones quincenales cuestan $38,000/16 = $2,375 por reunión, más gastos. ¿De dónde se están desviando estos $38,000? El personal y los estudiantes de SRCS sufren a diario penurias y condiciones laborales insostenibles debido a la falta de planes de implementación tras los recortes realizados bajo la dirección de este consultor. Este consultor genera dudas sobre la conveniencia de utilizar este contrato para obtener la información necesaria para el nuevo Superintendente y la junta directiva.

G.5. Aprobación de contratos – Fianza

Resumen de contratos de bonos del 14 de octubre de 2026 Contratos de bonos del 14 de octubre de 2026

#	Proveedor	Sitio	Descripción	Costo	Costo total
Elemental
1	Greystone West Company	ALES	Gestión de la construcción de cercas	$16,988	$247,500
2	RGH Consultants	ELA	Servicios geotécnicos y de inspección especial para la modernización.	$2,898	$5,000,000

El coste total de los contratos se calcula de la siguiente manera:

Medida C = $ 0

Medida G = $19,885

Total = $19,885

G.6. Actualización del Plan Maestro de Instalaciones (FMP) para los requisitos de la Propuesta 2 y el Plan de Mantenimiento Diferido de Cinco Años.

Resolución 2026-27-28 (1)  para cumplir con los requisitos de los Planes Maestros Quinquenales para las Instalaciones Escolares como condición para participar en el Programa Estatal de Instalaciones Escolares.

Plan de mantenimiento diferido 2026-27

El estado planea invertir 38 millones de dólares en los próximos cinco años en pisos, sistemas de climatización, pintura, pavimentación, plomería y amianto.

20260929_SRCS 2025 FMP_COMBINADO+APÉNDICES 1 Este plan está fechado en abril de 2026, pero hay muchos elementos que no se han actualizado.

G.7. Ajustes al Informe Fiscal de Datos Reales No Auditados 2025-26 ya aprobado

Actualizado el 14/10/2026. Informe fiscal de cifras reales no auditadas del ejercicio 2025-26.

Los cambios en la velocidad incluyen:

• Administradores de programas (Administración certificada): Reclasificación de costos para reflejar una división del 70 % para educación especial y el 30 % para educación general. Esto transfiere $427,193.69 del Recurso 6500 y $185,993.05 del Recurso 6546 al Recurso 0000 del Fondo General sin restricciones (Total: $613,186.74).
• Personal administrativo de servicios especiales: Se reclasifican los costos para reflejar una distribución del 70 % entre educación especial y el 30 % entre educación general. Esto transfiere $165,428.30 del Recurso 6500 al Recurso 0000.
• Operaciones de custodia: Reclasificación de $46,725.46 de un objetivo de educación especial a un objetivo de educación general dentro del recurso 0000 (solo actualización del objetivo).
• Terapeutas escolares: Reclasificación de $362,809.83 para personal que trabaja exclusivamente en entornos de educación general. $92,730.17 dentro del Recurso 0500 (actualización de objetivo únicamente) y $270,079.66 transferidos del Recurso 6546 al Recurso 0000.

Los cambios en el Boys and Girls Club incluyen:

• Ingresos reconocidos: Se revirtió el saldo de $240,000 de los ingresos no devengados previamente registrados y se reconoció un asiento adicional de cuentas por cobrar de $60,000, lo que eleva el total de ingresos reconocidos del programa 2025-26 a $300,000.
• Registro de gastos: Se aplicó la factura de gastos equivalente de $300,000 pagada a Boys & Girls Clubs of Sonoma-Marin para la expansión de verano 2025-2026 para los estudiantes de las dos escuelas objetivo, Lincoln Elementary y Monroe Elementary.

Los miembros de SRTA solicitan la justificación de que a los gerentes de programas y al personal administrativo de servicios especiales de educación general se les cobre el 30% de la educación general.

H. PRIMERA LECTURA Y POSIBLE EXENCIÓN DE LA SEGUNDA LECTURA DE LOS ESTATUTOS ACTUALIZADOS DE LA JUNTA DIRECTIVA

Estos documentos no se publican con las modificaciones indicadas para fines comparativos. No formaron parte de las agendas recientes del Subcomité de Políticas de la Junta Directiva. Reglamento 9320: Reuniones y Avisos Se debatió el tema. Una búsqueda en GAMUT no muestra ninguna póliza existente con estos números.

1. Comentarios del público sobre los estatutos de la junta directiva

2. Reglamento de la Junta Directiva 9100 Organización

BB 9100_Limpiar

3. Reglamento de la Junta Directiva 9322: Agenda/Materiales de la reunión

BB 9322_Limpiar

4. Reglamento de la Junta Directiva 9323 Conducta de las Reuniones

BB 9323_Limpiar

I. TEMAS DE DISCUSIÓN / PUNTOS DE ACCIÓN

I.1. Calendario de Recursos Humanos

1. Comentarios del público sobre el calendario de servicios educativos.

2. (Acción) Aprobación de la solicitud de permiso provisional de prácticas (PIP) de Kasey Olenberger

Solicitud PIP K. Olenberger 14-10-26

3. (Acción) Aprobación de la corrección a las tarifas de la escala salarial para maestros invitados certificados y suplentes clasificados para el año escolar 2026-2027.

Tarifas anteriores para profesores invitados y suplentes del curso 26-27 (Copia final aprobada por la junta el 9-9-26)

Tarifas para profesores invitados y personal docente suplente (26-27) (Revisiones pendientes de aprobación por la Junta Directiva el 14-10-26)

4. (Acción) Aprobación de la solicitud de exención de los gastos adicionales del maestro de recursos para más de 28 estudiantes para el administrador

Formulario de administrador de excedentes del especialista en recursos

5. (Acción) Aprobación de la solicitud de exención para los excedentes del maestro de recursos para más de 28 estudiantes para el maestro

Formulario de profesor especialista en recursos con exceso de edad

Tras las inquietudes expresadas por SRTA, SRCS someterá a consideración de la Junta el proceso de exención del límite de casos. La ley de California limita la carga de casos a 28 estudiantes. Para superar este límite se requiere el consentimiento voluntario del profesor, la documentación explícita del consentimiento del sindicato, generalmente mediante la firma del presidente de la unidad de negociación, la aprobación de la Junta, un mínimo de cinco horas diarias de apoyo de auxiliares de instrucción y, finalmente, la aprobación o denegación estatal. Las exenciones estatales no anulan los límites de carga de casos contractuales negociados por SRTA.

SRTA ha expresado su preocupación a los responsables de Educación Especial por el cumplimiento de la normativa sobre la sobrecarga de casos durante muchos años. Agradecemos que el actual equipo directivo se tome en serio estas preocupaciones y esté realizando esfuerzos significativos para cumplir con el Código de Educación.

El proceso de exención también exige a los distritos que identifiquen las circunstancias que dan lugar a los excesos y elaboren un plan para resolverlos. SRTA considera que esto supone una oportunidad para colaborar en la adopción de prácticas de dotación de personal más proactivas, garantizando que los especialistas en educación comiencen el curso escolar con una capacidad razonable para gestionar los nuevos matriculados, los traslados y las derivaciones, en lugar de encontrarse ya cerca de los límites contractuales.

Esperamos seguir colaborando para garantizar que los excesos de personal sigan siendo excepciones temporales y no prácticas habituales de dotación de personal, al tiempo que se protegen los derechos contractuales y se apoya a los docentes y a los alumnos.

I.2. Calendario Financiero

1. Comentarios del público sobre el calendario financiero

2. (Acción) Resolución N° 2026/27-29 que apoya la Proposición 3 para la financiación permanente

Resolución 2026_27-29 Apoyo a la Propuesta 3

Los miembros de SRTA están haciendo campaña activamente junto con CTA a favor de la Propuesta 3. Nos unimos a la junta directiva para apoyar esta propuesta.

J. APROBACIÓN DE LAS ACTAS

23 de septiembre de 2026 Minutos y Documentos de apoyo

K. SOLICITUDES DE INFORMACIÓN DE LOS MIEMBROS DE LA JUNTA DIRECTIVA

L. ELEMENTOS INFORMATIVOS

L.1. Temas de discusión futuros de la Junta Directiva

Los siguientes son los puntos que se actualizarán próximamente en la junta directiva:

• Aprobación de la resolución para declarar septiembre como el Mes de la Concientización sobre la Asistencia Escolar.
• Aprobación de la resolución para el Mes de la Prevención del Suicidio
• Actualizaciones de las políticas de la junta directiva

SRTA prevé la programación futura de los siguientes elementos:

Proyección propia de SELPA en el primer período intermedio (octubre)

Informe de seguimiento de FCMAT en la primera reunión intermedia (octubre)

Revisión de las opciones de itinerario del Comité de Graduación (octubre)

Plan de la Propuesta 28 para el año (26-27) con detalles por sitio

Medina – Datos de instrucción AP con el número de años de experiencia de los maestros

-Aclaración sobre la adopción de políticas de la junta directiva que requiere la mayoría de los miembros de la junta frente a la mayoría de los presentes/votantes.

– Considerar clubes o equipos de deportes electrónicos

Informe financiero del emplazamiento de Caston con diversas cantidades y fuentes.

-Actualizar la política 3510 sobre la reducción de residuos como tema de debate

– Plan de comunicación.

Prak – Información sobre un profesor sin derecho a voto en la junta directiva.

Kirby, ¿añadimos un entrenador asistente de lucha libre para mujeres?

– Copias del panorama y de las preguntas de la encuesta sobre la verdad de la juventud.

DeLaTorre: Información sobre cómo identificamos la preparación para la universidad y la vida laboral.

Plan de la Agencia MCHS y RVMS.

Jenkins – Actualización del plan de marketing según lo prometido el año pasado.

• Partidos inaugurales de SRCS Sunshine para SRTA (9 de septiembre de 2026)
• Aprobación de memorandos de entendimiento de uso conjunto para el uso de instalaciones escolares (extraído del orden del día del 22 de junio)
• Actualización del Sistema de Apoyo Multinivel (MTSS, por sus siglas en inglés) (dic. 2025)
• Datos de las encuestas Panorama y Youth Truth (agosto de 2025)
• Plan y cronograma para la implementación de las recomendaciones del Dr. Gillespie sobre Servicios Especiales (enero de 2025), Solicitud de un nuevo estudio FCMAT sobre el programa de Educación Especial de SRCS.
• Primer borrador del Plan de Seguridad del Distrito (retrasado desde septiembre de 2024)
• Compartir el Plan Maestro de la Biblioteca con las expectativas de implementación y el cronograma.
• Cierre oficial de Learning House, Brookhill Elementary, Biella Elementary y Steele Lane.
• Plan para un programa de apoyo a la vivienda del personal con los fondos recaudados en Fir Ridge.

Hasta que el distrito tome una decisión, los ingresos de la venta de la propiedad de Fir Ridge permanecen inactivos y pierden valor a medida que el costo de la vivienda continúa aumentando. Poner en marcha un programa podría ayudar a SRCS a atraer y retener personal de CSEA. El impacto potencial de los fondos disminuye con el paso del tiempo.

• Política de participación estudiantil
• Solicitud reiterada de presupuestos del sitio que incluya todas las fuentes, así como la matrícula y las cifras únicas.

L.2. Acrónimos y abreviaturas educativas

L.3. Fechas de las reuniones del subcomité de la junta directiva

SRTA y CSEA celebran reuniones sindicales los martes. Nuestras reuniones habituales se llevan a cabo todos los martes. No hay razón para que las reuniones del distrito, en las que deberían participar docentes y personal administrativo, se programen para un martes.

Las clases se extienden hasta las 3:35 p. m. Debido al tráfico escolar y al tiempo de desplazamiento, los docentes no pueden asistir en persona ni participar en las reuniones que comienzan a las 3:30 p. m. Al programar reuniones que prohíben expresamente la asistencia de docentes y personal administrativo, el Distrito margina a las partes interesadas y elimina la retroalimentación de quienes trabajan en los centros escolares.

Para garantizar que el Distrito reciba la retroalimentación y el apoyo necesarios, programe reuniones a las que puedan asistir todos los empleados del distrito.

Fechas de las reuniones del Subcomité de Finanzas de la Junta Directiva (Reunión conforme a la Ley Brown):

• Martes, 3 de noviembre de 2026 (3:30-5:30)
• Lunes, 7 de diciembre de 2026 (3:30-5:30) Provisional

Fechas de las reuniones del Comité Ad Hoc sobre el Uso de Instalaciones (no sujetas a la Ley Brown):

• Lunes, 2 de noviembre de 2026 (3:30-5:00)
• Diciembre de 2026 (fecha por determinar)

L.4. Fechas de reuniones extraordinarias de la Junta Directiva

Las siguientes fechas corresponden a las próximas reuniones extraordinarias de la Junta Directiva:

• Miércoles 21 de octubre de 2026: Noche de Reconocimiento de Premios (5:30 en el Campus ELA, 2140 Avenida Jennings.)
• Miércoles 18 de noviembre de 2026: Sesión especial de estudio: ELOP, ASES, Escuelas comunitarias (Auditorio de la Escuela Secundaria Santa Rosa)
• Miércoles 16 de diciembre de 2026: Reorganización anual de la junta directiva y prioridad estratégica 4: Entorno y recursos para la enseñanza y el aprendizaje (Auditorio de la escuela secundaria Santa Rosa)

L.5. Calendario de reuniones de la Junta Directiva 2026/27

NUEVO_ Calendario de reuniones de la Junta de Educación 2026_27

L.6. SRCS LCAP actualizado y carta de aprobación de SCOE

Plan de Control y Rendición de Cuentas Local 2026 – Escuelas de la Ciudad de Santa Rosa – 11/09/2026

Carta SCOE _26-27 LCAP

SCOE aceptó el LCAP el 11 de septiembre de 2026.

L.7. Informe trimestral del asentamiento de Williams

Hoja de portada del informe de quejas uniformes de Williams del primer trimestre, año escolar 26-27

SRCS afirma que se resolvió una queja relacionada con las instalaciones de Williams durante el trimestre.

M. CLAUSURA

REGULAR BOARD MEETING

Santa Rosa City Schools

September 23, 2026

Hybrid: Santa Rosa City Hall Council Chambers

4:00 p.m. – Closed Session

6:00 p.m. – Open Session

Hybrid: Zoom / Santa Rosa City Hall

*** streamed ***

Video Board Meetings through a link on this district webpage. (It is often changed right before the meeting.)

Please take time to review the following abbreviated version of the agenda. Click here to see the entire agenda. It has live links on many items with more information. If you want to comment to the board about any upcoming items, email agendacomments@srcs.k12.ca.us. Please CC wearesrta@gmail.com on your email.

Members attending online are encouraged to add SRTA to the front of their Zoom client name.

Closed Session Items: 

A.1. Public Comment On Closed Session Agenda Items To comment, email Melanie Martin at mmartinsrcs.k12.ca.us.

This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak to the board on Closed Session items only. 

B.1. Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release [Gov. Code § 54957]

B.2. Conference With Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation (Case Nos.: 2024-130 / 24CV05494, 2025-074 / 25CV05030 )

B.3. Conference With Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation (Number of potential cases: 2) 

B.4. Conference With Property Negotiator [Gov. Code § 54956.8]

B.5. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Title of employee being reviewed: Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent, Principals, Vice Principals, Directors, Coordinators)

C. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION (6:00 P.M.)

D. REPORTS (Bargaining Units, Sup, and Board)

E. Public Comment on Non Agenda and Consent Items

SRTA members are invited to complete ‘blue cards’ at the board meeting in order to make public comments. Online comments have been suspended. Comments will often be limited to 60 seconds. Only items NOT on the agenda are addressed at this time, with the exception of consent items.

Comments are requested at the board meeting to bring a member’s perspective and share real experiences of the impact of district policies and practices on students and staff. 

Speakers are limited to just those in person (unless a board member attends online without prior notice.)

Comments are most impactful when they are well spoken, composed and reasonable.

Dear Board,

Please do not interpret a lack of communication or attendance at Board meetings as evidence that all is well.

The implementation of cuts has created significant changes to working conditions for staff, with unsustainable demands and unacceptable consequences for students. Staff are ending each day with nothing left in the tank—managing packed classes while trying to adequately support students with disabilities and other students with significant needs.

There is also growing concern for our site administrators, who are carrying increased responsibilities without sufficient capacity or support. We fear many will leave the District at their first opportunity unless meaningful changes are made. Continued staff turnover disrupts stability and makes it difficult to build the forward momentum our district needs.

Our School-Based Therapists are in a particularly precarious position, facing unrealistic job expectations while the needs of the students they serve remain intense.

There is simply little capacity right now for staff to engage with the Board or District committees because people are overwhelmed—and we are only in week five. Staff are currently seeking information on accessing mental health support. This does not bode well for the remainder of the school year, when demands and stress typically increase.

Please recognize that silence is not a sign that things are working. For many staff, it is a sign that they are stretched beyond capacity.

F. CONSENT ITEMS 

All consent items are enacted by the Board in one motion, unless a Board member requests that an item be removed and discussed separately. 

F.1. Approval of Absent Board Members, If Necessary

Excusing Omar Medina’s absence from the regular meeting held on September 9, 2026 due to personal illness.

F.2. Approval of Personnel Transactions

Personnel Transactions 9-23-26

EdJoin shows a total of one hundred fifteen current postings for two hundred fifty-four jobs in SRCS. There are thirty-two certificated opening postings (six less than the last meeting). There are eighty-four current classified postings for two hundred nineteen job openings (eight less than the last meeting.) There are two certificated and one classified management positions posted. 

Welcome to these 5 new FTE: Nicolas Guihaire (FACS), Noble Amani (PHS), Maegan Webster (PHS), Elena Ingram (CCLA), and  Perla Espinoza Farias (SPSV).

Good bye to the resigning Taryn Reynolds (SPSV) after 6 years and happy retirement to Dana Gordon (LELA) after 23 years of service to students. SRTA wishes you both all the best in your future endeavours. 

Classified has two new hires and one rehire, and three resignations. 

There are two supervisory resignations. 

F.3. Approval of Vendor Warrants

Warrant Register September 5, 2026

F.4. Approval of Contracts

September 23, 2026 Contract Summary List September 23, 2026 Contracts

The total cost of contracts is $579,750.00.

#	Provider	Cost	Description
District
1	Every Special Child	$333,000,000	Contract for Sped. Teachers, Aides, SLP, RN plus. This contract is for 2 Sped. Teachers at $165,000 each for unfilled positions at CCLA and MCHS.
2	Paradigm	$228,000	Renew 3 year contract for platform and services to assist with Medical billing. The prior contract for $200,000 actually cost $175,000 over three years. They charge $2.25 per student per year, with a 7% cap for their fees based on billed claims.
Secondary
3	EdPuzzle	$15,400	Interactive video platform for PJ/HS, SRJ/HS, EAJ/HS and MCHS.
Charter
3	EdPuzzle	$3,350	Interactive video platform for CCLA.

SRTA members are concerned with the inability of SRCS to hire Special Education teachers. How can plans move forward for SRCS becoming its own SELPA when basic operations are beyond current ability?  What does this additional contract do to the budget for Sped?

At $165,000 per special education teacher this contract is paying $48,000 MORE than the highest salary schedule cell paid to any teacher employed by SRCS (25+ years of service and 75+ graduate units). Even when driven costs are considered, it is hard to defend the statement that this is SAVING SRCS money.

F.5. Approval of the contract for the Abraham Lincoln Elementary School Perimeter Fencing and Gates project

This work includes the rest of the fencing at Lincoln ES as well as the Division of State Architects (DSA) mandated path of travel (ADA) upgrades.

ALES Perimeter Fencing and Gates Project_CWS_Agreement

Notice of Intent to Award_ALES Perimeter Fencing and Gates

Fund 22 Measure G: $247,500.00

SRTA members are confused about what ‘rest of the fencing’ means. There are no maps or plans included in the attached documents.

G. SECOND READ: BOARD POLICY UPDATES

1. (Action) Second Read: Updated Mandated and Conditionally Mandated Board Policies

New/updated CSBA BP language: Red

Previous/current BP language that is changing: Blue

No changes to BP language: Grey

Policy 3551: Food Service Operations/Cafeteria Fund BP 3551_Comparison BP 3551_Clean

Policy 4033: Lactation Accommodation BP 4033_Comparison BP 4033_Clean

Policy 4119.24, 4219.24, 4319.24: Maintaining Appropriate Adult-Student Interactions BP4119.24_Comparison BP 4219.24_Comparison BP 4319.24_Comparison

BP 4119.24_Clean BP 4219.24_Clean BP 4319.24_Clean

* These CLEAN drafts were attached on Sunday, September 20, 2026.

Policy 4216: Probationary/Permanent Status BP 4216_Comparison BP 4216_Clean

Policy 4218: Dismissal/Suspension/Disciplinary Action BP 4218_Comparison BP 4218_Clean

Policy 5111: Admission BP 5111_Comparison BP 5111_Clean

Policy 5126: Awards For Achievement BP 5126_Comparison BP 5126_Clean

Policy 5131.7: Weapons And Dangerous Instruments BP 5131.7_Comparison BP 5131.7_Clean

Policy 5132: Dress And Grooming BP 5132_Comparison BP 5132_Clean

Policy 5141.21: Administering Medication And Monitoring Health Conditions BP 5141.21_Comparison BP 5141.21_Clean Option 1 was chosen allowing a parent to medicate a student on campus with cannabis products.

Policy 5141.52: Suicide Prevention BP 5141.52_Comparison BP 5141.52_Clean

Staff has been encouraged to build healthy relationships with our students.  SRTA members are concerned with BP4119.24, 4219.24 and 4319.24.  Specifically, wanting to ensure using terms of endearment, like having a general practice of referring to students as ‘Sweetie’ will not be disallowed. Similarly, thanking Peer Tutors with gifts at the end of a term, or acknowledging graduating students with a gift should not defy board policy. Reassurance of this would be helpful.

According to BP 5126 the Board shall establish a budget for student recognitions. Is this truly the intent? The district budget currently covers Extra Duty work to coordinate these academic awards, but the awards are not funded by the district, but by parent organizations. Similarly, the coordination of athletic awards are part of the district paid Athletic Director’s duties, but are the actual awards currently funded by site athletic boosters?  

 BP 5126 further states that “The Board shall establish and maintain a scholarship and loan fund which shall be used to provide interest-free loans for educational advancement, scholarship, and/or grants-in-aid to bona fide organizations, students, or graduates of district schools.” What is the timeline for this implementation?  Are leftover funds from Made in Santa Rosa available for this purpose? 

H. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEMS

H.1. Educational Services Calendar

1. Public Comment on the Educational Services Calendar

With the changes to positions and personnel at the district office, there have been hiccups with student allocations of textbooks and instructional materials this year. Added to that is the issue of publishers being currently out of print with new textbooks. The efforts to resolve these issues are duly noted.  Assurance that systems are improving would be appreciated.

2. Public Hearing Regarding Sufficiency of Textbooks or Instructional Materials for 2026-27, Grades K-6

NOTICE TO POST- Elementary Public Hearing Item 2026-27

NOTICE TO POST- Elementary Public Hearing Item 2026-27 ESP

3. (Action) Sufficiency of Textbooks or Instructional Materials for 2026-27, Grades K-6

SR Elementary School District Resolution 2026-27

4. Public Hearing Regarding Sufficiency of Textbooks or Instructional Materials for 2026-27, Grades 7-12

NOTICE TO POST – Secondary Public Hearing Item 2026-27 ESP

NOTICE TO POST- Secondary Public Hearing Item 2026-27

5. (Action) Sufficiency of Textbooks or Instructional Materials for 2026-27, Grades 7-12

SR High School District Resolution 2026-27

H.2. Business Services Calendar

1. Public Comment on the Business Services Calendar

Special education busing was a huge mess at the start of the year, now that all the busing request seem to be in we have students pick up times being missed leaving kids waiting outside for 15-20 minutes, arriving to school after 9 am at secondary, and buses showing up late for pick up at the end of the day. 

There are issues with students consistently being delivered late to school which is interrupting their educational opportunities. 

There is a school that is repeatedly requiring staff to stay after school because buses are not on site when class is dismissed. This is costing the district extended day pay for several teachers every day. 

Parents have reported students being on the bus for two hours or more on their way home. This may be improving, but should never happen. Bus staff seem untrained on basic bus safety like helping kids on and off buses or dealing with medical issues. The new buses are designed with huge steps that have been really difficult for kids with mobility issues to navigate. Parents are asking why no thought was put into accessibility when these buses were chosen. 

2. (Discussion) West County Transportation Agency Update

West County Transportation Agency Update 9-23-26

WC Transportation	2026 – 2027		2025 – 2026		2024 – 2025		2023 – 2024		2022 – 2023
RT Type	# Routes	Uncovered	# Routes	Uncovered	# Routes	Uncovered	# Routes	Uncovered	# Routes	Uncovered
SPED Ambulatory	55	2	55	0	49	3	47	10	46	12
SPED W/C	15	3	14	0	13	3	12	4	13	2
SPED Van	19	6 – trainees	20	5 – trainees	22	2	20	0	18	0
Gen Ed	34	2	35	6	35	4	33	2	33	5
Total RT	123	7	124	6	119	12	112	16	110	19
Standby Driver	20	1	20	0	20	0	20	3	20	7
Trans. Bus Aide	32	1	24	0	20	0
Total Et al.	175	9	168	6	159	12	132	19	130	26
Number of SRCS Sped Students	589		554/613Sept/June		580		535		485
Number of SRCS Gen Ed Routes	18		17		17
Gen Ed Budget	$3.2		$2.9		$2.3		$2.2		$1.8
% of WC Use	41.70%		42.6 %		42.1 %		42.5 %		42 %
SPED Budget	$8.4		$7.7		$7.3		$6.9		$5.9
% of WC Use	58.30%		58.8 %		59.6%*		57.8 %		58 %
Total Budget	$11.60		$10.6		$9.6		$9.1		$7.6
					* The prior numbers changed from what was provided.
WCTA & SRCS Bus Routes & SPED Students Comparison
	2026-7			2025-6			2024-5
Route Type	WCTA Total	SRCS	Current% of Use	WCTA Total	SRCS	Current% of Use	WCTA Total	SRCS	Current% of Use
Gen Ed Routes	34	18	41.7%	35	17	42.6%	35	17	42.1%
SPEDStudents	1057	613	57.9%	960	554	57.7%	965	562	58.3%

Where is the transition to electric vehicles at? How will the rate changes for fuel impact the cost of bussing? 

H.3. Human Resources Calendar

1. Public Comment on the Human Resources Calendar

Being unable to fill positions is a concern for SRCS. Students are being taught by folks who are not highly qualified to be teaching. These staff require significant resources to be able to fulfill their positions. Other staff are not volunteering their services to help, when they themselves are overextended in meeting their own position expectations. There is not a support system in place to provide this support, and site admin do not have the bandwidth to provide the necessary coaching. 

It is impossible to prepare for this item without the pertinent job description.

2. (Action) Approval of Provisional Internship Permit Application (PIP) Elizabeth Mensch

This is to fill a SDC-ESN Teacher position at James Monroe Elementary with someone who promises to do what they need to so that they can become an intern next year.

PIP Application E. Mensch 9-23-26

3. (Action) Approval of Provisional Internship Permit Application (PIP) Liliana Ramirez

This is to fill a 5th Grade Elementary Teacher position at Helen Lehman Elementary with someone who promises to do what they need to so that they can become an intern next year.

The PIP application will be attached to this item prior to the September 23, 2026, Board meeting.

4. (Action) Approval of Vapa Coaching Job Descriptions

26-27 Extra Duty and Titles and Classes Appendix G Revised Pending Board Approval 9-23-26 (Vapa Coach)

The job descriptions and applicable salary schedule will be added as an attachment prior to the September 23, 2026, Board meeting.

This item was not negotiated with SRTA. While SRTA is not opposed to a stipend for a marching band/drumline coach, this position has not been negotiated. As Appendix G is part of the collective bargaining agreement, unilateral additions are unfair labor practices.

I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

September 9, 2026  Minutes and Supporting Documents

J. BOARD MEMBER REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION

K. INFORMATION ITEMS

K.1. Future Board Discussion Items

The following are future board update items:

• Goal Setting for the 5 Board Priorities (September 25, 2026)
• Charter Process Update (October 14 or October 28, 2026)
• Student and Staff Awards Recognition Ceremony (October 21, 2026)
• Resolution for District for Capacity of Interdistrict Transfers (September 9, 2026, September 23, 2026, October 28, 2026)
• Update and Plan for LCAP Outreach (November 4, 2026)

SRTA looks to the future scheduling of the following items:

Savings from  closures and mergers vs projections.

Own SELPA projection at first interim  (October)

FCMAT follow up report at first interim (October)

Review of Graduation Committee Pathway Options (October)

Prop 28 plan for the year (26-27) with details by site

Medina- AP instruction data with number of years of experience of Teachers

-Clarification about board policy adoption requiring a majority of board membership versus a majority of those present/voting

– consider E-sports clubs or teams 

Caston- Site funding finance report with various amounts and sources

-update 3510 policy around reducing waste as a discussion item

– Communication plan. 

Prak – Info about a non voting teacher on the board. 

Kirby – add an assistant wrestling coach for women? 

– Copies of the panorama and youth truth survey questions. 

DeLaTorre- Info on how we identify College and Career readiness.

 Agendize MCHS and RVMS plan. Part of review of implementation of 7-12.

Jenkins – marketing plan update as committed to last year.

• SRCS Sunshine Openers for SRTA (Sept 9, 2026)
• Approval of Joint Use MOU’s for School Site Facility Use (pulled from June 22 agenda)
• Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) Update (Dec 2025)
• Panorama and Youth Truth Survey Data (August 2025)
• Plan and timeline for implementation of Dr. Gillespie’s recommendations around Special Services (January 2025), Requesting of New FCMAT Study on SRCS SpEd Program
• First Draft of the District Safety Plan (delayed from September 2024)
• Sharing the Library Master Plan with implementation expectations and timeline
• Officially Closing Learning House, Herbert Slater Middle School, Santa Rosa Middle School, Brookhill Elementary, Biella Elementary, Steele Lane, and Herbert Comstock Middle School. 
• Plan for Staff Housing support program from the proceeds of Fir Ridge

Until the district makes a decision, the proceeds from the sale of the Fir Ridge property are just sitting and losing value as the cost of housing continues to rise. Getting a program started could help SRCS attract and retain CSEA staff. The potential impact of the funds continues to diminish as time passes.

• Student Voice Policy
• Long standing request for site budgets including all sources as well as enrollment and unduplicated numbers.

K.2. Educational Acronyms and Abbreviations

K.3. Information on AR 5131.8: Mobile Devices 

These are the Administrative Regulations for implementing the new board policy. 

AR 5131.8 Mobile Communication Devices

K.4. Sonoma County Office of Education (SCOE) Letters: Approval of 2026/27 Adopted Budget 

SRCS Adopted Budget Approval Letters

The County approved the budget and recognizes significant fiscal improvement, but the letter makes clear that SRCS remains under close fiscal scrutiny. Maintaining stability will require continued expenditure discipline, realistic multiyear assumptions, careful cash-flow management, and adjustments where current projections are inaccurate.

