SRCS Board Meeting Agenda Analysis – 10/22/2025.

REGULAR BOARD MEETING

Santa Rosa City Schools

October 22, 2025

Hybrid: Santa Rosa City Hall Council Chambers (100 Santa Rosa Ave.)

4:00 p.m. – Closed Session

6:00 p.m. – Open Session

Hybrid: Zoom / Santa Rosa City Hall

*** streamed ***

Video Board Meetings through this link.

Please take time to review the following abbreviated version of the agenda. Click here to see the entire agenda. It has live links on many items with more information. If you want to comment to the board about any upcoming items, email agendacomments@srcs.k12.ca.us. Please CC wearesrta@gmail.com on your email.

Members attending online are encouraged to add SRTA to the front of their Zoom client name.

Closed Session Items: 

A.1. Public Comment On Closed Session Agenda Items To comment, email Melanie Martin at mmartinsrcs.k12.ca.us.

This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak to the board on Closed Session items only. 

Without specifics on closed session agenda items, it is impossible for the public to know when to provide insights for items being reviewed.

B.1. Student Readmissions (Case Nos: 2025/26-03)

B.2. Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release

B.3. Conference With Labor Negotiator – Name of designated rep attending: Dr. Vicki Zands (SRCS); name of organizations: SRTA, CSEA Santa Rosa 75, Teamsters Union 665

B.4. Conference With Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation (Case Name: OAH Case No. 2025090837)

B.5. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Title of employee being reviewed: Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent, Principals, Vice Principals, Assistant Principals, Directors, Coordinators) 

C. RECONVENE TO REGULAR OPEN SESSION (6:00 p.m.)

D. Reports

E. Public Comment on Non Agenda and Consent Items

SRTA Members are invited to complete ‘blue cards’ at the board meeting in order to make public comments. Online comments have been suspended unless a board member is attending remotely. Please be prepared to observe the three minute time limit or the imposition of a possible last minute reduction in the time limit. Comments have been limited to as little as 60 seconds, with a limit on the total time spent on public comments. Only items NOT on the agenda are addressed at this time, with the exception of consent items (See section F.)

Comments are requested at the board meeting to bring a member’s perspective and share real experiences of the impact of district policies and practices on students and staff. 

Speakers are limited to just those in person

 Comments are most impactful when they are well spoken, composed and reasonable.

F. CONSENT ITEMS 

All consent items are enacted by the Board in one motion, unless a Board member requests that an item be removed and discussed separately. 

F.2. Approval of Personnel Transactions 

Personnel Transactions 

SRTA members are concerned that the federal shut down is preventing the processing of VISAs for our international hires. Where can this information be verified by SRCS? What is the current plan around these open positions? 

EdJoin shows a total of 74 current postings for 207 jobs in SRCS. There are thirteen certificated opening postings for thirteen positions (six less than the last meeting.) There are sixty-one current classified postings for one-hundred eighty-eight job openings (the same as the last meeting.) There are no certificated and no classified management positions posted. 

SRTA heartily welcomes Matthew DePackh (SLES), Shannon Creighton (SRHS), and Alicia Hicks (LBES.) 

SRTA bids farewell to  Alison Peoples (HLES.)

Changes to classified staff includes six new hires, two rehires and one resignation. They leave taking with them 9.5 years of knowledge and service to our staff and students.

Welcome to Robin Whittaker, new Program Manager/Behavior Specialist.

F.5. Ratification of Contracts Under $15,000

Summary

#ProviderCostDescription
District 
8KBACost NeutralReplace 4 duplicating copiers with 5 in18 month contract
Charter
1Curriculum Associates$2,300.006 Hours of PD for CCLA on iReady
Secondary
2IXL Learning$559.001 year license for 40 PHS students
4Liftforward$380.29Minecraft Cloud Services for media tech students at RVMS.
Elementary
3Paws for HealingNo Direct CostVolunteer Paws for Reading for HVES
5Mobile Ed$3,590.00Production about air and our atmosphere for SLES students
6BMX Freestylers$2,144.00BMX Pro Athlete assembly on safety and anti-bullying.
7Teachers’ Curriculum Institute$1,390.00Resources for one teacher and their 5th grade class.

Total value of contracts = $10,363.29.

Summary of Contracts

Contracts

F.6. Approval of Contracts over $15,000

#ProviderCostDescription
District 
1Development Group, Inc.$792,384software licenses and technical support agreements required to maintain uninterrupted operation of the district’s voice and emergency communication systems for five years

Total value of contracts = $792.384.00

Summary of Contracts

Contracts

F.7. Approval of Contracts – Bond 

#ContractorSiteServiceCost
Elementary
4Greystone West CompanyJMESConstruction Management TK$793,206
6Stonewater Specialists, Inc.JMESStormwater Monitor and report$17,685
Secondary
2BT Mancini Co, IncPHSGym Divider Curtain$74,643
3Greystone West CompanySRMSConstruction Management TK$1,077,362
5Greystone West CompanyPHSConstruction Management Theater Lighting$80,139
District
1Golden State ElectricDOCabling for Data$17,163

Measure C = $1,245,187.03

Measure G = $815,011.00

Total = $2,060,198.03

Summary of Contracts

Contracts 

Measure C and G Implementation Plan 

F.8. New Citizens Oversight Committee (COC) Member

The Board will consider approving and appointing Donna Gomes as a new member to Measures I, L, C, and G bond Citizen’s Oversight Committee representing the Senior Citizen’s Organization.

Application

F.9. Solar Power Purchase Agreement

Approval of the 2nd Amendment to the Solar Power Purchase Agreement with Ridgway Ave DG Solar LLC (Jua Capital). The amendment “Removes Facilities” from the Original Agreement for 20 systems, apparently by mutual agreement as listed below; 

1. SRCS District Office, System Size: 291.6 KW 

2. Santa Rosa Charter for the Arts, System Size: 96.8 KW

3. Santa Rosa Middle School, System Size: 145.8 KW 

4. Cesar Chavez Learning Academy, System Size: 364.5 KW 

5. Piner High School, System Size: 607.5 KW 

6. Steele Lane Elementary School, System Size: 72.9 KW 

7. Helen Lehman Elementary School, System Size: 72.9 KW 

8. Brook Hill Elementary School, System Size: 72.9 KW

Agreement

F.10. Approval of Santa Rosa French-American Charter School’s Chess Students to travel to Cambridge, MA

For ten students to the annual Chess Tournament for the North American Zone in Cambridge, Massachusetts, from November 9  to November 12, 2025. The tournament brings together chess players from accredited French schools throughout the U.S.A. and Canada to compete in chess. Nov. 9–12, 2025. Cost of &7.900 is funded by the Parents Association Foundation.

Form

Letter of Intent

Schedule

F.11. Approval of the Clinical Student Placement MOU between San Jose State University and Santa Rosa City Schools

Placement Agreement

F.12. Approval of the Clinical Student Placement MOU between California State University, Sacramento and Santa Rosa City Schools

Placement Agreement

F.13. Approval of Newcomer English 1: Literacy for English Learners Course Proposal

The Board will consider approval of the following new course for the 2026-27 school year: Newcomer English 1: Literacy for English Learners which is different from the Foundational course which is appropriate for students with formal education in their first language.

Course Proposal

F.14. Approval of Resolution 2025/26-07 for the Declaration of Obsolete & Surplus M&O Vehicles and Authorization to Sell, Dispose, and/or Donate

The Board will consider the approval of Resolution 2025/26-07 to declare five M&O vehicles as obsolete and of insufficient value and authorize staff to sell, dispose, and/or donate the equipment.

Resolution

Obsolete/Surplus Vehicles List

F.15. Notice and Approval of the Removal/Recycling of Unusable, Outdated, and/or Damaged Instructional Materials and Textbooks

The Board will consider approval of the removal/recycling of approximately 17,600 unusable, outdated and/or damaged instructional materials and textbooks that have been removed from sites and stored in the Warehouse in accordance with District policy and State law. 

List

G. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEMS

G1 and G2 

SRTA members are concerned that the current efforts to trim expenses are limited to staff give backs. The total amount expected from these actions is minimal when compared to the sum required to hold off a state takeover.

It is expected that site staff will be asked to make financial concessions, on top of the extraordinary changes to working conditions resulting from the previous $19 million in staffing reductions. Maximized class sizes and severe reductions to student supports on campus have negatively impacted student learning and teaching. Teachers are picking up the tab for increased  costs associated with supplies and materials for our classrooms. We are giving away time outside the work day to tend to our students’ educational and emotional needs. Staff morale is at a record low. 

Sustainable changes must be sought to change the financial trajectory of the district. Staff concessions are not sustainable. 

G.1. (Action) Assistant Superintendent Contracts and Compensation Concessions

Administrators are proposing voluntary compensation and/or benefit concessions to assist in addressing the fiscal shortfall.  

More information on the proposed voluntary Administrative Compensation Concessions will be uploaded prior to the  October 22, 2025 Board Meeting. (Nothing uploaded yet.)

G.2. (Discussion/Possible Action) Scheduled Management Compensation Concessions

Scheduled Management is proposing voluntary compensation and/or benefit concessions to assist in addressing the fiscal shortfall.

Information on the proposed voluntary Scheduled Management Compensation Concessions will be uploaded.  (Nothing uploaded yet.)

G3 and G4

SRTA members are concerned that the district’s precarious situation will cause further hardship in recruiting and retaining students and staff, increasing the need to hire individuals that are not fully credentialed. 

G.3. (Action) Approval of Variable Term Waiver for Administrative Services Credential for Taryn Reynolds

This Variable Term Waiver will allow the district to fill a Program Manager position in Special Services for the 2025-2026 school year. Taryn Reynolds has passed the written portion of the administrative Credential exam, and is awaiting the outcome of the performance portion, which was completed on Thursday, September 26.

VTW T. Reynolds

G.4. (Action) Correction to Approved Provisional Internship Permit Application (PIP) Kailani Marie Gomez-Alcala

The Board will consider corrections to the previously Board approved Provisional Internship Application (PIP). The Preliminary Internship Permit (PIP) will allow the district to fill an Elementary Teacher position at Proctor Terrace Elementary (1.00 FTE) for the 2025-2026 school year.

PIP Correction

G.5. Public Hearing: Pivot Charter School North Bay Renewal

Pivot Charter School – North Bay, currently authorized by Oak Grove Union Elementary School District, is a nonclassroom-based K–12 program serving about 430 students, offering flexible attendance options including online learning. Pivot seeks to continue operating under authorization from Santa Rosa City Schools (SRCS). 

No decision will be made at the hearing; staff findings and recommendations will be posted by December 2, 2025, and the Board will vote on the renewal on December 17, 2025.

The actual charter renewal is not attached to the agenda for review.

Presentation

SRCS does not have enough alternative setting choices for students, which is why so many former SRCS students turn to Pivot.  

G.6. (Action) Approval of Contract with Leadership and Associates

The Board will consider approval of the contract with Leadership and Associates. SCOE will cover the costs for this service.

Agreement and Summary of Services

Search Proposal

While appreciative of movement toward locating a new Superintendent, this agency has not provided successful candidates in the last few hiring rounds for this position. It is a rare person with the necessary skills and passion that would choose to join SRCS at this precarious time. 

G.7. (Action) Second Read and Consideration of BP 5131.9, BP 6154, BP 6162.5

The Board will consider approval of Board Policy updates for 5131.9, 6154, 6162.5.

Updating Board Policy and Formatting Guidelines

  • BP 5131.9 Redline – Academic Honesty: Promotes integrity by setting standards for ethical student conduct for dishonest practices: cheating/collusion and plagiarism are defined. “Students must know that their teachers will not ignore or condone cheating, collusion, or plagiarism and that anyone discovered cheating, colluding, or plagiarizing will be penalized.” Penalties are not specified. 
  • BP6162.5 Redline – Student Assessment: Guides the use of varied assessments to measure learning, inform instruction, and support continuous improvement. The only substantial change to the prior policy is the specification that records will only be shared with staff directly involved with the student, and that release of records requires the student or parents’ authorization.
  • BP 6154 Clean (new policy)-  Homework/Makeup Work:  Establishes expectations for meaningful, manageable homework and ensures students have opportunities to complete missed work for excused absences.

G.8. (Action) Second Read and Consideration of Updated BP 5116.1 and BP 5117

The Board will consider approval of Board Policy updates for 5116.1 and 5117.

Updating Board Policy and Formatting Guidelines

BP 5116.1 (Redline) Intradistrict Open Enrollment includes specifying that acceptance shall not be based on a student’s academic or athletic performance and transportation will not be provided. Students can be transferred if they are victims of bullying,  the school or area is dangerous for them, they have a sibling attending, or their parent works at the site. Enrolling students in specialized schools or programs seems to be a separate issue not flushed out in this policy as it is referred to only in that academic records can be used to choose students in that case. 

BP 5117(2) (Redline) Interdistrict Attendance transfers require permission of their home district and shall be denied if the student was suspended or expelled the prior year for a list of reasons provided.

For information purposes:

AR 5116.1 – Intradistrict Open Enrollment Priorities – 1) Continuing student, 2) Sibling attends, 3) lives in a priority neighborhood, 4) child of site based employee, 5) displaced from natural disaster, 6) specialized program (this needs definition), 7) other

The current Wellness and Engagement webpage needs some reorganization.