• The budget meets state financial stability requirements and allows the District to meet obligations for the current and two subsequent years.
• Ending fund balance: 2026–27 is projected at $18.8 million, including $8.0 million unrestricted and $10.8 million restricted reserves. The District meets the state’s 3% minimum reserve requirement.
• Fiscal recovery: SRCS previously faced a negative certification/lack of going concern due to structural deficits, unsustainable spending, and declining cash. The District implemented approximately $16.6 million in ongoing expenditure reductions for 2026–27 and about $19 million in one-time solutions for 2025–26.
• Improved position: The District entered 2025–26 with a $1.1 million negative unrestricted balance, but unaudited actuals now show approximately $5.6 million, substantially better than the $2.5 million previously projected.
• Still requires close monitoring: The County specifically identifies Special Education costs, federal revenue assumptions, cash flow, one-time state funding, the additional 1.44% COLA, and Pregnancy Disability Leave costs as areas requiring review and possible budget adjustments.
• Cash-flow concern: Despite improved year-end cash, SRCS remains dependent on the County Treasury line of credit through March.
• Special Education: The County says certain Special Education contract expenditures and related revenues appear materially understated and should be reassessed at First Interim.
• Title I: Projected Title I revenue and expenditures appear to be overstated by approximately $1 million annually and should be adjusted.
• Collective bargaining: Negotiations remain unsettled for 2025–26 and 2026–27. Any salary or benefit increases must be supported by ongoing revenues and accompanied by the required three-year financial analysis and public disclosure.
• Charters: Four dependent charters are reported outside the General Fund in Fund 09, which is projected to have a $6.38 million ending balance, an increase of $1.64 million.

K.5. Board Subcommittee Meeting Dates

SRTA and CSEA have collaborated to have Union Tuesday. As much as possible, union meetings are held on Tuesdays. It is appreciated that these announced trustee meetings are on Mondays when there are no union meeting conflicts for bargaining unit members.

Board Finance Subcommittee Meeting Dates (Brown Act Meeting):

• Monday, October 5, 2026 (3:30-5:30)
• Monday, November 2, 2026 (3:30-5:30) Tentative

Facilities Use Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Dates (not subject to the Brown Act):

• Monday, September 21, 2026 (3:30 – 5:00)

K.6. 2026/27 Board Meeting Schedule

2026/27 Board Meeting Schedule (Link not accessible on agenda.)

Special Joint Meeting: Santa Rosa City Schools and the City of Santa Rosa Council:

• Wednesday, October 7, 2026 

K.7. High School Voter Education Weeks (September 14-25, 2026) Letter                                   High School Voter Education Weeks (September 14–25, 2026)

SRTA honors our Social Studies teachers and their efforts to encourage our students to actively engage with our democracy. 

K.8. Non-Public School/Non-Public Agency Contract Update                                                        9-23-26 NPA updates 9-23-26 NPS updates

	June 26	Budget	Sept 26
NPS	$ 10,103,375	$ 9,923,497	$ 9,923,497
NPA	$ 13,766,887	$ 15,685,338	$ 16,068,341
Total	$ 23,870,262	$ 25,608,835	$ 25,991,838

SRTA is concerned that in the midst of trying to control costs, the cost for sped NPA and NPS services has risen by $2.1 million dollars. These new shared reports do not include numbers of staff and students.

K.9. Facilities Projects Update

2026-09-23 Facilities Project Updates

Most projects are progressing, with several nearing completion. The primary upcoming work includes fencing/security improvements, completion of TK facilities, and continued roofing/HVAC projects.

• Abraham Lincoln Elementary fencing: Bids received; Board approval is pending, with construction expected to begin in early October.
• Electronic access controls: Phase 2 installation is nearing completion at several schools. Programming of staff access cards and systems continues; work is underway at additional sites.
• Perimeter fencing: Maria Carrillo is complete; Piner is nearing completion; Luther Burbank is scheduled to begin September 21; Elsie Allen will begin in early October. Some additional materials remain on order.
• TK classrooms: James Monroe’s Phase 2 shade structure is complete, while Phase 1 awaits engineering review. Additional security fencing has been requested. At Helen Lehman, the field is expected to open after sod establishment and remaining fencing should be complete in early October.
• Santa Rosa High School: DeSoto Hall Phase I is nearing completion with remaining markerboards being installed. Theater roofing is complete. Phase II is planned for summer 2027 and includes restroom, fire-system, and staff-workroom improvements.
• Elsie Allen roofing/HVAC: Roofing and painting continue into October. The new 7/8-grade play area improvements are nearly complete.
• Luther Burbank portables: All five portables are complete; an ADA-compliant restroom door remains pending.
• High school turf: Turf replacement is complete at all high schools; remaining stadium accessibility work will be bid separately.
• District Office/Education Center: Project remains pending DSA approval; Maintenance Office improvements are nearly complete and demolition of unoccupied buildings is finished.
• Projects closing out: Piner High School 2-story classroom building, Santa Rosa French-American Charter TK classrooms, and SRCS Early Learning Academy are in closeout.

L. ADJOURNMENT

REGULAR BOARD MEETING

Santa Rosa City Schools

September 9, 2026

Hybrid: Santa Rosa City Hall Council Chambers

4:00 p.m. – Closed Session

5:00 p.m. – Study Session  (Special Programs)

6:00 p.m. – Open Session

Hybrid: Zoom / Santa Rosa City Hall

*** streamed ***

Video Board Meetings through a link on this district webpage. (It is often changed right before the meeting.)

Please take time to review the following abbreviated version of the agenda. Click here to see the entire agenda. It has live links on many items with more information. If you want to comment to the board about any upcoming items, email agendacomments@srcs.k12.ca.us. Please CC wearesrta@gmail.com on your email.

Members attending online are encouraged to add SRTA to the front of their Zoom client name.

Closed Session Items: 

A.1. Public Comment On Closed Session Agenda Items To comment, email Melanie Martin at mmartinsrcs.k12.ca.us.

This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak to the board on Closed Session items only. 

B.1. Student Readmissions (Case Nos: 2024/25-29, 2026/27-05, 2024/25-26 )

B.2. Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release 

B.3. Conference With Property Negotiator

B.4. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Title of employee being reviewed: Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent, Principals, Vice Principals, Directors, Coordinators) 

C. RECONVENE TO STUDY SESSION (5:00 P.M.)

C.1. Public Comment Only on the Study Session 

C.2. Study Session: Signature Programs

Presentation 

• Define the term SRCS will use to refer to signature/specialized programs; 

Definitions of Signature, Specialized, Alternative, and CTE.

AR 5116.1 lists  “specialized programs”  Art Quest, (SRHS, 1994),  Early College Magnet (PHS, 2006, University Center (EAHS,2005 ), and  International Baccalaureate Program (MHS, 1995). 

SRCS Specialized Programs List  Includes “AVID – All Secondary Schools” and all of the above programs.  SRCS Website Programs Page includes alternative ed. and curriculum disciplines.

• Grapple with some opportunities and dilemmas associated with signature/specialized programs; and consider policy implications. 

Opportunities: Keep students at their neighborhood schools; offer attractive citywide options; attract students from other districts; and expand differentiated programs and alternative pathways.

Dilemmas: Small-enrollment programs; citywide enrollment impacts; specialized staffing and resource costs; facilities and feasibility findings.

Resources for Sustainability: Leadership support; aligned staffing; program coordination; community partnerships; training and faculty buy-in; specialized credentials; facilities and transportation; site-level investment.

• Provide necessary context on the definition, opportunities and dilemmas of specialized programs to assist the board in future policy development. 

Enrollment

Independent Study	Resident	In District	Out of District	Total
2026-2027	61	17	1	79
2025-2026	84	35	1	120
2024-2025	53	15	2	70
Art Quest (SRHS)	Resident	In District	Out of District	Total
2026-2027	124	202	35	361
2025-2026	102 ?	219	34	355
2024-2025	71	164	22	257
Early College Magnet (EAHS)	Resident	In District	Out of District	Total
2026-2027	348	115	1	464
2025-2026	332	100	2	434
2024-2025	242	70	2	314
University Program (PHS)	Resident	In District	Out of District	Total
2026-2027	58	20	1	79
2025-2026	67	27	1	95
2024-2025	49	12	2	63
International Baccalaureate (MHS)	Resident	In District	Out of District	Total
2026-2027	167	48	3	218
2025-2026	140	41	5	186
2024-2025	101	40	3	144

In March this agendized presentation included the following information piece which is NOT updated  for inclusion in this item:

There is NO specific financial information provided in this presentation.

There was  information provided in March for staffing to support these programs, which is NOT included in the current presentation information:

EAHS University Center 84 Students, 0.4 FTE TOSA (42 students per section)

MHS International Baccalaureate 361 Students,  0.8 FTE TOSA (90.3 students per section)

PHS Early College Magnet 431 Students,  1.0 FTE TOSA (86.2 students per section)

SRHS Art Quest 363  Students,  0.4 FTE TOSA (181.5 students per section)

Not a Signature/Specialized Program: MCHS Advanced Placement 468 Students, 0.2  FTE TOSA (468   (468  students per section) (The rest of the district has 353 AP Students.) 

How many TOSA FTEs are allocated to these programs this year?

SRTA members want a clear definition of a specialized program and greater transparency in how programs are selected, transfers are approved, and  funding allocated. This presentation leaves so many worthy questions unanswered.

Where is the line between board/district decisions and site decisions? Section allocations directly impact programs, yet there is little transparency around how sections and staffing are determined or revised. 

Are these programs achieving their educational goals? Beyond attendance numbers, what indicators show that students in these programs are achieving better academic, college-readiness, or career outcomes than their peers?

How are we measuring success? What specific metrics or milestones will be used to evaluate whether a specialized program should continue, be expanded, or be phased out? Beyond total enrollment counts, what specific academic, college-readiness, or career outcomes are we using to evaluate if a specialized program is successful?

Why was Maria Carrillo excluded from having a specialized program under AR 5116.1, and how has that lack of a designated program impacted their site?

What is the true cost-per-student to maintain each specialized program when accounting for release time, certifications, program coordinators, and facility upgrades?

At what point does maintaining a low-enrollment specialized program become financially unsustainable or unfair to the general education budget of other sites? And when is it reasonable to allow a low-enrolled class to build a program, or allow students to finish a program?

D. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION (6:00 p.m.)

E. REPORTS (Bargaining Units, Sup, and Board)

F. Public Comment on Non Agenda and Consent Items

SRTA members are invited to complete ‘blue cards’ at the board meeting in order to make public comments. Online comments have been suspended. Comments will often be limited to 60 seconds. Only items NOT on the agenda are addressed at this time, with the exception of consent items.

Comments are requested at the board meeting to bring a member’s perspective and share real experiences of the impact of district policies and practices on students and staff. 

Speakers are limited to just those in person (unless a board member attends online without prior notice.)

Comments are most impactful when they are well spoken, composed and reasonable.

G. CONSENT ITEMS 

All consent items are enacted by the Board in one motion, unless a Board member requests that an item be removed and discussed separately. 

G.1. Approval of Personnel Transactions 

Personnel Transactions

EdJoin shows a total of one hundred twenty-three current postings for two hundred sixty-eight jobs in SRCS. There are thirty-eight certificated opening postings (one less than the last meeting). There are eighty-nine current classified postings for two hundred twenty-seven  job openings (six less than the last meeting.) There are three certificated and no classified management positions posted. 

Welcome to these 11.9 FTE: Angela Barrett (SRHS/MHS), Michel Gasquy  (FACS), Kassandra Morales (JMES), Grace Heffington (HLES), Karla Kringen (PTES) , Paulina Vaclav (MHS), Gabriel Kut  (PTES) , Anthony Ramirez (SRHS), Yasmine Feham (FACS), Aurelie Tasserie (FACS), Severine Mori Baron (FACS), Vanessa Ramirez Garcia (JMES), Alexandra Descano (HLES), Oriana Schlaepfer (ALES), Lance Ohnmeiss (MCHS) and Crystal Chang (PTES).  

Welcome back to Ryan Branche (EAHS), Tina Boaz (Sp Serv) and Tamara Baganz (Sp Serv).

Good bye to the resigning Logan Kaper (MHS.)

Classified has ten new hires, one rehire, and three resignations. 

Please send Patricia Carpenter in Duplicating your appreciation with your next order as she has announced her retirement at the end of December after 23 years of taking care of our requests.

G.3. Approval of Donations and Gifts

Donations (final 2025/26) 

June 4, 2026, through June 30, 2026 = $60,596.39

District-wide donations (Total 25/26 Fiscal Year): July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026 = $560,806.78

Donation Reports 6-30-26

Donations Cash Revenue Summary_2025-26

Donations (Current) 

August 4, 2026, through August 25, 2026 = $247,684.44

District-wide donations (Total 26/27 Fiscal Year): July 1, 2026, through August 25, 2026 = $247,684.44

Donation Reports 8-25-26

Donations Cash Revenue Summary_2026-27

Gratitude goes out to Schools Plus for their substantial donation of $235,000!

G.4. Approval of Contracts

The total cost of contracts is $761,495.80.

Contract Summary

Contracts

#	Provider	Cost	Description
District
2	EMS LINQ, Inc.	$41,289.23	Software for CNS: menu planning, meal counting at school sites, and inventory management.
3	Soliant Health	$542,000.00	speech-language assessments and services until SLPs can be hired (Contract continued from 2022, at $208,000 less than last year)
4	SWING Education Platform	$50,000.00	Aides and certificated teachers for positions the District cannot fill with its own employees or through primary staffing agencies.
6	AVID	$18,050.00	Advancement Via Individual Determination through Writing, Inquiry, Collaboration, Organization, and Reading which are referred to as the WICOR Framework at HLES, EAJ/SHS, MJ/SH for about $4,700 per site plus $4,000 for district
7	GoGuardian	$33,436.57	Maintain online safety for ALES, EAHS, HLEM, HVES, JMES, LBES, PJSHS, PTES, SRACS, SRCSA, SRFACS, SRHS, SRJMS for $5.63 per student.
Secondary
5	IXL	$19,070.00	platform for Math, Science, History and English for secondary Sped Students
Elementary
1	Play Marimba	$57,650.00	48 practice marimbas, 5 full sized marimbas & lessons/resources for up to 240 students in Blitz program

SRTA members are appreciative of these contracts being consistently uploaded with the agenda.

The district would be wise to provide GoGuardian or something similar to all students using chromebooks. Teachers can not simultaneously monitor 30 plus screens at once to ensure safe usage. 

It is concerning that SRCS is hiring another contractor to supply special education aides and teachers. 

G.5. Approval of Contracts – Bond

#	Provider	Site	Description	Cost	Total Cost
Secondary
2	Golden State Electrical	HCMS	Disconnect portable	$10,306	n/a
Charter
1	Golden State Electrical	FACS	Disconnect portable	$7,221	n/a

The total cost of contracts is by measure:

Measure C = $17,527.00

Measure G = $0.00

Total =  $17,527.00

Summary of Contracts

Contracts

G.6. Approval of Resolution No. 2026/27-22 Approving the 2025-26 Appropriations Limitation Recalculation and 2026-27 Estimated Appropriations Limitation Calculation (Gann Limit)

This annual item addresses the 1979 GANN spending limit requirements. SRCS Unaudited Actuals for the 2025-26 fiscal years do not exceed the limitations imposed by Proposition 4.

Resolution

G.7. Approval of Resolution No. 2026/27-23 Authorizing Personnel to Sign Orders on District Funds Accounts

This action updates all district accounts due to personnel changes. All specific accounts with specific signers are enumerated.

Resolution

H. FIRST READ: BOARD BYLAW UPDATES

New/updated CSBA BP language: Red

Previous/current BP language that is changing: Blue

No changes to BP language: Grey

*Mandated Board Policies

SRTA members are overwhelmed with the quantity of board policy included in this agenda. We have just received district notification of policies for the year, without all these changes. If there are any significant changes, this information overload is not an effective way to communicate it to staff for implementation.

H.1. Approval of First Read of Board Bylaws 9100, 9322, 9323

BB 9100 Organization Comparison

BB 9322 Agenda/Meeting Materials Comparison BB 9322 Draft District Added Language

BB 9323 Meeting Conduct Comparison

I. SECOND READ: BOARD POLICY AND BOARD BYLAW UPDATES

I.1. Second Read and Approval of Updated CSBA Board Policies from August 2026

BP 1312.2: Complaints Concerning Instructional Materials Comparison

BP 3471: Parcel Taxes Comparison

BP 4119.1: Civil and Legal Rights Comparison

BP 4219.1: Civil and Legal Rights Comparison

BP 4319.1: Civil and Legal Rights Comparison

BP 5020: Parent Rights and Responsibilities Comparison

BP 6159: Individualized Education Program Comparison

BP 6159.1: Procedural Safeguards and Complaints for Special Education Comparison

BP 6164.4 Identification and Evaluation of Individuals for Special Education* Comparison

BP 4111: Recruitment and Selection Comparison

BP 4211: Recruitment and Selection Comparison

BP 4311: Recruitment and Selection Comparison

BP 5141.4: Child Abuse Prevention and Reporting Comparison

BP 5148.3: Preschool/Early Childhood Education* Comparison

BP 5131.8: Mobile Communication Devices Comparison This updates 8/1/2026 policy. 

BP 0410: Nondiscrimination in District Programs and Activities* Comparison

BP 1312.3: Uniform Complaint Procedures* Comparison

BP 4131: Staff Development Comparison

BP 4231: Staff Development Comparison

BP 4331: Staff Development Comparison

BP 5022: Student and Family Privacy Rights Comparison

BP 5125: Student Records Comparison

BP 5145.3: Nondiscrimination/Harassment* Comparison

BP 6141: Curriculum Development and Evaluation Comparison

BP 6159.2: Nonpublic, Nonsectarian School and Agency Services for Special Education* Comparison

BP 6161.1: Selection and Evaluation of Instructional Materials Comparison

BP 6161.11: Supplementary Instructional Materials Comparison

BP 7214: General Obligation Bonds Comparison

I.2. Second Read and Approval of Updated CSBA Board Bylaws

BB 9240: Board Training Comparison

BB 9220: Governing Board Elections Comparison

I.3. Second Read and Approval of Updated Mandated and Conditionally Mandated CSBA Board Policies

Policy 0430- Comprehensive Local Plan for Special Education Comparison

Policy 3470: Debt Issuance And Management Comparison

Policy 3516: Emergencies And Disaster Preparedness Plan Comparison

Policy 3553: Free And Reduced Price Meals Comparison

Policy 4030: Nondiscrimination In Employment Comparison

Policy 4119.11: Sexual Harassment Comparison

BP 4219.11: Sexual Harassment Comparison

BP 4319.11: Sexual Harassment Comparison

Policy 5131.2: Bullying Comparison

Policy 5145.7: Sexual Harassment Comparison

Policy 6143: Courses Of Study Comparison

Policy 6152.1: Placement In Mathematics Courses Comparison

Policy 6164.41: Children With Disabilities Enrolled By Their Parents In Private School Comparison

Policy 6178: Career Technical Education Comparison

Policy 6179: Supplemental Instruction Comparison

Policy 7150: Site Selection And Development Comparison

Policy 3311: Bids Comparison

J. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEMS

J.1. Business Services Calendar

a. Public Comment on the Business Services Calendar

b. (Action) 2025-26 Unaudited Actuals

SRCS finished 2025–26 in a better financial position than projected, but its ongoing unrestricted resources remain tight and reserves are still below the legally required 3% minimum. The improved balance also relies in part on one-time fiscal actions, so it does not necessarily mean the District has significant new ongoing money available.

• Better-than-expected year-end: General Fund balance increased $3.06M, ending at $18.95M.
• Unrestricted funds improved: Revenue was $1.15M higher and spending $1.42M lower than estimated, increasing the unrestricted balance by $4.82M to $5.59M.
• Restricted funds remain limited: Restricted programs ended with $13.36M, but those funds can only be used for their designated purposes.
• Reserves remain below the legal minimum: Available reserves are 2.37% of expenditures, or $5.83M, which is $1.54M below the required 3%. The Board’s target is 10%.
• Improved result partly reflects one-time actions: The ending balance includes a $1.89M restatement and a $5.4M transfer from Fund 40 to the General Fund as part of the Fiscal Stabilization Plan.
• Certificated salaries accounted for 46.6% and classified salaries for 15.1% of unrestricted spending. Services and operating costs were 15.4%, higher than the statewide comparison.
• Major fund balances: Charter Schools ended with $4.84M, Child Development with $3.62M, Cafeteria with $6.22M, and capital/building funds retain substantial restricted balances.
• The District cautions that the improved year-end result should not be treated as recurring revenue. Enrollment, attendance, staffing, class sizes, sections, special education costs, reserves, and cash flow will continue to require close monitoring.
• The independent auditor will review the results, and the District will use updated financial, enrollment, staffing, and compensation information for the 2026–27 First Interim report.

Presentation

Executive Summary

State Forms

Forms

SRTA members are concerned that the cuts made are significantly impacting students in an unsustainable way. Monitoring the impact of these changes on student enrollment and decline in job satisfaction is necessary. Restructuring systems to be more efficient is an enormous but necessary task. 

c. (Discussion) Fiscal Health & Stabilization Update

The Board will review:

• Fiscal health and progress on identified risks; self report a 23% decline in FHRA Risk score
• Enrollment impacts on funding, staffing, and class sizes; Accurate overall projection 
• Staffing levels, vacancies, and agency staffing; High Initial Need for Agency Staffing & Administrator Support
• Class balancing through schedule adjustments; and
• The costs and impacts of overages ($15 per day per student) versus adding FTE sections. 

These indicators will help the Board assess implementation of the District’s fiscal stabilization plans.

Presentation

SRTA members are ready for an improved process for assigning section allocations to sites. 

This reshuffling of students and staff requires a restart, losing 15 days of instruction. Losing fifteen days of instructional time noticeably shifts student academic achievement, with disadvantaged students experiencing the largest performance differences.

EducationandUrbanSociety.pdf

d. (Action) Approval of 7-11 Committee Recommendation for Phase 1 for Districts Surplus Property

The report recommended that the following four properties be designated as Phase 1 properties and declared surplus to the District’s educational needs: Brook Hill Elementary School, Lewis Early Learning Academy,  Steele Lane Elementary School,  and Santa Rosa French American Charter School/Doyle Park Campus. Housing uses were identified as the priority use and with the objective of maximizing the financial return to the District, and recommended long-term leases (up to ninety-nine (99) years)  without an option to purchase, with the intent of generating ongoing revenue for the District.

Resolution 2026-27-24 Real Property Surplus Declaration and Disposition

Report of the Surplus Facilities Advisory ‘7-11’ Committee

7-11 Surplus Property Advisory Committee Board Presentation

SRTA members appreciate the work of this committee, and are delighted to see that the board may honor the work of a committee by passing their proposal. 

J.2. Human Resources Calendar

a. Public Comment on the Human Resources Calendar

b. (Action) Approval of Certificated Guest Teacher and Classified Substitute Salary Schedule Rates for 2026- 2027 School Year

This proposal is for increasing rates for guest teachers credentialed in Special Education when covering Special Education teaching assignments to the highest rate within the District’s geographic area. The rate for credentialed guest teachers serving in classified Special Education substitute roles will increase from $75 to $100 for a half day and from $150 to $200 for a full day. 

Additionally substitutes will be paid the same if filling a certificated or a classified role. 

26-27 Guest Teacher and Classified Sub Rates (DRAFT 2 Finance Subcommittee Recommendation Pending Board Approval 9-9-26)

26-27 Guest Teacher and Classified Sub Rates (DRAFT 1 Pending Board Approval 9-9-26)

SRTA members acknowledge that a certificated sub with credentials appropriate for an assignment are best for student progress. 

K. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

August 26, 2026 Minutes and Supporting Documents

L. BOARD MEMBER REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION

M. INFORMATION ITEMS

M.1. Future Board Discussion Items

The following are future board update items:

• Updated Board Policy Recommendations from the Board Subcommittee (September 9, 2026)
• Resolution of District for Capacity of Interdistrict Transfers (September 9, 2026 September 23, 2026)
• Public Hearing and Action for Elementary and Secondary Sufficiency of Textbook or Instructional Materials (September 23, 2026)
• West County Transportation Agency Update (September 23, 2026)

SRTA looks to the future scheduling of the following items:

Savings from  closures and mergers vs projections.

Own SELPA projection at first interim  (October)

FCMAT follow up report at first interim (October)

Review of Graduation Committee Pathway Options (October)

Prop 28 plan for the year (26-27) with details by site

Medina- AP instruction data with number of years of experience of Teachers

-Clarification about board policy adoption requiring a majority of board membership versus a majority of those present/voting

– consider E-sports clubs or teams 

Caston- Site funding finance report with various amounts and sources

-update 3510 policy around reducing waste as a discussion item

– Communication plan. 

Prak – Info about a non voting teacher on the board. 

Kirby – add an assistant wrestling coach for women? 

– Copies of the panorama and youth truth survey questions. 

DeLaTorre- Info on how we identify College and Career readiness.

 Agendize MCHS and RVMS plan. Part of review of implementation of 7-12.

Jenkins – marketing plan update as committed to last year.

• SRCS Sunshine Openers for SRTA (Sept 9, 2026)
• Approval of Joint Use MOU’s for School Site Facility Use (pulled from June 22 agenda)
• Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) Update (Dec 2025)
• Panorama and Youth Truth Survey Data (August 2025)
• Plan and timeline for implementation of Dr. Gillespie’s recommendations around Special Services (January 2025), Requesting of New FCMAT Study on SRCS SpEd Program
• First Draft of the District Safety Plan (delayed from September 2024)
• Sharing the Library Master Plan with implementation expectations and timeline
• Officially Closing Learning House, Herbert Slater Middle School, Santa Rosa Middle School, Brookhill Elementary, Biella Elementary, Steele Lane, and Herbert Comstock Middle School. 
• Plan for Staff Housing support program from the proceeds of Fir Ridge

Until the district makes a decision, the proceeds from the sale of the Fir Ridge property are just sitting and losing value as the cost of housing continues to rise. Getting a program started could help SRCS attract and retain CSEA staff. The potential impact of the funds continues to diminish as time passes.

• Student Voice Policy
• Long standing request for site budgets including all sources as well as enrollment and unduplicated numbers.

N. Adjournment

REGULAR BOARD MEETING

Santa Rosa City Schools

August 12, 2026

Hybrid: Santa Rosa City Hall Council Chambers

4:00 p.m. – Closed Session

5:00 p.m. – Study Session

6:30 p.m. – Open Session

Hybrid: Zoom / Santa Rosa City Hall

*** streamed ***

Video Board Meetings through a link on this district webpage. (It is often changed right before the meeting.)

Please take time to review the following abbreviated version of the agenda. Click here to see the entire agenda. It has live links on many items with more information. If you want to comment to the board about any upcoming items, email agendacomments@srcs.k12.ca.us. Please CC wearesrta@gmail.com on your email.

Members attending online are encouraged to add SRTA to the front of their Zoom client name.

Closed Session Items: 

A.1. Public Comment On Closed Session Agenda Items To comment, email Melanie Martin at mmartinsrcs.k12.ca.us.

This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak to the board on Closed Session items only. 

Without specifics on closed session agenda items, it is impossible for the public to know when to provide insights for items being reviewed.

B.1.  Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release 

B.2. Conference With Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation (Number of potential cases: 1) 

B.3. Student Readmissions (Case Nos: 2025/26-01, 2025/26-04, 2025/26-06, 2025/26-16 ) 

B.4. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Title of employee being reviewed: Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent, Principals, Vice Principals, Assistant Principals, Directors, Coordinators) 

In response to a board inquiry, there was expectation of a robust communication campaign to prepare students and families for the new expectations around student phones on campus. There was only one parent square that went home about a week ago.  

C. STUDY SESSION: (5:00 p.m.)

C. RECONVENE TO OPEN STUDY SESSION (5:00 P.M.)

Public Comments are expected to be allowed on the Study Session Calendar

Parents were frustrated at being unaware that enrollment in “regular” courses were not college prep, and their students didn’t qualify to go straight to a four year college.  In response, SRCS went A-G for all. Now, it would be fair for parents to be just as upset that their students are graduating in this new system and don’t qualify to go straight to a four year college. There was a communication problem that was not mended. Unless students have a C or better average, they do not qualify to go straight to a four year school.

C.1. (Discussion) Current Graduation Requirement and Updates

Staff continues to work toward a formal recommendation that will:

1. Maintain high academic standards and readiness expectations.
2. Incorporate feedback from teachers and instructional leaders regarding course sequencing, student workload, and instructional capacity.
3. Identify policy adjustments and support structures necessary to improve access, persistence, and graduation outcomes for all students.

Summary of  Major Perceptions from the HS Graduation Requirement Committee 

• Teacher Training: Teachers need more training and ongoing professional development to effectively support students in higher-level A–G courses.
• Tracking and Course Changes: The district did not view its course structure as tracking, but the rapid elimination of regular/survey and RSP classes removed important supports without a transition plan, leaving students and teachers in a difficult position.
• Student Preparation and Support: Students need stronger academic preparation beginning in elementary school to be successful in A–G coursework.
• Student Concerns: Some students have given up because they do not see a clear path to graduation or college readiness. The district has not adequately tracked students who successfully moved from non-A–G courses into A–G pathways or recognized those successes.
• Lack of Effective Off-Ramps and On-Ramps: Promised alternatives for students struggling with A–G requirements were not consistently provided. Waivers and alternative pathways often require students to fail first, rather than providing meaningful alternatives. Students also need clear “on-ramps” to return to the A–G pathway.
• Lessons for Future Changes: Major instructional and curricular changes need a better implementation process, including:
  • Meaningful opportunities for teachers and staff to review and process changes.
  • Genuine consideration of staff concerns and feedback.
  • Ongoing, relevant professional development.
  • A clear transition plan that anticipates how changes will affect students and educators.

Overall: The committee identified a central lesson: raising A–G expectations without providing adequate preparation, supports, pathways, and professional development can create barriers rather than increase student success.

Graduation Pathways

Graduation Requirements
	UC/CSU Entrance	State of California	Santa Rosa City Schools	Santa Rosa City Schools	Santa Rosa City Schools	Santa Rosa City Schools	Santa Rosa City Schools
Name	A-G Requirements	Diploma Requirements	A-G for All	220 Alternative	180 Alternative	130 Alternative	Industry Concentration/CTE
Number Credits	220 Credits	130 Credits	220 Credits	220 Credits	180 Credits	130 Credits	220 Credits
Stipulations	with grade of C or Better	D or Better	D or Better	D or Better	D or Better	D or Better	D or Better
Who can do this?	All Students	All Students	All Students	RHS/Grace @ PHS	RHS	Sped, Homeless or Foster Youth	???
Requirements	Requirements	Requirements	Requirements	Requirements	Requirements	Requirements	Requirements
A: Social Studies	2 years	3 years	3 years	3 years	3 years	3 years	3 years
B: English	4 years	3 years	4 years	4 years	4 years	3 years	4 years
C: Mathematics	3 years, Math 1-3, rec 4	2 years, Math 1	3 years, Math 1 and beyond	2 years, Math 1 and beyond	2 years	2 years, Math 1	2 years, Math 1 and beyond
D: Science	2 years, rec 3	2 years	2 years	2 years	2 years	2 years	2 years
E: World Language (Foreign Language)	2 years, rec 3	1 year WOLA, VAPA or CTE	2 years	1 year WOLA, VAPA or CTE	1 year WOLA, VAPA or CTE	1 year WOLA, VAPA or CTE	1 year
F: Visual & Performing Arts (VAPA)	1 year		1 year				1 year
Physical Education	none required	2 years	2 years	2 years	2 years	2 years	2 years
G: Electives	1 year	none required	5 years	8 years	4 years	none required	2 years CTE including capstone and 5 years electives

SRCS 2026 Graduate Data
Site	Number of Graduates	Grad Rate	A-G Diploma	Math Waiver	No F’s	Average Sem Repeat
EAHS	230	91.30%	77.0%	11.7%	36.30%	9.6
MCHS	393	97%	87.3%	8.1%	70.40%	4.2
MHS	297	94.90%	85.2%	12.8%	68.90%	4.1
PHS	347	98%	74.1%	11.2%	56.90%	6.9
SRHS	371	95.40%	57.4%	29.6%	66.20%	5.3
RHS	120	80%	80.0%	0.8%	10.80%	17.2
SRCS Total	1758	94%	76%	14.0%	58.10%	6.5

A-G Graduation Requirements Study Session Presentation

Sonoma County Graduation Requirements Review

Sonoma County Math Requirements Review

SRTA Member Survey A-G Summary (Mar 2026)

SRTA Graduation Requirements Resolution, Adopted Dec 5, 2023

Graduation Requirement Committee

SRTA supports a thoughtful review of graduation requirements and welcomed the Board’s direction to conduct a collaborative process that meaningfully includes educators. We are therefore deeply concerned that the District Office appears to have reached its conclusion before that process has occurred. The agenda states that differences between sites suggest “site- and department-specific instructional and support needs, rather than a need for changes to the district-level graduation policy itself,” and identifies DO’s emerging recommendation as maintaining current requirements.

This is not a recommendation of the Graduation Requirements Committee. The committee has met only once, has not completed its analysis, and much of the data members have asked to examine is absent from this presentation. Instead of neutrally presenting the questions still to be answered, the presentation appears structured to support DO’s already emerging recommendation.

The data presented raise important questions, but they do not establish that graduation policy is not contributing to student outcomes. A 94% graduation rate alone does not tell us how many students graduate fully A-G eligible, why students require waivers, what prevented non-graduates from earning diplomas, or how outcomes differ for students with disabilities, multilingual learners, dually identified students and other subgroups. Other districts are asking these same questions and reconsidering one-size-fits-all approaches. San Diego Unified—long viewed by SRCS as a model for A-G for All—recently adopted an alternative graduation sequence for qualifying students while maintaining rigorous college- and career-readiness expectations. SRCS should allow its own committee to fully examine the evidence and alternatives before declaring that policy change is unnecessary.

SRTA is particularly troubled by the proposal to “rework” the existing committee into a working group focused on implementing DO initiatives. Educators have been asked time and again to serve on committees, invest their time and expertise, and trust collaborative processes, only to see their recommendations disregarded or decisions made elsewhere. The current committee was mutually selected by SRTA and District Admin specifically to complete the review requested by the Board. At the same time SRCS is asking educators to trust and participate in the educator-led CAPS process, it cannot unilaterally substitute a District Office recommendation for the collaborative work the Board explicitly requested. Trust requires that the existing committee be allowed to complete its charge and make its own recommendations before its membership, purpose, or work is changed.

Finally, SRTA rejects the false choice between high expectations and multiple pathways. SRCS raised graduation expectations while reducing many of the supports students need to reach them, including intervention, smaller class sizes, and other systems of support; we still do not have a comprehensive MTSS system. If universal A-G readiness is the goal, that investment must begin in elementary school—not after students arrive in high school already years behind. At the same time, we must support the students sitting in our classrooms today and broaden our definition of success. College, community college, CTE, apprenticeships, skilled trades and the workforce are all valuable outcomes. 

D. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION (6:30 p.m.)

D.7. Student Board Members Loyalty Oath of Office

Welcome to Zaira Alvarado, a senior at Montgomery High School, and Mallix Way,  a senior at Piner High School .

E. REPORTS (Bargaining Units, Sup, and Board)

F. Public Comment on Non Agenda and Consent Items

SRTA members are invited to complete ‘blue cards’ at the board meeting in order to make public comments. Online comments have been suspended. Comments will be limited to 60 seconds. Only items NOT on the agenda are addressed at this time, with the exception of consent items (See section G.)

Comments are requested at the board meeting to bring a member’s perspective and share real experiences of the impact of district policies and practices on students and staff. 

Speakers are limited to just those in person (unless a board member attends online without prior notice.)

Comments are most impactful when they are well spoken, composed and reasonable.

G. CONSENT ITEMS 

All consent items are enacted by the Board in one motion, unless a Board member requests that an item be removed and discussed separately. 

G.2. Approval of Personnel Transactions 

Personnel Transactions 

EdJoin shows a total of ninety-eight current postings for two hundred forty-six jobs in SRCS. There are thirty-six certificated opening postings (fifteen more than the last meeting). There are sixty-one current classified postings for two hundred seven job openings (twenty-nine more than the last meeting.) There are three certificated and no classified management positions posted. 

Certificated changes include the reinstatement of Adam Derum (SRHS), Lara Costanzo (EDSERV), 

Jessica Fruiht (ELAL), Ketsia Cabaz Raufaste (FACS), Julie Montgomery (MHS), Jennifer Evans (HVES), and Andrew Ravani (SRCSA). Welcome back to Theresa Batchelder (MHS). There are seven resignations as Carolyn Smith (CCLA), Deborah Kantor (ALES), Aileen Cormack (HSMS), Carolyn Smith (CCLA) , Jereme Anglin (SRHS), Jason Pedri (SRHS) and Audrey Mosquera (ALES) leave after a combined sixty-nine years of services to our students. We bid a fond farewell to the retiring Tracy Hahn (MHS) and Colette Scafani (FACS). We wish you all the best in your future endeavors. 

This brings this year’s certificated resignation totals to seventy-eight folks who amazingly gave over three-hundred eighty-five  years of service to the students and families of SRCS before they resigned. The gap they leave will be noticed.

A total of thirty-three certificated folks amazingly gave over seven hundred thirty-three years of service to the students and families of SRCS as they retired this year. 

Changes to classified staff includes ten hires, eight resignations and four retirements. They leave taking with them nearly ninety-three years of knowledge and service to our staff and students. You will be missed!

SRCS bids a fond farewell to Tamra Oser who is retiring from HR after thirty-four years. Her knowledge and kindness were deeply appreciated. 

SRTA members are especially distraught witnessing talented staff choosing to leave SRCS for better working conditions. 

There is one supervisory retirement and one resignation after twenty-two and a half years with SRCS.

G.5. Approval of Contracts

The total cost of contracts is $2,983,427.70.

Contract Summary

Contracts

#	Provider	Cost	Description
District
1	California School Board Association (CSBA)	$26,760.00	Dues and Educational Legal Alliance (ELA)
2	California School Board Association (CSBA) / GAMUT Online	$18,475.00	Manual Maintenance Plus and GAMUT Platform
5	Integrated Security Controls	$50,000.00	Cameras Maintenance
6	Pitney Bowes	$22,171.20	5 year Lease of a postage meter/mailing system
8	LunchAssist	$25,000.00	professional services for CNS Admin Review
10	Amplify	$33,563.00	Platform for Dibels K—8 reading skill assessment
11	Amergis	$2,000,000.00	behavior technicians, SLP aides, health aides and other support staff as needed
12	Pearson Clinical Assessments	$59,017.70	platform for diagnosing, treating, and monitoring psychological, behavioral, and development conditions
Elementary
9	All City Management Services	$662,734.80	Crossing guard services, at an increase of $83,000 for 3.5 hours of daily service to 28 sites, prior contract was for 25 sites, with decrease to campuses.
Secondary
7	Magnolia Global Academy for Leaders, DBA Magnolia Project	$39,000.00	PD and secure 3-day industry mentorships for Career Exploration Program phases all MS students and 30 RHS students
Charter
3	Joe Culpepper	$20,808.00	Magic and Juggling in French
4	NatureBridge	$25,898.00	SRACS Outdoor Ed

SRTA has questions about two contracts. All City Management Services are increasing the number of sites for crossing guards while SRCS is decreasing the number of campuses.

At the June 24 board meeting, the $4,200,000 contract for Sunburst Workforce was presented as an MSP for managing contract vendors who provide staff to districts for unfilled positions, including instructional aides, Speech Language Pathologists, Occupational Therapists, and Behaviorists. The Amergis contract for $2,000,000 seems like a contract that would be under Sunburst.  Will Sunburst subcontract to 360, Emerald, and Inspire?

G.6. Approval of Contracts – Bond

#	Provider	Site	Description	Cost	Total Cost
Secondary
2	Quattrocchi Kwok Architects	PHS	Additional Design for AV in theater	$8,250	$1,300,000
9	Ghilotti Construction Company	MHS	Reconnect Water Supply	$16,000	$16,000
District
1	Arkance	–	Software Subscription	$660	$660
3	Integrated Security Controls	DO	Remove Cameras	$290	$78,000,000
8	PBK	DO	CNS Kettle Replacement design services	$255,250	$2,000,000
Elementary
4	Crawford & Associates, Inc.	HLES	Amendment for testing and observation due to soil conditions	$25,000	$18,000,000
5	Integrated Security Controls	JMES	Remove Cameras	$290	$14,500,000
6	Crawford & Associates, Inc.	JMES	Amendment for testing and observation due to soil conditions	$25,000	$14,500,000
7	F & G Design/Drafting Services	ALES	Inspection Services for fencing	$13,500	$110,000

The total cost of contracts by measure:

Measure C = $218,962.00

Measure G = $125,278.00

Total =  $344,240.00

Summary of Contracts

Contracts

SRTA members wonder why special CNS funding  isn’t covering the kettle replacement. 

G.7. Approval of the CNS School Nutrition Program Micro-Purchase Self-Certification

Program operators may now self-certify for a micro-purchase threshold, up to $50,000, on an annual basis.

Self-Certification

G.8. Approval of the Use of Piggyback Bids/Contracts (CMAS, NASPO, Co-Ops) for the 2026-27 School Year

Authorizes staff to use available pre-negotiated contracts for the procurement of eligible items to save cost and time.

Amendment

G.9. Notice and Approval of the Removal/Recycling of Unusable, Outdated, and/or Damaged Instructional Materials and Textbooks

Materials List Catalog of library/textbook items by site.

G.10. Approval of Resolution 2026/27-12 for the Declaration of Obsolete Items/Equipment and Authorization to Sell, Dispose, and/or Donate

Resolution

Materials List  Seven vehicles from SRHS Auto program

G.11. Approval of Correction to the Amendment of the Left Coast Scanning Proposal

2/28/24  Board approved contract for  $540,998

12/17/25 Board approved contract for $21,980 for Invoice #12340

6/27/26 Board approved amendment for an additional $11,270.

Two previously incurred invoices totaling $22,663.49 were inadvertently omitted from the amendment request.

Total Revised Not-to-Exceed Amount: $49,518.49 including  $563 in late charges.

Document Imaging Proposal 2026

SRCS Past Due & Fees Total

Invoice 12424

Invoice 12425

SRTA appreciates the caution of accounts payable to ensure  expenses are approved by existing contracts. 

G.12. Approval of School District Nomination to the Sonoma County School Attendance Review Board (SARB)

Nomination of Stacy Desideri, Executive Director, Wellness and Engagement.

Nomination

H. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEMS

1. Finance Calendar

a. Public Comment on the Finance Calendar

b. (Action) Approval of 2026-27 45 Day Budget Update 

The unaudited actuals report is due by September 15th, and actual student enrollments for 2026–27 will be known after school has opened, and the staffing assignments are completed. The next current fiscal year financial report, the 2026-27 First Interim  in December will take all of this into consideration.

Summary:

• SRCS’s projected unrestricted reserve improves significantly, from $8.65 million (3.65%) at budget adoption to approximately $14.0 million (5.88%) after the 45-day adjustments.
• The largest positive changes are:
  • $2.44 million increase from the 1.44% LCFF add-on.
  • $4.6 million increase from the Special Education base funding rate.
• The report estimates SRCS’s theoretical share of the $3.9 billion Proposition 98 settle-up at $7.2–$7.5 million, but this money is not budgeted because the state is delaying allocation.

Significant New/Restored Funding

• $10.43 million Student Support & Professional Development Discretionary Block Grant — one-time funding.
• $1.36 million restored Learning Recovery Emergency Block Grant funding.
• $3.21 million annually in ongoing Community Schools funding, with SRCS sites receiving approximately $3.095 million based on eligibility.
• $450,000 for Abraham Lincoln Elementary for literacy coaches/reading specialists.
• $45,224 for K–2 reading-difficulties screening.

The report strongly emphasizes that one-time funds should not be used to create permanent expenses. The $10.43 million professional development/student support grant is one-time, while the LCFF and Special Education increases are ongoing.

Several expenditures reduce the benefit of the additional revenue:

• Paid pregnancy disability leave: approximately $428,750 in 2026–27, rising to $857,500 annually in future years. There is ample additional income from the state to cover this.
• CSEA layoff MOU: $178,036.
• SRTA MOU/TA: $428,319.
• Reinstated calendar work days for admin: $135,000.
• Special Services restructure/SELPA preparation: $250,000.
• Board stipend increase $122,973
• Other board/bylaw and technology-related costs also add expenditures.

Despite the improved reserve, SRCS continues to have a significant cash-flow problem.

In 2025–26, Fund 01 cash fell to approximately: -$7.23 million in August, -$20.05 million in September, -$25.34 million in October and -$38.71 million in November.

Property-tax payments in December and April temporarily restored cash.

The report estimates that SRCS would have needed approximately $38.7 million of additional liquidity to avoid going negative under the same cash-flow pattern. Even a 10% reserve would not have been enough to cover that cash trough.

The 45-day update is financially more positive than the adopted budget, but it does not mean SRCS suddenly has $14 million available to spend.

The improved reserve reflects several new revenue sources, but:

• some money is restricted;
• much of the new funding is one-time;
• ongoing costs are increasing even though there have been no improvements to staff salaries.
• declining enrollment remains a concern; and
• The District still faces a substantial cash-flow/liquidity problem.

The report itself recommends monthly cash forecasting and cautions that reserve percentage alone does not demonstrate that sufficient cash will be available throughout the year. Lines of credit with the county will need to be utilized. 

Bottom Line

SRCS enters 2026–27 in a stronger budget position than anticipated, with roughly $5.4 million more projected unrestricted reserves. However, much of the new funding is restricted or one-time, while the District continues to face structural cost pressures, declining enrollment, and a significant cash-flow gap.

The next major checkpoint will be the December 2026 First Interim Report, which will incorporate actual enrollment, staffing, and updated financial data.

Presentation

Executive Financial Report

How do other districts manage their cashflow without loans? 

What is the progress on  FCMAT recommendations? 

How much have closures and consolidation actually saved the district? How can we move forward without knowing the financial impact of these moves?

SRTA is concerned the cuts being implemented this year will harm students. There is a need to restructure budgeting by priorities. Dedicated staff can not remain employed in the district without increases to compensation as the cost of living continues to increase dramatically. 

2. Educational Services Calendar

a. Public Comment on the Student Services Calendar

b. (Discussion) Comprehensive School Site Safety Plans 

Review of the development of the annual Comprehensive Site Safety Plans and the annual work timeline for schools in the Santa Rosa City School District.  Each  School Site Council or Safety Committee’s responsibilities include:

• Approving the plan
• Recommending it to the local governing board for approval
• Monitoring its implementation, and
• Evaluating the effectiveness of the planned activities at least annually.

Q 1: July, August, September ● Update Incident Command ● Build Safety Committee ● Identify Article 8 representatives ● Schedule Safety Drills ● Train Staff, Students, Parents and Community

Q 2: October, November December ● Analyze safety data ○ Panorama ○ Youth Truth ○ Discipline ● Review Metrics from prior year with teams ○ ELAC ○ School Site Council ○ Safety Committee ● Identify new goals and Metrics

Quarter 3: January, February, March  ● Collaborate and Revise ● Add new goals ● Revise in Document Tracking System ● Share Updates with Site Teams ○ ELAC ○ School Site Council ○ Safety Committee ● Share revised with SRFD and SRPD ● Bring for Board Approval in Early March

Quarter 4: April, May, June ● Update Incident Command ● Train Staff, Students, Parents and Community

Site Safety plans must be accessible to the public upon request (*tactical responses shall be kept confidential)

The First Draft of the District Safety Plan was pulled from the September 2024 board agenda. It still has not been shared at a board meeting.

Presentation

SRCS/SRTA Contract Article 8 Safety (Summarized at the end.)

The contract specifies a District Safety Committee that includes teacher representatives appointed by the Association.

The committee helps develop and review major safety plans, including:

• Comprehensive School Safety Plans (CSSP)
• Injury and Illness Prevention Program (IIPP)
• Emergency Operations Plan (EOP)
• Workplace Violence Prevention Plan (WVPP)

The committee meets at least six times per year and analyzes safety data.

SRTA members will be glad to see a plan for sites to attack their safety plans. The district Safety Committee and District Admin provide much of the specified content for site plans. Site Councils need support by being provided the data they are to review and suggestions for changing the plan when the data calls for it. 

The District Safety Committee has not been effectively utilized to develop and review major plans. SRTA negotiated in good faith for this committee. 

c. (Discussion) Career Technical Education (CTE) Update

Presentation on CTE pathways designed to meet regional workforce needs while providing students with engaging, relevant learning experiences that support college, career, and lifelong success. 

CTE participation consistently hovers around 23% of SRCS high school students. The rate of completers, students finishing a two year pathway or a capstone consistently hovers around 4% of CTE students.

CTE Update Presentation 8.12.26

MCHS CTE Brochure

PHS CTE Brochure

SRHS CTE Brochure

EAHS CTE Brochure

MHS CTE Brochure

12 Elements of a High-Quality Program

Description of Work-Based Learning Experiences

SRTA appreciates the efforts of our CTE staff.  The data is very thin on this item. There is no transparency with reductions to CTE staffing and sections due to the significant cuts to sites. The new brochures are noteworthy. How are CTE programs being messaged to students and families? What is the plan to increase Work-Based Learning Experiences for students?

d. (Action) Approval of Agricultural Career Technical Education Incentive Grants

Santa Rosa City Schools is applying for $49,716 in grant funding for the Elsie Allen and Santa Rosa High School Agriculture programs. There is a 1:1 matching funds requirement.

2026-27 Elsie Allen High School Agricultural CTE Incentive Grant Application $16,715

2026-27 Santa Rosa High School Agricultural CTE Incentive Grant Application $33,001

e. (Discussion / Action) Update on Current Prop 28 and Approval of the Annual Report 

For LEAs with an enrollment of 500 or more students, 80 percent of the funds are to be expended to employ certificated or classified staff to provide instruction, and the remaining 20 percent of funds are to be expended on training, supplies and materials, and educational partner programs. No more than 1 percent of the LEA’s allocation can be used for administrative costs, including indirect costs.This item is to meet the annual compliance audit.

Allocations must be used for additional or new arts programs and may not be used to supplant existing staff funding.  Funds may be pooled between sites.

Although only programmatic information is required in this annual report, annually, beginning in October 2026, the current year plan with fiscal information will be presented.

Prop 28 25-26 School Year Elementary

• Number of full-time equivalent teachers (certificated). .5 :  Abraham Lincoln Elementary – .5 FTE certificated 
• Number of full-time equivalent personnel (classified). 2.5 : Proctor Terrace Elementary – .75 FTEclassified personnel,  Helen Lehman Elementary – .75 FTEclassified personnel, Steele Lane Elementary – 1.0 FTE classified personnel 4. 
• Number of full-time equivalent teaching aides: 0 5. 
• Number of students served: 2,606
• Number of school sites providing arts education: 6

Prop 28 25-26 School year Secondary

• Number of full-time equivalent teachers (certificated) providing arts education programs with AMS funds 5.68 FTE 
• Number of full-time equivalent personnel (classified) providing arts education programs with AMS funds . 75 
• Number of full-time equivalent teaching aides providing arts education programs with AMS funds . 75 
• Number of students served with AMS funds 787 
• Number of school sites providing arts education programs with AMS funds 10

SRTA members are unclear on the decision making process for these funds on each site. This report is not transparent as to how each secondary site is utilizing this funding. 

3. Charter School Calendar

a. Public Comment on the Charter School Calendar

b.- e. (Discussion / Action) Update on Current Prop 28 and Approval of the Annual Reports

CCLA Prop 28 One 0.4 FTE certificated teacher is serving 47 students.

SRACS Prop 28 One 0.2 FTE certificated teacher is serving 128 students.

SRCAS Prop 28 Number of full-time equivalent personnel (classified) providing arts education programs with AMS funds .8125 FTE serving 300 TK -5 students. 

SRFACS Prop 28 ne 0.4 FTE certificated teacher is serving 92 students.

4. Human Resources Calendar

a. Public Comment on the Human Resources Calendar

b.-e. (Action) Approval of Provisional Internship Permit Application (PIP)

This is an annual process for new hires that are not fully qualified for the positions they have been placed in. The applicants must agree to complete course work to qualify for an intern program next year. PIP’s are not renewable and are issued on a one-time basis per applicant in any credential subject area. 

Angelica Montalvan TK Elementary Teacher position at Cesar Chavez Language Academy (1.00 FTE)

Vanessa Ramirez Garcia SDC- ESN Teacher position at James Monroe Elementary (1.00 FTE) 

Gabriella Alvarez ESN Teacher position at  Early Learning Academy (1.00 FTE) 

Briana Seely-Clark Mild/Mod Teacher position at Santa Rosa Jr./Sr. High School (1.00 FTE)

f.-i. The following items are all rescinding the salary reductions made last year.

• Amendment to Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources Employment Contract Total Cost  $1,150.49
• Oral Recommendation and Amendment Regarding Associate Superintendent (CBO) Salary and Fringe Benefits Total Cost $1,449.41 
• Approval of Revised Job Description for Executive Director of SELPA and Special Services Total Cost $1,845  (This is 2 days as opposed to the others that are restoring 1 day)
• Approval of Revised Director of Human Resources Job Description Total Cost $1,510 

5. Business Services Calendar

a. Public Comment on the Business Services Calendar

b. (Action) Approval of Santa Rosa Elementary School District Resolution 2026/27-15 Authorizing The Issuance And Sale Of General Obligation Bonds, 2022 Election, 2026 Series C, In An Aggregate Principal Amount Not To Exceed $15,000,000 And Approving Related Documents And Actions

Resolution

POS

Agreement 

c. (Action) Approval of City of Santa Rosa High School District Resolution No. 2026/27-16 Authorizing The Issuance And Sale Of General Obligation Bonds, 2022 Election, 2026 Series C, In An Aggregate Principal Amount Not To Exceed $50,000,000 And Approving Related Documents And Actions

Resolution

POS

Agreement 

I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

June 24, 2026 Minutes and Supporting Documents

July 22, 2026 Minutes and Resolution

J. BOARD MEMBER REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION

K. INFORMATION ITEMS

K.1. Future Board Discussion Items

The following are future board update items:

• Resolutions for first semester
  • Resolution for Suicide Prevention Month (August 26, 2026)
  • Resolution Sept Attendance Month (August 26, 2026)
  • Resolution Recognizing October as LGBTQIA+ History Month (August 26, 2026)
  • Approval of Resolution to Recognize September 15 to October 15 as Latinx Heritage Month (August 26, 2026)
  • Resolution Proclaiming October 12, 2026, as Indigenous People’s Day (August 26, 2026)
  • Resolution Recognizing the School Administrator (August 26, 2026)
  • Resolution Recognizing Ruby Bridges (August 26, 2026)
  • Resolution Proclaiming October as Filipino American History Month (August 26, 2026)
  • Resolution: October as Coaches Appreciation Month (August 26, 2026)
  • Resolution Proclaiming the Week of School Psychologist (August 26, 2026)
  • Resolution of Italian Heritage Month (August 26, 2026)
• Approval of 2025/26 Unaudited Actuals (September 9, 2026)
• Resolution for District for Capacity of Interdistrict Transfers 

SRTA looks to the future scheduling of the following items:

Plan for pivoting from A-G for all. 

Medina- AP instruction data with number of years of experience of Teachers

-Clarification about board policy adoption requiring a majority of board membership versus a majority of those present/voting

– consider E-sports clubs or teams 

Caston- Site funding finance report with various amounts and sources

-update 3510 policy around reducing waste as a discussion item

– Communication plan. 

Prak – Info about a non voting teacher on the board. 

Kirby – add an assistant wrestling coach for women? 

– Copies of the panorama and youth truth surveys. 

DeLaTorre- facility fee, possible reductions?

– Info on how we identify College and Career readiness.

Jenkins — projected enrollment for next year. 

– marketing plan update as committed to last year.

• Approval of Joint Use MOU’s for School Site Facility Use (pulled from June 22 agenda)
• Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) Update (Dec 2025)
• Panorama and Youth Truth Survey Data (August 2025)
• Restorative Practices Data (March 2025)
• Plan and timeline for implementation of Dr. Gillespie’s recommendations around Special Services (January 2025), Requesting New FCMAT Study on SRCS SpEd Program
• First Draft of the District Safety Plan (delayed from September 2024)
• Sharing the Library Master Plan with implementation expectations
• Officially Closing Learning House, Herbert Slater Middle School, Santa Rosa Middle School, Brookhill Elementary, Biella Elementary, Steele Lane, and Herbert Comstock Middle School. 
• Plan for Staff Housing support program from the proceeds of Fir Ridge

Until the district makes a decision, the proceeds from the sale of the Fir Ridge property are just sitting and losing value as the cost of housing continues to rise. Getting a program started could help SRCS attract and retain CSEA staff. The potential impact of the funds continues to diminish as time passes.

• Student Voice Policy
• Long standing request for site budgets including all sources as well as enrollment and unduplicated numbers.

K.3. Board Subcommittee Meeting Dates

Board Policy Subcommittee Meeting Dates:

• Wednesday  September 2, 2026 (5:00-7:00)

Board Finance Subcommittee Meeting Dates:

• Tuesday September 1, 2026 (3:30-5:30)
• Monday October 5, 2026 (3:30-5:30) Tentative 
• Monday November 2, 2026 (3:30-5:30) Tentative 

Board Facilities Subcommittee Meeting Dates (not subject to the Brown Act): 

• Tuesday August 25, 2026 (3:00-4:30)

SRTA members are appreciative of this transparency.

K.4. 2026/27 Regular and Special Board Meeting Schedule

Wed. August 26: Study Session TBD and Regular Board Meeting

Wed. Sept. 9: Study Session ISP and Signature Programs and Regular Board Meeting

Wed. Sept 23: Regular Board Meeting

Friday Sept. 25: All Day Planning- Strategic Goal Setting  (SRCS Training Center) 

Calendar

K.5. Williams Settlement Quarterly Report

Report 1 facility complaint was received and resolved

The report attached to the agenda is incomplete. It is missing the required complaint details and response. “Copies of the complaint and the district’s written response will be submitted along with this report.”

L. Adjournment

REGULAR BOARD MEETING

Santa Rosa City Schools

August 26, 2026

Hybrid: Santa Rosa City Hall Council Chambers

4:00 p.m. – Closed Session

7:00 p.m. – Open Session This meeting is scheduled to begin an hour later than normal.

??  p.m. – Closed Session (Again)

Hybrid: Zoom / Santa Rosa City Hall

*** streamed ***

Video Board Meetings through a link on this district webpage. (It is often changed right before the meeting.)

Please take time to review the following abbreviated version of the agenda. Click here to see the entire agenda. It has live links on many items with more information. If you want to comment to the board about any upcoming items, email agendacomments@srcs.k12.ca.us. Please CC wearesrta@gmail.com on your email.

Members attending online are encouraged to add SRTA to the front of their Zoom client name.

Closed Session Items: 

A.1. Public Comment On Closed Session Agenda Items To comment, email Melanie Martin at mmartinsrcs.k12.ca.us.

This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak to the board on Closed Session items only. 

B.1.  Conference With Labor Negotiator Name of designated rep attending: Dr. Vicki Zands (SRCS); name of organizations: Santa Rosa Teachers Association, CSEA Santa Rosa 75, Teamsters Union 665  

SRTA members are hopeful that the Board will establish parameters for negotiations that prioritize improvements to working conditions and fair compensation—essential to attracting and retaining the highly qualified staff needed to serve our students. Maintaining a 10% reserve has little value if the District fails to invest in the facilities, programs, and staff necessary to encourage enrollment and strengthen community confidence. SRCS must balance fiscal responsibility with meaningful investment in the people and structures that support student success.

C. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION (7:00 P.M.)

D. REPORTS (Bargaining Units, Sup, and Board)

E. Public Comment on Non Agenda and Consent Items

SRTA members are invited to complete ‘blue cards’ at the board meeting in order to make public comments. Online comments have been suspended. Comments will be limited to 60 seconds. Only items NOT on the agenda are addressed at this time, with the exception of consent items (See section G.)

Comments are requested at the board meeting to bring a member’s perspective and share real experiences of the impact of district policies and practices on students and staff. 

Speakers are limited to just those in person (unless a board member attends online without prior notice.)

Comments are most impactful when they are well spoken, composed and reasonable.

F. CONSENT ITEMS 

All consent items are enacted by the Board in one motion, unless a Board member requests that an item be removed and discussed separately. 

F.1. Approval of Personnel Transactions 

Personnel Transactions NOT ATTACHED 

“The attachment will be included before the 8/26/26 Board meeting.”

EdJoin shows a total of 84 current postings for two hundred sixty-five jobs in SRCS. There are thirty-nine certificated opening postings (six more than the last meeting). There are eighty-four current classified postings for two hundred twenty-three job openings (sixteen more than the last meeting.) There are three certificated and no classified management positions posted. 

SRCS is having difficulty adequately serving our students with disabilities. On Ed Join SRCS is currently trying to recruit for twenty-two certificated openings and one hundred fifty-seven classified positions to serve these students. Students are being negatively impacted by this, as well as staff trying to meet student needs while being shorthanded. Directors are prevented from doing their job because they are required to cover unfilled classroom positions.

G.5. Approval of Contracts

The total cost of contracts is $2,983,427.70.

Contract Summary

Contracts

#	Provider	Cost	Description
District
1	Solution Tree	$90,000.00	Year one of multi-year PD for CAPS Network.
2	Adroit	$70,000.00	Specialized transportation services to students with IEPs- This appears to be one vehicle getting student(s) to and from school for the year. (183 days x 2 trips x $159 = $58,194. The contract is utilized per trip.
6	Curriculum Associates (Ellevation)	$88,641.00	K-12 software platform designed to manage English Language Learner (ELL) program for 2,814 students at $31.50 each
Secondary
3	Curriculum Associates (iReady)	$24,330.00	i-Ready ELA and Math assessments for RVMS
4	CPM Education Program	$44,895.00	1 year licenses for Math curriculum for 1220 MS students and 58 teachers.
5	Vista Higher Learning	$76,653.80	Get Ready is a one year supplemental curriculum to support 7-12th grade Newcomers with language development.
Charter
7	Humanidad Therapy & Education Services	$143,000.00	Weekly Mindful Therapeutic sessions at CCLA- 4 therapists, a total of 8 work days per week.
8	Portuguese Futbol Academy	$16,000.00	Two-hours of lunchtime activities to all CCLA students on Mondays and Fridays
9	National Academy of Athletics	$19,008.00	Two-hours of lunchtime activities to all CCLA students on Tuesdays and Thursdays
10	Colors of Spanish	$35,497.00	A weekly 45 minute Music & Movement class in Spanish to all CCLA TK-1st grade classes (total 8)

SRTA members are appreciative of these contracts being uploaded with the agenda.