G.9. (Action) Resolution 2025/26-42 Authorizing the Formation of a 7-11 Advisory Committee for Surplus Property

The 7-11 Committee will ensure that the District proceeds in a transparent, community-informed, and legally compliant manner as it evaluates the best use of the closed school property. Specifically, they will consider “Doyle Park”,  “Lewis Early Learning Academy”, and  “Brook Hill Elementary”.

Persons with expertise in environmental impact, legal contracts, building codes, land use planning, zoning, or related fields are particularly desired for this committee.

Resolution

G.10. (Action) Secondary Boundary Discussion

The modifications also more accurately reflect housing developments since their last update in the 1990s and to better align with current traffic patterns. 

Proposal 10-22 A reverts the secondary attendance boundaries to the 2024-2025 boundaries with three significant updates: (1) all communities located west of Highway 101 and north of W College Avenue are assigned to Piner High School, (2) all communities situated east of Highway 101 and west of Cross Creek Road are assigned to Santa Rosa High School, and (3) all communities south of W College Avenue and north of Highway 12 are assigned to Santa Rosa High School. This proposal primarily aims to distribute residential students evenly across the five secondary school sites, and to align attendance boundaries with bussing zones and the fastest routes to school. This proposal has been developed and recommended by staff as it most closely aligns with development and current traffic patterns. 

Proposal 10-22 B expands upon Proposal 10-22 A by further assigning the Alta Vista unincorporated area (behind the Flamingo) from MCHS to  MHS. This adjustment impacts approximately 100 students and would facilitate the optimal utilization of the larger facility at Montgomery High School.

Proposal 10-22 C Move the Lincoln Heights and Larkfield Manors neighborhoods from SRHS to MCHS. Staff states this will increase travel time and require an additional bus for 48 residents and 5 students.

No data is provided for enrollment changes from these boundary proposals, and there is no financial impact included except for the statement that each additional bus route is slightly over $100,000 annually.

Boundaries 

The goal of changing boundaries looks to be to equalize high school campus enrollments, informed by traditional boundaries and traffic patterns.

G.11. (Discussion) Parcel Tax Consideration and Next Steps

With an uncertain outlook on future education funding due to declining enrollment and lack of adequate state and federal funding, SRCS is exploring additional methods to provide financial resources to  increasing safety and security measures on school campuses; attracting and retaining excellent teachers; enhancing science, technology, engineering, and math programs and instruction; providing student counseling for mental health support.

In 2023/24, the district explored the possibility of a parcel tax. Both flat rate and per square foot options were explored. At the time, it was determined that, given the climate, it was not likely worth the cost to further explore feasibility. The Board chose to leave the option open for future discussion. The Board Finance Subcommittee recommends exploration of a parcel tax.

Potential Elections:  June or November 2026.

Parcel Tax Discussion

3/29/2023 Contracts

The public perception of SRCS’s fiscal management has declined since the last discussion of a Parcel Tax. 

The consulting and surveying of the voting public around a parcel tax by Team CivX cost $168,845 two and a half years ago. 

Staff support could be garnered from adding specific language guaranteeing the vast majority of the tax would be used to improve compensation for SRCS bargaining unit members. 

G.12. (Discussion) Expanded Learning Update

This year’s summer programs focused on strengthening academic skills and offering enrichment across all grade levels. Elementary and middle school programs emphasized skill-building and academic challenges, while high school programs prioritized credit recovery and enrichment. All programs supported personal and academic growth, aligning with Board Strategic Priorities such as Whole Person Focus, Equity & Excellence, and Family Engagement.

Key highlights included expanded high school credit recovery, continued investment in early literacy, and strong community partnerships—such as those with Sonoma State University, Luther Burbank Center for the Arts, and Santa Rosa Recreation & Parks. Data from Springboard Impact and Student & Family Reports reflected positive outcomes in literacy, academic progress, and overall satisfaction.

SRCS implemented experiential summer programs under the auspices that if students were more engaged over summer, it would increase their success during the regular school year. This has now been underway for several years. Where is the data to hold up this continued practice? 

The choice and evaluation of programs is not transparent. 

The A-G requirement for high school diplomas, without academic support systems in place, results in students needing credit recovery. A short summer class, or an online course through Cyber High gets students credits, but is in no way equivalent to the knowledge gained in the traditional classroom setting. Where is the data on follow up for these students? If a student recovers Math 1 credit, what is their probability of passing Math 2 the following year? 

H.1. Approval of Minutes

October 8, 2025 Minutes and Supporting Documents

J.1. Future Board Discussion Items (not included in this agenda)

Can the board accept the transparent practice of announcing future special board meetings at the prior regular board meeting, allowing stakeholders to plan accordingly? 

SRTA members are encouraged to prepare for the upcoming agenda items.

  • Updates from Fiscal Stabilization Advisory Committee 
  • Pivot Charter Renewal 
  • Update on Elementary Boundaries and Consolidation Plan 

Recently  and Still Pending Information  from the Board

Medina- AP instruction data with number of years of experience of 

Teachers

-Clarification about board policy adoption requiring a majority of board membership versus a majority of those present/voting

– consider E-sports clubs or teams 

Caston- Site funding finance report with various amounts and sources

-strategy of athletics program across the district, 

-update 3510 policy around reducing waste as a discussion item

– how different sports programs are supported with rallies, announcing, etc. 

Prak – Turf fields maintenance level report

– update on sports at MS level

Kirby – Why MCHS not in district showcase?

– Shadow Program- Create new Permission Slips?  

– add an assistant wrestling coach for women? 

DeLaTorre- facility fee, possible reductions?

Jenkins – transporting as needed for sports? 

SRTA looks to the future scheduling of the following items:

  • Cell Phone Board Policy Presentation and Update (September 2025)
    • Staff was recently given the opportunity to complete a survey about cell phones. All questions were required to be answered, while options for answering did not always allow for an accurate response. Valuable input will not be included in the results from this faulty survey..
  • Appointment of Vacant Committee Position: Board Finance Subcommittee (September 2025)
  • Panorama and Youth Truth Survey Data (August 2025)
  • Restorative Practices Data (March 2025)
  • Alternate Education Update (December 2024, Feb 2025) 
    • There is a strong need for Alternative placements for secondary students who need more services than our comprehensive schools are able to provide. How can SRCS meet the needs of these students during these tough financial times? Is there data that the ISP program is sufficient to meet this need?
  • VAPA Program Highlights (Feb 2025)
  • Plan and timeline for implementation of Dr. Gillespie’s recommendations around Special Services (January 2025)
  • First Draft of the District Safety Plan (delayed from September 2024)
  • Sharing the Library Master Plan with implementation expectation
  • Officially Closing Learning House, and other sites
  • SRACS Accelerated Charter Material Revision Request (delayed)
  • Plan for Staff Housing support program from the proceeds of Fir Ridge

Until the district makes a decision, the proceeds from the sale of the Fir Ridge property are just sitting and losing value as the cost of housing continues to rise. Getting a program started could help SRCS attract and retain CSEA staff. The potential impact of the funds continues to diminish as time passes.

  • Student Voice Policy

J.3. Facilities Projects Update

The Facilities Master Plan update process will begin this fall, to address needed changes due to school consolidations. The schedule for  site visits is being developed. 

Communication about these visits must commence more than a week before the events if there is a desire to have the community feel like they have a chance to attend. The process being utilized must be transparently communicated at the same time, so the community can decide if it is worth attending a meeting to share their input. 

Upcoming Projects

District Office & Education Center Alternative Design-Build (end of design phase)

SRFACS @ SRMS TK Classrooms Alternative Design-Build (@ DSA)

James Monroe ES TK Classrooms Alternative Design-Build  (Work beginning)

Helen Lehman ES TK Classrooms Alternative Design-Build (@ DSA)

Santa Rosa HS Parking Lot Improvements and Fencing (Work beginning)

Santa Rosa DeSoto Hall Modernization and Theater Roofing (bidding)

Current Construction Projects

Piner High School 2-Story Classroom Alternative Design-Build  (grading)

District-Wide Electronic Access Controls 

Phase 1 ongoing: SRHS, MCHS  and RVMS 

Phase 2 design: PHS, ALES, HLES, JMES and LBES 

Phase 3 (Prelim): SRMS,RHS and SRCSA 

Projects Closing Out  

James Monroe ES Drainage Improvements 

Montgomery HS 2-Story Classroom Building 

Montgomery HS New Communication Wire for HVAC Controls 

Rincon Valley MS Roofing & HVAC 

Piner HS Ball Wall and Fencing 

Central Receiving Warehouse 

Projects 

Facilities Master Plan Webpage

J.4. Sonoma County Office of Education Letter: 2025/26 Budget Approval Letter

SRCS Letter to SCOE Promising a pre-First Interim MYP by October 21,2025.

24-month cash flow projection  There are two sets. The first one presumably was the initial cash flow projection. The worst month for cash flow  is December prior to the influx of property taxes.  The first version shows a $48 million deficit on cash on hand in December  while the  other, updated version,  shows a $40,000,000 deficit in December, with income of $1.6 million less, and disbursements predicted to be $1.2 million more. There are updated values added to the balance sheet through October. 

Year end cash  is shown to be updated from -$5.2 million to  -$0.1 million. Not meeting the required 3% reserve.

Email from Carter SCOE to SRCS 

J5. Board Finance Subcommittee Meeting Dates

Board Finance Meeting Schedule for the Remainder of 2025:

  • Monday, November 3, 2025
  • Monday, December 1, 2025

SRCS Board Meeting Agenda Analysis – Finance Subcommittee — Oct 6th, Regular Board Meeting — Oct 8, 2025

Santa Rosa City Schools, Board Finance Sub-Committee Meeting

Date: October 6, 2025
Time: 3:30 PM
Location: District Office / Superintendent’s Conference Room, Santa Rosa City Schools District Office (110 Stony Point Road, Suite 210 Santa Rosa, Ca. 95401)

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON AGENDA AND AGENDA ITEMS

Without any attachments to the long list of Discussion/Action items, it is difficult to comment. 

How can “work to analyze and recommend strategic solutions that address our budget and best align resources” be discussed without data? 

SRTA members are united in pushing for cuts as far away from the classroom as possible. The budget for classroom employees was below state minimums last year, at 52%. This appears to be the part of the budget that is being focused on for further cuts. 

While there is a stated commitment to open communication, there is no information being shared about how the current consolidations are actually saving money, or how the various proposals will save money.

Where is the forensic work to explore where SRCS spent beyond their budget this past year? Where is the examination of those past decisions and the systems in place to control future spending? 

SRCS has been historically weak at evaluating decisions and implementations. How are the site consolidations implemented from last spring’s decisions being evaluated? 

Where are the actual results from the SCOE survey of folks leaving the district, to guide how SRCS can move forward without further alienating our community? This year’s enrollment is meeting expectations, with hundreds less students. Can SRCS afford a continued exodus of students? 

3. DISCUSSION / ACTION

a. (Discussion/Possible Action) 7-11 Committee

Why is SRFACS being moved to SRMS campus instead of being relocated to the Slater campus with a TK-12 Charter. This would open up SRMS Campus for a multitude of uses because it resides in both the elementary and secondary boundaries.

How was the decision for the SRMS campus usage made? What was considered? Where is that information being publicly shared? What are the intentions for other campuses? 

b. (Discussion/Possible Action) Parcel Tax Revenue

In May of 2024 the board met with a consultant around a Parcel Tax. The decision at that time was to not pursue a parcel tax, because the community would not sufficiently support it. What data supports that this opinion has shifted? 

c. (Discussion) Consolidation

a. (Discussion) 5- Comprehensive 7-12 Junior/Senior High Schools

b. (Discussion) Accelerated Charter 4/5-12’s

d. (Discussion) Fiscal Stabilization Plan Update

4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

a. Approval of Meeting Minutes of the Board Finance Subcommittee held on September 8, 2025Supporting Docs/Links attached to this item

5. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION

a. Conference With Labor Negotiator (Name of designated rep attending: Dr. Vicki Zands )

6. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION

7. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS

a. School Finance Terms and Budget Process Overview

b. Board Finance Subcommittee Meeting Schedule for the Remainder of 2025

  • Monday, November 3, 2025
  • Monday, December 1, 2025

c. Comparison of Salaries Supporting Doc

8. ADJOURNMENT


Click aquí para la versión en español

REGULAR BOARD MEETING

Santa Rosa City Schools

October 8, 2025

Hybrid: Santa Rosa City Hall Council Chambers (100 Santa Rosa Ave.)

4:00 p.m. – Study and Open Session

??? – Closed Session

Hybrid: Zoom / Santa Rosa City Hall

*** streamed ***

Video Board Meetings through this link.

Please take time to review the following abbreviated version of the agenda. Click here to see the entire agenda. It has live links on many items with more information. If you want to comment to the board about any upcoming items, email agendacomments@srcs.k12.ca.us. Please CC wearesrta@gmail.com on your email.

Members attending online are encouraged to add SRTA to the front of their Zoom client name.

A. CALL TO ORDER (4:00 p.m.)

5. Public Comment on Study Session Items, Only

6. Board of Education Study Session 

Presentation

a. (Discussion / Possible Action) Elementary Boundaries and Consolidation

Closure of Schools ● Steele Lane Elementary (Board approved in February 2025) ● Abraham Lincoln Elementary (New board action needed) 

Two TK-3 School Sites ● Helen Lehman Primary School ● James Monroe Primary School 

One 4 – 6 School ● Upper Elementary School at the current Hilliard Comstock Campus

Proctor Terrace, Burbank and Hidden Valley remain as TK-6.

b. (Discussion / Possible Action) Secondary Boundaries and Consolidation 

Concrete timeline for RVMS-MCHS reconfiguration ● 5 Comprehensive 7-12 sites ● Development of an alternative secondary school 

Concept for SRACS charter renewal under the high school district

Option 1: Close Charter 

Option 2: Move to Elementary District campus 

● 1A: Offer 5-6 grades @ 64 students per grade ○ 128 total students 

● 1B: Offer 4-6 grades @ 64 students per grade ○ 192 total students 

● Shared Site Considerations 

Option 3: Stay at RVMS and offer 4-12 grades

Alt Ed Fact Sheet 

Where is the financial information that is informing this decision? 

This 4-6 campus idea was dismissed last spring. Why is it back for discussion while other decisions from last spring are not open for further discussion? 

What role does community feedback play in these decisions? 

There has been a twice delayed promise of an Alternate Education Update (December 2024, Feb 2025) agenda item for the board.

  • There is a strong need for Alternative placements for secondary students who need more services than our comprehensive schools are able to provide. How can SRCS meet the needs of these students during these tough financial times? Is there data that the ISP program is sufficient to meet this need?

B. CONVENE TO REGULAR OPEN SESSION

C. REPORTS

D. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON AGENDA AND CONSENT ITEMS

SRTA Members are invited to complete ‘blue cards’ at the board meeting in order to make public comments. Online comments have been suspended unless a board member is attending remotely. Please be prepared to observe the three minute time limit or the imposition of a possible last minute reduction in the time limit. Comments have been limited to as little as 60 seconds, with a limit on the total time spent on public comments. Only items NOT on the agenda are addressed at this time, with the exception of consent items (See section F.)

Comments are requested at the board meeting to bring a member’s perspective and share real experiences of the impact of district policies and practices on students and staff. 

Speakers are limited to just those in person

 Comments are most impactful when they are well spoken, composed and reasonable.

Can the board accept the transparent practice of announcing future special board meetings at the prior regular board meeting? 

E. CONSENT ITEMS

5. Ratification of Contracts Under $15,000

Contracts Total Cost: $21,977.75

6. Approval of Contracts over $15,000

Summary Contracts Total Cost: $960,000.00

7. Approval of Contracts – Bond 

Summary Contracts

The total cost of contracts is by measure:

Measure C = $15,241.16

Measure G = $28,883.10

Total = $44,124.26

8. Approval of Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) for the SRMS TK Classroom Buildings Project

Amendment #1 Fund 21 Measure C: $11,075,511.00

9. Approval of James Monroe ES TK Project.

Amendment #1 Fund 21 Measure G: $8,500,724.21

10. Approval of Contract Award for the Piner High School Theater Lighting Repair Project

Bid Package Agreement Fund 21, Measure C: $1,083,560.00

11. Approval of Albert Biella Elementary School Library Modernization Project

Lease-Lease Back Fund 21 Measure G = $3,000.00 for preconstruction services

12. Approval of the Resolution for Participation in the State Charter School Facility Program

Resolution

13. Approval of Revised Hilliard Comstock Middle School Instructional Minutes for 2025-26

Revised Instructional Minutes

14. Approval of Santa Rosa High School’s Agriculture Program Students to travel to Phoenix, Arizona

Total Cost of Trip: $2,500 funded through CTE grants, student fundraisers and FFA account. 

FT Request

F. BOARD POLICY UPDATES / FIRST READ

1. (First Read) First Read of BP 5131.9, BP 6154, BP 6162.5

  • BP 6154 – Homework/Makeup Work: Establishes expectations for meaningful, manageable homework and ensures students have fair opportunities to complete missed work.
  • BP 6162.5 – Student Assessment: Guides the use of varied assessments to measure learning, inform instruction, and support continuous improvement.
  • BP 5131.9 – Academic Honesty: Promotes integrity by setting standards for ethical student conduct and outlining consequences for dishonest practices. 

G. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEMS

1. (Action) Approval of Provisional Internship Permit Application (PIP) Kailanie Marie Gomez Alcala for PTES

Permit

2. and 3. Public Hearing/Action: Naming of the Montgomery High School Baseball Field in honor of retired coach Russ Peterich

Nomination

4. (Discussion / Possible Action) Administrative Compensation Concessions

5. (Action) Acceptance of Governance Handbook

Handbook

6. (Discussion / Possible Action) Discussion and Considerations for Board Bylaw 9250

This item is being brought up again, to pay student board members at the same rate as trustees while also giving students units. 

BP 9250

While talking about drastic cuts, is this the moment for this discussion? Student board members do not serve in the same capacity as trustees, without the same time constraints. If there are two five hour public meetings in a month, and the students stay for the entirety of open session, this policy would pay them over $50 per hour. 

Students who work on campus receive minimum wage OR units, not both. Teachers attending training either do so on paid time OR get units, not both. Will the board commit to reconsider those policies if they adopt this policy? 

7. (Action) Second Read and Consideration of BP 4219.21, BP 4219.24, BP 4319.21, BP 4319.24 

Classified:

BP 4219.21– Professional Standards 

BP 4219.24 – Maintaining Appropriate Adult – Student Interactions

Administartor:

BP 4319.21– Professional Standards 

BP 4319.24– Maintaining Appropriate Adult – Student Interactions 

8. (Discussion) Charter Renewal Process 

Presentation 

BP 0420.4 BP 0420.43 BP 0420.42

AR 0420.4 Coverpage

Exhibit 0420.41 BP 0420.41

During a prior charter hearing the outside charter was held to standards far above those required for in district charters. SRTA members appreciate efforts to set clear standards, and practice equity.

H. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

1. Approval of Minutes of the Regular Board Meeting Held On September 24, 2025

Minutes Supporting Documents

2. Approval of Minutes of the Regular Board Meeting Held On August 27, 2025

Minutes Supporting Documents Resolutions

3. Approval of Minutes of the Regular Board Meeting Held On September 10, 2025

Minutes Supporting Documents

4. Approval of Minutes of the Special Board Meeting / Strategic Planning Workshop Held On September 2, 2025

Minutes Mission Vission Handbook

I. BOARD MEMBER REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION

J. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION AGENDA

K. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION

1. Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release [Gov. Code § 54957]

2. Conference With Labor Negotiator Name of designated rep attending: Dr. Vicki Zands (SRCS) ; name of organization: Santa Rosa Teachers Association, CSEA Santa Rosa 75, Teamsters Union 665) [Gov. Code § 54957.6]

3. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Title of employee being reviewed: Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent, Principals, Vice Principals, Assistant Principals, Directors, Coordinators) [Gov. Code § 54957]

L. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION

1. Report of Actions Taken in Closed Session

2. Items Considered In Closed Session for Action In Open Session

M. INFORMATION ITEMS

a. Future Board Discussion Items

SRTA members are encouraged to prepare for the upcoming agenda items.

  • Public Hearing for Pivot Charter School
  • Summer School Update (Sept. 2025)
  • Cell Phone Board Policy Presentation and Update
    • Staff was recently given the opportunity to complete a survey about cell phones. All questions were required to be answered, while options for answering did not always allow for an accurate response. Valuable input will not be included in these results

Recently Requested Agenda Items from the Board

Medina- AP instruction data with number of years of experience of 

Teachers

-Clarification about board policy adoption requiring a majority of board membership versus a majority of those present/voting

Caston- Site funding finance report with various amounts and sources

-strategy of athletics program across the district, 

-update 3510 policy around reducing waste as a discussion item

SRTA looks to the future scheduling of the following items:

  • Appointment of Vacant Committee Position: Board Finance Subcommittee (September 2025)
  • Panorama and Youth Truth Survey Data (August 2025)
  • Restorative Practices Data (March 2025)
  • Alternate Education Update (December 2024, Feb 2025) 
    • There is a strong need for Alternative placements for secondary students who need more services than our comprehensive schools are able to provide. How can SRCS meet the needs of these students during these tough financial times? Is there data that the ISP program is sufficient to meet this need?
  • VAPA Program Highlights (Feb 2025)
  • Plan and timeline for implementation of Dr. Gillespie’s recommendations around Special Services (January 2025)
  • First Draft of the District Safety Plan (delayed from September 2024)
  • Sharing the Library Master Plan with implementation expectation
  • Officially Closing Learning House, and other sites
  • SRACS Accelerated Charter Material Revision Request (delayed)
  • Plan for Staff Housing support program from the proceeds of Fir Ridge

Until the district makes a decision, the proceeds from the sale of the Fir Ridge property are just sitting and losing value as the cost of housing continues to rise. Getting a program started could help SRCS attract and retain CSEA staff. The potential impact of the funds continues to diminish as time passes.

  • Student Voice Policy

c. Board Finance Subcommittee Meeting Dates

d. Williams Settlement Quarterly Report

Report 3 facility reports were addressed.

e. SRCS Letter to Sonoma County Office of Education

Letter of Reponse addresses three areas of concern.

SRCS has convened a task force to address the fiscal concerns about the SpEd program.

With SCOEs help, enrollment projections for budgeting purposes have greatly improved.

Compensation has outpaced budget growth. There is a commitment to future compensation at a dollar amount instead of a percentage, citing that even when COLA was 8.22% the actual budget only went up by 3.31%. 

SRTA members are not pleased with the tone that fiscal problems are their fault. Santa Rosa is among the most expensive communities to live in and total compensation is below average for the state. This is a challenge that must be met head on, united, to keep the district from going under, as well as ensuring the budget is not balanced on the backs of the teachers or the students.


 

REUNIÓN ORDINARIA DE LA JUNTA DIRECTIVA

Escuelas de la ciudad de Santa Rosa

8 de octubre de 2025

Híbrido: Sala del Consejo del Ayuntamiento de Santa Rosa (100 Santa Rosa Ave.)

4:00 pm – Sesión de estudio y apertura

??? – Sesión cerrada

Híbrido: Zoom / Ayuntamiento de Santa Rosa

*** transmitido ***

Reuniones de la junta directiva por videoa través de este enlace.

Tómese el tiempo para revisar la siguiente versión abreviada de la agenda.Haga clic aquí para ver la agenda completa.Tiene enlaces en vivo sobre muchos temas con más información. Si desea comentar con la junta sobre los próximos temas, envíe un correo electrónico a agendacomments@srcs.k12.ca.us. Por favor, envíe una copia a wearesrta@gmail.com en su correo electrónico.

Se recomienda a los miembros que asisten en línea que agreguen SRTA al frente de su nombre de cliente de Zoom.

A. LLAMADA AL ORDEN (4:00 pm)

5. Comentarios públicos sobre los temas de la sesión de estudio, únicamente

6. Sesión de estudio de la Junta de Educación

Presentación

a. (Discusión/Posible acción) Límites elementales y consolidación

Cierre de escuelas ● Escuela primaria Steele Lane (aprobada por la junta en febrero de 2025) ● Escuela primaria Abraham Lincoln (se necesita una nueva acción de la junta)

Dos escuelas TK-3 ● Escuela primaria Helen Lehman ● Escuela primaria James Monroe

Una escuela de 4 a 6 años ● Escuela primaria superior en el campus actual de Hilliard Comstock

Proctor Terrace, Burbank y Hidden Valley permanecen como TK-6.

 

b. (Discusión/Posible acción) Límites secundarios y consolidación

Cronograma concreto para la reconfiguración de RVMS-MCHS ● 5 sitios integrales de 7.º a 12.º grado ● Desarrollo de una escuela secundaria alternativa

Concepto para la renovación de la charter de SRACS bajo el distrito escolar secundario

Opción 1: Cerrar la Charter

Opción 2: Mudarse al campus del Distrito Primario

● 1A: Ofrece 5-6 grados a 64 estudiantes por grado ○ 128 estudiantes en total

● 1B: Ofrece de 4.º a 6.º grado a 64 estudiantes por grado ○ 192 estudiantes en total

● Consideraciones sobre sitios compartidos

Opción 3: Permanecer en RVMS y ofrecer del 4.º al 12.º grado

Hoja informativa sobre educación alternativa 

¿Dónde está la información financiera que fundamenta esta decisión?

Esta idea de un campus de 4 a 6 años se descartó la primavera pasada. ¿Por qué se vuelve a debatir mientras que otras decisiones de la primavera pasada no se han abierto a debate?

¿Qué papel juega la retroalimentación de la comunidad en estas decisiones?

Se ha retrasado dos veces la promesa de incluir en la agenda de la junta un tema de Actualización de Educación Alternativa (diciembre de 2024, febrero de 2025).