SRTA members look forward to greater transparency in the process used to evaluate contracts.

G.6. Approval of Contracts – Bond

#	Provider	Site	Description	Cost	Total Cost
Charter
1	Drapery Concepts	FACS	TK Window Coverings	$9,625	$10,000
Secondary
2	City Mechanical	RHS	Disconnect portable	$1,950	$50,000
6	F & G Design/Drafting Services	PHS, MCHS, EAHS	Inspection Services for fencing	$55,000	$6,000,000
District
3	NorBay Consulting	DO	Air Quality monitoring during demolition	$7,020	$60,000,000
8	Golden State Electrical	DO	Electrical Work at Warehouse	$12,786	$9,500,000
Elementary
4	City Mechanical	PTES	Replace fountain with Bottle Fill Station	$12,610	$15,000
5	San Francisco Roofing Services Inc.	LBES	Reimbursed roofing repair of library	$4,180	$5,000
6	F & G Design/Drafting Services	LBES	Inspection Services for fencing	$12,000	$6,000,000
7	Greystone West Company	ALES	Construction management for fencing	$5,180	$74,000

The total cost of contracts by measure:

Measure C = $72,002.52

Measure G = $48,348.43

Total =  $120,350.95

Summary of Contracts

Contracts

SRTA members are appreciative of these contracts being uploaded with the agenda.

SRTA members wonder if bond funds are available for converting fountains to bottle water stations at all sites? 

F.5. Approval of Resolution 2026/27-19 for the use of 2025/26 Education Protection Account (EPA) Funds

Although EPA funds are unrestricted, the District must annually publicly document, obtain Board approval for, and publish a plan for how the funds will be spent.  A total of $2.69 million will be transferred, primarily from operations in the elementary and high school districts, while the charter schools will transfer $343,690 from instruction.

Because the EPA funds do not represent additional funds to the district, there is no fiscal impact.

Resolution

F.6. Approval of Mandated Block Grant  (MBG) Applications for 2026-27 for the Elementary School District, High School District, Santa Rosa French-American Charter, CCLA, Santa Rosa Charter School for the Arts, and Santa Rosa Accelerated Charter

The 2026-27 Mandate Block Grant (MBG) covers 51 mandates.  School districts used to have to file reimbursement claims for state-mandated activities annually.  MBG was established  in lieu of filing individual claims. The funding rates for the 2026-27 MBG are $40.41 per ADA for Grades K-8, $79.29 per ADA for Grades 9-12, and $21.31 per ADA for Charter School Grades K-8.

Estimated Block Grant funding for 2026-27:

General Fund 01 Elementary & High Districts: $693,889

Charter Schools Funds 06-09: $34,882

Santa Rosa Elementary District 2026–27 MBG Report

Santa Rosa High District 2026–27 MBG Report

CCLA 2026–27 MBG Report (Two reports are ready depending on where the state is on having CCLA part of SRCS Elementary District or SRCS Secondary District.)

Santa Rosa Accelerated Charter 2026–27 MBG Report

Santa Rosa Charter School for the Arts 2026–27 MBG Report

Santa Rosa French-American Charter (SRFACS) 2026–27 MBG Report

MBG Programs and Activities 2026-27 (CA Dept of Education)

G. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEMS

1. Approval of 2026/27 First Semester Resolutions

a. Public Comment on First Semester Resolutions

b. (Action) Approval of Resolution In Recognition of September as Suicide Prevention Month

Resolution

c. (Action) Approval of Resolution to Recognize September Attendance Awareness Month

Resolution

SRTA members support diligent efforts to improve student attendance as a way to positively impact the finances of the district. 

d. (Action) Approval of Resolution Proclaiming October as LGBTQIA+ History Month 

Resolution

e. (Action) Approval of Resolution to Recognize September 15 to October 15, 2026 as Latinx Heritage Month

Resolution

f. (Action) Approval of Resolution Proclaiming October 12, 2026, as Indigenous Peoples’ Day

Resolution   Press Democrat Article

g. (Action) Approval of Resolution Recognizing the Week of the School Administrator October 12-18, 2026

Resolution

h. (Action) Resolution Recognizing November 14 as Ruby Bridges Walk to School Day

Resolution

SRTA members call out that programs like these require site staff to operate in our schools. They are an unfunded effort, relying on volunteer staff to implement. This is not sustainable, especially in the current situation we are in.

i. (Action) Approval of Resolution Proclaiming October as Filipino American History Month 

Resolution

j. (Action) Approval of Resolution Recognizing October as Coaches Appreciation Month

Resolution Athletic Coach Data

k. (Action) Resolution Recognizing the Week of November 9-13, 2026 as the Week of the School Psychologists

Resolution

l. (Action) Approval of Resolution Recognizing Italian Heritage Month

Resolution

m. (Action) Approval of Resolution Recognizing September 14-25, 2026, As High School Voter Education Weeks

Resolution

2. Business Services Calendar

a. Public Comment on the Business Services Calendar

b. (Discussion) Facility Use Fees AdHoc Committee Update

The Committee is reviewing facility-use fees, costs, agreements, staffing, outstanding balances, and joint-use opportunities to create a more consistent, equitable, and financially sustainable system that does not subsidize outside activities with K–12 education funds. A work plan and further update will be provided during the meeting, as the ad hoc committee is scheduled to meet between the posting of this agenda and the Board meeting.

H. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

August 12, 2026 Minutes and Supporting Documents

I. BOARD MEMBER REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION

J. INFORMATION ITEMS

J.1. Future Board Discussion Items

The following are future board update items:

• Approval of 2025/26 Unaudited Actuals (September 9, 2026)
• SRTA Sunshine Reopeners (September 9, 2026)
• Updated Board Policy Recommendations from the Board Subcommittee (September 9, 2026)
• Resolution of District for Capacity of Interdistrict Transfers (September 9, 2026)
• Public Hearing and Action for Elementary and Secondary Sufficiency of Textbook or Instructional Materials (September 23, 2026)
• West County Transportation Agency Update (September 23, 2026)

SRTA looks to the future scheduling of the following items:

Savings from  closures and mergers vs projections.

Own SELPA projection at first interim. 

FCMAT follow up report at first interim (October)

Review of Graduation Committee Pathway Options (October)

Prop 28 plan for the year (26-27)

Medina- AP instruction data with number of years of experience of Teachers

-Clarification about board policy adoption requiring a majority of board membership versus a majority of those present/voting

– consider E-sports clubs or teams 

Caston- Site funding finance report with various amounts and sources

-update 3510 policy around reducing waste as a discussion item

– Communication plan. 

Prak – Info about a non voting teacher on the board. 

Kirby – add an assistant wrestling coach for women? 

– Copies of the panorama and youth truth survey questions. 

DeLaTorre- Info on how we identify College and Career readiness.

 Agendaize MCHS and RVMS plan. Part of review of implementation of 7-12.

Jenkins – marketing plan update as committed to last year.

• Approval of Joint Use MOU’s for School Site Facility Use (pulled from June 22 agenda)
• Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) Update (Dec 2025)
• Panorama and Youth Truth Survey Data (August 2025)
• Plan and timeline for implementation of Dr. Gillespie’s recommendations around Special Services (January 2025), Requesting of New FCMAT Study on SRCS SpEd Program
• First Draft of the District Safety Plan (delayed from September 2024)
• Sharing the Library Master Plan with implementation expectations and timeline
• Officially Closing Learning House, Herbert Slater Middle School, Santa Rosa Middle School, Brookhill Elementary, Biella Elementary, Steele Lane, and Herbert Comstock Middle School. 
• Plan for Staff Housing support program from the proceeds of Fir Ridge

Until the district makes a decision, the proceeds from the sale of the Fir Ridge property are just sitting and losing value as the cost of housing continues to rise. Getting a program started could help SRCS attract and retain CSEA staff. The potential impact of the funds continues to diminish as time passes.

• Student Voice Policy
• Long standing request for site budgets including all sources as well as enrollment and unduplicated numbers.

J.3. Board Subcommittee Meeting Dates

Board Policy Subcommittee Meeting Dates:

• Wednesday  September 2, 2026 (5:00-7:00)

Board Finance Subcommittee Meeting Dates:

• Tuesday September 1, 2026 (3:30-5:30)
• Monday October 5, 2026 (3:30-5:30) Tentative 
• Monday November 2, 2026 (3:30-5:30) Tentative 

Board Facilities Subcommittee Meeting Dates (not subject to the Brown Act): 

• September 25, 2026 (3:00-4:30)

SRTA members are appreciative of this transparency.

J.5. Facilities Projects Update 

The Facilities Department reports that most major summer projects are complete or nearing completion, including new TK classrooms, the Piner High classroom building, turf replacement, portable classrooms, and several painting projects. Electronic access control upgrades continue across multiple sites, while remaining work includes delayed fencing and shade structures, deferred modernization work at Santa Rosa High, ongoing roofing and HVAC work at Elsie Allen, and continued progress on the new District Office and Education Center.

Update

J.6. Safe Routes to Schools Program Update

This program promotes safe, active transportation through education, community engagement, data collection, and infrastructure improvements. In 2025–26, the program reached 1,193 Santa Rosa City Schools students, supported walking and biking events, and helped more than 450 students bike to school, nearly a 200% increase. The program has also conducted extensive school walk audits and supported approximately $225,000 in safety improvements, including crosswalks, bike lanes, signage, and speed reductions.

Update

SRTA members call out that programs like these require site staff to operate in our schools. They are an unfunded effort, relying on volunteer staff to implement. This is not sustainable, especially in the current situation we are in.

K. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION

K.1. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Title of employee being reviewed: Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent, Principals, Vice Principals, Assistant Principals, Directors, Coordinators) 

SRTA members are struggling with the implementation of budget reductions recommended to and approved by the board. The impact on students is precisely what SRTA members warned of.  

2. Conference With Real Property Negotiator (Property Address: 2750 W. Steele Lane, Santa Rosa, Ca. 95403. SRCS Negotiator: Lisa August Hulme, Associate Superintendent ) 

On May 27, 2026 the Board approved a report by the 7-11 Surplus Property Committee. 

May Presentation

May 7-11 Report

There was a recommendation to do a 99 year lease on this property. The board has taken no public action on this idea.

The SRCS community is still waiting on a plan for a Staff Housing support program from the proceeds of the Fir Ridge property.

Until the district makes a decision, the proceeds from the sale of the Fir Ridge property are just sitting and losing value as the cost of housing continues to rise. Getting a program started could help SRCS attract and retain CSEA staff. The potential impact of the funds continues to diminish as time passes.

L. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION

1. Report of Actions Taken in Closed Session

M. Adjournment

 

---

REUNIÓN ORDINARIA DE LA JUNTA DIRECTIVA

Escuelas de la ciudad de Santa Rosa

26 de agosto de 2026

Híbrido: Salón de plenos del Ayuntamiento de Santa Rosa

16:00 h – Sesión a puerta cerrada

7:00 p.m.– Sesión abierta

Esta reunión está programada para comenzar una hora más tarde de lo habitual.

?? p.m. – Sesión a puerta cerrada (de nuevo)

Híbrido: Zoom / Ayuntamiento de Santa Rosa

*** transmitido ***

Reuniones de la junta directiva por videoconferencia a través de un enlace en la página web de este distrito. (Suele modificarse justo antes de la reunión).

Por favor, tómese un tiempo para revisar la siguiente versión abreviada del programa.Haga clic aquí para ver el programa completo.Contiene enlaces directos a muchos temas con más información. Si desea hacer algún comentario al consejo sobre algún tema próximo, envíe un correo electrónico.agendacomments@srcs.k12.ca.usPor favor, incluya una copia.wearesrta@gmail.comen tu correo electrónico.

Se recomienda a los miembros que asistan en línea que añadan SRTA al principio de su nombre de usuario de Zoom.

Temas de la sesión a puerta cerrada:

A.1. Comentarios del público sobre los puntos del orden del día de la sesión a puerta cerrada Para comentar, envíe un correo electrónico a Melanie Martin ammartinsrcs.k12.ca.us.

Esta es una oportunidad para que los miembros del público se dirijan a la junta directiva únicamente sobre los temas que se traten en sesión a puerta cerrada.

B.1. Reunión con el negociador laboral. Nombre del representante designado que asistirá: Dra. Vicki Zands (SRCS); nombre de las organizaciones: Asociación de Maestros de Santa Rosa, CSEA Santa Rosa 75, Sindicato Teamsters 665.

Los miembros de SRTA confían en que la Junta establezca parámetros para las negociaciones que prioricen las mejoras en las condiciones laborales y una remuneración justa, elementos esenciales para atraer y retener al personal altamente cualificado que se necesita para atender a nuestros estudiantes. Mantener una reserva del 10 % tiene poco valor si el Distrito no invierte en las instalaciones, los programas y el personal necesarios para fomentar la matrícula y fortalecer la confianza de la comunidad. SRCS debe equilibrar la responsabilidad fiscal con una inversión significativa en las personas y las estructuras que apoyan el éxito estudiantil.

C. REANUDAR LA SESIÓN PRINCIPAL (7:00 pm)

D. INFORMES (Unidades de Negociación, Superintendente y Junta Directiva)

E. Comentarios del público sobre asuntos no incluidos en el orden del día y temas de trámite urgente.

Se invita a los miembros de SRTA a completar las tarjetas azules durante la reunión de la junta directiva para realizar comentarios públicos. Los comentarios en línea están suspendidos. Cada comentario tendrá una duración máxima de 60 segundos. Solo se tratarán los temas que no figuren en el orden del día, con la excepción de los puntos que se someten a aprobación por consentimiento (véase la sección G).

Se solicitan comentarios en la reunión de la junta directiva para aportar la perspectiva de cada miembro y compartir experiencias reales sobre el impacto de las políticas y prácticas del distrito en los estudiantes y el personal.

Solo podrán participar ponentes presenciales (a menos que un miembro de la junta directiva asista en línea sin previo aviso).

Los comentarios resultan más impactantes cuando están bien expresados, redactados con coherencia y son razonables.

F. ARTÍCULOS QUE REQUIEREN CONSENTIMIENTO

Todos los puntos que requieren consentimiento son aprobados por la Junta en una sola moción, a menos que un miembro de la Junta solicite que un punto sea retirado y discutido por separado.

F.1. Aprobación de transacciones de personal

Transacciones de personal NO ADJUNTAS

“El documento adjunto se incluirá antes de la reunión de la Junta Directiva del 08/26/2026.”

EdJoin Se muestran un total de 84 ofertas de empleo para doscientos sesenta y cinco puestos en SRCS. Hay treinta y nueve ofertas para personal certificado (seis más que en la última reunión). Hay ochenta y cuatro ofertas para personal clasificado para doscientos veintitrés puestos (dieciséis más que en la última reunión). Hay tres puestos de gestión para personal certificado y ninguno para personal clasificado.

SRCS está teniendo dificultades para atender adecuadamente a nuestros estudiantes con discapacidades. Actualmente, SRCS está intentando cubrir veintidós vacantes de personal docente certificado y ciento cincuenta y siete puestos administrativos para atender a estos estudiantes. Esto está afectando negativamente a los estudiantes, así como al personal que intenta satisfacer las necesidades de los estudiantes con falta de personal. Los directores no pueden desempeñar sus funciones porque se les exige cubrir puestos vacantes en las aulas.

G.5. Aprobación de contratos

El coste total de los contratos asciende a 2.983.427,70 dólares.

Resumen del contrato

Contratos

#	Proveedor	Costo	Descripción
Distrito
1	Solution Tree	$90,000.00	Primer año del programa de desarrollo profesional plurianual de la red CAPS.
2	Adroit	$70,000.00	Servicios de transporte especializado para estudiantes con IEP: parece ser un vehículo que lleva al/los estudiante(s) hacia y desde la escuela durante el año. (183 días x 2 viajes x $159 = $58,194. El contrato se utiliza por viaje.
6	Curriculum Associates (Ellevation)	$88,641.00	Plataforma de software para los niveles K-12 diseñada para gestionar el programa de aprendizaje del idioma inglés (ELL) para 2814 estudiantes a $31.50 cada uno.
Secundario
3	Curriculum Associates (iReady)	$24,330.00	Evaluaciones i-Ready de Lengua y Matemáticas para RVMS
4	CPM Education Program	$44,895.00	Licencias de 1 año para el plan de estudios de matemáticas para 1220 estudiantes de secundaria y 58 profesores.
5	Vista Higher Learning	$76,653.80	Get Ready es un programa educativo complementario de un año de duración diseñado para apoyar el desarrollo del lenguaje de los estudiantes recién llegados de 7.º a 12.º grado.
Charter
7	Humanidad Therapy & Education Services	$143,000.00	Sesiones semanales de terapia consciente en CCLA: 4 terapeutas, un total de 8 días laborables por semana.
8	Portuguese Futbol Academy	$16,000.00	Dos horas de actividades a la hora del almuerzo para todos los estudiantes de CCLA los lunes y viernes.
9	National Academy of Athletics	$19,008.00	Dos horas de actividades a la hora del almuerzo para todos los estudiantes de CCLA los martes y jueves.
10	Colors of Spanish	$35,497.00	Una clase semanal de música y movimiento de 45 minutos en español para todas las clases de CCLA desde preescolar hasta primer grado (un total de 8).

Los miembros de SRTA agradecen que estos contratos se hayan adjuntado al orden del día.

Los miembros de SRTA esperan una mayor transparencia en el proceso utilizado para evaluar los contratos.

G.6. Aprobación de contratos – Fianza

#	Proveedor	Sitio	Descripción	Costo	Costo total
Carta
1	Drapery Concepts	FACS	Cortinas y persianas TK	$9,625	$10,000
Secundarias
2	City Mechanical	RHS	Desconectar portátil	$1,950	$50,000
6	F & G Design/Drafting Services	PHS, MCHS, EAHS	Servicios de inspección de cercas	$55,000	$6,000,000
Distrito
3	NorBay Consulting	DO	Monitoreo de la calidad del aire durante la demolición	$7,020	$60,000,000
8	Golden State Electrical	DO	Trabajos eléctricos en el almacén	$12,786	$9,500,000
Primarias
4	City Mechanical	PTES	Reemplazar la fuente de agua por una estación de llenado de botellas.	$12,610	$15,000
5	San Francisco Roofing Services Inc.	LBES	Reparación de techo de la biblioteca (reembolsada)	$4,180	$5,000
6	F & G Design/Drafting Services	LBES	Servicios de inspección de cercas	$12,000	$6,000,000
7	Greystone West Company	PREFERIDO	Gestión de la construcción de cercas	$5,180	$74,000

El coste total de los contratos por medida:

Medida C = $72,002.52

Medida G = $48,348.43

Total = $120,350.95

Resumen de contratos

Contratos

Los miembros de SRTA agradecen que estos contratos se hayan adjuntado al orden del día.

Los miembros de SRTA se preguntan si hay fondos procedentes de bonos disponibles para convertir las fuentes en puntos de agua embotellada en todas las instalaciones.

F.5. Aprobación de la Resolución 2026/27-19 para el uso de los fondos de la Cuenta de Protección Educativa (EPA) del año 2025/26.

Si bien los fondos de la EPA no tienen restricciones, el Distrito debe documentar públicamente cada año, obtener la aprobación de la Junta Directiva y publicar un plan sobre cómo se gastarán dichos fondos. Se transferirán un total de $2.69 millones, principalmente de las operaciones de los distritos de escuelas primarias y secundarias, mientras que las escuelas autónomas transferirán $343,690 de los fondos destinados a la instrucción.

Dado que los fondos de la EPA no representan fondos adicionales para el distrito, no hay impacto fiscal.

Resolución

F.6. Aprobación de las solicitudes de Subvención en Bloque Obligatoria (MBG) para 2026-27 para el Distrito Escolar Primario, el Distrito Escolar Secundario, la Escuela Chárter Franco-Americana de Santa Rosa, CCLA, la Escuela Chárter de Artes de Santa Rosa y la Escuela Chárter Acelerada de Santa Rosa.

La subvención global obligatoria (MBG) del año escolar 2026-27 cubre 51 mandatos. Anteriormente, los distritos escolares debían presentar solicitudes de reembolso anuales para las actividades exigidas por el estado. La MBG se creó en lugar de presentar solicitudes individuales. Las tasas de financiación para la MBG del año escolar 2026-27 son de $40.41 por ADA para los grados K-8, $79.29 por ADA para los grados 9-12 y $21.31 por ADA para las escuelas autónomas de los grados K-8.

Estimación de la financiación del programa de subvenciones globales para 2026-27:

Fondo General 01 Distritos de Primaria y Secundaria: $693,889

Fondos para escuelas autónomas 06-09: $34,882

Informe MBG 2026-27 del Distrito Primario de Santa Rosa

Informe MBG 2026-27 del distrito secundario de Santa Rosa

Informe MBG de CCLA 2026-27(Hay dos informes listos, dependiendo de la postura del estado respecto a si CCLA forma parte del Distrito de Primaria SRCS o del Distrito de Secundaria SRCS).

Informe MBG del programa acelerado de escuelas chárter de Santa Rosa 2026-27

Informe MBG 2026-27 de la Escuela Chárter de Artes de Santa Rosa

Informe MBG 2026-27 de la Carta Franco-Estadounidense de Santa Rosa (SRFACS)

Programas y actividades de MBG 2026-27 (Departamento de Educación de California)

G. TEMAS DE DISCUSIÓN / PUNTOS DE ACCIÓN

1. Aprobación de las resoluciones del primer semestre del curso 2026/27

a. Comentarios del público sobre las resoluciones del primer semestre

b. (Acción) Aprobación de la resolución que reconoce septiembre como el Mes de la Prevención del Suicidio

Resolución

c. (Acción) Aprobación de la resolución para reconocer el Mes de Concientización sobre la Asistencia Escolar en septiembre.

Resolución

Los miembros de SRTA apoyan los esfuerzos diligentes para mejorar la asistencia estudiantil como una forma de impactar positivamente las finanzas del distrito.

d. (Acción) Aprobación de la resolución que proclama octubre como el Mes de la Historia LGBTQIA+

Resolución

e. (Acción) Aprobación de la Resolución para reconocer del 15 de septiembre al 15 de octubre de 2026 como el Mes de la Herencia Latinx

Resolución

f. (Acción) Aprobación de la Resolución que proclama el 12 de octubre de 2026 como Día de los Pueblos Indígenas

Resolución   Artículo del Press Democrat

g. (Acción) Aprobación de la Resolución que reconoce la Semana del Administrador Escolar del 12 al 18 de octubre de 2026.

Resolución

h. (Acción) Resolución que reconoce el 14 de noviembre como el Día de la Caminata a la Escuela de Ruby Bridges

Resolución

Los miembros de la SRTA señalan que programas como estos requieren que el personal de los centros trabaje en nuestras escuelas. Se trata de una iniciativa sin financiación, cuya puesta en marcha depende del personal voluntario. Esto no es sostenible, sobre todo en la situación actual en la que nos encontramos.

i. (Acción) Aprobación de la resolución que proclama octubre como el Mes de la Historia Filipino-Estadounidense

Resolución

j. (Acción) Aprobación de la resolución que reconoce octubre como el Mes de Agradecimiento a los Entrenadores

Resolución Datos del entrenador atlético

k. (Acción) Resolución que reconoce la semana del 9 al 13 de noviembre de 2026 como la Semana de los Psicólogos Escolares.

Resolución

l. (Acción) Aprobación de la Resolución que reconoce el Mes de la Herencia Italiana

Resolución

m. (Acción) Aprobación de la Resolución que reconoce del 14 al 25 de septiembre de 2026 como Semanas de Educación Electoral para Estudiantes de Secundaria.

Resolución

2. Calendario de servicios empresariales

a. Comentarios del público sobre el calendario de servicios empresariales

b. (Discusión) Actualización del Comité Ad Hoc sobre Tarifas de Uso de Instalaciones

El Comité está revisando las tarifas de uso de las instalaciones, los costos, los acuerdos, el personal, los saldos pendientes y las oportunidades de uso compartido para crear un sistema más coherente, equitativo y financieramente sostenible que no subvencione actividades externas con fondos destinados a la educación primaria y secundaria. Se presentará un plan de trabajo y una actualización durante la reunión, ya que el comité especial tiene previsto reunirse entre la publicación de este orden del día y la reunión de la Junta Directiva.

H. APROBACIÓN DE LAS ACTAS

12 de agosto de 2026 Minutos y Documentos de apoyo

I. SOLICITUDES DE INFORMACIÓN DE LOS MIEMBROS DE LA JUNTA DIRECTIVA

J. ELEMENTOS INFORMATIVOS

J.1. Temas de discusión futuros de la Junta Directiva

Los siguientes son los puntos que se actualizarán próximamente en la junta directiva:

• Approval of 2025/26 Unaudited Actuals (September 9, 2026)
• Reaperturas de SRTA Sunshine (9 de septiembre de 2026)
• Recomendaciones actualizadas de la Junta Directiva por parte del Subcomité de la Junta (9 de septiembre de 2026)
• Resolución del Distrito sobre la Capacidad de Transferencias Interdistritales (9 de septiembre de 2026)
• Audiencia pública y decisión sobre la suficiencia de los libros de texto o materiales didácticos para la educación primaria y secundaria (23 de septiembre de 2026)
• Actualización de la Agencia de Transporte del Condado Oeste (23 de septiembre de 2026)

SRTA prevé la programación futura de los siguientes elementos:

Ahorros derivados de cierres y fusiones frente a las previsiones.

Proyección propia de SELPA en el primer período intermedio.

Informe de seguimiento de FCMAT en la primera reunión intermedia (octubre)

Revisión de las opciones de itinerario del Comité de Graduación (octubre)

Plan de la Propuesta 28 para el año (26-27)

Medina – Datos de instrucción AP con el número de años de experiencia de los maestros

-Aclaración sobre la adopción de políticas de la junta directiva que requiere la mayoría de los miembros de la junta frente a la mayoría de los presentes/votantes.

– Considerar clubes o equipos de deportes electrónicos

Informe financiero del sitio Caston con diversas cantidades y fuentes.

-Actualizar la política 3510 sobre la reducción de residuos como tema de debate

– Plan de comunicación.

Prak – Información sobre un profesor sin derecho a voto en la junta directiva.

Kirby, ¿añadimos un entrenador asistente de lucha libre para mujeres?

– Copias del panorama y de las preguntas de la encuesta sobre la verdad de la juventud.

DeLaTorre: Información sobre cómo identificamos la preparación para la universidad y la vida laboral.

Agendar el plan MCHS y RVMS. Parte de la revisión de la implementación del 7-12.

Jenkins – Actualización del plan de marketing según lo prometido el año pasado.

• Aprobación de memorandos de entendimiento de uso conjunto para el uso de instalaciones escolares (extraído del orden del día del 22 de junio)
• Actualización del Sistema de Apoyo Multinivel (MTSS, por sus siglas en inglés) (dic. 2025)
• Datos de las encuestas Panorama y Youth Truth (agosto de 2025)
• Plan y cronograma para la implementación de las recomendaciones del Dr. Gillespie sobre Servicios Especiales (enero de 2025), Solicitud de un nuevo estudio FCMAT sobre el programa de Educación Especial de SRCS.
• Primer borrador del Plan de Seguridad del Distrito (retrasado desde septiembre de 2024)
• Compartir el Plan Maestro de la Biblioteca con las expectativas de implementación y el cronograma.
• Cierre oficial de Learning House, Herbert Slater Middle School, Santa Rosa Middle School, Brookhill Elementary, Biella Elementary, Steele Lane y Herbert Comstock Middle School.
• Plan para un programa de apoyo a la vivienda del personal con los fondos recaudados en Fir Ridge.

Hasta que el distrito tome una decisión, los ingresos de la venta de la propiedad de Fir Ridge permanecen inactivos y pierden valor a medida que el costo de la vivienda continúa aumentando. Poner en marcha un programa podría ayudar a SRCS a atraer y retener personal de CSEA. El impacto potencial de los fondos disminuye con el paso del tiempo.

• Política de participación estudiantil
• Solicitud reiterada de presupuestos del sitio que incluya todas las fuentes, así como la matrícula y las cifras únicas.

J.3. Fechas de las reuniones del subcomité de la junta directiva

Fechas de las reuniones del subcomité de políticas de la junta directiva:

• Miércoles 2 de septiembre de 2026 (5:00-7:00)

Fechas de las reuniones del subcomité de finanzas de la junta directiva:

• Martes 1 de septiembre de 2026 (3:30-5:30)
• Lunes 5 de octubre de 2026 (3:30-5:30) Provisional
• Lunes 2 de noviembre de 2026 (3:30-5:30) Provisional

Fechas de las reuniones del subcomité de instalaciones de la junta directiva (no sujetas a la Ley Brown):

• 25 de septiembre de 2026 (3:00-4:30)

Los miembros de SRTA agradecen esta transparencia.

J.5. Actualización de proyectos de instalaciones

El Departamento de Instalaciones informa de que la mayoría de los principales proyectos de verano han finalizado o están a punto de concluir, entre ellos las nuevas aulas de TK, el edificio de aulas del instituto Piner, la sustitución del césped artificial, las aulas prefabricadas y varios proyectos de pintura. Continúan las mejoras en los sistemas electrónicos de control de acceso en múltiples centros, mientras que los trabajos pendientes incluyen la instalación de vallas y estructuras de sombra, que se han retrasado; las obras de modernización aplazadas en el instituto Santa Rosa; los trabajos en curso en los tejados y en el sistema de climatización en Elsie Allen; y los continuos avances en la nueva Oficina del Distrito y el Centro Educativo.

Actualizar

J.6. Actualización del programa Rutas Seguras a las Escuelas

Este programa promueve el transporte seguro y activo mediante la educación, la participación comunitaria, la recopilación de datos y la mejora de la infraestructura. En el ciclo escolar 2025-2026, el programa benefició a 1193 estudiantes de las Escuelas Públicas de Santa Rosa, apoyó eventos para caminar y andar en bicicleta, y ayudó a más de 450 estudiantes a ir en bicicleta a la escuela, lo que representa un aumento de casi el 200 %. El programa también ha realizado auditorías exhaustivas de los recorridos escolares a pie y ha apoyado mejoras de seguridad por un valor aproximado de $225,000, incluyendo cruces peatonales, carriles para bicicletas, señalización y reducción de la velocidad.

Actualizar

Los miembros de la SRTA señalan que programas como estos requieren que el personal de los centros trabaje en nuestras escuelas. Se trata de una iniciativa sin financiación, cuya puesta en marcha depende del personal voluntario. Esto no es sostenible, sobre todo en la situación actual en la que nos encontramos.

K. RECESO A SESIÓN A PUERTA CERRADA

K.1. Evaluación del rendimiento de los empleados públicos (Cargo del empleado objeto de evaluación: superintendente, superintendente adjunto, subdirector general, directores, vicedirectores, subdirectores, directores y coordinadores)

Los miembros de SRTA están teniendo dificultades con la implementación de los recortes presupuestarios recomendados y aprobados por la junta directiva. El impacto en los estudiantes es precisamente lo que los miembros de SRTA habían advertido.