  • Existe una gran necesidad de colocaciones alternativas para estudiantes de secundaria que requieren más servicios de los que nuestras escuelas integrales pueden ofrecer. ¿Cómo puede SRCS satisfacer las necesidades de estos estudiantes durante estos tiempos financieros difíciles? ¿Existen datos que indiquen que el programa ISP es suficiente para cubrir esta necesidad?

B. CONVOCAR A SESIÓN ABIERTA ORDINARIA

C. INFORMES

D. COMENTARIOS PÚBLICOS SOBRE TEMAS NO INCLUIDOS EN LA AGENDA Y CON CONSENTIMIENTO

Se invita a los miembros de SRTA a completar las tarjetas azules en la reunión de la junta para hacer comentarios públicos. Se han suspendido los comentarios en línea, a menos que un miembro de la junta asista de forma remota. Les rogamos que estén preparados para respetar el límite de tiempo de tres minutos o la posible reducción de último minuto. Los comentarios se han limitado a un máximo de 60 segundos, con un límite en el tiempo total dedicado a los comentarios públicos. En este momento, solo se abordan los puntos que no están en la agenda, con la excepción de los puntos de consentimiento (véase la sección F).

Se solicitan comentarios en la reunión de la junta para aportar la perspectiva de un miembro y compartir experiencias reales del impacto de las políticas y prácticas del distrito en los estudiantes y el personal.

Los oradores se limitan solo a aquellos en persona.

Los comentarios tienen mayor impacto cuando están bien expresados, compuestos y razonables.

¿Puede la junta directiva aceptar la práctica transparente de anunciar futuras reuniones especiales de la junta directiva en la reunión ordinaria anterior?

E. ELEMENTOS DE CONSENTIMIENTO

5. Ratificación de contratos de menos de $15,000

Contratos Costo total: $21,977.75

6. Aprobación de contratos superiores a $15,000

Resumen de contratos Costo total: $960,000.00

7. Aprobación de Contratos – Fianza

Resumen de contratos

El coste total de los contratos es por medida:

Medida C = $15,241.16

Medida G = $28,883.10

Total = $44,124.26

8. Aprobación del Precio Máximo Garantizado (PMG) para el Proyecto de Aulas de SRMS TK

Enmienda #1Fondo 21 Medida C: $11,075,511.00

9. Aprobación del Proyecto TK de James Monroe ES.

Enmienda #1 Fondo 21 Medida G: $8,500,724.21

10. Aprobación de la adjudicación del contrato para el proyecto de reparación de la iluminación del teatro de la escuela secundaria Piner

Paquete de licitación Acuerdo Fondo 21, Medida C: $1,083,560.00

11. Aprobación del Proyecto de Modernización de la Biblioteca de la Escuela Primaria Albert Biella

Arrendamiento con arrendamiento posterior Fondo 21 Medida G = $3,000.00 para servicios de preconstrucción

12. Aprobación de la Resolución para la Participación en el Programa de Instalaciones de Escuelas Charter Estatales

Resolución

13. Aprobación de las actas de instrucción revisadas de la escuela secundaria Hilliard Comstock para el año escolar 2025-26

Actas de instrucción revisadas

14. Aprobación del Programa de Agricultura de la Escuela Secundaria Santa Rosa. Los estudiantes viajarán a Phoenix, Arizona.

Costo total del viaje: $2,500 financiados a través de subvenciones CTE, recaudaciones de fondos estudiantiles y cuenta FFA.

Solicitud de FT

F. ACTUALIZACIONES DE POLÍTICAS DE LA JUNTA / PRIMERA LECTURA

1. (Primera lectura) Primera lectura de BP 5131.9, BP 6154, BP 6162.5

  • Presión arterial 6154- Tareas/Trabajos de recuperación: Establece expectativas para tareas significativas y manejables y garantiza que los estudiantes tengan oportunidades justas para completar el trabajo perdido.
  • Presión arterial 6162.5- Evaluación de estudiantes: Guía el uso de diversas evaluaciones para medir el aprendizaje, informar la instrucción y respaldar la mejora continua.
  • Presión arterial 5131.9- Honestidad académica: promueve la integridad estableciendo estándares para la conducta ética de los estudiantes y describiendo las consecuencias de las prácticas deshonestas.

G. TEMAS DE DISCUSIÓN/ACCIÓN

1. (Acción) Aprobación de la Solicitud de Permiso Provisional de Pasantía (PIP) Kailanie Marie Gomez Alcala para PTES

Permiso

2. y 3. Audiencia pública/Acción: Nombramiento del campo de béisbol de la escuela secundaria Montgomery en honor al entrenador retirado Russ Peterich

Nominación

4. (Discusión/Posible acción) Concesiones de compensación administrativa

5. (Acción) Aceptación del Manual de Gobernanza

Manual

6. (Discusión/Posible acción) Discusión y consideraciones para el Reglamento de la Junta 9250

Este tema se está planteando nuevamente: pagar a los miembros estudiantiles de la junta directiva la misma tarifa que a los fideicomisarios y al mismo tiempo darles unidades a los estudiantes.

BP 9250

Hablando de recortes drásticos, ¿es este el momento de debatirlo? Los miembros estudiantiles de la junta directiva no ejercen la misma función que los administradores, sin las mismas limitaciones de tiempo. Si hay dos reuniones públicas de cinco horas al mes y los estudiantes asisten a toda la sesión abierta, esta política les pagaría más de $50 por hora.

Los estudiantes que trabajan en el campus reciben el salario mínimo o unidades, no ambos. Los docentes que asisten a capacitaciones lo hacen en horario remunerado o reciben unidades, no ambos. ¿Se comprometerá la junta a reconsiderar estas políticas si adopta esta?

 

7. (Acción) Segunda lectura y consideración de BP 4219.21, BP 4219.24, BP 4319.21, BP 4319.24

Clasificado:

Presión arteria l4219.21– Estándares profesionales

Presión arterial 4219.24- Mantener interacciones apropiadas entre adultos y estudiantes

Administrador:

Presión arteria l4319.21– Estándares profesionales

Presión arterial 4319.24- Mantener interacciones apropiadas entre adultos y estudiantes

8. (Discusión) Proceso de renovación de la Charter

Presentación 

BP 0420.4BP 0420.43BP 0420.42

AR 0420.4Portada

Anexo 0420.41BP 0420.41

Durante una audiencia previa sobre la charter constitutiva, se exigió que la charter externa cumpliera estándares muy superiores a los exigidos para las charters del distrito. Los miembros de la SRTA valoran los esfuerzos por establecer estándares claros y practicar la equidad.

 

H. APROBACIÓN DE ACTAS

1. Aprobación del Acta de la Reunión Ordinaria de Directorio celebrada el 24 de septiembre de 2025

Minutos Documentos de respaldo

2. Aprobación del Acta de la Reunión Ordinaria de Directorio celebrada el 27 de agosto de 2025

Minutos Documentos de respaldo Resoluciones

3. Aprobación del Acta de la Reunión Ordinaria de Directorio celebrada el 10 de septiembre de 2025

Minutos Documentos de respaldo

4. Aprobación del Acta de la Reunión Extraordinaria de la Junta Directiva/Taller de Planificación Estratégica celebrada el 2 de septiembre de 2025

Minutos Misión VisiónManual

I. SOLICITUDES DE INFORMACIÓN DE LOS MIEMBROS DE LA JUNTA DIRECTIVA

J. COMENTARIOS DEL PÚBLICO SOBRE LA AGENDA DE LA SESIÓN CERRADA

K. RECESO A SESIÓN CERRADA

1. Disciplina/Despido/Liberación de Empleados Públicos [Código de Gobierno § 54957]

2. Reunión con el negociador laboral. Nombre del representante designado que asiste: Dra. Vicki Zands (SRCS); nombre de la organización: Asociación de Maestros de Santa Rosa, CSEA Santa Rosa 75, Sindicato de Camioneros 665 [Código de Gobierno, § 54957.6]

3. Evaluación del desempeño de empleados públicos (Título del empleado evaluado: Superintendente, Superintendente asociado, Superintendente adjunto, Directores, Vice Directores, Subdirectores, Directores de Administración, Coordinadores) [Código de Gobierno § 54957]

L. VOLVER A CONVOCAR A LA SESIÓN ABRIR

1. Informe de las acciones tomadas en sesión cerrada

2. Temas considerados en sesión cerrada para acción en sesión abierta

M. ELEMENTOS DE INFORMACIÓN

a. Temas futuros de discusión de la Junta

Se anima a los miembros de SRTA a prepararse para los próximos puntos de la agenda.

  • Audiencia pública para la escuela autónoma Pivot
  • Actualización de la Escuela de Verano (septiembre de 2025)
  • Presentación y actualización de la política de la Junta de Teléfonos Celulares
    • Recientemente, el personal tuvo la oportunidad de completar una encuesta sobre teléfonos celulares. Todas las preguntas eran obligatorias, y las opciones de respuesta no siempre permitían una respuesta precisa. No se incluirán en estos resultados las aportaciones valiosas.

Temas del orden del día solicitados recientemente a la Junta Directiva

Medina- Datos de instrucción AP con número de años de experiencia de

Profesores

-Aclaración sobre la adopción de políticas de la junta que requieren una mayoría de los miembros de la junta en lugar de una mayoría de los presentes/votantes.

Caston- Informe financiero de financiación del sitio con diversos montos y fuentes

-estrategia del programa de atletismo en todo el distrito,

-Actualizar la política 3510 sobre la reducción de residuos como tema de debate

SRTA analiza la programación futura de los siguientes elementos:

  • Designación de un puesto vacante en el Subcomité de Finanzas de la Junta Directiva (septiembre de 2025)
  • Datos de la Encuesta Panorama y Youth Truth (agosto de 2025)
  • Datos de prácticas restaurativas (marzo de 2025)
  • Actualización de la educación alternativa (diciembre de 2024, febrero de 2025)
    • Existe una gran necesidad de colocaciones alternativas para estudiantes de secundaria que requieren más servicios de los que nuestras escuelas integrales pueden ofrecer. ¿Cómo puede SRCS satisfacer las necesidades de estos estudiantes durante estos tiempos financieros difíciles? ¿Existen datos que indiquen que el programa ISP es suficiente para cubrir esta necesidad?
  • Aspectos destacados del programa VAPA (febrero de 2025)
  • Plan y cronograma para la implementación de las recomendaciones del Dr. Gillespie sobre Servicios Especiales (enero de 2025)
  • Primer borrador del Plan de Seguridad del Distrito (retrasado desde septiembre de 2024)
  • Compartir el Plan Maestro de la Biblioteca con expectativas de implementación
  • Cierre oficial de Learning House y otros sitios
  • Solicitud de revisión acelerada del material de la Charter del SRACS (retrasada)
  • Plan para el programa de apoyo a la vivienda del personal con los ingresos de Fir Ridge

Hasta que el distrito tome una decisión, los fondos provenientes de la venta de la propiedad de Fir Ridge se encuentran estancados y pierden valor a medida que el costo de la vivienda sigue aumentando. La puesta en marcha de un programa podría ayudar a SRCS a atraer y retener al personal de CSEA. El impacto potencial de los fondos disminuye con el tiempo.

  • Política de Voz Estudiantil

c. Fechas de las reuniones del Subcomité de Finanzas de la Junta

Informe trimestral del acuerdo de d. Williams

Informe: Se abordaron 3 informes de instalaciones.

e. Carta de SRCS a la Oficina de Educación del Condado de Sonoma

Carta de respuesta aborda tres áreas de preocupación.

SRCS ha convocado un grupo de trabajo para abordar las preocupaciones fiscales sobre el programa SpEd.

Con la ayuda de los SCOE, las proyecciones de inscripción para fines presupuestarios han mejorado enormemente.

La compensación ha superado el crecimiento presupuestario. Existe un compromiso de compensación futura en dólares en lugar de un porcentaje, argumentando que incluso cuando el costo de vida (COLA) era del 8.22 %, el presupuesto real solo aumentó un 3.31 %.

Los miembros de SRTA no están satisfechos con el tono que se aplica a los problemas fiscales como su culpa. Santa Rosa es una de las comunidades más caras para vivir y la compensación total está por debajo del promedio estatal. Este es un desafío que debemos afrontar con decisión y unidad para evitar la quiebra del distrito y asegurar que el presupuesto no se equilibre a costa de los docentes ni de los estudiantes.

SRCS Board Meeting Agenda Analysis – 9/24/2025.

REGULAR BOARD MEETING

Santa Rosa City Schools

September 24, 2025

Hybrid: Santa Rosa City Hall Council Chambers (100 Santa Rosa Ave.)

4:00 p.m. – Closed Session

6:00 p.m. – Open Session

Hybrid: Zoom / Santa Rosa City Hall

*** streamed ***

Video Board Meetings through this link.

Please take time to review the following abbreviated version of the agenda. Click here to see the entire agenda. It has live links on many items with more information. If you want to comment to the board about any upcoming items, email agendacomments@srcs.k12.ca.us. Please CC wearesrta@gmail.com on your email.

Members attending online are encouraged to add SRTA to the front of their Zoom client name.

Closed Session Items: 

A.1. Public Comment On Closed Session Agenda Items To comment, email Melanie Martin at mmartinsrcs.k12.ca.us.

This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak to the board on Closed Session items only. 

Without specifics on closed session agenda items, it is impossible for the public to know when to provide insights for items being reviewed.

B.1. Student Readmissions (Case Nos: 2024/25-01)

B.2. Student Expulsions (Case Nos: 2025/26-01, 2025/26-02)

B.3. Conference With Labor Negotiator – Name of designated rep attending: Dr. Vicki Zands (SRCS); name of organizations: SRTA, CSEA Santa Rosa 75, Teamsters Union 665

B.4. Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release

B.5. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Title of employee being reviewed: Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent, Principals, Vice Principals, Assistant Principals, Directors, Coordinators) 

RECONVENE TO REGULAR OPEN SESSION (6:00 p.m.)

D. Reports

E. Public Comment on Non Agenda and Consent Items

SRTA Members are invited to complete ‘blue cards’ at the board meeting in order to make public comments. Online comments have been suspended unless a board member is attending remotely. Please be prepared to observe the three minute time limit or the imposition of a possible last minute reduction in the time limit. Comments have been limited to as little as 60 seconds, with a limit on the total time spent on public comments. Only items NOT on the agenda are addressed at this time, with the exception of consent items (See section F.)

Comments are requested at the board meeting to bring a member’s perspective and share real experiences of the impact of district policies and practices on students and staff. 

Speakers are limited to just those in person

 Comments are most impactful when they are well spoken, composed and reasonable.

Can the board accept the transparent practice of announcing future special board meetings at the prior regular board meeting? 

F. CONSENT ITEMS 

All consent items are enacted by the Board in one motion, unless a Board member requests that an item be removed and discussed separately. 

F.2. Approval of Personnel Transactions 

Personnel Transactions 

EdJoin shows a total of 88 current postings for 207 jobs in SRCS. There are nineteen certificated opening postings for nineteen positions (three less than the last meeting.) There are sixty-nine current classified postings for one-hundred eighty-eight job openings (one more than the last meeting.) There are no certificated and no classified management positions posted. 

This attachment lists department chairs and lead teachers. This internal process must be addressed so that those willing to step up to these responsibilities get their fair payment on the first check of the year, not delayed for weeks as was the case this year.

SRTA heartily welcomes Adrianna Begley (SRHS), Ellen Farwell (SPSV), Daniel Charlip Blumlein (PTES), and  Danielle Yount (JMES).

SRTA welcomes back Anita Riveros Santiago (EAHS).

Changes to classified staff includes six new hires, and one resignation. They leave taking with them two years of knowledge and service to our staff and students.

Welcome to Gabriela Mendoza-Torres as Interim Principal of CCLA.

F.5. Approval of Contracts

Summary

#ProviderCostDescription
Elementary
4North Bay Children’s Center$947,157.00Preschool at SLES and JMES for 48 students ($19,732 per student)
5Santa Rosa City Rec & Parks Department$6,950.002 day camp over Thanksgiving Break for 150 students ($46 per student)
6Springboard Collaborative$354,955.00After-school, early-literacy academic program for 675 students (K-3) at 5 sites ($526 per student)
10Community MattersNo Direct CostSafe School Ambassador program for PTES
15Santa Rosa Junior CollegeNo Direct CostESL, College Skills, and Adult ESL classes at JMES
21eSpark Inc.$3,724.99instruction and practice for reading, writing, and math with PD for up to 20 staff at ALES.
District 
2Document Tracking Services$5,500.00application to manage District & Charter LCAPs, the School Site SPSAs, Safety Plans and other documents
9Restorative Resources$7,000.00to support SRCS staff members with restorative practices
11Soliant Health$750,000.00SLP services for students (last year contract was $425,000)
13Marin County Office of Education / CA Collaborative for Educational ExcellenceNo Direct CostPD to help school staff and community members deepen their knowledge and skills in community engagement
14King Consulting$82,000.00make determination of the District’s State School Facility Program (SFP) New Construction Eligibility and assist SRCS in applying for modernization funding reimbursements from the state.
16CyberReef$480.00Internet filtering for hotspots provided for students.
18DGI Development Group, Inc. / CISCO$82,534.31DO Hyperflex & UCS – Support and Licensing C9500 switches – Support and Licensing Firewalls
Secondary
1EdPuzzle$14,259.00Platform for Burbank Elementary, CCLA, EAHS, MCHS & PHS
3Swank K12 Films$2,650.00movie licensing for MCHS.
8The Backdrop$6,100.002026 PHS Prom Location.
12Steve Smith$10,200.00run Student Observatory projects for our STEM Level 2 & 3 STEM Certificate program, and assists with technical aspects of the Observatory.
19Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District$2,400.00The team from EAHS will meet with the team from CRPUSD for four hours around 4×4 schedule.
20Parent Institute for Quality Education (PIQE)$10,000.00Family Engagement in Education program for all HS’s.
Charter
7Membean Inc.$1,395.00vocabulary program that builds word consciousness for SRACS
17Solution Tree$8,000.00four professional developments at SCOE for CCLA

Total value of contracts = $2,295,305.30

Summary of Contracts

Contracts

SRTA members would like to know why the DGI/CISCO expenses can’t come from bond funds. 

F.6. Approval of Contracts – Bond 

#ContractorSiteServiceCost
Elementary
1ZFA Structural EngineersPTESStructural review after trenching$5,000
4Incompli Inc.HLESRisk Assessment for Storm Water Plan$18,990
9Stocksdale Inspection ServicesABESInspection for modernization project$50,950
11Brelje & RaceABESExtra underground survey$5,900
Secondary
2Brelje & RaceMHSTopographic Map for pavement project$38,700
3STRATA Archecture & PlanningEAHSsupplemental design services$74,400
5NorBay ConsultingSRHSAsbestos inspection pre renovation$1,594
6Greystone West CompanyPHSConstruction Management for new building$1,676,669
7Greystone West CompanySRHSConstruction Management for parking lot$275,347
8RGH ConsultantsSRHSGeotechnical Testing$16,121
10Miller Pacific Engineering GroupPHSGeotechnical Testing$38,600

Measure C = $2,121,430.40

Measure G = $80,840.00

Total = $2,202,270.40

Summary of Contracts

Contracts 

Measure C and G Implementation Plan 

F.7. Approval of Request for Proposal for Boys and Girls Club Sonoma-Marin

For after-school, expanded learning programs to approximately 525 students at Herbert Slater Middle/Junior High, Santa Rosa Middle/Junior High and Rincon Valley Middle School  from Oct 1 through July 31, 2025.

Cost: $610,448

Contract

SRTA members wonder why students at Comstock are not included in this program.

How do students qualify for this program? Is there any associated cost? When will staff be briefed on these details so we can support students and families utilizing this opportunity?

Update on Current Prop 28 and Approval of the Annual Reports

Proposition 28: The Arts and Music in School Funding (AMS) is a legislative measure that was presented to voters in California during the 2022 elections. This proposition addresses the allocation of state funds to enhance and expand arts and music education in public schools.

F.8. – Cesar Chavez Language Academy

Using Proposition 28 funding to hire more staff and acquire additional supplies to expand our offerings including adding a Mariachi course allocating a new section which was a .20 FTE. The funding enabled us to provide materials and supplies such as instruments to support the section. Another .20 FTE to offer a course that focused on exploring video technology.

F.9. Santa Rosa Accelerated Charter School

Funds were allocated to support a 0.2 FTE certificated Art Teacher, expanding opportunities for students to engage in visual arts. In addition, Prop 28 funds were used to help sustain and enhance our music program, ensuring that students continue to have access to high-quality instruction in this area.

F.10. Santa Rosa Charter for the Arts School

This funding was used to hire an instructional aide and purchase supplemental materials that align with our integrated VAPA standards and project-based learning model.

F.11. Santa Rosa French-American Charter School

SRFACS did not have any expenses for Prop 28 arts education programs during the 2024-2025 school year

There is no specific financial information or data attached to any of these site reports. 

SRTA members insist on assurances that Prop 28 funds are being utilized not to sustain, but to enhance art experiences for students. Reassurance that an instructional aide is being utilized to enhance art education is necessary. 

F.12. Approval of New Ethnic Studies Course Proposal

The Board will consider approval of the following new course for the 2025-2026 school year: Ethnic Studies Small Group Instruction English 9-10. This course satisfies 10 English credits. 

Course Proposal

The course overview specifies English 3-4 which is intended for 11th and 12th graders, which causes confusion.

SRTA members support offering Ethnic Studies content to all students. 

It is time for the board to review the devotion to A-G only courses, in a way which includes teacher feedback on the true impact of this implementation. It is also necessary to clarify the expectations of an A-G course in a small group setting, and a co-taught setting as well as a traditional setting.

F.13. Approval of Santa Rosa High School’s FFA members to travel to Indianapolis, IN

The Board is being asked to approve the Field Trip Request for Santa Rosa High School’s annual  FFA students to travel to the FFA National Convention in Indianapolis, IN, October 27 – Nov. 2, 2025.

Letter of Intent & Itinerary

Field Trip Form

Fundraising

F.14. Approval of BP 4119.24

The Board will consider approval of Board Policy updates for 4119.24.

4119.24 Redline Maintaining Appropriate Adult-Student Interactions

Formatting Guidelines

SRTA members appreciate the changes to the proposed policy allowing for healthy interactions between staff and students. This BP is also included in G.1. 

F.15. Approval of the Field Placement Affiliation MOU between Grand Canyon University and Santa Rosa City Schools

This is a three year contract. Mentor teachers are to be paid $500 per 16 week session. 

MOU

G. BOARD POLICY UPDATES/FIRST READ

G.1. (First Read) First Read of Updated BP 4219.21, BP 4219.24, BP4319.21, BP4319.24

The Board will conduct a first reading of Board Policy updates for 4219.21, 4219.24, 4319.21, 4319.24.

BP 4219.21 Redline Professional Standards  Changes include the addition of a section on Social Media. 

BP 4219.24 Redline Maintaining Appropriate Adult-Student Interactions (See F.14.)

BP 4319.21 Redline  Attachment is labeled  BP 4219.21  and is identical to BP 4219.21 Professional Standards above except for omitting  the phrase ‘during work hours.’

BP 4319.24 Redline Attachment is labeled BP 4219.24 and is identical to the above BP 4219.24  Maintaining Appropriate Adult-Student Interactions

Formatting Guidelines

G.2.  (First Read) First Read of Updated BP 5116.1 and BP 5117

Intradistrict means between districts. 

Redline BP 5116.1 Intradistrict Open Enrollment includes specifying that acceptance shall not be based on a student’s academic or athletic performance and transportation will not be provided.

Redline BP 5117 Interdistrict Attendance transfers require permission of their home district and shall be denied for a list of reasons provided.

Formatting Guidelines

SRTA members would appreciate transparent communication of the current SRCS philosophy about Intradistrict Transfers in light of declining enrollment and financial burdens. 

H. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEMS

H.1. (Discussion) SRCS/SCOE, Six Projects Presentation

The Sonoma County Office of Education (SCOE) partnered with Santa Rosa City Schools (SRCS) for a six-month MOU to address

  1. Financial Stability – Guidance and strategies to improve fiscal health and sustainability.

Given the budget approval letter attached in K.4. grave concerns remain. Where has the spending outside the limits of the budget occurred? What mechanics can be utilized to cease this practice? 

  1. Student Enrollment Insights – Analysis and tools to better understand and respond to enrollment trends.

It was openly stated that SCOE did exit interviews with families that chose to leave the district. What are the lessons learned from this data? What systems are in place to keep current with the factors impacting declining enrollment?

  1. School Restructuring – Support for data-informed decisions around school configuration and resource alignment.

Where is the open and honest sharing of the data around school configuration and resource alignment? 

Where are the staffing ratios? 

Where are the metrics for evaluating the transitions to fewer elementary sites and two 7-12 sites? 

What are the expected savings on these changes coming from, specifically? Is that being realized?

Can an evaluation be completed and shared before closing more sites? It is hard for SRTA members to support this shift when there is little information about it working to fix the problem it was designed to impact. 

  1. Safety – Enhancements to school safety protocols and planning.

What has this entailed? The new district Safety Committee required by the SRTA/SRCS contract has not been utilized to collaboratively address safety in the district. The district Safety Plan was expected to be a board agenda item in September of 2024. It has not been rescheduled. 

  1. Special Education Transitions – Streamlined processes and support for students moving into or out of special education services.

What does this look like? The SRCS Special Education Task Force has just been initiated. What kind of timeline is expected to address and implement changes to increase the efficiency of the Special Education program which was assessed to be overspending by $20 million dollars by Dr. Gillespie nearly a year ago.

  1. Communications – Strengthened internal and external communications to support transparency and community engagement.

The promises of open two-way  communication are welcome. Implementation is a historical deficiency for SRCS. Not having the details for this report posted does not bode well. 

Attachments will be added to this item after posting of the agenda. (These are not yet posted.)

SRTA members support the district righting the financial position of the district and avoiding a state takeover. 

SRTA members  are curious about the specificities of this support, and the impact this MOU has had on improving the systems and processes utilized by SRCS. 