2. Reunión con el negociador de bienes inmuebles (Dirección de la propiedad:2750 W. Steele Lane, Santa Rosa, Ca. 95403 Negociadora de SRCS: Lisa August Hulme, Superintendente Asociada)

El 27 de mayo de 2026, la Junta aprobó un informe del Comité de Bienes Excedentes de 7-11.

Presentación de mayo

Informe del 7 al 11 de mayo

Se recomendó suscribir un contrato de arrendamiento de 99 años para esta propiedad. La junta no ha tomado ninguna medida pública al respecto.

La comunidad de SRCS sigue a la espera de un plan para un programa de apoyo a la vivienda del personal financiado con los ingresos de la propiedad de Fir Ridge.

Hasta que el distrito tome una decisión, los ingresos de la venta de la propiedad de Fir Ridge permanecen inactivos y pierden valor a medida que el costo de la vivienda continúa aumentando. Poner en marcha un programa podría ayudar a SRCS a atraer y retener personal de CSEA. El impacto potencial de los fondos disminuye con el paso del tiempo.

L. REANUDAR LA SESIÓN ABIERTA

1. Informe de las medidas adoptadas en sesión a puerta cerrada

M. Aplazamiento

REGULAR BOARD MEETING

Santa Rosa City Schools

June 24, 2026

Hybrid: Santa Rosa City Hall Council Chambers

4:00 p.m. – Closed Session

5:00 p.m. – Study Session

6:00 p.m. – Open Session

Hybrid: Zoom / Santa Rosa City Hall

*** streamed ***

Video Board Meetings through a link on this district webpage. (It is often changed right before the meeting.)

Please take time to review the following abbreviated version of the agenda. Click here to see the entire agenda. It has live links on many items with more information. If you want to comment to the board about any upcoming items, email agendacomments@srcs.k12.ca.us. Please CC wearesrta@gmail.com on your email.

Members attending online are encouraged to add SRTA to the front of their Zoom client name.

Closed Session Items: 

A.1. Public Comment On Closed Session Agenda Items To comment, email Melanie Martin at mmartinsrcs.k12.ca.us.

This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak to the board on Closed Session items only. 

Without specifics on closed session agenda items, it is impossible for the public to know when to provide insights for items being reviewed.

B.1. Student Expulsions (Case Nos: 2025/26-18, 2025/26-20) 

B.2.  Public Employee Appointment/Employment (Position to be filled: Executive Director)

SRTA members recognize the need for a highly qualified Director of Special Services. As SRCS reorganizes this department, creates systems and procedures, and works toward becoming a SELPA, the person leading this department needs a deep knowledge of Special Services, a magnetic personality, deep empathy, and the ability to inspire the department to build systems to employ an inspiring new vision. With the expedited SEPLA timeline, there is no time to build the leader SRCS needs. SRCS must ensure that we are hiring the right person for this critical job. A open position is better than one filled with the wrong person.

B.3. Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release

B.4. Conference With Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation ((Case name: 2026-110 / 26CV3377 ) 

Lawsuit Alleging District‑Wide Failures in Piner High School Sexual Abuse Case

B.5. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Title of employee being reviewed: Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent, Principals, Vice Principals, Assistant Principals, Directors, Coordinators) 

C. RECONVENE TO OPEN STUDY SESSION: COMMUNICATIONS UPDATE (5:00 P.M.)

C.1. Public Comment on the Study Session Calendar

C.2. (Strategic Priority: Communication

Presentation 

The Superintendent’s Partners In Education (PIE) Committee identified these communication strengths, challenges, and suggestions back in the spring of 2023.

Strengths / Priorities Identified

• Increase communication with families regarding discipline, attendance, and academic expectations (including A-G requirements).
• Amplify student voices and involve students in promoting positive school culture.
• Provide more family forums and opportunities for direct engagement.
• Develop comprehensive communication plans for both routine and emergency situations.
• Consistently train staff, students, and substitutes on communication tools and systems.
• Improve access to important student information and accommodations.
• Explore student-created videos and other creative approaches to community messaging.

Challenges and Areas for Improvement

• Communications are sometimes released with incorrect or  incomplete details or unclear procedures.
• Overreliance on electronic notifications and a single platform (ParentSquare) does not reach all families.
• Messages are often not tailored to different audiences.
• Excessive communications can overwhelm families and staff.
• Inconsistent information-sharing between district, school sites, and staff creates confusion.
• Site administrators face significant communication demands while managing emergencies and daily operations.
• Concerns about balancing  student privacy and limiting inappropriate sharing of student information while keeping stakeholders appropriately  informed. 

Recommendations

• Survey families to determine preferred communication methods based on urgency and purpose.
• Use focus groups and stakeholder feedback to evaluate communication effectiveness.
• Ensure staff receive communications sent to families and students to improve consistency and ability to share information  and answer questions.
• Utilize multiple communication channels, including ParentSquare, district websites, SMORE, videos, and other outreach tools.
• Consider dedicated communications/customer service support at school sites or grade spans.
• Continue researching and implementing more user-friendly websites and communication platforms.
• Provide ongoing education about tools such as ParentSquare and StopIt, including their purpose and benefits.
• Strengthen communication systems for truant students and emergency situations through coordinated, multi-channel outreach.

The attached presentation does not include an actual communication plan, such as this example (from Portland Public Schools.)

It is disappointing that SRCS continues to acknowledge the same communication challenges year after year without implementing a clear and measurable plan to resolve them. The Board has an obligation to ensure accountability by requiring a published District Communication Plan with specific objectives, timelines, responsible parties, and progress reporting so that these longstanding communication failures are no longer allowed to persist.

D. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION (6 pm)

E. REPORTS (Bargaining Units, Sup, and Board)

F. Public Comment on Non Agenda and Consent Items

SRTA Members are invited to complete ‘blue cards’ at the board meeting in order to make public comments. Online comments have been suspended. Comments will be limited to 60 seconds. Only items NOT on the agenda are addressed at this time, with the exception of consent items (See section G.)

Comments are requested at the board meeting to bring a member’s perspective and share real experiences of the impact of district policies and practices on students and staff. 

Speakers are limited to just those in person (unless a board member attends online without prior notice.)

Comments are most impactful when they are well spoken, composed and reasonable.

• There remains great concern about the looming cost of overages for next year due to the lack of allocated sections. Teachers are not willing to take on last minute 0.2 FTE because SRCS was insistent on releasing employees beyond what is needed for next year.
• Too many summer school students with IEPs and 504s are not having their needs met in gen ed placements. Supports like aides are NOT being provided during summer school. This was not effectively communicated to families. 

G. CONSENT ITEMS 

All consent items are enacted by the Board in one motion, unless a Board member requests that an item be removed and discussed separately. 

G.1. Approval of Personnel Transactions 

Personnel Transactions 

EdJoin shows a total of seventy-four current postings for two hundred four jobs in SRCS. There are twenty-one certificated opening postings (six more than the last meeting). There are fifty-four current classified postings for one hundred seventy-eight job openings (four more than the last meeting.) There are three certificated and two classified management positions posted. 

Certificated changes include six resignations after forty-two years of service. We bid a fond farewell to Robin Wilkins (RVMS), Rose Mertens (PHS), Mary Bedient (HVES), Jessica Dickson (SRHS), Melissa Baker (MCHS) and Megan Ornelas (EAHS). We wish you all the best in your future endeavors. 

This brings this year’s certificated resignation totals to seventy-one folks who amazingly gave over three-hundred sixteen years of service to the students and families of SRCS before they resigned. The gap they leave will be noticed.

SRTA recognizes the retiring Cassie Kubiak (RVMS) who is retiring after thirty years of service. Enjoy not having a pile of papers to grade! 

A total of thirty-one certificated folks amazingly gave over seven hundred thirty-one years of service to the students and families of SRCS as they retired this year. 

Changes to classified staff includes four hires, four probationary releases, four resignations and five retirements. They leave taking with them one-hundred forty-four years of knowledge and service to our staff and students. You will be missed!

SRCS bids a fond farewell to Tammy Affonso who is retiring after thirty-eight and a half  years of service to SRCS, including serving as CSEA’s President and Chief Negotiator.

SRTA members are especially distraught witnessing talented staff choosing to leave SRCS for better working conditions. 

Announced administrative placements include Monica Fong as Director of Special Services, Francisco Manriquez Torres new Principal of CCLA, Timothy McCarty as Asst. Sup. of Student Services, Phillip Gedeon Director of Secondary Education, and Tyler Ahlborn Principal of MHS. 

G.3. Approval of Contracts over $15,000

The total cost of contracts is $2,322,678.80

Contract Summary

Contracts

#	Provider	Cost	Description
District
9	Be A Mentor	$30,000.00	Cumbersome volunteer management system
10	Informed K12	$75,723.00	Digital internal office forms for HR
11	Sonoma County Schools Connect Consortium (SCOE)	$71,035.00	Telecommunications services
Elementary
1	Boys and Girls Club Sonoma-Marin	$750,000.00	Annual rate for afterschool care for MJH, SRJH, and RVMS, through 6/2028, includes dedicated space, available for use during the school day.
2	North Bay Children’s Center	$994,800.00	All day pre-K for 48 students at JMES @ $20,725 per student.
3	SRJC (ASL Instruction)	$120,000.00	Up to 35 hours per week of ASL instruction for students, staff and families at HVES.
4	Kathleen Farrell	$34,000.00	Physical Therapy at $143/hour for L/SRCS ELA students.
5	Kimberly Imsdahl	$20,000.00	Occupational Therapy at $143/hour for L/SRCS ELA students.
6	Community Child Care Council (4C’s)	$93,420.00	3 seats each at Willow Creek and Paulin Creek Preschools @ $15,570.
7	North Bay Children’s Center	$111,701.00	8 seats at JMES preschool @$13,963. SRCS must provide aides.
Secondary
8	Validate Me!	$22,000.00	Foreign transcript evaluation service @ $200-$350 each

SRTA members raise concerns about the need for chaperones for field trips.  When sites can not utilize volunteers for chaperones, site support staff are used to chaperone field trips in order to ensure they are able to occur. Many of the staff positions utilized for this purpose were eliminated for next school year. A dedicated campaign is required from SRCS to make Be A Mentor and fingerprinting more accessible as well as systemically ensuring equity to field trip experiences.

G.4. Approval of Contracts – Bond

#	Provider	Site	Description	Cost	Total Cost
Charter
12	Redwood Moving & Storage Inc.	SRFACS	Moving Supplies (in addition to services)	$7,920	$200,000
Secondary
9	Redwood Moving & Storage Inc.	HCMS	Moving Supplies (in addition to services)	$4,752	$200,000
13	Redwood Moving & Storage Inc.	SRHS	Moving Supplies (in addition to services)	$6,336	$200,000
14	Motive Studio Inc.	SRHS	Amendment to include reroof of theater and Desoto restrooms	$342,176	$8,000,000
District
1	Crawford & Associates, Inc.	DO	Testing and Inspection Services	$325,000	$78,000,000
2	Miller Pacific Engineering Group	DO	Geotechnical Inspection Services	$125,280	$78,000,000
3	Van Pelt Construction Services	DO	Management for Summer Campus Moves	$50,000	$200,000
6	Redwood Moving & Storage Inc.	DO	Additional Moving Supplies for Summer Moves	$13,246	$200,000
7	Stanton Inspection Services, Inc.	DO	Inspection Services	$635,000	$78,000,000
8	Greystone West Co.	DO	Construction Management for Access Phase 3	$735,461	$7,450,000
16	Greystone West Co.	DO	Construction Management for fencing at 4 sites	$382,115	$5,750,000
17	Motive Studio Inc.	DO	DSA Fees for HS Turf Field Projects	$55,707	$7,500,000
18	One Workplace	DO	Design work for new DO and Ed Center	$15,000	$78,000,000
20	Stormwater Specialists, Inc.	DO	Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan	$40,920	$78,000,000
Elementary
4	Van Pelt Construction Services	LBES	Construction Management for Portable Project	$39,081	$2,800,000
5	Motive Studio Inc.	LBES	DSA Fees for Portable Project	$7,200	$2,800,000
10	Redwood Moving & Storage Inc.	LELA	Moving Supplies (in addition to services)	$6,336	$200,000
11	Redwood Moving & Storage Inc.	SLES	Moving Supplies (in addition to services)	$7,920	$200,000
15	RGH Consultants	ABES	additional Inspection Services	$5,000	$5,000,000
19	Wright Contracting	ALES	Perimeter Fencing	$74,000	$125,000

The total cost of contracts by measure:

Measure C = $2,317,260.66

Measure G =  $661,190.77

Total =  $2,978,451.43

Summary of Contracts

Contracts

G.5. Approval of Amendment No. 1 to the Lease-Leaseback Agreement with CWS Construction Group, Inc. for PHS, MCHS, LBES, and EAHS Perimeter Fencing and Gates Project.

Total estimated project budget $6,125,000

Fund 21, Measure C: $4,810,941.57

Fund 22, Measure G: $647,847.41

Amendment

PHS Hard Cost	$1,063,230
MCHS Hard Cost	$1,368,978
EAHS Hard Cost	$1,811,078
LBES Hard Cost	$547,509
Total	$4,790,795
Build Up Costs	$667,994
Guaranteed Maximum Price	$5,458,789

SRTA members are confused on two items. First, the amendment has two different prices for the Hard Cost at EAHS, $1,642,918 and $1,811,078. Secondly, the GMP is stated to be $5,458,789 while the agenda documentation states $6,125,000 which is an additional 12%. 

G.6. Approval of City of Santa Rosa High School District Resolution No. 2025/26-79 Authorizing The Issuance And Sale Of General Obligation Bonds, 2022 Election, 2025 Series C, In An Aggregate Principal Amount Not To Exceed $50,000,000 And Approving Related Documents And Actions for Secondary Sites.

Insurance Resolution

Bond Purchase Agreement

Preliminary Statement

Tax Rate Resolution

SRTA members would appreciate a clear communication about which projects this is expected to fund, including a timeline. 

G.7. Approval of the 2026-2027 MOUs between North Coast School of Education (NCSOE) and Santa Rosa City Schools

• Teacher Induction Program: $2,500 per year (per candidate)
• Be A Teacher Program: $2,500 per year (per candidate)
• Career Technical Education (CTE) Program:
  • New credential holder $2,500 per year
  • Existing credential holder: $1,250 per year

Fee for Service Flyer

“Be A Teacher” Intern Program MOU Cover Letter

Career Technical Education (CTE) Program MOU Cover Letter

Teacher Induction Program MOU Cover Letter

SRTA members would like clear annual communication about the expectations and support available for these candidates as well as their mentors from SRCS. 

G.8. Approval of Resolution of Early College Program for Full ADA for students attending 180 minutes vs 240 minutes

For the University Center program at Elsie Allen High School, to operate under the instructional time and attendance accounting provisions applicable to Early College High School to support the district’s ability to claim full Average Daily Attendance for these participating students.

G.9. Approval of Joint Use MOU’s for School Site Facility Use

Santa Rosa American Little League  3 fields at James Monroe Elementary School for $1 per year.

Westside Little League 3 fields at CCLA for $1 per year.

G.10. Approval of Piner High School’s Leadership Members to Travel to Washington, DC

Piner High School chapter of Family, Career, and Community Leaders of America (FCCLA) to attend the 2026 National Leadership Conference (NLC) in Washington, DC, from July 5th to July 11th, 2026.

The $10,054 cost will be covered with the CTEIG grant and ASB account.

Letter of Intent

Field Trip Request

Conference Schedule

G.11. Adoption of Resolution No. 2025/26-90 Authorizing and Approving the Transfer of Real Property to Santa Rosa Elementary School District

Transfer SRMS/FACS property from the HS district to the elementary district. This action is necessary for the district to be eligible for the reimbursement allocated under the Charter Facilities Grant program. Anticipated reimbursement is $3,640,906. 

Resolution

Grant Deed

Certificate of Acceptance

Accommodation Recording Agreement

G.12. Approval of Sunburst Workforce Advisors

Sunburst Workforce Advisors is a Managed Service Provider (MSP). With the MSP model, the district has one contract with Sunburst for no added cost. Sunburst then contracts with our vendors for unfilled positions, including instructional aides, Speech Language Pathologists, Occupational Therapists, and Behaviorists. Sunburst is paid by charging a 5% fee to participating vendors. 

Cost: $4,200,000

Master Service Agreement

Cost Saving Brochure 

Time Saving Brochure

Hiring district staff for these incredibly necessary, important positions is far preferable to hiring outside agency staff. Consistently outside agency staff have high turn over rates and inconsistent attendance. SRCS lost several behaviorists this past year due to unsustainable job expectations.  For the last several years, SRCS has been consistently unable to hire all the speech pathologists needed. SRCS struggles with having enough occupational therapists as well. Special ed restructuring must analyze SRCS’s difficulties to attract, onboard and retain staff. Cutting mileage reimbursement  for these positions at the end of last year could not have helped, but general feedback is that the positions require more work with fewer resources and staff don’t feel they can serve the students at the level they feel is professionally acceptable.  Staff would rather relocate to a district that provides the resources necessary to give  students what they need. Continuing to outsource these jobs means more money spent outside of our district, more money wasted on supporting these agencies and less money directly spent on students. A new director will face considerable pressure in tackling these long-standing challenges.

G.13. Approval of Santa Rosa Elementary School District Resolution 2025/26-80 Authorizing The Issuance And Sale Of General Obligation Bonds, 2022 Election, 2026 Series C, In An Aggregate Principal Amount Not To Exceed $15,000,000 And Approving Related Documents And Actions For Elementary Bonds

Insurance Resolution

Bond Purchase Agreement

Preliminary Statement

Tax Rate Resolution

SRTA members would appreciate a clear communication about which projects this is expected to fund, including a timeline. 

G.14. Approval of Amended Citizens’ Bond Oversight Committee Bylaws

Specifically, the bylaws changes include these recommendations by the auditors:

a) Consolidating the separate oversight committees into a single Citizens’ Bond Oversight Committee responsible for monitoring expenditures associated with the High School District and Elementary School District Bond Measures.

b) Annual verification that committee members continue to meet the Proposition 39 membership category requirements under which they were appointed.

c) Updating the bylaws to clearly identify the voter-approved bond measures subject to committee oversight. 

ByLaw Update

BP 1220

AR 1220

G.15. and G.16. Concerns

These items bring up the need for decision making systems and implementation around course development and textbooks. 

Department Steering Committees deserve respect to make decisions in the best interest of students, as they have the most information.  SRTA is hopeful that this attitude will be integral to SRCS systems moving forward. 

Also, clarification is needed when a new edition of a text is available. Does the board need to do an adoption before the text can be ordered, or are new editions automatically approved? The practice has not been consistent. 

When is purchasing a new text required? Does a course require a textbook, and must it be available online? Where is this codified?

When a committee was convened to create BP around textbook adoption, it was agreed that each site could adopt the text of their choice. This was because there was an acknowledgement of the differences at each site. District admin wants district wide texts for simplicity of text distribution across sites to be the primary factor. Which priority guides textbook decisions?

G.15. Adoption of Financial Math Textbook

The UC Board of Admissions and Relations with Schools (BOARS) has clarified its expectations for third year math courses requiring Algebra 2 or Math 3 content beginning SY 2026-27. The current Math 3 alternatives offered by SRCS will no longer be accepted. The Statistics courses will continue to be offered as third year courses.

Math with Financial Implications (course title update to Financial Math), was submitted to the UC system and approved as an Algebra 2 course. The book currently approved for this course is no longer in print and unavailable on secondary markets.  

Adopting Financial Algebra: Advanced Algebra with Financial Applications, 3rd edition will financially impact the district at the sum of $55,919.70 from restricted lottery funds. 

Financial Algebra

This class was initially approved in May of 2020. If textbook availability is an issue, maybe the initial purchase should be stacked. 

 SRTA members await the A-G committee recommendations. Many students would like to learn about financial content without the rigor of a Math 3 course. 

G.16.  Approval of Autentico Spanish I, II and III Textbook Adoption 

Cost: $452,756.15 from restricted lottery funds.

Will the availability of 2018 texts cause problems a few years out? 

G.17.  Approval of Amendment to the Left Coast Scanning Proposal

This amendment is for additional work as boxes had more images than expected. $21.980 + $11, 270 = $33,250 

Fund 21 $11,270 

$21.980 + $11, 270 = $33,250 (New Contract total)

Please note this is an estimate, quantity/cost could change based on actual count of images at project completion.

Proposal Scanning and organizing at $1.75 per page

Updated Project

2/23 Proposal

H. SECOND READ: BOARD BYLAW UPDATES

Omitting public comments on these items because there has been another option for commenting is wrong. Comments made during sub committee meetings are made before discussion when the changes to policy are disclosed. So actually, there is currently no time to comment on these proposed policies.

Deletions of BP language: Red

Insertion of BP language: Blue

Move of BP language: Grey

Initial link is comparison followed by clean copy. In general, these policies are more streamlined.

H.1. First Read and Possible Waive of the Second Read and Approval of Updated Board Policies

Due to the lack of a quorum within boundaries, the Board Policy Subcommittee informally discussed the CSBA updated Board Policies from May 2026.  

BP 1240: Volunteer Assistance Clean

BP 2110: Superintendent Responsibilities Clean Requires biannual ethics training. 

BP 4100: Certificated Personnel Clean

BP 4112.9: Employee Notifications Clean     The Superintendent or designee shall provide district employees all notifications required by law and any other notifications he/she believes will promote staff knowledge of the district’s policies, programs, activities, and operations.

BP 4212.9: Employee Notifications Clean

BP 4312.9: Employee Notifications Clean

BP 4200: Classified Personnel Clean

BP 4300: Administrative and Supervisory Personnel Clean

BP 5131.4: Student Disturbances Clean The Superintendent or designee and the principal of each school shall establish a student disturbance management plan for the school.

This is part of each site Safety Plan. Why is that not explicit? 

BP 5141.7: Sun Safety (Delete)

BP 5141.75: Weather Safety (New)*      The Superintendent or designee may monitor the UV Index and modify outdoor school activities with regard to the risk of harm associated with the Index level.

Will more detailed information be provided in an AR about what measures will be monitored and what the expectations will be for different levels of air quality? 

BP 5142: Safety Clean

BP 5145.6: Parent/Guardian Notifications Clean    Whenever an employee learns that a student’s parent/guardian is unable to understand the district’s printed notifications for any reason, the employee shall inform the principal or designee, who shall work with the parent/guardian to establish other appropriate means of communication.

“Printed” seems like an inappropriate word here. SRCS members have insisted that many parents are not accessing Parent Square communications from the district, and expect that the district needs to create multiple modes of communication with parents to ensure messages are reaching their target audience.

BP 5148: Child Care and Development Clean     Includes Response to Immigration Enforcement.

BP 7110: Facilities Master Plan Clean

H.2. First Read and Possible Waive of the Second Read and Approval of Updated Board Bylaws

BB 9200: Limits of Board Member Authority Clean 

 “Individual Board members do not have the authority to investigate, resolve, or otherwise actively engage with community members with respect to complaints, personnel or student matters, or legal issues. Any Board member who receives a communication regarding such a topic shall forward the communication to or otherwise inform the Superintendent or Board president, as appropriate, who shall respond or otherwise follow-up, as needed. The Board member shall not respond substantively to the communication beyond acknowledging receipt and explaining the limits of the Board member’s authority.” 

“A Board member may observe and/or volunteer in a school or classroom…”

BB 9320.1: Remote Meetings and Attendance Clean 

A remote Board member may attend and participate in no more than five Board meetings per year for just cause. 

I. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEMS

I.1. Charter School Calendar

I.1. a. (Public Comment on the Charter School Calendar

Comments will be limited to 60 seconds. Only items on I.1. agenda are addressed at this time.

I.1. b. (Action) Approval of CCLA LCAP

Supplemental and Concentration Grant funding in the LCAP $3,113,116

CCLA LCAP

CCLA Self Reflection

Prior Board Presentation

I.1.c. (Action) Approval of Santa Rosa Accelerated Charter School LCAP

Supplemental and Concentration Grant funding in the LCAP $61,518.

SRACS LCAP

SRACS Self Reflection

I.1.d. (Action) Approval of Santa Rosa Charter School for the Arts LCAP

Supplemental and Concentration Grant Funding in the LCAP year –  $335,766

SRCSA LCAP

SRCSA Self Reflection

I.1.e. (Action) Approval of Santa Rosa French American Charter School LCAP

Supplemental and Concentration Grant Funding in the LCAP year $596,321

SRFACS LCAP

SRFACS Self Reflection

I.2. Student Services Calendar

I.2. a. (Public Comment on the Charter School Calendar

Comments will be limited to 60 seconds. Only items on I.2. agenda are addressed at this time.

I.2.b. Public Hearing for Santa Rosa City Schools LCAP

“Incorporates detailed calculations of staff-to-student ratios, offering a clearer picture of staffing equity across sites.” To build trust, these ratios and the number of staff at each site must be transparently shared.

“This required the district to have meaningful conversations with participating educational partners …” This process requires more than conversation. SRCS has again promised an improved system for the LCAP creation and revision, without even meeting the basic requirement of meeting with bargaining units to consult on the changes being incorporated. The consultation meetings listed did not include any specifics. A further meeting for specifics was promised but did not happen.

Elementary School District Supplemental & Concentration = $10,10,746,841

High School District Supplemental & Concentration = $21,817,723

LCAP

I.2.c. (Action) Approval of New High School Course Proposals

Beginning Choir

Financial Math (textbook approval in consent agenda)

I.2.d. (Action) Approval of the 2026/27 Elementary, Charter and Secondary Instructional Minutes

Kindergarten: Must be 36,000 minutes or more

Grades 1-3: Must be 50,400 minutes or more

Grades 4-6: Must be 54,000 minutes or more

Middle School: Must be 54,000 minutes or more

High School: Must be 64,800 minutes or more

Continuation schools: Must be 32,400 minutes or more.

Elementary 2026-27 Instructional Minutes

ALES 54,186  HLES 54,245 HVES 55,093 JMES 54,140 LBES 54,700 PTES 54,310

1000 extra minutes is more than an additional 3 days of instructional time. 

Charter 2026-27 Instructional Minutes (Elementary)

CCLA 54,749   SRACS 54, 420  SRCSA 54,460  (MS 54,620) SRFACS 54,484

Middle School 2026-27 Instructional Minutes

CCLA 55,674  RVMS 54,340   MJH  55,030  SRJH  54,680   PJH  55,240   EAJH   55,611

1600 extra minutes is nearly 5 additional days of instructional time. 

High School 2026-27 Instructional Minutes 

EAHS 65,615 MCHS 64,890 MHS 65,154 PHS 64,844 SRHS 64,869 RHS 63,090

SRTA members are aware of the ramifications in meeting deadlines like this one when the instructional calendar is left until late spring.

I.2.e. (Action) Approval of School Plan for Student Achievement

This includes three new schools that now qualify for Title I funding: Hidden Valley Elementary, French-American Charter, and Rincon Valley Middle Schools. (The district proclaimed that MCHS also qualified, but is not included here.)

Each School Site Council (SSC) develops the School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) along with any applicable school advisory committee. The SSC’s responsibilities include: approving the plan, monitoring its implementation, and

evaluating the effectiveness of the planned activities at least annually. 

26-27 Title I & LCAP Counts & Site Allocations

25-26 Title I & LCAP Counts & Site Allocations

Site-LCAP Plans & Allocations Summary – FINAL

2026-2027 SPSA/Site LCAP Plans & Allocations Summary
Elementary & K-8 Site Plans 2026-2027
SPA/Site-LCAP	Title I Allocation		LCFF Allocation	Total Allocation	YoY Change
ALES	$34,018.08		$66,688.13	$100,706.13	-$79,253.37
HLES	$57.436.19		$116,664.46	$174,100.65	-$47,006.83
HVES	$31,240.19		$63,468.92	$94,709.11	-$1,552.75
JMES	$51,002.49		$101,107.23	$152,109.72	-$53,537.61
LBES	$41,668.43		$85,528.85	$127,197.28	-$64,584.16
PTES	$28,993.95		$59,200.54	$87,329.21	-$25,628.72
SRACS	–		$61,518.00	$61,518.00	$14,616.00
SRCSA	$20,011.33		$445,723.00	$465,734.33	$118,016.00
SRFACS	$22,927.55		$596,321.00	$619,248.55	$170,422.00
SRLA (CCLA)	$65,263.08		$3,113,116.00	$3,178,349.08	$700,427.08
Secondary Site Plans 2026-2027
SPA/Site-LCAP	Title I Allocation		LCFF Allocation	Total Allocation	YoY Change
EAHS	$49,568.26		$89,,868.94	$139,437.20	-$112,804.49
MCHS	$40,434.50		$72,818.10	$113,252.60	-$25,135.11
MHS	$47,932.50		$87,213.19	$135,145.69	-$16,376.22
MJHS	$22,271.67		$40,380.27	$62,651.94	-$43,964.10
PHS	$71,988.03		$132,016.58	$204,004.61	-$129,622.16
PJHS	$19,068.47		$35,262.27	$54,330.74	-$68,363.21
RHS	$9,405.69		$17,395.19	$26,800.88	$6,131.60
RVMS	$18,457.49		$33,553.84	$52,011.33	$134.71
SRHS	$52,367.91		$9,555.06	$148,222.96	-$139,461.88
SRJHS	$23,091.79		$41,499.88	$64,591.67	-$47,699.08

Financial transparency like these attachments are appreciated. It would be more helpful to have all funds going to the site listed included in a single document.

SRTA members notice that the charter school allocations are raising while nearly every other site is losing funding. What explains this? Would SRCS benefit from every site becoming a charter?

SRTA members encourage the district to develop a system and timeline for the creation and monitoring of site SPSAs (and LCAPS) to ensure that this is a community effort. Without guidance, it can too often be the result of a rushed job by an administrator to create a plan to utilize a last minute budget and then rush it through the approval process.

I.3. Business/Fiscal Services Calendar

I.3. a. Public Comment 

Comments will be limited to 60 seconds. Only items on I.3. agenda are addressed at this time

I.3.b. (Action) Adoption of Santa Rosa City Schools Budget for the 2026-27 School Year

There are no major changes from the Public Hearing on June 10, 2026. 

Presentation

Resolution for Single Budget

Budget

Revenue is down 2.8%

Expenses are down 4.8%

Instruction related expenses are down 17.3%

The reserve is up 228.9%

November cashflow is near negative $40 million. 

Projected ADA is reduced by 400 students.

SRTA members are still waiting on a report showing if there were any savings from the closures and consolidations of sites. So far the district has not proved that a single dollar was saved by closing school sites. The primary objective of these changes were financial. It is past time for transparent evaluation of the fiscal impact, especially before more closures are enacted. 

---

Closing a School? Don’t Expect to Save Money, a New Study Warns  

Enrollment Flight: When a school closes, many families choose to leave the district entirely to attend charter, private, or neighboring public schools. Because public funding is tied directly to enrollment, the district loses money. SRCS lost around 500 students last year and is projecting the loss of another 400 this year. This is not being addressed.

Staff Reassignment: The largest expense in any district is staffing. When a school closes, teachers and faculty are typically absorbed into other schools within the district rather than laid off, resulting in negligible savings on payroll. How much do the savings recovered from a single administrator position and a few classified staff add up to?