H.2. (Discussion) Proctor Terrace ES and Hidden Valley ES Trench Study Report

The Board will receive information about the trenching study report that was performed at the Proctor Terrace ES and Hidden Valley ES campuses during the summer of 2025.

Presentation

HVES Report Concludes that no Holocene active faults exist within the areas explored. 

HVES Recommendation Recommended a “no build” zone which extends 50-feet east from the western end of the seismic profiles. (No further building along the west boundary of the site.)

PTES Report  The aggregated evidence suggests likely Holocene fault activity.

PTES Recommendation  Recommend a minimum setback from the potential faults be imposed for new structures. (No further building at the front of the school.)

Letter

H.3. (Discussion/Possible Action) Boundary Discussion

Presentation

  • H.3a. Elementary Schools: 
Current SiteProjected at SiteNeighborhood(s) to be absorbedNew projections for SiteBased on the provided Numbers
JMES417424Coffey Lane (9) and W Steele Lane (91)524524
HLES470487Coddingtown (96)566583
ALES325320Corby (124) and Copperfield (17)466461
HVES540504Steele Lane (62)602566
PTES478441none390441
LBES457461College (43) and Fairgrounds (45)421549
Totals2687263748729693124

SRTA members are concerned about the current lack of space at sites. The thought of sites absorbing an additional 420 students from Steele Lane is causing angst. Sharing a detailed facility use plan for impacted sites must be a top priority.

H.3b. Secondary Schools: 

Current SiteProjected at SiteNeighborhood(s) to be absorbedNew projections for SiteBased on the provided Numbers
PHS15391853Mark West-Wickiup (23)18761876
SRHS19191650Franklin (48), Proctor Terrace (45)17431743
EAHS9350Bellvue East (157), Bellvue West (565), Wright (188), Roseland (197)11011107
MCHS15821648Larkfield (0), Hidden Valley (74)16481722
MHS17321400Kawana Springs (207), Olive Park (5), Julliard Park (22), Corby (91)17251725
Totals77076551162280938173

EAHS was set to be a magnet school without boundaries, open to any interested students. The new boundary map  shows a ‘Priority Enrollment Area.’  What does this mean? It is impossible for staff to promote enrollment from a state of confusion, and the deadline for transferring  is approaching.

  • H.3c. Elsie Allen High School Update: This item provides an update on the planned restructuring of Elsie Allen High School into a new 7–12 magnet model that emphasizes a personalized approach to student programming, project-based options and experiential learning. Recommendations will be presented, including a phased approach being taken in order to ensure student and programmatic success within the available resources.
    Additional attachments will be uploaded after agenda posting. (Not yet posted.)
    • Proposal This includes 4 rounds of PD to support Project Based Learning (PBL), with growing circles of influence. There is a full site experience in the Spring.

 Total cost for training: not specified.

SRCS has a legacy of less than stellar implementations of new programs.

Implementing a single new course is a large lift. This includes writing course proposals and guiding them through the SRCS and UC Regent approval process. Then new courses require time to flush out curriculum, resources  and pacing at a general level allowing for a pilot run of the course, including a revision process before the course is rolled out.  SRCS has historically hesitated to provide the necessary support for this full implementation process of a single course. 

Implementing a full program based on PBL takes training in PBL, as well as serious dedication to resources both curricular and material. SRTA members stand strong with their colleagues that this transition is fully supported by SRCS. The implementation of this shift can not be borne by volunteer efforts of staff, and can not be done without required financial resources for staff time,  curriculum and materials. 

Public Hearing and action  Regarding Sufficiency of Textbooks or Instructional Materials for 2025-26, 

This certifies that textbooks and instructional materials are available and legally required for all California K-12 public school students, ensuring each pupil has access to standards-aligned materials in sufficient quantities to use in class and at home, either print or digital.

  • Sufficient Quantity: Each student must have access to the materials to use in the classroom and to take home. 
  • Digital Formats: Materials can be digital, as long as each pupil has access to them both in class and at home. 
  • Alignment to Standards: Materials must be consistent with the curriculum framework and aligned to the SBE-adopted content standards
  • Usable Condition: Textbooks and materials must be in usable condition. 
  • No Cost to Students: Materials

H.4.& 5. Grades K-6

Notice (English) (Español)

Resolution

H.6.&7. Grades 7-12

Notice (English) (Español)

Resolution

How are materials provided without cost to students? 

All students need adopted materials and access. There are issues with TK, K, Special Ed, Newcomers and ALD. 

There are special problems with Maravallas, Everyday Math, and AP Biology texts not being provided, many online platforms not being available, as well as students not having devices to access online materials when they are available.

The process for adopting and ordering new textbooks is not clear. 

SRTA  Textbook Access Survey (Sept 2025) Responses

H.8. (Action) Acceptance of Governance Handbook

The Board will consider acceptance of the Governance Handbook, which outlines the roles, responsibilities, policies, and procedures guiding board operations. This acceptance affirms the board’s commitment to effective governance, transparency, and accountability in serving the SRCS community.

Governance Handbook This is not a redline copy.  Were there changes? 

The board met at an all day meeting in early September to reset the vision and mission of the district. They also discussed the Governance Handbook. 

H.1. Approval of Minutes

August 27, 2025 Minutes and Supporting Documents and Resolutions (Regular Meeting)

September 2, 2025 STRATEGIC PLANNING WORKSHOP Minutes and Supporting Documents and Handbook (Special Meeting)

Holding a meeting without a zoom option and without posting a video clearly breaks from current practice. It does not project openness and transparency.

September 10, 2025 Minutes and Supporting Documents (Regular Meeting)

K.1. Future Board Discussion Items (not included in this agenda)

SRTA members are encouraged to prepare for the upcoming agenda items.

  • Updated Board Policies
  • Summer School Update (Sept. 2025)
  • Cell Phone Policy Presentation 
    • Staff was recently given the opportunity to complete a survey about cell phones. All questions were required to be answered, while options for answering did not always allow for an accurate response. Valuable input will not be included in these results.

Recently Requested Agenda Items from the Board

Medina- AP instruction data with number of years of experience of 

Teachers

-Clarification about board policy adoption requiring a majority of board membership versus a majority of those present/voting

Caston- Site funding finance report with various amounts and sources

-strategy of athletics program across the district, 

-update 3510 policy around reducing waste as a discussion item

SRTA looks to the future scheduling of the following items:

  • Appointment of Vacant Committee Position: Board Finance Subcommittee (September 2025)
  • Panorama and Youth Truth Survey Data (August 2025)
  • Restorative Practices Data (March 2025)
  • Alternate Education Update (December 2024, Feb 2025) 
    • There is a strong need for Alternative placements for secondary students who need more services than our comprehensive schools are able to provide. How can SRCS meet the needs of these students during these tough financial times? Is there data that the ISP program is sufficient to meet this need?
  • VAPA Program Highlights (Feb 2025)
  • Plan and timeline for implementation of Dr. Gillespie’s recommendations around Special Services (January 2025)
  • First Draft of the District Safety Plan (delayed from September 2024)
  • Sharing the Library Master Plan with implementation expectation
  • Officially Closing Learning House, and other sites
  • SRACS Accelerated Charter Material Revision Request (delayed)
  • Plan for Staff Housing support program from the proceeds of Fir Ridge

Until the district makes a decision, the proceeds from the sale of the Fir Ridge property are just sitting and losing value as the cost of housing continues to rise. Getting a program started could help SRCS attract and retain CSEA staff. The potential impact of the funds continues to diminish as time passes.

  • Student Voice Policy

K.3. Facilities Projects Update

The Facilities Master Plan update process will begin this fall, to address needed changes due to school consolidations. There will be site visits this fall. 

The bond Citizen Oversight Committee (COC) is recruiting.

SRFACS @ SRMS and District Office & Education Center are under design.

James Monroe and Helen Lehman ES TK Classrooms are awaiting DSA approval.

Santa Rosa HS Parking Lot  is expected to begin in October.

Piner High School 2-Story Classroom has had the site approved by DSA. Awaiting further approvals from DSA. DSA certification is pending for Rincon Valley MS Roofing & HVAC .

Piner HS Ball Wall and Fencing complete. 

District-Wide Electronic Access Controls install is ongoing at SRHS, MHS, MCHS and RVMS. Design work is nearly complete for PHS, ALES, HLES, JMES and LBES with preliminary drawing are being reviewed for SRMS, RHS, and SRCSA.

The Central Receiving warehouse is completed.

Closing out happening on James Monroe ES Drainage and MHS 2-Story projects as well as PHS drainage, painting at RVMS, ALES and EAHS.  SRHS, MHS and RVMS gym floor refinishes are being closed out.

Projects (includes some pictures)

K.4. Sonoma County Office of Education Letter: 2025/26 Budget Approval Letter

Budget Approval Letter

SCOE Standard Reminders

K.5. Board Finance Subcommittee Meeting Dates

Board Finance Meeting Schedule for the Remainder of 2025:

  • Monday, October 6, 2025
  • Monday, November 3, 2025
  • Monday, December 1, 2025

K.6. Nominations Open: Sonoma County Committee on School District Organization

Letter

K.7. Superintendent Student Leadership Council Committee

The first meeting will be on September 22 at the District Office. Future meetings will rotate to the various schools. Natalia Olivera and Jonathan Carrillo, as Board Trustees, will be co-presidents of the council.

Committee

K.8. Updated AR 5117 and AR 5116.1

Regulation 5117: Interdistrict Attendance

Regulation 5116.1: Intradistrict Open Enrollment

There are BP with these numbers being approved in G.2. 

SRCS Board Meeting Agenda Analysis – 9/10/2025.

REGULAR BOARD MEETING

Santa Rosa City Schools

September 10, 2025

Hybrid: Santa Rosa City Hall Council Chambers (100 Santa Rosa Ave.)

4:00 p.m. – Closed Session

6:00 p.m. – Open Session

Hybrid: Zoom / Santa Rosa City Hall

*** streamed ***

Video Board Meetings through this link.

Please take time to review the following abbreviated version of the agenda. Click here to see the entire agenda. It has live links on many items with more information. If you want to comment to the board about any upcoming items, email agendacomments@srcs.k12.ca.us. Please CC wearesrta@gmail.com on your email.

Members attending online are encouraged to add SRTA to the front of their Zoom client name.

Closed Session Items: 

A.1. Public Comment On Closed Session Agenda Items To comment, email Melanie Martin at mmartinsrcs.k12.ca.us.

This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak to the board on Closed Session items only. 

Without specifics on closed session agenda items, it is impossible for the public to know when to provide insights for items being reviewed.

B.1. Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release

B.2. Conference With Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation (Case name: OAH Case No. 2025070109, No.: 24CV00520/ No.: 23CV00397)

B.3. Conference With Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation Litigation (Number of potential cases: 2) 

B.4. Student Expulsions (Case Nos: 2025/26-01)

B.5. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Title of employee being reviewed: Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent, Principals, Vice Principals, Assistant Principals, Directors, Coordinators) 

RECONVENE TO REGULAR OPEN SESSION (6:00 p.m.)

D. Reports

SRTA welcomes Teamsters Local 665!

E. Public Comment on Non Agenda and Consent Items

SRTA Members are invited to complete ‘blue cards’ at the board meeting in order to make public comments. Online comments have been suspended unless a board member is attending remotely. Please be prepared to observe the three minute time limit or the imposition of a possible last minute reduction in the time limit. Comments have been limited to as little as 60 seconds, with a limit on the total time spent on public comments. Only items NOT on the agenda are addressed at this time, with the exception of consent items (See section F.)

Comments are requested at the board meeting to bring a member’s perspective and share real experiences of the impact of district policies and practices on students and staff. 

Speakers are limited to just those in person

 Comments are most impactful when they are well spoken, composed and reasonable.

F. CONSENT ITEMS 

All consent items are enacted by the Board in one motion, unless a Board member requests that an item be removed and discussed separately. 

F.2. Approval of Personnel Transactions 

Personnel Transactions 

EdJoin shows a total of 84 current postings for 201 jobs in SRCS. There are twenty-two certificated opening postings for twenty-two positions (two less than the last meeting.) There are sixty-one current classified postings for one-hundred eighty-seven job openings (fourteen fewer than the last meeting.) There is one certificated and no classified management positions posted. 

SRTA members wonder about HR decisions. Three weeks into school and staff is being involuntarily transferred. This is traumatic for students, and not in keeping with putting students first. 

This attachment lists changes effective in June and July. It lists additional assignments that have been reneged. 

SRTA heartily welcomes

Marcus Dunseth (MHS), Ana-Karen Lopez (CCLA), Carlos Castaneda (PHS), Julie Montgomery (SRHS), Alyssa August (PTES), Andrew Kempiak (SRCAS), Kawai Navares (EAHS) and Alexandra Evans (JMES).

SRTA welcomes back the returning Sarah Legesse (MHS), Yosan Zeweldi (HVES) and Lori Lapham (LBES).

SRTA bids farewell to Sharon Stevens (SLP) who has resigned after nearly 1 year of service to our students. 

Changes to classified staff includes three new hires, seven rehires, and five resignations. They leave taking with them ten years of knowledge and service to our staff and students.

There are two administrative promotions, and a School Based Therapist resigned.