Building Maintenance: Empty school buildings require continued funding for upkeep, security, and preparation for potential sale. 

I.3.c. (Action) Acceptance of the Measures I, L, C and G Annual and Audit Reports

The committee approves expenses already incurred as allowable to be covered by the bond funds. 

7b) 24 25 SRCS Annual Report Measure I&L

7b) 24 25 SRCS Annual Report Measure C&G

 FY 2024-25 SRCS Bond Measure I Audit Report_C&ALLP 

FY 2024-25 SRCS Bond Measure L Audit Report_C&ALLP

FY 2024-25 SRCS Bond Measure C Audit Report_C&ALLP

FY 2024-25 SRCS Bond Measure G Audit Report_C&ALLP

Board Policy Manual SRCS Regulation 1220_Citizen Advisory Committee

Board Policy Manual SRCS Policy 1220_Citizen Advisory Committee

I.3.d. Action) Special Services Restructure and Preparation for SELPA Formation

Identified gaps are being addressed as follows:

Staff Development Gap Implementation: Dedicates 4.0 Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) positions focused exclusively on building site capacity, coaching, and training staff in compliant IEP writing and evidence-based instructional strategies.

Data & Compliance Gap Implementation: Dedicates 1.0 Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) position housed within the Information and Evaluation Department to manage rigorous state reporting, track compliance markers, and maintain data integrity.

The department is being reorganized into two distinct layers to ensure clear ownership and better implementation:

Executive Leadership: Sets the strategic direction and oversees the entire department.

Functional Leadership: Establishes clear, centralized leaders for high-need areas like compliance, placements, behavior, mental health, and 504 systems, reducing reliance on individual staff knowledge and site-by-site variability.

A summary document will be uploaded detailing the fiscal impact. (When?)

SELPA Roadmap Visual 

Special Services Reorganization Proposal-June, 2026

2026-2027 Info & Eval Reorg

Special Services Org Chart

SRTA members wonder about the after action efforts around these changes. How were the systemic needs of the Sped Dept effectively addressed? How can what worked be incorporated into other systemic needs? Where are the metrics to evaluate this work and make adjustments moving forward? 

I.3.e. (Action) Consideration and Approval of Restoration of Previously Reduced Work Days for Administrative, Supervisory, and Unrepresented Employees for the 2026-27 Fiscal Year

Approximately $135,000 for salary and statutory benefits for restoration of calendar work days only.

SRTA members are concerned for our site administrators. We support this restoration. There is apprehension about the unmanageable workload of site administrators with the elimination of positions for next year.

I.3.f. (Action) Approval of Resolution No. 2025/26-85 to Establish Temporary Inter-fund Transfers

This annual item allows for managing cash flow by borrowing from internal sources which avoids interest payments while waiting for December property taxes to refill the coffers.

Resolution

I.3.g. (Action) Approval of Resolution No. 2025/26-86 Requesting Fund Transfer Under Article XVI, Section 6 of the State Constitution To Borrow Funds From The Sonoma County Treasury As Needed During The 2026-27 Fiscal Year

This is another stop gap measure but it incurs a ~3% interest charge. Loans are limited to 85% of the expected tax income.

Resolution 

I.4. Human Resources Calendar

I.4. a. Public Comment 

Comments will be limited to 60 seconds. Only items on I.3. agenda are addressed at this time

I.4.b. (Action) Approval of California School Employees Association, Chapter 75 25-26 #3 MOU regarding Classified Layoff Agreement

1) Frozen Vacation Balance Payout 

cost $2,999.

2) Laid-Off Employees Health Coverage through September 30, 2026: cost $52,663.

3) Reduced Hours Employee Health Coverage Benefit Maintenance through September 30, 2026: cost $14,430.

4) Top-Step Placement for Demotions/Laterals: cost $47,893.

5) Uncontested Unemployment Insurance Claims: cost $60,051.

Estimated Total Cost: $178,036

CSEA 75 25-26 #3 Classified Layoff Agreement

Public Disclosure

SRTA members support this CSEA MOU.

I.4.c. Action) Approval of California School Employees Association, Chapter 75 25-26 #4 MOU 100 Hours Additional Work to New Jr/Sr High School Sites

Allocates 100 additional work hours per new Junior-Senior High School sites. This time will be used to support student registration and related duties due to the transition of students from Comstock Middle School to the newly established Junior-Senior High Schools (Piner and Elsie Allen).

total cost of $4,357

CSEA 75 25-26 #4

Public Disclosure

SRTA members support this CSEA MOU.

I.4.d. (Action) Declaration of Need for Fully Qualified Educators

The declaration must be approved at a regularly scheduled public meeting before Limited Term Assignments and Emergency Permits are issued.

Costs: When vacancies remain unfilled, this can cause overages for Class Counts that must be paid as well as the significant  loss of quality Tier 1 and Tier 2 learning and interventions to students.

Elementary Declaration Expect 12 elementary  interns this year. 

Secondary Declaration Expect 12 secondary interns this year. 

SRTA members are saddened that qualified teachers were released (or threatened to be released) when openings are expected.

Interns significantly impact resources. It is estimated that each replacement costs an additional $25,000. When the replacement is an intern, that cost is significantly higher. And there is significant energy required at the site level to acclimate and incorporate new staff. The willingness of staff to do this on a volunteer basis is waning. 

Learning Policy Institute 2024 Update: What’s the Cost of Teacher Turnover?  

I.4.e. (Action) Approval of Santa Rosa Teachers Association (SRTA) 25-26 #8 MOU/Tentative Agreement

Inclusion Model Collaboration Time:  Cost $279,174

Push-In Model Gen Ed Teacher Overage cost $39,612

Principal & Safety Advisor Simultaneous Absence (10 days), Report Card Committee Support (8 teachers x 10 meetings (1 per month)) Cost: $18,569.

Counselors assigned 480 students shall receive compensation at 1.2 FTE cost $90,964.

Estimated Total Cost: $ 428,339

SRTA 25-26 MOU #8/Tentative Agreement

Public Disclosure

SRTA members appreciate the efforts to mitigate these changes.

I.4.f. (Action) Approval of Santa Rosa Teachers Association (SRTA) 25-26 #9 MOU Title I COSA Renewal

Funded through central Title I funds, to provide targeted support (a ratio of 1: 150) to improve student outcomes for at-risk 8th and 9th grade students who have less than 90% attendance, have D or F in 4 or more classes.

The Renewal MOU does not require a ratification by the SRTA membership. 

SRTA 25-26 MOU #9 Title I COSA

I.5. Governance Calendar

I.5. a. Public Comment 

Comments will be limited to 60 seconds. Only items on I.5. agenda are addressed at this time

I.5.b.  (Action) Approval of the Specification of the Election Order Resolution for November 2026 Election

The three (3) Board seats coming up for election will be from Trustee Areas 2, 4, and 6.The terms of Shaun Du Fosse, Omar Medina, and Donna Prak will be expiring this year. This item further clarifies the financial commitment of the district.

Past practice of the Board has been to stipulate the following: The District is responsible for costs incurred in publishing a Statement (to not exceed 200 words) of Qualifications and for the publication in the voter pamphlet portion of the sample ballot. 

Also the board must stipulate what happens in case of a tie (hold a run-off election or draw lots.)

Cost: $15,000

Resolution

I.5.c. (Action) Approval of Resolution 2025/26-91: SOS for Student Achievement: Calling on the State of California to develop a coherent, state-focused plan for supporting local schools in closing achievement gaps

Key priorities include aligning state budgets, policies, and programs around student outcomes; replacing fragmented initiatives with a unified system of support; establishing shared accountability among state, county, and local agencies; evaluating and streamlining programs based on effectiveness; shifting from a compliance-driven approach to one centered on service and support; and removing barriers that limit local innovation and responsiveness to student needs.

Resolution

SRTA members support shifts in practice that eliminate box checking to avoid penalties, instead focusing on actually making improvements. The California Dashboard encourages the continuation of Cyber High to meet graduation requirements on paper, while many students are not actually learning content.  Dealing with discipline issues remains an issue, while the dashboard pressures districts to not suspend or expel without financially supporting other transformative practices.

J. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

June 10, 2026 Minutes and Supporting Documents

K. BOARD MEMBER REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION

L. INFORMATION ITEMS

L1. Future Board Discussion Items

The following are future board update items:

• Study Session: Graduation Requirements

The A-G Committee’s purpose is unclear. 

• 45 Day Budget Revisions
• Approval of Comprehensive School Safety Plans (CSSP)
• College and Career Readiness Update 
• Approval of Prop 28 Annual Reports 

SRTA looks to the future scheduling of the following items:

Plan for pivoting from A-G for all. 

Medina- AP instruction data with number of years of experience of Teachers

-Clarification about board policy adoption requiring a majority of board membership versus a majority of those present/voting

– consider E-sports clubs or teams 

Caston- Site funding finance report with various amounts and sources

-update 3510 policy around reducing waste as a discussion item

– Communication plan. 

Prak – Info about a non voting teacher on the board. 

Kirby – add an assistant wrestling coach for women? 

– Copies of the panorama and youth truth surveys. 

DeLaTorre- facility fee, possible reductions?

– Data on waiver’s impact on graduation rates. 

– Info on how we identify College and Career readiness.

Jenkins — projected enrollment for next year. 

– marketing plan update as committed to last year.

• Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) Update (Dec 2025)
• Panorama and Youth Truth Survey Data (August 2025)
• Restorative Practices Data (March 2025)
• Plan and timeline for implementation of Dr. Gillespie’s recommendations around Special Services (January 2025), Requesting New FCMAT Study on SRCS SpEd Program
• First Draft of the District Safety Plan (delayed from September 2024)
• Sharing the Library Master Plan with implementation expectations
• Officially Closing Learning House, and other sites
• Plan for Staff Housing support program from the proceeds of Fir Ridge

Until the district makes a decision, the proceeds from the sale of the Fir Ridge property are just sitting and losing value as the cost of housing continues to rise. Getting a program started could help SRCS attract and retain CSEA staff. The potential impact of the funds continues to diminish as time passes.

• Student Voice Policy
• Long standing request for site budgets including all sources as well as enrollment and unduplicated numbers.

L.3. Board Subcommittee Meeting Dates

There is so much work to be done to run the district. It is hard to understand how to get everything done without a July board meeting.

• Wednesday, July 22, 2026 (tentative) Special Board Meeting has been dropped from the agenda
  • There is so much work to be done to run the district. It is hard to understand how to get everything done without a July board meeting.
• Monday, August 3, 2026 (3:30-5:30) Board Finance Subcommittee
• Wednesday, September 16, 2026  Board Policy Subcommittee

SRTA members are appreciative of this transparency.

L.4. Non-Public School/Non-Public Agency Contract Update

NPA 25_16 SY – Updated 6_18

NPS 25_16 SY – Updated 6_18

		April	May	June	Latest Change
NPS	160 to 150 students	$9,571,368.24	$10,232,337.73	$10,103,375.21	-$128,962.52
NPA	275 to 247 Staff	$8,370,217.42	$14,909,562.98	$13,766,886.98	-$1,142,676.00
Total		$17,941,585.66	$25,141,900.71	$23,870,262.19	-$1,271,638.52

L.5. Facilities Projects Update

2026-06-24 Facilities Project Updates

Planning and Upcoming Projects

• Santa Rosa High School’s DeSoto Hall modernization and theater roofing project is awaiting DSA approval, with contractor mobilization and preparation underway.
• Santa Rosa Charter School for the Arts’ exterior paint project is scheduled to begin in early July. 

Major Construction Projects

• Districtwide electronic access control upgrades are underway at multiple sites, with Phase 3 construction beginning this summer.
• New TK classroom projects at Santa Rosa French American Charter School, James Monroe Elementary, and Helen Lehman Elementary are making substantial progress, including completion of playgrounds, building finishes, utilities, and furnishings.
• The new two-story classroom building at Piner High School is nearing completion, with interior finishes, HVAC commissioning, elevator installation, and site improvements progressing.
• The Early Learning Academy at Albert Biella Elementary continues construction on classrooms, playgrounds, pathways, and restroom facilities. 

District Office Project

• The District Office and Education Center replacement project has completed design, is awaiting DSA approval, and is undergoing environmental review through the CEQA process. 

Infrastructure Improvements

• Major roofing and HVAC replacement work is underway at Elsie Allen High School.
• Temporary portable classrooms are being installed at Luther Burbank Elementary.
• Turf replacement projects have begun or are scheduled at Maria Carrillo, Montgomery, Piner, Santa Rosa, and Elsie Allen high schools.
• Exterior painting projects are progressing at James Monroe and Hidden Valley elementary schools. 

Projects Nearing Completion or Closing Out

• Montgomery High School’s two-story classroom building is in final closeout and awaiting DSA certification.
• The Central Receiving Warehouse project is complete.
• Santa Rosa High School parking lot and fencing improvements are complete.
• Piner High School’s theater lighting modernization is substantially complete, with only minor remaining work. 

M. Adjournment

REGULAR BOARD MEETING

Santa Rosa City Schools

June 10, 2026

Hybrid: Santa Rosa City Hall Council Chambers

4:00 p.m. – Closed Session

5:00 p.m. – Study Session

6:00 p.m. – Open Session

Hybrid: Zoom / Santa Rosa City Hall

*** streamed ***

Video Board Meetings through a link on this district webpage. (It is often changed right before the meeting.)

Please take time to review the following abbreviated version of the agenda. Click here to see the entire agenda. It has live links on many items with more information. If you want to comment to the board about any upcoming items, email agendacomments@srcs.k12.ca.us. Please CC wearesrta@gmail.com on your email.

Members attending online are encouraged to add SRTA to the front of their Zoom client name.

Closed Session Items: 

A.1. Public Comment On Closed Session Agenda Items To comment, email Melanie Martin at mmartinsrcs.k12.ca.us.

This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak to the board on Closed Session items only. 

Without specifics on closed session agenda items, it is impossible for the public to know when to provide insights for items being reviewed.

B.1. Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release [Gov. Code § 54957]

B.2. Conference With Labor Negotiator Name of designated rep attending: Dr. Vicki Zands (SRCS); name of organization: Santa Rosa Teachers Association, CSEA Santa Rosa 75, Teamsters Union 665) 

B.3. Conference With Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation (Case No. 2026-110/26CV03377 ) 

B.4. Conference With Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation (Number of potential cases: 1) 

B.5. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Title of employee being reviewed: Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent, Principals, Vice Principals, Assistant Principals, Directors, Coordinators) 

C. RECONVENE TO OPEN STUDY SESSION: SPECIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT RESTRUCTURE AND SELPA PROGRESS UPDATE (5:00 p.m.)

C.1. Public Comment on the Study Session Calendar

C.2. (Discussion) Special Services Restructure and SELPA Formation Progress Update 

Special Services Updates The Special Services Department is proposing a restructuring plan aimed at creating a more sustainable and organized leadership system focused on districtwide consistency, compliance, and student support.

The new model would shift away from managing programs by school site and instead assign leaders to specific functional areas, including:

• Compliance, data, and legal requirements
• Non-public and out-of-district placements
• Tier 3 behavior supports
• Early childhood education
• Extensive support needs
• Districtwide mental health services
• Section 504 coordination and implementation

The district says the restructure is part of broader Special Education System Improvement efforts focused on:

• Clarifying staff roles and responsibilities
• Improving communication between schools and district supports
• Strengthening MTSS and SST intervention systems
• Creating more consistent procedures for behavior, discipline, placements, and 504 plans

The proposal also aims to expand support services beyond students with IEPs by providing earlier intervention and consultation for general education students, including multilingual learners. 

ReorganizationThis specifies district officejobs and their area of focus

Department Leadership 

● Executive Director of Special Services 

Functional Leadership 

● Compliance, IEP Quality, and Data Systems 

● NPS, Out-of-District, and Program Placement 

● Behavior and Intensive Student Support 

● ESN, Nursing, and K–12 Transition Continuum 

● 504 Coordinator

● Coordinator of Mental Health 

● ECE Leadership 

Core Department Infrastructure and Implementation Supports 

● 2 IEP Compliance and Case Management Coaches 

● 2 Instruction and Access Coaches 

● Full-time Special Education Substitute 

● SEIS Technicians 

● Data / Reporting Support Specialist

SELPA Roadmap

Summer and fall, board appoints CAC and bylaws are developed

Local Plan Committee convenes to review and revise Local Plan (Is this separate from CAC?)

SRTA members insist on systemic improvements to our Special Services systems. Students deserve to be supported, and costs must be controlled. 

D. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION (6 pm)

D.8. Special Presentation for 2025 – 2026 Santa Rosa City Schools Retirees

This year’s retirees represent classified, certificated, and administrative staff.Altogether, our 53 retirees represent over 1,192 years of service to our students, staff, and community.

Honoring Certificated Retirements (posted Aug – June)

Mary Anna Maloney, Janet Fisher, Christina Gravelle, Corinne Naro, Gail Gagliano, Michelle Meislahn, Steven Carpenter, Cynthia McDaniel, Carol Forrest, Valerie Johnson, Joseph Davis, William Huntsinger, Carla Forchini, Linda McCoy-Hernandez, Gale Ligotti, Diane Holly, Abby Walls, Kyle Hart, Joy Schermer, Janice Rodeck, Lisa DeCarbo, Cheryl Brooks, Page Willson, Rosalinda Brady, Mary Cain, Michael Persinger, Anthony Slaten, Linda Kastanis, Daniel Bartholome, and Richard Johnstone.

These thirty certificated folks amazingly gave over seven hundred one years of service to the students and families of SRCS.

We thank each of them for their dedication, passion, and service.

E. REPORTS (Bargaining Units, Sup, and Board)

E.5.a. Formation of Board Facilities Ad Hoc Committee

SRTA Members areready for transparent systems around facility decisions that incorporate site staff.

F. Public Comment on Non Agenda and Consent Items

SRTA Members are invited to complete ‘blue cards’ at the board meeting in order to make public comments. Online comments have been suspended. Comments will be limited to 60 seconds. Only items NOT on the agenda are addressed at this time, with the exception of consent items (See section G.)

Comments are requested at the board meeting to bring a member’s perspective and share real experiences of the impact of district policies and practices on students and staff. 

Speakers are limited to just those in person (unless a board member attends online without prior notice.)

Comments are most impactful when they are well spoken, composed and reasonable.

• There is great concern about the looming cost of overages for next year due to the lack of allocated sections. Teachers are not willing to take on last minute 0.2 FTE because SRCS was insistent on releasing employees beyond what is needed for next year.
• Special education teachers left for the summer without any clarity on the plan for their assignments for next year. They have not been able to prepare their students or update IEP paperwork without knowing the plan. This includes being unable to set secondary schedules. The counselors are off after this week. Leaving this scheduling workfor the days before school starts, when counselors return is creating an impossible task.
• “Additional information and documents will be uploaded prior to the meeting.” It is impossible to prepare for board meetings without the appropriate documents. This has become all too regular an occurrence, especially with weighty items like the budget and the LCAP. 
• Edjoin shows 17 elementary and 7 secondary RISE program assistant positions, 40 elementary and 29 secondary ESN assistants, 7 secondary CEP program assistants, 3 health aide positions, 6 transition program assistant positions, as well as multiple special ed assistant positions in mild/moderate programs. How will we staff the push in model that requires special ed assistants when we are already short 109 assistant positions? The new special ed model being touted by the district office requires the use of instructional assistants to support students moving from SDC to Gen Ed and from Co-taught to push in. Where will we get these assistants? Will we have to pay outside agencies at exorbitant rates, exasperating one of the major special ed costs that has consistently pushed our budget past what we can afford. 

G. CONSENT ITEMS 

All consent items are enacted by the Board in one motion, unless a Board member requests that an item be removed and discussed separately. 

G.2. Approval of Personnel Transactions 

Personnel Transactions 

EdJoin shows a total of sixty-three current postings for one hundred, ninety-one jobs in SRCS. There are fifteen certificated opening postings (three less than last meeting). There are some positions posted for next year. There are forty-eight current classified postings for one hundred seventy-four job openings (fifteen less than the last meeting.) There are one certificated and one classified management position posted. 

Welcome aboard Adam White (LBES.)

Changes to classified staff includes three resignations and two retirements. They leave taking with them fifty-five and a half years of knowledge and service to our staff and students.

Waiting until August or later to add sections costs us valuable colleagues now and adds even more chaos to our student’s experience. To encourage SRCS to properly allocate sections now, secondary SRTA Teachers will decline taking on additional sections that would place them above full time (1.2 FTE) after the end of the 2025-26 school year. SRTA members that have caseload caps (Special Ed, etc) will decline waiving those caps. SRTA demands that the district add the necessary sections now to avoid extreme overage costs and keep teachers from being laid off due to a lack of sections. 

Honoring Resignations (posted Aug – June)

Dan Evans, Sydney Miller, Danielle Ullyott, Annamarie Robustellini, Cody Martin, Nathan Murray, Donna Fernandez, Anthony Henderson, Clinton Magdaleno Sweek, Sharon Stevens, Brandi Ramos, Gino Beccaria, Alison Peoples, Aimee Ouellette, Meghan McDonnell, Gabrielle Licata, Alexandra Evans, Olivier Begue, Antoine Machillot, Emilie Carret Machillot, Manon Czuckermand, Armando Flores Partida, Dawn Rash, Andrea Munguia, Florian Mahe, Nicolette Elliott, Juan Trejo Gonzalez, Ellisa Beamish, Barbara Shelton, Marcus Dunseth, Beatriz Vera Mejia, Colette Ufholtz, Ryan Branche, Glenda Lowery, Madeline Daniels, Marie-Pierre Prieur, April Lombardo, Kaitlyn Watts, Debra Morrow, Elizabeth Parady, Cindy Beurtheret, Paulina Guadalupe Lopez Javalois, Tina Peretz, Cassie Kubiak, Christina Frost, Matthew Bowker, Stephanie Hsu, Danielle Yount, Andrew Hathaway, Kristen Barnes, Adrienne Mancilla, Macy Sharif, Madison Winslow, Nora Parajon, Khen Hirshberg, Brett Kovacs, Martine Merino, Lacey Helming, Danielle Yount, Michael Weldon, Emilie Pierce, Bianca LeMaster, Edward Vulpe, Genevieve Lilligren and Cynthia Gutierrez Garcia.

These sixty-five certificated folks amazingly gave over two-hundred, seventy-four years of service to the students and families of SRCS. We appreciate all you have done, and wish you all the best. 

SRTA members are especially distraught witnessing talented staff choosing to leave SRCS for better working conditions. 

G.5. Approval of Contracts over $15,000

The total cost of contracts is $522,556.34.

Contract Summary

Contracts

#	Provider	Cost	Description
District
2	Incident IQ, LLC	$50,519.00	platform for Facilities Management and IT Help Desk/Repairs
3	CDW-G	$70,274.14	Google Workspace for Education Plus
4	CLASSLINK, Inc.	$50,170.20	Software management platform
6	King Consulting	$180,000.00	Help SRCS apply for modernization funding from the state (Fund 40)
9	Softchoice Corporation	$15,498.00	315 Microsoft MS365 licenses at $49.20 each
Elementary
8	Stepping Stones Group, LLC	$25,000.00	Additional contract to cover therapy for non-insured elementary students at $105/hour.
Secondary
1	MINGA	$83,520.00	digital hall passes, student ID, and communication platform (includes charter)
5	Imagine Learning	$22,575.00	Edgenuity learning platform for ISP.
7	Keystone Therapy & Training Services	$25,000.00	Additional contract to cover therapy for non-insured secondary students at $165/hour.

G.6. Approval of Contracts – Bond

#	Provider	Site	Description	Cost	Total Cost
District
4	Uline	DO	Storage Tables and Racking	$111,040	$9,500,000
Elementary
2	Crawford & Associates, Inc.	LBES	Materials Testing & Inspection	$16,965	$2,800,000
Secondary
1	Crawford & Associates, Inc.	SRHS	Materials Testing & Inspection	$5,386	$8,000,000
3	Consolidated Engineering Laboratories	PHS	Materials Testing & Inspection	$57,474	$27,633,236

The total cost of contracts is by measure:

Measure C = $145,030.14

Measure G = $45,835.34

Total =$190,865.48

Summary of Contracts

Contracts

SRTA members notice that the turf fields appear to be installed right over the old turf. Are there assurances that the problems with the original turf won’t continue to cause problems for athletes if this cost saving effort is employed? 

G.7. Approval of California Interscholastic Federation Representatives

High school reps for the year to CIF, by title not name.

Form

G.8. Approval of Resolution to Appoint Alisa Haley to the Adult Education Program Member Participation and Sonoma County Adult Education Consortium Oversight Committee

Resolution

G.9. Approval of Amendment No.1 to the Lease-Leaseback Agreement with Wright Contracting LLC, for the Electronic Access Control Phase Three Project

Elsie Allen High School, Santa Rosa French-American Charter School (SRMS), Santa RosaLanguage Academy (CCLA), Ridgway High School, Hidden Valley Elementary School, and Santa Rosa Charter School for the Arts Electronic Access Controls Phase Three Project.

Fund 21: $9,925,524.00

Amendment

SRTA members have been frustrated with the implementation of these locks. It is impossible to know from inside a classroom if a door is locked or unlocked. Doors can only be locked from outside the classroom. This seems like we have gone backwards from the previous round of Columbine locks which are being removed.

There is a hope that with this contractor timelines and plans will be better communicated with all staff. Outside agency staff still are not consistently given access to keycards, limiting their access to parking lots, work spaces, bathrooms, gates, and the classrooms they work. The lack of access is more than just an inconvenience, it’s a safety concern.

G.10. Approval of Amendment No. 2 to the Alternate Design-Build Agreement with Arntz Builders, Inc. for the James Monroe Elementary School (JMES) TK Classroom Buildings Project

For additional fencing and security improvements, modifications to the site entry configuration, replacement of existing playground equipment and surfacing, and related site improvements necessary to support the Project and enhance campus functionality. Amendment No. 2 increases the Contract Sum by $841,738.65, resulting in a revised GMP amount of $13,316,174.86.

Fund 21 Measure G: $841,738.65

Amendment #2

Unfortunately, no TK or kindergarten teachers were consulted in the design of these new buildings. Because of this the new kinder rooms have extremely inadequate storage available in the classrooms. There are concerns regarding some of the landscaping design choices that may be unsafe for kindergarteners during less structured recess play.

H. SECOND READ: BOARD BYLAW UPDATES

Omitting public comments on these items because there has been another option for commenting is wrong. It is not possible for most employees to comment at the Finance Sub Committee, as the comments must be made in person, at the beginning of the meeting while most employees are still working. This excludes one of the major groups of constituents from participating. Furthermore, those comments are made before discussion when the details of the policy are disclosed. So actually, there is currently no time to comment on these proposed policies.

H.1. Second Read: Board Bylaw 9150: Student Board Members

The Board Finance Subcommittee proposed the following:

The student Board member(s) shall receive monthly compensation of $50. 00 per meeting.

There are 26 scheduled regular and special Board meetings for 2026/27; should the students attend the majority of meetings, the cost is estimated at $2,500 for two student board members.

Deletions of BP language: Red

Insertion of BP language: Blue

Move of BP language: Grey

Bylaw 9150 Clean

Bylaw 9150 Comparison

Students cannot double dip. If students receive compensation they can not claim the time served for volunteer community service. Perhaps student board members could be given an option between compensation or volunteer community service hours . 

H.2. Second Read: Board Bylaw 9250: Remuneration, Reimbursement and Other Benefits

The current stipend amount is $536.04.Should the Board take action to increase to the new maximum allowable amount of $2,000/month, the estimated impact is approximately $122,973 annually.

Bylaw 9150 Clean

Bylaw 9150 Comparison

It is concerning that the finance sub-committee, the body with the most awareness of the financial plight of the district, is suggesting quadrupeling the board stipend.What would be set aside to make these funds available?This estimated financial impact is large enough to pay for another teacher or counselor to reduce class sizes or impact counselor availability.

There was talk of creating an inclusive system to advise on decisions for additional spending, and restoring programs. This item, and the $76,000 raise at the board’s prior meeting make it appear that there are no longer financial concerns. If SRCS is ready to increase spending, where is the transparent process to collaborate on those decisions to ensure we are centering our student experience? 

I. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEMS

I.1. Charter School Calendar

I.1. a. (Public Hearing / Action) Public Hearing on CCLA Renewal Petition and Material Revision Request and Consideration/Action on Resolution No. 2025/26-88 to Approve Renewal Petition and Material Revision Request

CCLA is a middle-performing charter school and is seeking a five-year charter term, from July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2031. SRCS has determined that the CCLA qualifies for a five-year renewal of its charter term. SRCS staff have also reviewed the Material Revision Request and recommend approval. 

Resolution

Response ten points for improvement

Recommending elementary counselors for these students while eliminating this service for non charter sites is a gut punch.

Many of the shortfalls cited are district wide, and deserve solutions led from a district level. 

Final Staff Report

Renewal

May Board Presentation

I.1. b. (Public Hearing / Action) Public Hearing on Santa Rosa Accelerated Charter School Renewal Petition and Consideration/Action on Resolution No. 2025/26-87 to Approve Renewal

Draft Resolution No. 2025/26-87 recommends a seven-year term, though the Board may choose any of the three options SRACS is eligible for based on the school’s high-performing status.

Resolution

Response ten points for improvement

Recommending elementary counselors for these students while eliminating this service for non charter sites is a gut punch.

Many of the shortfalls cited are district wide, and deserve solutions led from a district level. 

Final Staff Report

Renewal

SRTA members have watched a contorted process for renewal, including threatening the existence of a comprehensive middle school at CCLA, and confusion around the definition of a 9-12 program. District staff have not provided the vision, focus and support this process calls for. 

I.1.c. Public Hearing for CCLA LCAP

Supplemental and Concentration Grant funding in the LCAP $3,113,116.

CCLA LCAP

Board Presentation

I.1.d. Public Hearing for Santa Rosa Accelerated Charter School LCAP

Supplemental and Concentration Grant Funding in the LCAP year – $61,518

SRACS LCAP

I.1.e. Public Hearing for Santa Rosa Charter School for the Arts LCAP

Supplemental and Concentration Grant funding in the LCAP $445,723

SRCSA LCAP

I.1.f. Public Hearing for Santa Rosa French American Charter School LCAP

Supplemental and Concentration Grant Funding in the LCAP year $596,321 

SRFACS LCAP

I.2. Student Services Calendar

I.2.a. Public Hearing for Santa Rosa City Schools LCAP

Elementary School District Supplemental & Concentration = $10,695,610 

High School District Supplemental & Concentration =$15,871,183

Additional information and documents will be uploaded prior to the meeting.

Board Presentation

LCAP Federal Addendum

SRTA leadership was invited to the table to ask for general input prior to the development of the LCAP. There were no specific plans for the LCAP shared. A follow up meeting to consult on the actual plan was promised but did not happen. 

The system for reviewing and revising the LCAP is wanting. By the time staff admits that the system is flawed, and promises systemic improvements will be made ‘next year’ staff is moving on from SRCS, and there are no changes. 

Transparency on what funding is being provided to sites, inclusive of LCAP, Lottery, Title and other funds, as well as enrollments and number of unduplicated students would assist the process of rebuilding trust. 

I.3. Finance Calendar

I.3. a. Public Comment 

Comments will be limited to 60 seconds. Only items on I.3. agenda are addressed at this time

I.3.b. Public Hearing for Santa Rosa City Schools 2026-27 Proposed Budget

Supporting documents will be attached prior to the Board Meeting.

Budget Fund Forms

SRTA members are still waiting on a report clarifying the savings from the closures and consolidations of sites. So far the district has not proved that a single dollar was saved by closing school sites. The primary objective of these changes were financial.It is past time for transparent evaluation of the fiscal impact.

SRTA members demand the inclusion of details on all funding sources for each school site as well as current, accurate enrollment and unduplicated counts. This has been promised at every interim, and then pushed to the next report. This is the end of the line. Financial transparency is a necessary piece of trust building.

I.3.c. (Action) Approval of Newly Established Fund 20: Special Revenue Funds

Establish a fund known as the Special Reserve for Postemployment Benefits, Fund 20, and such fund is authorized to account for amounts the LEA has earmarked for the future cost of retiree benefits.

Resolution

SRTA members wonder about the wisdom in setting aside funds when they are confined to accounts that just keep up with COLA. This seems contrary to the idea that the funds would grow and become a sustaining income source for the post employment benefits in any reasonable timeline. 

I.4. Human Resources Calendar

I.4. a. Public Comment 

Comments will be limited to 60 seconds. Only items on I.3. agenda are addressed at this time

I.4.b. (Action) Approval of California School Employee Association, Chapter 75 (CSEA 75) 25-26 #1 MOU 2026-2027 Classified Employee Calendar

CSEA MOU Calendar

CSEA Calendar

I.4.c. (Action) Approval of California School Employees Association, Chapter 75 25-26 #2 MOU Job Description Updates

CSEA 25-26 MOU #2 Job Descriptions (Reclass 2023-2026) 

Administrative Assistant, Secondary-Middle and Continuation Schools Job Description 

Culinary Coordinator Job Description 

District Data Specialist I Job Description 

HR Recruiting Technician Job Description 

SIS Coordinator Job Description

College and Career Technician Job Description 

CNS Warehouse Keeper_Driver Job Description 

Human Resources Technician III Job Description Program Account Tech III Job Description 

I.4.d. (Action) Approval of Santa Rosa Teachers Association (SRTA) 25-26 #6 MOU Elsie Allen Junior Senior High School Instructional Minutes Schedule (Bell Schedule)

EAJH Bell

I.4.e. (Action) Oral Recommendation Regarding Assistant Superintendent of Student Support Salary and Fringe Benefits; Discussion and Board Vote on Assistant Superintendent Employment Agreement

• The Assistant Superintendent’s contract states that the Assistant Superintendent’s salary for the 2026-2027 fiscal year will be $59,565.
• The 2026-2027 work year for the Assistant Superintendent shall be 69.5 days.
• The contract provides the Assistant Superintendent with the same access to health, dental, and vision benefits as other management employees.

Contract

SRTA members celebrate Dr. McCarty’s dedication to SRCS. 

For transparency and to prevent later confusion, is this position being budgeted at 100% of the typical compensation, or at the contracted amount? 

I.4.f. (Action) Oral Recommendation Regarding Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources Salary and Fringe Benefits; Discussion and Board Vote on Assistant Superintendent Employment Agreement

• The Assistant Superintendent’s contract states that the Assistant Superintendent’s salary for the 2026-2027 fiscal year will be $191,591.31.
• The 2026-2027 work year for the Assistant Superintendent shall be 224 days.
• The contract provides the Assistant Superintendent with the same access to health, dental, and vision benefits as other management employees.
• Finally, the contract provides for $1,800 as annual reimbursement for automobile-related expenses.

This contract includes concessions of a reduction of one (1) workday, a 50% reduction in the automobile stipend, a reduction of ten (10) vacation days, and the suspension of vacation payout provisions.

Contract

SRTA members wonder about employee absences when there are no vacation days. 

If the employee is released without cause, the district shall pay for the remainder of the unexpired term of this Agreement, or a sum equal to three (3) months of the gross monthly base salary at the salary rate in effect at the termination.

I.4.g. (Action) Oral Recommendation Regarding Superintendent Salary and Fringe Benefits; Discussion and Board Vote on Superintendent Employment Agreement

• The Superintendent’s contract states that the Superintendent’s salary for the 2026-2027 fiscal year will be $275,000.
• The 2026-2027 work year for the Superintendent shall be 222 days.
• The contract provides the Superintendent with the same access to health, dental, and vision benefits as other management employees.

Contract

SRTA Members wonder if there were any other expenses agreed to, such as a moving allowance, or if this list is complete.

I.5. Governance Calendar

I.5. a. Public Comment 

Comments will be limited to 60 seconds. Only items on I.5. agenda are addressed at this time

I.5.b. (Action) Approval of a Resolution for Governing Board Elections November 2026

The three (3) Board seats coming up for election will be from Trustee Areas 2, 4, and 6.The terms of Shaun Du Fosse, Omar Medina, and Donna Prak will be expiring this year.

Resolution

Trustee Area Map

J. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

April 27, 2026 Minutes and Supporting Documents

June 3, 2026 Minutes and Site Presentation Bellflower Visit, CAPS Presentation , CAPS Year 1, Dashboard

K. BOARD MEMBER REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION

L. INFORMATION ITEMS

L1. Future Board Discussion Items

The following are future board update items:

• Approval of SRCS LCAP (June 24, 2026)
• Approval of LCAP for All Charter Schools (June 24, 2026)
• Adoption of SRCS and Charter Budget for 2026/27 (June 24, 2026)
  • Request to include details on all funding sources for each school site as well as enrollment and unduplicated counts.
• Action Special Services Restructure (June 24, 2026)
• Action SRC SELPA Related Item(s) (June 24, 2026)

SRTA looks to the future scheduling of the following items:

Plan for pivoting from A-G for all. 

Medina- AP instruction data with number of years of experience of Teachers

-Clarification about board policy adoption requiring a majority of board membership versus a majority of those present/voting

– consider E-sports clubs or teams 

Caston- Site funding finance report with various amounts and sources

-update 3510 policy around reducing waste as a discussion item

– Communication plan. 

Prak – Info about a non voting teacher on the board. 

Kirby – add an assistant wrestling coach for women? 

– Copies of the panorama and youth truth surveys. 

DeLaTorre- facility fee, possible reductions?

– Data on waiver’s impact on graduation rates. 

– Info on how we identify College and Career readiness.

Jenkins — projected enrollment for next year. 

– marketing plan update as committed to last year.

• Approval of Mental Health Coordinator Position (delayed from Feb 2026)

• Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) Update (Dec 2025)
• Panorama and Youth Truth Survey Data (August 2025)
• Restorative Practices Data (March 2025)
• Plan and timeline for implementation of Dr. Gillespie’s recommendations around Special Services (January 2025), Requesting New FCMAT Study on SRCS SpEd Program
• First Draft of the District Safety Plan (delayed from September 2024)
• Sharing the Library Master Plan with implementation expectations
• Officially Closing Learning House, and other sites
• Plan for Staff Housing support program from the proceeds of Fir Ridge

Until the district makes a decision, the proceeds from the sale of the Fir Ridge property are just sitting and losing value as the cost of housing continues to rise. Getting a program started could help SRCS attract and retain CSEA staff. The potential impact of the funds continues to diminish as time passes.

• Student Voice Policy
• Long standing request for site budgets including all sources as well as enrollment and unduplicated numbers.

L.3. Board Subcommittee Meeting Dates

• Thursday, June 18, 20265:00-7:00) Board Policy Subcommittee

• Wednesday, July 22, 2026 (tentative) Special Board Meeting
• There is so much work to be done to run the district. It is hard to understand how to get everything done without a July board meeting.
• Monday, August 3, 2026 (3:30-5:30)Board Finance Subcommittee

SRTA members are appreciative of this transparency.

M. Adjournment

REGULAR BOARD MEETING

Santa Rosa City Schools

May 27, 2026

Hybrid: Santa Rosa City Hall Council Chambers

4:00 p.m. – Closed Session

5:00 p.m. – Study Session

6:00 p.m. – Open Session

Hybrid: Zoom / Santa Rosa City Hall

*** streamed ***

Video Board Meetings through a link on this district webpage. (It is often changed right before the meeting.)

Please take time to review the following abbreviated version of the agenda. Click here to see the entire agenda. It has live links on many items with more information. If you want to comment to the board about any upcoming items, email agendacomments@srcs.k12.ca.us. Please CC wearesrta@gmail.com on your email.

Members attending online are encouraged to add SRTA to the front of their Zoom client name.

Closed Session Items: 

A.1. Public Comment On Closed Session Agenda Items To comment, email Melanie Martin at mmartinsrcs.k12.ca.us.

This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak to the board on Closed Session items only. 

Without specifics on closed session agenda items, it is impossible for the public to know when to provide insights for items being reviewed.

B.1. Student Readmissions (Case Nos: 2023/24-03, 2024/25-27, 2024/25-25)

B.2. Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release

B.3. Conference With Labor Negotiator Name of designated rep attending: Dr. Vicki Zands (SRCS); name of organization: Santa Rosa Teachers Association, CSEA Santa Rosa 75, Teamsters Union 665)

B.4. Conference With Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation (1 Potential Case ) 

B.5. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Title of employee being reviewed: Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent, Principals, Vice Principals, Assistant Principals, Directors, Coordinators) 

C. RECONVENE TO OPEN STUDY SESSION: FISCAL SERVICES (5:00 P.M.)

C.1. Public Comment on the Study Session Calendar

C.2. (Action) 2025-26 Third Interim Financial Report and Information on the Governor’s May Revision to the 2026-27 Proposed State Budget

Summary: The 2025–26 Third Interim Report for Santa Rosa City Schools projects a modestly improved unrestricted general fund position compared to earlier budgets, but the district continues to face major structural financial pressures.

Key highlights include:

• Total unrestricted revenues are projected at about $187.9 million, slightly above the board-approved budget. LCFF funding remains the district’s primary revenue source.
• Total unrestricted expenditures are projected at about $142.5 million, lower than budgeted by roughly $1.1 million. Savings are largely due to lowered services and operating costs.
• Certificated salaries are projected to exceed budget expectations by nearly $3 million, while employee benefits are also higher than anticipated. 
• The unrestricted fund is projected to end the year with a positive balance of approximately $2.8 million, a significant improvement from the originally projected negative balance of over $11 million.
• The district is transferring substantial unrestricted dollars — about $43.8 million — to support restricted programs such as special education and categorical programs.
• Restricted funds project approximately $53.3 million in revenues against $108.8 million in expenditures, requiring major contributions from unrestricted funds and transfers to remain solvent.
• Restricted programs are projected to end the year with about $8.9 million in restricted fund balance reserves.
• Significant restricted funding sources include Title I, special education grants, Expanded Learning Opportunities Program (ELO-P), Arts and Music in Schools funding, and Career Technical Education grants.
• Services and operating expenditures remain one of the district’s largest spending categories, particularly in restricted programs, where they exceed $40 million.

Overall, the report shows short-term stabilization compared to earlier projections, but ongoing reliance on unrestricted contributions to support restricted programs continues to strain the district’s financial outlook.

Additional documents will be uploaded prior to the study session. 

Report

• It is still very unclear what savings if any have been realized by closing and consolidating campuses. There has been no publicly released documentation of any savings.
• With the intense control of spending this year, certificated staffing is 4.6% over budget with substantial reductions in staffing, and no increase to salaries. That makes one wonder if next year’s staffing cuts are too severe to actually implement. 
• Spending for restricted programs requires a concerning $56 million (an additional 106%) from unrestricted funds. This requires intense energy to create and implement a plan to right size spending. 
• Services and other operating expenses remain a major concern for SRTA members. These outside contracts must be curtailed.
• The Governors May Revision has a noticeable increase to COLA. How will decisions be made about the use of additional funds? 

D. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION (6 pm)

E. REPORTS (Bargaining Units, Sup, and Board)

E.4. Superintendent’s Annual Report

F. Public Comment on Non Agenda and Consent Items

SRTA Members are invited to complete ‘blue cards’ at the board meeting in order to make public comments. Online comments have been suspended. Comments will be limited to 60 seconds. Only items NOT on the agenda are addressed at this time, with the exception of consent items (See section G.)

Comments are requested at the board meeting to bring a member’s perspective and share real experiences of the impact of district policies and practices on students and staff. 

Speakers are limited to just those in person (unless a board member attends online without prior notice.)

Comments are most impactful when they are well spoken, composed and reasonable.

• Students thrive when their teachers thrive
• Students learn better in environments where they feel psychologically safe, emotionally connected, and valued. Students learn best from teachers they trust. 
• Teachers perform best when they feel valued. If teachers are burned out, unsupported, distrusted, and emotionally exhausted, students ultimately pay the price. 
• The current steps to restore trust within our district are not sufficient. 
• There is a perception that there are more staff members than current positions, as approved section numbers are at an all time low. Classes will be packed as supports are diminished. This is creating the image of a pressure cooker for next year.
• The adopted cell phone policy goes beyond what can be upheld. How can a secondary campus with a handful of advisors be expected to monitor student phone usage at break and lunch? How will this be implemented? 

G. CONSENT ITEMS 

All consent items are enacted by the Board in one motion, unless a Board member requests that an item be removed and discussed separately. 

G.2. Approval of Personnel Transactions 

Personnel Transactions 

EdJoin shows a total of seventy-seven current postings for two hundred ten jobs in SRCS. There are eighteen certificated opening postings (two more less than last meeting). There are a few positions posted for next year. There are fifty-eight current classified postings for one hundred eighty-nine job openings (thirteen more than the last meeting.) There are three certificated and one classified management position posted. 

We bid farewell to Debra Morrow (PHS), Elizabeth Parady (SPSV), Cindy Beurtheret (MHS), Paulina Guadalupe Lopez Javalois (PHS), Tina Peretz (SRCSA), Cassie  Kubiak (RVMS),

Christina Frost (LBES), Matthew Bowker (MCHS), Stephanie Hsu (MHS), Danielle Yount (JMES), and Andrew Hathaway (MHS) who are resigning at the end of the year, taking seventy-two years of service and experience with them. 

We bid a fond farewell to Joy Schermer (MCHS), Janice Rodeck (RVMS), Lisa DeCarbo (EAHS), Cheryl Brooks (MHS), Page Willson (PHS), Rosalinda Brady (H&H), Mary Cain PTES), Michael Persinger (JMES), Anthony Slaten (PHS), Linda Kastanis (RVMS) who are all retiring at the end of the year, after two hundred forty-seven years of combined service to our students and families. We are grateful for their service, and wish them all the best!

Changes to classified staff includes two new hires, three rehires , four resignations and three retirement. They leave taking with them sixty-one and a half years of knowledge and service to our staff and students.

We bid farewell to the following resigning administrators: Luz Perez, Exec. Director, Educational Services, Maleni Carrillo Gomez Proj. Mgr/Behavior Specialist, Kelly Briggs HCMS  Principal and Gabriela Mendoza-Torres CCLA Principal.They leave us taking nine years of experience with them.  Also, to the retiring Raphael Sanabria Custodial Manager who has 31 years of service to SRCS.

Waiting until August or later to add sections costs us valuable colleagues now and adds even more chaos to our student’s experience. To encourage SRCS to properly allocate sections now, secondary SRTA Teachers will decline taking on additional sections that would place them above full time (1.2 FTE) after the end of the 2025-26 school year. SRTA members that have caseload caps (Special Ed, etc) will decline waiving those caps. SRTA demands that the district add the necessary sections now to avoid extreme overage costs and keep teachers from being laid off due to a lack of sections. 

G.5. Approval of Contracts over $15,000

The total cost of contracts is $249,727.94.

Contract Summary

Contracts

#	Provider	Cost	Description
District
1	King Consulting	$49,200.00	For an additional 240 hours to apply for CA modernization funding. (Bond funds.)
2	Follett Software	$44,276.28	Library and Resource management software.
5	ParentSquare	$84,536.66	Renewal for communication platform which allows choice of language.
Charter
4	Westminster Woods	$21,715.00	CCLA Outdoor Ed
Elementary
3	Bala Creative / Maxfield Bala Creative	$50,000.00	Mural for multipurpose room at HVES to use Prop 28 funds.

G.6. Approval of Contracts – Bond

#	Provider	Site	Description	Cost	Total Cost
Secondary
1	Kurt Hirtzer Inspection Services	All HSs	Inspection Services for new turf projects	$25,000	$9,375,000

The total cost of contracts is by measure:

Measure C = $25,000.00

Measure G = $0.00

Total =  $25,000.00

Summary of Contracts

Contracts

SRTA members notice that the cost for the field project has been increased by $2,375,000. 

G.7. Approval of the Student Representatives to the Board of Education for 2026/2027 School Year

Timeline

Questions

Zaira  Alvarado MHS

Mallix (Ella) Way PHS

SRTA members welcome our new student board members. 

G.8. Approval of College and Career Access Pathways (CCAP) Partnership Agreement

Assembly Bill 288 established the College and Career Access Pathways (CCAP) program, allowing community college districts and K–12 school districts to create formal partnerships that expand dual enrollment opportunities for high school students. The Santa Rosa Junior College Board approved the CCAP Memorandum of Understanding on May 12, 2026, and the agreement now requires approval by the Santa Rosa City Schools Board.

The CCAP agreement would allow SRCS students to take Santa Rosa Junior College courses on high school campuses during the school day, earning both high school and college credit simultaneously. The program is designed to improve college and career readiness, expand access for underrepresented students, strengthen Career Technical Education pathways, and support transitions to four-year colleges.

The agreement specifically protects K–12 staffing and school funding by ensuring that dual enrollment participation does not reduce district full-time equivalent (FTE) allocations. Students who successfully complete courses also receive weighted GPA credit.

SRCS first implemented the program at Elsie Allen High School after securing a CCAP grant in Fall 2023. In Spring 2024, SRCS secured four additional CCAP grants to expand the program districtwide. During the 2025–26 school year, six CCAP courses were offered across Elsie Allen, Maria Carrillo, and Montgomery Junior/Senior High School. A total of 78 students enrolled in fall courses with an 86% average pass rate, while 70 students are currently enrolled in spring courses.

Overall, the partnership is intended to expand equitable access to college coursework, increase early college credit opportunities, and strengthen academic and career pathways for SRCS students.

Agreement

SRTA members would appreciate reassurance that these sections are in addition to the district section allocations. If SRTA members are qualified, is it agreed that they can teach these sections? Is there transparent access to the details around this arrangement and the impacts? 

H. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEMS

H.1. Business Services Calendar

H.1. a. Public Comment

Comments will be limited to 60 seconds. Only items on H.1. agenda are addressed at this time

H.1. b. (Discussion/Action) Approval of the 7-11 Surplus Property Committee Report

The 7-11 Committee recommends that the Board officially declare six school properties no longer needed for district educational purposes:

• Brook Hill Elementary
• Lewis Early Learning Academy
• Santa Rosa French American Charter (Doyle Park Elementary)
• Hilliard Comstock Elementary
• Herbert Slater Middle School
• Steele Lane Elementary

The committee recommends moving quickly to lease four of the properties — Brook Hill, Doyle Park/French American Charter, Steele Lane, and Lewis Early Learning — for housing development at fair market value after the required surplus property process is completed.

The committee recommends holding onto Herbert Slater and Hilliard Comstock for another 3–5 years so the district can explore possible community uses and avoid flooding the real estate market with too many properties at once.

The committee also recommends using 99-year leases instead of selling the properties outright. This would allow the district to keep ownership while generating ongoing revenue, with 80% going to the unrestricted general fund and 20% going to district reserves and Fund 40.

7-11 Committee Report

SRTA members appreciate the efforts of this committee. The board is encouraged to follow these recommendations. 

H.1.c. (Discussion) Deferred Maintenance Update

The ability to maintain upgraded facilities as opposed to responding to urgent repairs to facilities and equipment beyond useful life has a direct impact on the productivity of the maintenance department. An additional component is the Deferred Maintenance Plan, which has been developed and includes replacement cycles for major facilities systems, such as roofing, flooring, HVAC, etc. 

Presentation

The actual deferred maintenance plan is not attached.

H.1.d. (Discussion) SRCS Facility Use Requests and Policies

The discussion will include an overview of:

• Current Platform: iiQEvents
• Minimum two-week advance submission requirements for facility use requests;
• Required documentation, including Certificates of Insurance and nonprofit verification, when applicable
• Reservation policies related to cancellations, no-shows, and modification limitations
• Monthly invoicing procedures for facility use and related operational costs; using the Board-approved SRCS Community Use of School Facilities Fee Schedule
• Community communication resources and user support materials available through iiQEvents
• Development of joint use agreements when appropriate

Fee Schedule

SRCS is a vital member of the Santa Rosa community. Our facilities are an important part of local life. 

With the decline of administrative positions on sites, the processing of facility use permits is likely to become a non essential task. 

There is no financial benefit to sites for hosting outside groups. Actually, it can cost sites, because if items are broken during rentals, it is up to the site to replace them. SRTA members support a portion of rental fees being shared with sites. 

H.1.d. (Discussion) Update on Child Nutrition Services (CNS)

The CNS department will provide updates on program achievements, operations, and finances, including recognition of Rosalba Estrada de Martinez as Classified School Employee of the Year in the Food and Nutrition category. 

Fund 13 remains financially strong with maximum allowable reserves, and CNS expects to end the 2025/26 school year with a positive balance that will be reinvested into student meal programs.

Updates also include expanded meal service at Santa Rosa and Montgomery Junior Senior High Schools, staff training in scratch cooking and food safety, and approximately $360,000 invested in capital equipment, much of it supporting meal preparation and service at school sites. 

CNS highlights nutrition education efforts, sustained local food purchasing, and successful implementation of plastic-free meal programs at two elementary schools, with plans to expand in 2026/27.

Presentation

Additional Information

How is the CNS program evaluated? What methods are used to ensure that sites have enough food for students, to avoid students eager to leave class early to ensure they can be fed? How are student opinions collected to assess their satisfaction with menu items? 

H.2. Human Resources Calendar

H.2. a. Public Comment 

Comments will be limited to 60 seconds. Only items on H.2. agenda are addressed at this time

H.2. b. (Action) Approval of Santa Rosa Teachers Association (SRTA) 25-26 #3 MOU Helen Lehman Elementary School Instructional Minutes Schedule (Bell Schedule)

The MOU was ratified by the members at this site.

Lehman MOU

SRTA supports this MOU.

H.2.c. (Action) Approval of Santa Rosa Teachers Association (SRTA) 25-26 #4 MOU James Monroe Elementary School Instructional Minutes Schedule (Bell Schedule)

The MOU was ratified by the members at this site.

Monroe MOU

SRTA supports this MOU.

H.2.d. (Action) Approval of Santa Rosa Teachers Association (SRTA) 25-26 #7 MOU Impacts and Effects of School Consolidation and Closure Transition

The MOU is intended to protect employee rights, reduce disruption during consolidations and closures, and clarify working conditions during the transition process. Key provisions include:

• Teachers displaced by closures or consolidations will retain transfer rights under the collective bargaining agreement.
• Staff at Steele Lane and Hilliard Comstock who voluntarily relocate to open positions or new junior high programs can choose placements by seniority before involuntary transfers occur.
• Junior high (7–8) and high school (9–12) programs at consolidated campuses will continue to be treated separately for staffing, transfers, schedules, and contract provisions during the transition period.
• Schools sharing campuses will continue voting independently on bell schedules.
• If classroom space is limited, teachers may share classrooms, but the district must provide adequate materials, storage, workspace, prep areas, and classroom resources.
• Protections are included for special education staff and students to ensure IEP services continue during transitions.
• The district must complete classroom setup and physical moves before August 3.

The MOU was ratified by  SRTA  members.

Closure and Consolidation MOU

SRTA supports this MOU.

H.2.e. (Action) Approval of Final Decision of Reclassifications for California School Employees Association (CSEA) Chapter 75

Increased workload is not enough to reclassify a classified employee, there must be evidence of significant new duties and responsibilities. 

• Account Clerk III – Reclassification Denied
• Lead Food Service Worker – Reclassification Recommended for this 1 employee.

Panel Summary

Appendix E

SRTA members are concerned for our classified employees who are experiencing significant increases to their workload.

H.2.f. (Action) Approval of Amendment of the Interim Associate Superintendent/Chief Business Official (CBO) Employment Contract

The Board is being asked to approve an amendment to Interim Associate Superintendent/CBO Luz Cazares’ employment agreement, increasing her position from 50% to 75% FTE retroactive to July 1, 2025.

The change reflects a greater-than-expected workload, largely caused by vacancies in the fiscal department during the 2025–26 school year. 

Under the amendment:

• Her salary will be adjusted to reflect 75% FTE.
• Her annual work year will increase proportionally to 168.75 days.
• Benefits and automobile stipend will remain unchanged.

The updated salary and benefits cost for 2025–26 is approximately $229,551, an increase of about $76,000 over the previously approved 50% position. However, the district states the added cost is partially offset by savings from vacant fiscal department positions.

Amended Contract

SRTA members wonder where the funding that is not offset by vacancies is coming from to offset this additional expense.  

Greater than expected workload is not enough to increase the pay for classified employees. 

SRTA members are upset that an administrative position is the top priority for action. 

H.2.g. Public Hearing Regarding Teamsters Local 665 “Sunshine” Proposals for Contract Openers with the Santa Rosa City Schools District for 2026-2027

Reopeners

Contract

H.2.h. (Action) Teamsters Local 665 “Sunshine” Proposals for Contract Openers with the Santa Rosa City Schools District for 2026-2027

H.3. Superintendent Calendar

H.3. a. Public Comment 

Comments will be limited to 60 seconds. Only items on H.3. agenda are addressed at this time

H.3.b. (Action) Approval of SRCS 2026/27 Board Meeting Calendar

8/26 – 12/27 Board Meetings

Governance Calendar Organization of which topics will be visited when 

I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

April 22, 2026 Minutes and Supporting Documents

May 13, 2026 Minutes and Supporting Documents 1, Supporting Documents 2

May 15, 2026 Minutes  In a 6-1 vote, the board will move forward with one finalist to negotiate a superintendent contract. Trustee Jenkins was the dissenting vote.

J. BOARD MEMBER REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION

K. INFORMATION ITEMS

K1. Future Board Discussion Items

The following are future board update items:

• Public Hearing: SRCS LCAP Report (June 10, 2026)
• Public Hearing: LCAP for All Charter Schools (June 10, 2026)
• Charter Petition for CCLA (May 13, 2026,June 10)
• Charter Petition for Santa Rosa Accelerated Charter School (June 10, 2026)
• Public Hearing: 2026/27 SRCS and Charter Budget (June 10, 2026)
• Special Services and Information and Evaluation Department Restructuring (June 10, 2026)
• Approval of SRCS LCAP (June 24, 2026)
• Approval of LCAP for All Charter Schools (June 24, 2026)
• Adoption of SRCS and Charter Budget for 2026/27 (June 24, 2026)
  • Request to include details on all funding sources for each school site as well as enrollment and unduplicated counts. 

SRTA looks to the future scheduling of the following items:

Plan for pivoting from A-G for all. 

Medina- AP instruction data with number of years of experience of Teachers

-Clarification about board policy adoption requiring a majority of board membership versus a majority of those present/voting

– consider E-sports clubs or teams 

Caston- Site funding finance report with various amounts and sources

-update 3510 policy around reducing waste as a discussion item

– Communication plan. 

Prak – Info about a non voting teacher on the board. 

Kirby – add an assistant wrestling coach for women? 

– Copies of the panorama and youth truth surveys. 

DeLaTorre- facility fee, possible reductions?

– Data on waiver’s impact on graduation rates. 

– Info on how we identify College and Career readiness.

Jenkins — projected enrollment for next year. 

– marketing plan update as committed to last year.

• Approval of Mental Health Coordinator Position (delayed from Feb 2026)

• Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) Update (Dec 2025)
• Panorama and Youth Truth Survey Data (August 2025)
• Restorative Practices Data (March 2025)
• Plan and timeline for implementation of Dr. Gillespie’s recommendations around Special Services (January 2025), Requesting New FCMAT Study on SRCS SpEd Program
• First Draft of the District Safety Plan (delayed from September 2024)
• Sharing the Library Master Plan with implementation expectations
• Officially Closing Learning House, and other sites
• Plan for Staff Housing support program from the proceeds of Fir Ridge

Until the district makes a decision, the proceeds from the sale of the Fir Ridge property are just sitting and losing value as the cost of housing continues to rise. Getting a program started could help SRCS attract and retain CSEA staff. The potential impact of the funds continues to diminish as time passes.

• Student Voice Policy
• Long standing request for site budgets including all sources as well as enrollment and unduplicated numbers.

K.3. Board Subcommittee Meeting Dates

• Monday, June 1, 2026 Board Finance Subcommittee
• Thursday, June 18, 2026  Board Policy Subcommittee

SRTA members are appreciative of this transparency.

K.4. Non-Public School/Non-Public Agency Contract Update

No changes to report at this time in Non-Public Agencies. This will also be discussed during a special services update to the Board at a future meeting.

Non Public Agencies (May) 

 Non-Public Agency (April) 

Non Public Schools (May)   

 Non-Public School (April) 

		April Totals	May Totals	Change
NPS	160 students	$9,571,368.24	$10,232,337.73	$660,969.49
NPA	275 Staff	$8,370,217.42	$14,909,562.98	$6,539,345.56
Total		$17,941,585.66	$25,141,900.71	$7,200,315.05

SRTA members support students getting the services they need. A review of the demographics of students receiving these services seems prudent. There must be a system in place to ensure this is done in an equitable way. 

How can the tide be seriously turned to limit outside contracts for positions that should be in house hires? The most recent pay raise was a small help, but these contracts show us paying far more to outside agencies than it would cost to hire. 

K.5. Special Services Update

Special Services Updates The Special Services Department is proposing a restructuring plan aimed at creating a more sustainable and organized leadership system focused on districtwide consistency, compliance, and student support.

The new model would shift away from managing programs by school site and instead assign leaders to specific functional areas, including:

• Compliance, data, and legal requirements
• Non-public and out-of-district placements
• Tier 3 behavior supports
• Early childhood education
• Extensive support needs
• Districtwide mental health services
• Section 504 coordination and implementation

The district says the restructure is part of broader Special Education System Improvement efforts focused on:

• Clarifying staff roles and responsibilities
• Improving communication between schools and district supports
• Strengthening MTSS and SST intervention systems
• Creating more consistent procedures for behavior, discipline, placements, and 504 plans

The proposal also aims to expand support services beyond students with IEPs by providing earlier intervention and consultation for general education students, including multilingual learners. 

Reorganization  This specifies district office  jobs and their area of focus

Department Leadership 

● Executive Director of Special Services 

Functional Leadership 

● Compliance, IEP Quality, and Data Systems 

● NPS, Out-of-District, and Program Placement 

● Behavior and Intensive Student Support 

● ESN, Nursing, and K–12 Transition Continuum 

● 504 Coordinator

● Coordinator of Mental Health 

● ECE Leadership 

Core Department Infrastructure and Implementation Supports 

● 2 IEP Compliance and Case Management Coaches 

● 2 Instruction and Access Coaches 

● Full-time Special Education Substitute 

● SEIS Technicians 

● Data / Reporting Support Specialist

SELPA Roadmap

Summer and fall, board appoints CAC and bylaws are developed

Local Plan Committee convenes to review and revise Local Plan (Is this separate from CAC?)