F.4. Approval of Contracts

Summary

#ProviderCostDescription
Elementary
4Made iN Santa Rosa – ELITE Early Literacy ProgramNo Direct CostHLES 3rd grade students will participate in an afterschool literacy support program, paid by MiNSR
6Play Marimba!$5,000.00Rent 44 marimbas for HLES
7Science if for All$17,000.00two PD sessions on design workshop process, including specific strategies to support multilingual students
District 
2Imagine Learning$2,500.00These courses are specifically tailored to serve students who are below grade level and need greater support.
5Everyday Speech$13,439.72online curriculum used by speech language pathologists and school psychologists
11Paws As Loving Support Assistance DogsNo Direct Costtherapy dogs and trained 1:1 handlers to attend SRCS community events and trauma or crisis support
12Adobe$4,920.00500 user licenses plus 100 device licenses to a single pool of 1,000 user licenses.
14School Services of California, Inc.$20,000.00gather data and provide an initial fiscal analysis of current SELPA funding, projected SRCS funding if leave the county program
15CDW Amplified$48,807.20Google Workspace for Education Plus (formally G Suite Enterprise for Education)
16DGI$116,678.85Cohesity Data Management and Backup Renewal – 3-Year CMAS Contract
Secondary
1RaizesNo Direct Costart, cultural, and environmental focused workshops to support secondary students
3Poppy Bank EpicenterNo Direct Costcommunity based paid and volunteer work for students in transition Program
8Santa Rosa Sports Medicine$2,500.00medical consultations, injury management, and collaborative efforts with schools and athletic programs
9PanapticNo Direct Costmarijuana, alcohol, and opioids prevention program for SRHS
10Humanidad Therapy & Education ServicesNo Direct Costmental health services for Latinx youth combining traditional Latino practices with group therapy in 8-week bilingual support groups
13IXL Learning$10,518.75online platform for Math, Science, History and English for HCMS

Total value of contracts = $241,364.57.

Summary of Contracts

Contracts

SRTA members support researching before committing to leaving the county to run SRCS’s own SELPA. This research is more expensive than Gillespie’s advice for all Special Education Services. 

F.5. Approval of Contracts – Bond 

#ContractorSiteServiceCost
District
2Terraphase Engineering Inc.DOCEQA testing or clearance$161,740
Secondary
7Quattrocchi Kwok ArchitectsSRHSsupplemental design services$19,000
8Brelje & RaceABESTopographic Map$4,000
9NorBay ConsultingSRHSHaz Mat Testing$1,702
10Redwood Moving and StorageMHSReturn books to Slater$1,920
Elementary
1Adobe Assoc, IncHLESBoundary line survey$3,250
3Crawford and Associates, IncHLESmaterials inspection and testing$80,000
4Crawford and Associates, IncJMESmaterials inspection and testing$80,000
6Quattrocchi Kwok ArchitectsABESservices for modernization$126,300
11National Construction RentalsABESTemporary Fencing$13,184
12National Construction RentalsBHESTemporary Fencing$13,372
Charter
5Crawford and Associates, IncSRMS/FACSmaterials inspection and testing$80,000

Measure C = $225,544.40

Measure G = $358,923.28

Total = $584,467.68

Summary of Contracts

Contracts 

Measure C and G Implementation Plan 

F.6. Approval of Resolution No. 2025/26-06 Approving the 2024-25 Appropriations Limitation Recalculation and 2025-26 Estimated Appropriations Limitation Calculation (Gann Limit)

Annually the board requests the State of California allow SRCS proceeds above the adjusted 1978-79 rates.

Resolution

F.7. Approval of Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) for the SRHS Parking Lot Improvements and Fencing Project

This is a Lease-Leaseback Agreement Amendment with Wright Contracting LLC for the Santa Rosa High School Parking Lot Improvements and Fencing project.

Cost from Measure C funds: $3,682,898.00

Amendment

F.8. School Consolidation California Environmental Quality (CEQA) Notice of Exemption

The Santa Rosa Middle School TK project and the Piner High School New 2-Story Classroom Building project qualify for a statutory exemption from the CEQA analysis.

Cost from Measure C funds: $100.00

Notice of Exemption

Attachment

F.9. Update on Current Prop 28 and Approval of the Annual Report

Prop 28 funds are to increase funding by securing additional funds for arts and music education. 80 percent of the funds are to be expended to employ certificated or classified staff to provide instruction, and the remaining 20 percent of funds are to be expended on training, supplies and materials, and educational partner programs. No more than 1 percent of the LEA’s allocation can be used for administrative costs, including indirect costs. Each site is allocated funds. 

Some elementary sites are working to add an art teacher, and purchase instruments. Secondary sites are adding additional and new sections. 

Local stakeholder feedback is expected to be crucial to this decision making process. 

Sites must use the yearly allocation within a three-year time period. Allocations must be used for additional or new arts programs and may not be used to supplant existing staff funding. Funds may be pooled between sites.

Elementary

2024-2025 school year

  • More Instruments: Schools were able to purchase more marimbas, including practice instruments for students.
  • New Programs: Several schools introduced Ballet Folklorico programs and funded costumes for student performances. 
  • Number of full-time equivalent teachers (certificated) providing arts education programs with AMS funds 1.15 FTE 
  • Number of full-time equivalent personnel (classified) providing arts education programs with AMS funds. 2.5 FTE 
  • Number of full-time equivalent teaching aides providing arts education programs with AMS funds. 2.5 FTE
  • Number of students served with AMS funds. 1,955 6. 
  • Number of school sites providing arts education programs with AMS funds. 7

High School

  • Funds were used to purchase new ceramics wheels, kilns, and sculpting tools for the art classrooms. Classes were expanded offering advanced ceramics courses, guitar classes, mariachi band, graphic design and photography. 
  • Sites also used funds to purchase updated software licenses and equipment to support these new programs. Sites used funds for theatre courses, after hour practices focusing on acting, stagecraft, and costume design. One site was able to perform a musical which had not occurred in over ten years. 
  • Number of full-time equivalent teachers (certificated) providing arts education programs with AMS funds 4.15 FTE 
  • Number of full-time equivalent personnel (classified) providing arts education programs with AMS funds. 0 
  • Number of full-time equivalent teaching aides providing arts education programs with AMS funds. 0 
  • Number of students served with AMS funds. 592 
  • Number of school sites providing arts education programs with AMS funds. 10

SRTA is appreciative of extending arts education for our students. 

SRCS has many initiatives that are intended to be locally controlled. Creating a transparent and inclusive process as well as communicating a timeline for decision making and implementation for these initiatives has proven to be challenging. 

The process for making these Prop 28 decisions did not include discussions at staff meetings at all sites. 

Where can the plans for each site be accessed?

What controls are in place to ensure this funding is utilized for supplemental not replacement programs, as SRCS functions with such a tight budget? 

F.10. Approval of Job Description for Community School Coordinator

SRCS contends that the Community School Coordinator is a proven best-practice for implementing the community school model. The CCSPP grant was for 

Funding Source:

Grant funding comes from the California Community Schools Partnership Program, totaling $4,750,000 over a five-year period (2025–2030). That is $950,000 per year. 

Job Description Coordinating afterschool and summer programs seems to overlap with the Director of Extended Learning. 

Jan 24, 2024 Community School Grant Update was the last SRCS board agenda for CCSPP.

Over 8 percent of this grant will be used for this coordinator. 

G. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEMS

G.1. (Discussion) West County Transportation Agency Update

WCTA will provide an update on current ridership, as well as progress related to driver shortages, route changes, driver training, and planning for more environmentally conscious practices as this collaboration begins its tenth year.

• Ridership to schools from the newly implemented elementary boundaries has been low 

• Ridership to/from Montgomery Jr/High School has been high and required additional buses to relieve overloading 

• Ridership to/from Santa Rosa Jr/High School has been steady, but lower than anticipated. Most students are Jr High riders.

 • Ridership to/from Piner High School has been low ( Jr High expected to increase ridership)

* numbers provided are from WCTA Updates.

Update

What communication system is being utilized to inform riders and their families when issues arise? 

If six routes are ‘uncovered’, how are those students getting to school? 

Has there been any changes to support student field trips? 

How does the JPA determine member district financial contributions? What is the rate paid by SRCS? How much of that is recuperated from restricted funding? 

How is this contract evaluated? 

G.2. (Action) 2024-25 Unaudited Actuals

Additionally, a 2024-25 Unaudited Actuals Report Narrative will be added to this item. The Narrative will provide informative details as well as additional information on the Current Expense Formula/Minimum Classroom Compensation Form CEA deficiency.

Presentation

Financial Report

Revenues were $5.2 million more (2.3%) than budgeted.

Expenses were $18.7 million more (7.8%) than budgeted.

Current Expense Formula/Minimum Classroom Compensation requires 55%, while SRCS only spent 52.3% of the budget on direct expenses for classrooms. 

Noncompliance Rates

SRTA members are concerned with the district spending more than budgeted. Making severe cuts negatively impacts the student experience and creates hardships for many. When the savings from these cuts are offset with more spending, is it not clear how the financial picture can ever improve. 

The cuts seem majorly focused on classroom level spending. Already this year, the impacts of decisions creating larger class sizes are creating unsustainable conditions. If SRCS is already underfunding classrooms by 2.7% of the budget, cuts need to come from elsewhere. 

G.3. (Discussion/Action) Second Read and Consideration of BP 4119.24, BP 4119.21, BP 1114

The Board will consider approval of Board Policy updates for 4119.24, 4119.21, 1114.

BP 4119.24 This policy addresses a range of behaviors that include not only obviously unlawful or improper interactions with students, but also behaviors that undermine the professional adult/student relationship and can lead to either misconduct or the appearance of impropriety.

BP 4119.21 Employee personal use of Social Media and Social Media Guidelines.

BP 1114 School employees may use only district-controlled social media or district approved platforms to communicate directly with current students about school-related matters. Examples of district approved platforms include district gmail, google classroom, parentsquare, minga, etc

Guidelines

While SRTA members appreciate the updates to these policies, they still inhibit healthy connection with students. 

Teachers use Class DoJo, Remind, and other platforms for communicating with students, sometimes at their own expense. How can these communication platforms be incorporated into these policies?

G.4. (Discussion) Enrollment and Capacity Discussion

  1. Elementary. Overall, elementary enrollment is slightly higher than projected with the distribution of students over expectations at some sites and under enrolled at others. With the planned closure of Steele Lane at the end of this school year, additional discussions are needed to adjust boundaries for the 2026/27 year.
  1. Secondary. Overall, enrollment in the junior high programs at reconfigured schools is in line with projections. In preparation for the conversion of Elsie Allen High School in 2026/27, a discussion of considerations of boundaries for traditional secondary schools is needed.

10-Day Student Count Current attendance rates meet the numbers projected.

Room Use By Site (Aug 2025) An example of the data by site: FACS has 20 classrooms and 31 classrooms in use, requiring the use of other non-classroom spaces for instruction and educational support needs.

Before plans are made for moving full steam ahead, the financial motivation for this discussion must be made transparent, if the support of the community is desired. Is the district saving the anticipated $6 million dollars this year from the closing of 4 sites? How is this achieved? If this is playing out as planned, then discussing next steps is reasonable. If the savings are not actually being accessed, then proceeding with more consolidation seems unwarranted. 

G.5. (Action) Appointment of Vacant Committee Position: Board Finance Subcommittee

President McNally has indicated that she wishes to step down from this role and provide an opportunity for another trustee to serve. A new member may be appointed to serve.

H.1. Approval of Minutes

August 27, 2025 Minutes and Supporting Documents and Resolutions (Regular Meeting)

J.1. Future Board Discussion Items (not included in this agenda)

SRTA members are encouraged to prepare for the upcoming agenda items.

  • Summer School Update
  • SCOE/SRCS AdHoc Presentation
  • Sufficiency of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (Elementary / Secondary)
  • Updated Board Policy: Mobile Devices 

Recently Requested Agenda Items from the Board

Medina- AP instruction data with number of years of experience of 

teachers

Caston- Site funding finance report with various amounts and sources

-strategy of athletics program across the district, 

-update 3510 policy around reducing waste as a discussion item

SRTA looks to the future scheduling of the following items:

  • Panorama and Youth Truth Survey Data (August 2025)
  • Discussion and update on Reconfiguration and Ad Hoc Committee with SCOE (August 2025)
  • Restorative Practices Data (March 2025)
  • Alternate Education Update (December 2024, Feb 2025) 
    • There is a strong need for Alternative placements for secondary students who need more services than our comprehensive schools are able to provide. How can SRCS meet the needs of these students during these tough financial times? Is there data that the ISP program is sufficient to meet this need?
  • VAPA Program Highlights (Feb 2025)
  • Plan and timeline for implementation of Dr. Gillespie’s recommendations around Special Services (January 2025)
  • First Draft of the District Safety Plan (delayed from September 2024)
  • Board Update of Strategic Goals with input from sites and equity assessment (begun June 2024) 
  • Sharing the Library Master Plan with implementation expectation
  • Officially Closing Learning House, and other sites
  • SRACS Accelerated Charter Material Revision Request (delayed)
  • Plan for Staff Housing support program from the proceeds of Fir Ridge

Until the district makes a decision, the proceeds from the sale of the Fir Ridge property are just sitting and losing value as the cost of housing continues to rise. Getting a program started could help SRCS attract and retain CSEA staff. The potential impact of the funds continues to diminish as time passes.