K.6.  Facilities Projects Update

The Facilities Department reported that it is preparing for a busy summer construction season, with multiple modernization, painting, security, roofing, classroom, and early learning projects underway across the district.

Key updates:

• Santa Rosa High School’s DeSoto Hall modernization and theater roofing project has been submitted to DSA for approval, while the contractor is preparing materials and construction planning.
• Luther Burbank Elementary is preparing temporary portable classrooms to accommodate increased enrollment, with installation contracts already approved.
• Exterior painting projects are moving forward at James Monroe Elementary, Hidden Valley Elementary, Santa Rosa Charter School for the Arts, and Santa Rosa French American Charter School. Several sites have already completed substantial portions of work.
• The District Office and Education Center redesign project has completed design work and is awaiting DSA approval while moving through CEQA review.
• Districtwide electronic access control and security upgrades are ongoing at multiple school sites, including Santa Rosa, Montgomery, Maria Carrillo, Piner, and Rincon Valley campuses.
• TK classroom expansion projects continue at several campuses:
  • SRFACS at Santa Rosa Middle School is nearing completion with classroom interiors finished and playground and solar work underway.
  • James Monroe Elementary’s TK classrooms are substantially complete.
  • Helen Lehman Elementary and Albert Biella Early Learning Academy projects continue with roofing, framing, utilities, and site improvements in progress.
• The new two-story classroom building at Piner High School is progressing through interior finishing, HVAC, solar, elevator, and courtyard construction phases.
• Elsie Allen High School roofing and HVAC improvements have begun, including demolition of old roofing while awaiting final DSA approval.

Several projects are also reaching completion, including:

• Montgomery High’s two-story classroom building,
• Rincon Valley Middle School roofing and HVAC upgrades,
• Central Receiving Warehouse improvements,
• Santa Rosa High parking lot and fencing upgrades,
• Piner High theater lighting modernization.

Project Update

K.7. Santa Rosa City Schools 2026-2027 Instructional Calendar Update

In future years, the instructional calendar will be placed on the Board agenda for consideration after ratification by labor partners.

Instructional Calendar

SRTA members request that communications not go out to stakeholders until after items are ratified. 

L. Adjournment

REGULAR BOARD MEETING

Santa Rosa City Schools

May 13, 2026

Hybrid: Santa Rosa City Hall Council Chambers

4:00 p.m. – Closed Session

6:00 p.m. – Open Session

Hybrid: Zoom / Santa Rosa City Hall

*** streamed ***

Video Board Meetings through a link on this district webpage. (It is often changed right before the meeting.)

Please take time to review the following abbreviated version of the agenda. Click here to see the entire agenda. It has live links on many items with more information. If you want to comment to the board about any upcoming items, email agendacomments@srcs.k12.ca.us. Please CC wearesrta@gmail.com on your email.

Members attending online are encouraged to add SRTA to the front of their Zoom client name.

Closed Session Items: 

A.1. Public Comment On Closed Session Agenda Items To comment, email Melanie Martin at mmartinsrcs.k12.ca.us.

This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak to the board on Closed Session items only. 

Without specifics on closed session agenda items, it is impossible for the public to know when to provide insights for items being reviewed.

B.1. Student Readmissions (Case Nos: 2025/26-05)

B.2. Student Expulsions (Case Nos: 2025/26-12 and 2025/26-14)

B.3. Public Employee Appointment/Employment (Position to be filled: Assistant Superintendent and Leave of Absence Request )

B.4. Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release

B.5. Conference With Labor Negotiator Name of designated rep attending: Dr. Vicki Zands (SRCS); name of organization: Santa Rosa Teachers Association, CSEA Santa Rosa 75, Teamsters Union 665)

SRTA members are facing what is likely to be a year of unprecedented stress and instability. In recent years, the needs of students have changed dramatically. Educators are not only working to address increasing academic challenges, but are also being asked to meet growing social-emotional and mental health needs every day in their classrooms. Staff remain deeply committed to supporting students and feel a strong responsibility to meet those needs.

At the same time, budget cuts are stripping away multiple layers of student support while class sizes are being pushed to their maximums. Educators will be expected to do more for more students with fewer resources and less support. 

SRTA is eager to bargain the impacts of the program cuts so that we can offer our students the education and support they deserve. SRTA finally received a response to our information requests that were made in February. This two month delay means staff have no real understanding of implementation for next school year, and no way to plan.

It is also important to recognize that cabinet-level reductions impacted supplemental income, not base salary. Staff do not receive districtwide supplemental income that can simply be reduced in the same way. Meanwhile, SRCS continues to publicly state that the district has stabilized its finances and is positioned to move forward, including initiating plans to expand and reestablish programs. 

B.6. Conference With Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation (Case Nos. 2025-09, 2025-069)

These appear to be internal case numbers, not actual case numbers. 

B.7. Conference With Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation (Case name: OAH 2026040974)

This is a case for a student with disabilities.

B.8. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Title of employee being reviewed: Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent, Principals, Vice Principals, Assistant Principals, Directors, Coordinators)

SRCS communications and lack of transparency with staff and the community have been a point of contention for years. The recent SRCS communication of an unratified instructional calendar to stakeholders as being approved was premature, broke trust with classified and certificated staff, and contributed to SRTA members’ no vote on the calendar.

The lack of attached documents in the posted board agenda is up to six items for this meeting. This does not allow reasonable time for review prior to the meeting. 

C. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION (6 pm)

C.7. Special Presentation for Outgoing Trustee McNally

SRTA thanks Roxanne McNally for her service to SRCS. Serving on the Board while also teaching full time is a challenge that few would attempt. Ms McNally’s perspective and knowledge of the classroom and teaching is missed.

D. REPORTS (Bargaining Units, Sup, and Board)

E. Public Comment on Non Agenda and Consent Items

SRTA Members are invited to complete ‘blue cards’ at the board meeting in order to make public comments. Online comments have been suspended. Comments will be limited to 60 seconds. Only items NOT on the agenda are addressed at this time, with the exception of consent items (See section G.)

Comments are requested at the board meeting to bring a member’s perspective and share real experiences of the impact of district policies and practices on students and staff. 

Speakers are limited to just those in person (unless a board member attends online without prior notice.)

Comments are most impactful when they are well spoken, composed and reasonable.

• Complete the analysis of the 5000s and reduce outside contracts. Spending on outside contracts is 50% of spending on teacher salaries. Spending on outside contracts has increased by 20 million dollars over the last 5 years. That money should be invested in our own staff and classrooms.
• Special service spending has been increasing by six million dollars per year. This must be addressed. 
• Current funds received by our district are for current students. 
• Instructional Calendar communications to families prior to ratification by bargaining unit members is of concern. 
• Students learn better in environments where they feel psychologically safe, emotionally connected, and valued. Students learn best from teachers they trust. Teachers perform better in cultures where they feel valued. If teachers are burned out, unsupported, distrusted, and emotionally exhausted, students ultimately pay the price. 

F. CONSENT ITEMS 

All consent items are enacted by the Board in one motion, unless a Board member requests that an item be removed and discussed separately. 

F.2. Approval of Personnel Transactions 

Personnel Transactions 

EdJoin shows a total of seventy-four current postings for one hundred ninety-none jobs in SRCS. There are sixteen certificated opening postings (thirty-three less than last meeting). There are a few positions posted for next year. There are fifty-four current classified postings for one hundred seventy-six job openings (forty-three less than the last meeting.) There are three certificated and one classified management position posted. 

We bid farewell to Marie-Pierre Prieur (FACS), April Lombardo (JMES) and Kaitlyn Watts (LBES) who are resigning at the end of the year, taking sixteen years of service and experience with them. 

We bid a fond farewell to Gale Ligotti (MCHS), Diane Holly (MCHS), Abby Walls (RVMS) and Kyle Hart (RVMS) who are all retiring at the end of the year, after seventy-eight years of combined service to our students and families. We are grateful for their service, and wish them all the best!

Changes to certificated staff include one rehire while classified staff includes seven new hires, four resignations and one retirement. They leave taking with them fifty-one years of knowledge and service to our staff and students.

F.5. Approval of Contracts over $15,000

The total cost of contracts is $120,256.58

Contract Summary

Contracts

#	Provider	Cost	Description
District
1	Kathleen Farrell	$17,400.00	Additions to contract for Physical Therapy Services, new total contract $51,400
2	Shared Plate Strategies	$18,615.00	This contract signifies the end of co-operative bidding with regional districts to bid for just SRCS.
4	Frontline	$32,476.58	Staff Absence and Substitute Management. This contract is for 7% more than last year.
5	Left Coast Scanning, LLC	$21,980.00	These services will allow staff to view, search, and manage files directly through Left Coast Scanning’s platform, reducing dependency on physical files and related storage space.
Elementary
3	Walker Creek Ranch	$29,785.00	HVES Outdoor Ed

F.6. Approval of Contracts – Bond

#	Provider	Site	Description	Cost	Total Cost
Charter
4	First American Title	SRMS	Title transfer to elementary district	$500	$18,000,000
District
5	AireSpring Inc.	DO	Taxes on construction to relocate phone system	$3,817	9,500,000
Elementary
1	Stanton Inspection Services, Inc.	LBES	Inspections for 5 portables	19,400	$2,800,000
3	NorBay Consulting	JMES	Haz Mat testing for PK Buildings	$1,415	$14,000,000
Secondary
2	Crawford & Associates, Inc.	High Schools	Drainage testing	$37,485	$7,500,000
6	Stocksdale Inspection Services	EAHS	Additional Inspection for roofing	$16,660	$25,000,000

Measure C = $57,048.00

Measure G = $22,231.74

Total = $79,279.74

Summary of Contracts

Contracts

7. Approval to File a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Notice of Exemption for the Luther Burbank ES Temporary Portables Project

The filing ensures the District remains in compliance with environmental review requirements and reduces the statute of limitations for legal challenges from 180 days to 35 days and preserves the District’s eligibility for state funding both now and in the future.

Contract

Fund 21, Measure G: $50.00

8. Approval of Contract for the Summer Temporary Portables project at Luther Burbank ES

In order to provide the time necessary to plan for the appropriate capacity needs at this site, it was determined that placement of temporary portable classrooms would be the most efficient and cost-effective solution.

Agreement

Award

Bid Doc

JOC Bid

Fund 22, Measure G – $868,475.00

SRTA members wonder what the facilities plan is including timeline, for housing additional students at the elementary schools. How does $2.8 million for temporary portables for two years at Burbank fit into a doable facilities plan?

9. Adoption of Resolution No. 2025/26-75 Supporting Award and Approval of Lease-Leaseback Agreement with CWS Construction Group Inc., for the Piner High School, Maria Carrillo High School, Luther Burbank Elementary School, and Elsie Allen High School Perimeter Fencing and Gates Project

Includes an initial authorization of $7,500.00 for Pre-Construction Services. The GMP will be brought back to the Board for separate approval at a future date.

 Fund 21 Measure C: $5,700.00

 Fund 21 Measure G: $1,800.00

Resolution

Notice of Intent to Award

Facilities Lease

Site Lease

RFP Response

SRTA members are concerned about access during and after construction. The fiascos with access during the key fob access projects have undermined confidence in the districts’ ability to plan and communicate access issues appropriately. 

10. Adoption of Resolution No. 2025/26-74 Supporting Award and Approval of Lease-Leaseback Agreement with Wright Contracting, LLC, for Phase 3 of the Electronic Access Controls Project

Resolution 202526-74

Controls_Notice of Intent to Award

Controls_Site Lease_Wright

Controls_Facilities Lease_Wright

Controls_ Wright RFP Response

The total project cost preliminary estimate is $9,500,000. 

Fund 21, Measure C: $7,600.00

Fund 21, Measure G: $2,400.00

SRTA members notice that Phase 3 is being contracted with a different company. 

11. Approval on New Course Proposal: ArtQuest Honors Art Lab

AQ Honors Art Lab is a proposed advanced honors-level visual and performing arts course designed to strengthen Santa Rosa High School’s Art Quest pathway. The course would provide advanced students with opportunities for sustained studio work, performance, critique, portfolio development, and exhibition preparation.

The course is intended to serve as a capstone-style honors option within the Art Quest program, aligned with both A-G Visual and Performing Arts requirements and Career Technical Education pathways. If approved, it would be added to the master schedule based on student demand and available staffing. The proposal was reviewed by site principals and steering committees, and Prop 28 funding could support course sections, materials, supplies, and equipment.

Course Proposal

SRTA members support this course. They still await the board’s definition and parameters for signature programs. 

G. SECOND READ OF UPDATED BOARD POLICIES

G.1. Second Read and Approval of Updated Board Policies

The Board Policy Subcommittee provided the first reading of Board Policies that are listed below at their meeting on April 23, 2026. During the subcommittee meeting, public comment on the board policies was offered.

The attached comparison documents are of the CSBA sample policy and the current SRCS policy, and the steps for reviewing the comparisons and marking-up colors are explained below:

Deletions of BP language: Red

Insertion of BP language: Blue

Move of BP language: Grey

 BP 0450 Comprehensive Safety Plan 

BP 0450_Comparison BP 0450_Clean

 BP 1340 Access to District Records 

 BP 1340_Comparison BP 1340_Clean

 BP 4156.3 Employee Property Reimbursement 

BP 4156.3_Comparison BP 4156.3_Clean

 BP 4256.3 Employee Property Reimbursement 

BP 4256.3_Comparison BP 4256.3_Clean

 BP 4356.3 Employee Property Reimbursement

BP 4356.3_Comparison BP 4356.3_Clean

 BP 5125 Student Records *

BP 5125_Comparison BP 5125_Clean

 BP 5125.1 Release of Directory Information *

BP 5125.1_Comparison BP 5125.1_Clean

 BP 5144.1 Suspension and Expulsion/Due Process*

BP 5144.1_Comparison BP 5144.1_Clean

 BP 5145.2 Freedom Of Speech/Expression *

BP 5145.2_Comparison BP 5145.2_Clean

 BP 6146.3 Reciprocity of Academic Credit

BP 6146.3_Comparison BP 6146.3_Clean

 BP 6146.4 Differential Graduation and Competency Standards for Students with Disabilities

BP 6146.4_Comparison BP 6146.4_Clean

 BP 6173 Education for Homeless Children*

BP 6173_Comparison BP 6173_Clean

 BP 6173.1 Education for Foster Youth 

BP 6173.1_Comparison BP 6173.1_Clean

 BP 6173.2 Education of Children of Military Families 

BP 6173.2_Comparison BP 6173.2_Clean

 BP 6175 Migrant Education Program 

BP 6175_Comparison BP 6175_Clean

*Mandated or Conditionally Mandated Board Policies

H. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEMS

H.1. Charter School Calendar

Decision Tree

Comparison of Board Roles

• As a dependent charter governing board, the Board operates within the system, directly responsible for outcomes and operations. 
• As an authorizer, the Board operates in an oversight capacity, holding charter schools accountable for performance without engaging in day-to-day management.

H.1. a. Public Comment

Comments will be limited to 60 seconds. Only items on H.1. agenda are addressed at this time

H.1. b. (Discussion) Current Charter School Strategies Overview

The presentations provide an opportunity for the Board to better understand site-specific approaches, challenges, and areas of focus.

SRFACS Board Discussion

SRACS Board Discussion

CCLA Board Discussion

SRCSA Board Discussion

SRTA members are concerned about the lack of continuity in the leadership of our sites. This is of specific concern with our charter schools. Continuity in school site leadership ensures operational stability, fosters deeper trust with the community, and allows long-term initiatives to thrive rather than being abandoned during transitions. It preserves institutional knowledge, supports consistent student learning, improves staff morale, and strengthens the implementation of academic programs, resulting in higher teacher retention and better student achievement. 

H.1.c. Public Hearing: CCLA Charter Renewal

The Board of Education will hold a public hearing to assess support for the CCLA renewal petition among SRCS employees and parents/guardians. A second hearing is scheduled for June 10, 2026, when the Board will vote to approve or deny the renewal request, which includes expanding the charter to serve grades 9–12.

The petition has undergone significant revisions based on feedback, legal updates, and district practice changes, with a final review and document upload expected before the meeting.

SRTA members are concerned about transparent decision making processes for our dependent charters. How is the decision made about offering a comprehensive middle school program at CCLA that is not dual language? It seems that the school community is in strong support of this, yet its existence is threatened. Similarly, how are decisions made about the parameters and implementation of a 9-12 program? What is the role of the governing board in guiding the charter committee through these questions?

H.1.d. Public Hearing: Santa Rosa Accelerated Charter School Charter Renewal

There have been substantial revisions, including incorporating feedback received, an expanded description of the programs, and updates to align with changes in law and district practices.

Due to the extensive updates, a final review is being conducted before the final document upload, which will occur before the meeting.

H.2. Human Resources Calendar

H.2. a. Public Comment 

Comments will be limited to 60 seconds. Only items on H.2. agenda are addressed at this time

H.2. b. (Action) Approval of California School Employees Association, Chapter 75 25-26 #2 MOU Job Description Updates

The CSEA 75 25–26 #2 MOU will be attached by the May 13, 2026 Board Meeting. The MOU and applicable job descriptions are pending ratification by the CSEA membership.

Job Descriptions:

Administrative Assistant, Secondary – Middle and Continuation Schools

CNS Buyer

Culinary Coordinator

District Data Specialist I

HR Recruiting Technician

SIS Coordinator

CNS Warehouse Keeper/Driver

HR Technician III

Program Account Technician III (formerly Senior Secretary – State and Federal)

New – College and Career Technician 

H.2.c. ((Action) Approval of SRTA 25-26 #5 MOU Piner Junior High School (Hilliard Comstock) Instructional Minutes Schedule (Bell Schedule)

MOU

H.2.d. (Action) Resolution No. 2025/26-70 Final Reduction in Classified Work Force Involving California School Employees Association (CSEA) Chapter 75 for the 2026-27 School Year

The resolution identifies the final reduction of FTE for CSEA classified staff and Classified Management staff.  

Supporting documents will be attached by the 5/13/26 Board Meeting.

H.2.e. (Action) Resolution No.2025/26-71 Final Recommendation for Reduction or Discontinuance of Certain Particular Kinds of Services for the 2026-27 School Year

The resolution identifies the final reduction of FTE for Certificated SRTA staff, Site Administrators and District Administrators.

Supporting documents will be attached by the 5/13/26 Board Meeting.

H.3. Student Services Calendar

H.3. a. Public Comment 

Comments will be limited to 60 seconds. Only items on H.3. agenda are addressed at this time

H.3.b. (Discussion) Update on Athletics

The considerations focus on balancing athletic facility access while prioritizing student-athlete needs over adult preferences. Junior high programs at 7–12 sites would receive priority gym access on game days and some local practice opportunities, while in-season teams would take precedence over open gyms and non-season activities. Practice schedules would aim to remain consistent, with limits of two hours for high school teams and 1.5 hours for junior high teams.

Significant concerns were raised about limited gym space, especially during winter sports seasons when multiple middle school and high school teams compete for facilities. Middle school programs face challenges related to transportation, storage, access to enclosed practice areas, and late-night practices, while high school programs worry that shared facilities reduce practice quality, preseason preparation, and athlete development. Schools with only one competition gym already struggle to meet scheduling demands, and inadequate facilities could discourage participation or lead families to transfer to schools with stronger athletic programs.

Additional challenges include supervision, transportation logistics, security, custodial staffing, and the costs of maintaining or renting alternative facilities. Proposed solutions include increasing custodial staffing, upgrading athletic spaces, improving storage options, using shared closed-site gyms, coordinating schedules more effectively, and exploring partnerships with local facilities such as SRJC. While some sites believe workable schedules can be created, winter sports remain the most difficult period due to limited space and league-controlled game schedules.

Considerations

SRCS made promises with closures and consolidation of sites that middle school athletics would not be negatively impacted. Member concerns were dismissed. This item makes it clear that High school programs leave little time or space for middle school athletics. There are also questions about athletics for the new 7-8 program at Elsie Allen. Is EAHS making plans to integrate these new teams into their facilities usage?

Prior requests for information from board members include:

• sharing of the district strategy of athletics program across the district
• Update on how different sports programs are supported with rallies, etc. across the district
• Turf fields maintenance level report
•  Update on transportation for middle school sports

G.4. Business Services Calendar

G.4. a. Public Comment 

Comments will be limited to 60 seconds. Only items on G.4. agenda are addressed at this time

G.4.b. (Discussion) Update on Child Nutrition Services (CNS)

The CNS department will provide updates on program achievements, operations, and finances, including recognition of Rosalba Estrada de Martinez as Classified School Employee of the Year in the Food and Nutrition category. 

Fund 13 remains financially strong with maximum allowable reserves, and CNS expects to end the 2025/26 school year with a positive balance that will be reinvested into student meal programs.

Updates also include expanded meal service at Santa Rosa and Montgomery Junior Senior High Schools, staff training in scratch cooking and food safety, and approximately $360,000 invested in capital equipment, much of it supporting meal preparation and service at school sites. 

CNS highlights nutrition education efforts, sustained local food purchasing, and successful implementation of plastic-free meal programs at two elementary schools, with plans to expand in 2026/27.

How is the CNS program evaluated? What method is used to ensure that sites have enough food for students, to avoid students eager to leave class early to ensure they can be fed? How are student opinions collected to assess satisfaction with menu items? 

G.4.c. (Approval) Resolution Regarding the Integrity of Proposition 98 in the Governor’s 2026/27 Budget

This resolution calls upon the Governor and California State Legislature to fully fund Proposition 98 and reject any withholding, deferral, or manipulation of constitutionally guaranteed education funding for public schools.

Resolution

I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

April 22, 2026 Minutes and Supporting Documents

J. BOARD MEMBER REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION

K. INFORMATION ITEMS

K1. Recognition of Awards for 2025/2026

a. 2025/26 Students of the Year

Elementary Schools:

• Francisco Ledesma Villanueva, Abraham Lincoln ES
• Alexa Valdivia Avalos, Helen Lehman ES
• Dylan Katz, Hidden Valley ES
• Santiago Rivera, James Monroe ES
• Jose Zurita Vasquez, Lewis Early Learning Academy ES
• Alex Torres, Luther Burbank ES
• Samuel O’Donnell, Proctor Terrace ES
• Deymi Vaca Marin, Steele Lane ES

Charter Schools:

• Yaretzi Rodriguez-Rincon, CCLA
• Sadiya McBride, Santa Rosa Charter for the Arts 
• Xio Palacios, Santa Rosa French American Charter School

Middle Schools:

• Santiago Moya Garcia, Hilliard Comstock MS
• Adela Torres, Rincon Valley MS

High Schools:

• Tennayah Williams, Elsie Allen HS
• Kaylin Wen, Maria Carrillo HS
• Fernanda Lopez Lopez, Montgomery HS
• Santiago Cuevas, Montgomery HS 
• Brenda Gonzalez Zavala, Piner HS
• Vashti Valmonte, Ridgway HS
• Bianca Reyes Manzo, Santa Rosa HS
• Emma Verdu, Santa Rosa HS 

b. 2025/26 Classified Employees of the Year

Elementary Schools 

• Claudia Gallegos De Salazar, Abraham Lincoln ES
• Rosalia Ramirez Paredes, Helen Lehman ES
• Kristen Chatterson, Hidden Valley ES
• Patricia Cruz , James Monroe ES
• Yen Luu, Lewis Early Learning Academy
• Emma Coria Salgado, Luther Burbank ES
• Suzanne (Suzy) Norton, Proctor Terrace ES 
• Reggie Misa, Steele Lane ES 

Charter Schools

• Silvia Morales Vargas, CCLA
• Brianna Wilson, Santa Rosa Charter for the Arts School 
• Angel Bigelow, Santa Rosa French American Charter School

Middle Schools

• Renee Clay, Hilliard Comstock MS
• Alicia Morley, Rincon Valley MS

High Schools 

• Maria Lopez, Elsie Allen HS
• Fessehai Woldeslassie, Maria Carrillo HS
• Paul Vercammen-Grandjean, Montgomery HS
• Melanie Rosales, Piner HS
• Victor Hernandez Ramirez, Ridgway HS
• Alida Hart, Santa Rosa HS 

c. 2025/26 Certificated Employees of the Year

Elementary Schools

• Michelle Meislahn, Abraham Lincoln ES
• Samantha Winters, Helen Lehman ES
• Jessica Biddulph, Hidden Valley ES
• Kat Morton, James Monroe ES
• Phil Snyder, Lewis Early Learning Academy
• Lindsay Reichmuth, Luther Burbank ES
• Tara Lyon, Proctor Terrace ES 
• Kristen Ott, Steele Lane ES 

Charter Schools 

• Nicholas Veveiros, CCLA
• Moriah Grey, Santa Rosa Charter for the Arts School 
• Corinne Naro, Santa Rosa French American Charter School

Middle Schools

• Genna Becker, Hilliard Comstock MS
• Lindsey Qualls, Rincon Valley MS

High Schools

• Mitch Jensen, Elsie Allen HS
• Natasha Deakins, Maria Carrillo HS
• Jeremy Hahn, Montgomery HS
• Wendy Provost, Montgomery HS 
• Eric Cecil, Piner HS
• Colleen Spires, Ridgway HS
• Dawn Rash, Santa Rosa HS 
• Justine Mendoza, Santa Rosa HS 

K.2. Information on Revised AR 6146.11: Alternative Credits Toward Graduation

The Administrative Regulation revisions have been made with input from high school counselors to provide clarification on concurrent college and university attendance and credit. 

The policy outlines how students may earn high school graduation credit through interscholastic athletics, concurrent college coursework, and correspondence or online courses.

Students in grades 10–12 may earn up to 10 PE credits through participation in CIF-sanctioned varsity or junior varsity sports if they have already completed two semesters of PE and meet requirements related to participation, attendance, eligibility, and documentation. Active participation in practices and competitions is required, and coaches and administrators are responsible for verifying eligibility and attendance.

The policy also allows students in grades 7–12 to earn concurrent high school credit for accredited college and university courses when those courses align with graduation requirements and are planned in coordination with counselors and administrators. Credit is awarded based on college units earned, and students receive the same letter grade as shown on the college transcript.

Additionally, students may earn graduation credit through approved correspondence or online courses offered by accredited institutions. Most students are limited to 50 credits from these courses, and online credit recovery courses generally require a prior failed attempt. Exceptions may be granted for students in alternative education settings or those with unique graduation needs. Pre-approval is required for all correspondence or online coursework, and families are responsible for associated costs unless courses are provided by SRCS.

Regulation 6146.11 – Alternative Credits Toward Graduation

K.3. Information on Revised AR 6146.1: High School Graduation Requirements

The Administrative Regulation revisions have been made to align with Board Policy 6146.1: High School Graduation Requirements, specifically regarding Graduation with an Industry Concentration. 

AR 6146.1

K.4. Information on Draft of Governance Calendar and 2026/27 Board Meeting Calendar

A governance calendar is a planning and accountability tool that organizes the board’s work across the school year.

Key purposes include:

• Ensures legal and policy compliance
  Tracks required actions such as budget approvals, audits, policy reviews, evaluations, public hearings, and reporting deadlines.
• Supports strategic governance
  Aligns board agendas and discussions with district goals, student achievement priorities, and the district’s strategic plan.
• Improves meeting efficiency
  Helps board members and administrators prepare in advance by scheduling recurring topics and annual actions throughout the year.
• Promotes transparency and accountability
  Gives board members, staff, and the public a clear understanding of when important decisions and discussions will occur.
• Balances workload throughout the year
  Prevents major governance tasks from clustering into a few meetings by distributing responsibilities across months or quarters.
• Strengthens board-superintendent collaboration
  Clarifies expectations and timelines for reports, evaluations, planning sessions, and decision-making processes.
• Provides continuity during leadership transitions
  Creates institutional consistency even when board membership or administration changes.

Typical items included in a Board of Education governance calendar:

• Budget development and adoption
• Superintendent evaluation
• Student achievement/data reviews
• Policy review cycle
• Collective bargaining updates
• Audit presentation
• Strategic plan progress reports
• Board self-evaluation
• Graduation and recognition events
• Annual organizational meeting
• State and federal reporting deadlines

SRCS Study Session Formats

• Full Day (2 per year)
  • Summer/Fall weekday
  • Winter/Spring weekend day
• Special Meeting
  • 2 – 3 hour stand alone meeting
• Embedded in Regular Meeting
  • Closed session scheduled 4pm – 5pm
  • Open study session 5pm – 7pm

SRCS Governance Calendar (DRAFT)

2026_27 Board of Education Meeting Calendar (DRAFT)

CSBA Sample Governance Calendar

K.5. Future Board Discussion Items

The following are future board update items:

• Charter Petitions Public Hearings & Action — CCLA and SRACS (May 13, 2026,June 10)
• Third Interim / Governors May Revision Study Session (May 27)
• Public Hearing for Local Control Accountability Plans (June 10)
• Public Hearing for SRCS & Charter Budgets (June 10)
• Adoption of Local Control Accountability Plans (June 10)
• Adoption of SRCS & Charter Budgets for 2026/27 (June 24)

SRTA looks to the future scheduling of the following items:

Medina- AP instruction data with number of years of experience of Teachers

-Clarification about board policy adoption requiring a majority of board membership versus a majority of those present/voting

– consider E-sports clubs or teams 

Caston- Site funding finance report with various amounts and sources

-update 3510 policy around reducing waste as a discussion item

– Communication plan. 

Prak – Info about a non voting teacher on the board. 

Kirby – add an assistant wrestling coach for women? 

– Copies of the panorama and youth truth surveys. 

DeLaTorre- facility fee, possible reductions?

– Data on waiver’s impact on graduation rates. 

– Info on how we identify College and Career readiness.

Jenkins — projected enrollment for next year. 

– marketing plan update as committed to last year.

• Deferred Maintenance and Facilities Update (May 27, 2026)
• Approval of Mental Health Coordinator Position (delayed from Feb 2026)

• Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) Update (Dec 2025)
• Panorama and Youth Truth Survey Data (August 2025)
• Restorative Practices Data (March 2025)
• VAPA Program Highlights (Feb 2025)
• Plan and timeline for implementation of Dr. Gillespie’s recommendations around Special Services (January 2025), Requesting New FCMAT Study on SRCS SpEd Program
• First Draft of the District Safety Plan (delayed from September 2024)
• Sharing the Library Master Plan with implementation expectations
• Officially Closing Learning House, and other sites
• Plan for Staff Housing support program from the proceeds of Fir Ridge

Until the district makes a decision, the proceeds from the sale of the Fir Ridge property are just sitting and losing value as the cost of housing continues to rise. Getting a program started could help SRCS attract and retain CSEA staff. The potential impact of the funds continues to diminish as time passes.

• Student Voice Policy
• Long standing request for site budgets including all sources as well as enrollment and unduplicated numbers.

K.6. Board Subcommittee Meeting Schedule 

Board Finance Subcommittee Meeting Schedule for 2026:

• Monday, June 1, 2026

Board Policy Subcommittee Schedule for 2026:

• Thursday, June 18, 2026
•  1, 2026

K.7. Dates of Future Special Board Meetings and Study Sessions

• Friday, May 15, 2026 (9 am – 3 pm) Special Board Meeting, Superintendent Search
• Wednesday, July 22, 2026 (Tentative) 

SRTA members are appreciative of this transparency.

K. Adjournment