  • Student Voice Policy

J.4. Approval Notification by SCOE / LCAP 2025-26 Revised

There is no approval letter attached from SCOE. If the attached LCAP is revised, the changes are not obvious.

Revised LCAP? 

SRCS Board Meeting Agenda Analysis – 8/27/2025.

REGULAR BOARD MEETING

Santa Rosa City Schools

August 27, 2025

Hybrid: Santa Rosa City Hall Council Chambers (100 Santa Rosa Ave.)

4:00 p.m. – Closed Session

6:00 p.m. – Open Session

Hybrid: Zoom / Santa Rosa City Hall

*** streamed ***

Video Board Meetings through this link.

Please take time to review the following abbreviated version of the agenda. Click here to see the entire agenda. It has live links on many items with more information. If you want to comment to the board about any upcoming items, email agendacomments@srcs.k12.ca.us. Please CC wearesrta@gmail.com on your email.

Members attending online are encouraged to add SRTA to the front of their Zoom client name.

Closed Session Items: 

A.1. Public Comment On Closed Session Agenda Items To comment, email Melanie Martin at mmartinsrcs.k12.ca.us.

This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak to the board on Closed Session items only. 

Without specifics on closed session agenda items, it is impossible for the public to know when to provide insights for items being reviewed.

B.1. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Title of employee being reviewed: Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent, Principals, Vice Principals, Assistant Principals, Directors, Coordinators) 

B.2. Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release

B.3. Conference With Labor Negotiator (Name of designated rep attending: Dr. Vicki Zands (SRCS); name of organization: Teamsters Union 665)

B.4. Conference With Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation (Case No.24CV-00530, OAH 2025050933 Special Services – continuing from last meeting) 

B.5. Conference With Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation Litigation (Number of potential cases: 2) 

RECONVENE TO REGULAR OPEN SESSION (6:00 p.m.)

D. Reports

SRTA looks forward to a future report on the transitions SRCS is making. There are still so many questions. 

Where are the metrics for evaluating the transitions to fewer elementary sites and two 7-12 sites? 

What are the expected savings on these changes coming from, specifically? Is that being realized?

How much is being spent to make these transitions?

What are the current enrollment numbers? 

What is the process for deciding if programs or schools will utilize closed sites? 

How will lessons learned from these actions inform the transitions underway for another 7-12 and closing another elementary site?

What is the process and timeline for implementing the next round of changes, including transforming EAHS?

In the board minutes, the motion for consolidation states that MHS will have facilities for culinary and woodshop for the 26-27 school year. Where are the plans to facilitate this? 

District communication issues were cited for causing heartache this week when it was temporarily understood that middle school athletes from the transitioned middle school sites would not be utilizing their old sites for athletics. What has changed structurally to assure strong and accurate communication moving forward?

E. Public Comment on Non Agenda and Consent Items

SRTA Members are invited to complete ‘blue cards’ at the board meeting in order to make public comments. Online comments have been suspended unless a board member is attending remotely. Please be prepared to observe the three minute time limit or the imposition of a possible last minute reduction in the time limit. Comments have been limited to as little as 60 seconds, with a limit on the total time spent on public comments. Only items NOT on the agenda are addressed at this time, with the exception of consent items (See section F.)

Comments are requested at the board meeting to bring a member’s perspective and share real experiences of the impact of district policies and practices on students and staff. 

Speakers are limited to just those in person. Comments are most impactful when they are well spoken, composed and reasonable.

F. CONSENT ITEMS 

All consent items are enacted by the Board in one motion, unless a Board member requests that an item be removed and discussed separately. 

F.2. Approval of Personnel Transactions 

Personnel Transactions 

EdJoin shows a total of 80 current postings for 201 jobs in SRCS. There are twenty-four certificated opening postings for twenty-five positions. There are fifty-six current classified postings for two-hundred-one job openings (five more than the last meeting). There are no  certificated and no classified management positions posted. 

SRTA members wonder about HR processes. When is a job posted, and an interview required, vs when can a partial position just be given to an employee? What is the process for a job to be posted on EdJoin? Why might an unfilled position currently utilizing a substitute teacher not be posted? Why would a job posting remain on Ed Join after a new employee is actively teaching in the position?

SRTA heartily welcomes Audrey Castillo ( SPSV), Sierra Overton ( SPSV), Leila Mori ( SPSV), Ashley Reich (EAHS), Alia Ismail-Nielsen (SRHS), Madison Winslow (JMES), Kyle Woodruff (EAHS), Armando Flores Partida (EAHS), Derek Piastrelli (MCHS), Danielle Durfey (HCMS), Mary Shappell King (MCHS), Zachary Asher (ARTS), Christina Pezzolo (MCHS), Timothy Wolcott (MCHS), Andrew Hathaway (MHS), Mollie Duran (EAHS), Nicolette Elliott (HVES), Julie Drogin (RVMS), Matthew Pitchford (MHS), Adrienne Boone (MCHS) and Anna Bernier (MCHS).

SRTA welcomes back the returning Elizabeth Irving (JMES), Brandi Ramos (PTES), Cynthia Miles (LELA) and Jessica Hazlewood (EdServ).

SRTA bids farewell to Clinton Sweek (ARTS) who has resigned after nearly 2 years of service to our students. 

Changes to classified staff includes four new hires, six rehires, four resignations and one retirement. They leave taking with them twenty-seven years of knowledge and service to our staff and students.

There are four administrative/supervisory hires, two new School Based Therapists and two new Program Managers. Additional changes in admin are shown in the org chart but not yet in the personnel report such as Aida Diaz’s promotion from CCLA Principal to Director of PD, and Lyndsey Nash’s move to admin as a Multi-Lingual Coordinator. 

F.4. Approval of Contracts

Summary

#ProviderCostDescription
Charter
3Humanidad Therapy and Education Services$143,0001 year of therapy services for CCLA
4Portuguese Futbol Academy$9,900CCLA activities at lunch Mondays and Fridays
5National Academy of Athletics$19,456CCLA activities at lunch twice a week
6Colors of Spanish$34,722music and movement for CCLA TK and K students
10Curriculum Associates$2,300iReady PD for FACS staff
15IXL Learning$1,575platform for Math, Science, History and English for SRACS
District 
2Newsela, Inc.$19,621leveled articles for students at LBES, CCLA and EAHS from title 1 funds
7California Association of School Business Officials CASBO$5,250one year memberships for all business service staff
9Dominican UniversityNo Direct Costteaching/counseling interns
11CalState TEACHNo Direct Costteaching/counseling interns
16Everway$12,248online platform to supplement the general education curriculum for Sped Students
17360-Degree Customer Inc.$2,930,000for up to 45 paraprofessionals for $45 per hour through 6/30/2026
20Integrated Security Controls, Inc.$37,500Security Cameras Maintenance Contract
Elementary
19McGraw Hill$80,4921 year access to online the textbook and resources for Every Day Math
Secondary
1Instructure / Parchment$2,310fee to setup Parchment transcripts services
8The Backdrop$7,850MHS Prom Location
12City Mechanical$36,967Repair water line to boiler system at MCHS
13Classlink$45,075Single Sign On access to online resources and licenses management
14Panaptic Inc.No Direct Costonline suspension diversions for alcohol and THC ed code violations at MCHS
18Aeries$2,100training around 4×4 scheduling setup in Aeries for EAHS
21CVS Pharmacy – 4th StreetNo Direct CostTransition students (18-22) participate in community based paid and volunteer work program
22CVS Pharmacy – Mendocino AvenueNo Direct CostTransition students (18-22) participate in community based paid and volunteer work program
23CVS Pharmacy – Yulupa AvenueNo Direct CostTransition students (18-22) participate in community based paid and volunteer work program
24Franco American BakeryNo Direct CostTransition students (18-22) participate in community based paid and volunteer work program
25Round Table Pizza – Guerneville RoadNo Direct CostTransition students (18-22) participate in community based paid and volunteer work program
26Round Table Pizza / Circle PizzaNo Direct CostTransition students (18-22) participate in community based paid and volunteer work program
27Lucky SupermarketNo Direct CostTransition students (18-22) participate in community based paid and volunteer work program
28Oliver’s MarketNo Direct CostTransition students (18-22) participate in community based paid and volunteer work program
29Santa Rosa CinemasNo Direct CostTransition students (18-22) participate in community based paid and volunteer work program

Total value of contracts = $3,390,364.77.

Summary of Contracts

Contracts

SRTA members are concerned about the $2.9 million dollar contract for special ed paraprofessionals.

F.5. Approval of Contracts – Bond 

#ContractorSiteServiceCost
District
2Storm Water Specialists, Inc.DOPollution Prevention Plan$5,973
3Greystone West CompanyvariousManagement of Control Access$516,753
4Greystone West CompanyDOComplete digitization of blueprints$50,000
Secondary
7Grassetti Environmental ConsultingSRHSCEQA testing clearance$1,080
8Hagstone & Sons Tree ServiceEAHSTree trimming$12,480
Elementary
1Oden and Diycette, Inc.HVESBlacktop Painting$6,375.00
5NorBay ConsultingABESHaz Mat Testing$1,080
6Grassetti Environmental ConsultingABESCEQA testing clearance$12,480

Measure C = $330,364.71

Measure G = $267,948.13

Total = $598,312.84

Summary of Contracts

Contracts 

Measure C and G Implementation Plan 

F.6. Approval of the Lease Agreements with Enterprise Fleet Management Vehicle Replacement for Maintenance and Operations

The district owns twenty-six (26) vehicles used by the maintenance and operations department. We replaced five (5) vehicles last year in round one of the vehicle replacement program. Staff proposes that the Board consider the Lease Agreement with Enterprise for the immediate addition of six (6) vehicles within the Maintenance and Operations Department. We will bring back each year, over the next three years, an addition of five vehicles until we have replaced all twenty-six. Lease cycles for most vehicles are sixty (60) months. Utilizing this program will provide a consistent preventive maintenance cycle and substantially reduce repair expenses and potential vehicle downtime. Enterprise will also provide a full maintenance program for all vehicles which will be serviced by approved local vendors.

Total Annual Lease Cost- $79,539.00

Rate Quote/Report (RAM Vans)

Rate Quote/Report (RAM Truck)

Rate Quote/Report (Ford EV Truck)

Monthly leaseEstimated quantitymonthly totalannualTotal paid (5yr)MSRP total
Dodge Ram$982.761$982.76$11,793.12$58,965.60$47,055.00
Ram Truck$989.462$1,978.92$23,747.04$118,735.20$95,680.00
Ford F-150$1,701.052$3,402.10$40,825.20$204,126.00$156,926.70
Total$6,363.78$76,365.36$381,826.80$299,661.70

Over the five year lease for these five vehicles, SRCS will pay $82,165 above the MSRP list price for these vehicles, but have nothing to show for it when the lease ends. 

The average maintenance cost for a truck is less than $1,200 per year. For five vehicles this would be $30,000 for five years. 

SRTA members support a replacement plan for aging and defunct items. Leasing items, so that everything is relatively new, seems ideal. However, this requires a continual financial commitment to lease payments which is a questionable tact given the financial situation of SRCS. New equipment is not the highest priority of our staff and students, when facilities are in such disrepair.

If SRCS used restricted maintenance funds to purchase equipment to replace the items in the poorest shape, there would be more funds to repair and replace parts of facilities which are desperately in need of attention. 

F.7. Approval of Mandated Block Grant (MBG) Applications for 2025-26 for the Elementary School District, High School District, SRFAC, CCLA, SRCSA, SRAC

The funding rates for the 2025-26 MBG are $39.09 per ADA for Grades K-8, $76.48 per ADA for Grades 9-12, and $20.52 per ADA for Charter School Grades K-8.

Estimated Block Grant funding for 2025-26:

General Fund 01 Elementary & High Districts: $684,892

Charter Schools Funds 06-09: $34,053

2025-26 Mandated Block Grant Applications

2025-26 Programs and Activities

F.8. Approval of Resolution 2025/26-05 for the use of 2024/25 Education Protection Account (EPA) funds

Revenues generated from Proposition 30 are to be deposited into a state account called the Education Protection Account (EPA). The District must determine and report on how these unrestricted funds are spent. EPA funds cannot be used for any administrative costs. The recommendation is to use the EPA funds for teacher salary expenses. If approved, teacher salary expenses that were incurred during the 2024-25 school year will be transferred into these EPA accounts during the year-end close process. This is done at year-end because the final EPA amounts are known at that time.

For the 2024-25 fiscal year, the EPA funds are as follows:

Santa Rosa Elementary District $592,626

Santa Rosa High School District $1,828,850

Santa Rosa French American Charter School $79,929

Cesar Chavez Language Academy $145,082

Santa Rosa Charter School for the Arts $70,432

Santa Rosa Accelerated Charter School $24,720

Resolution

F.9. Approval of Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) for the Piner High School Two-Story Classroom Building Project

 Due to the current enrollment at Piner High School, additional capacity is needed to accommodate the 7th and 8th graders that will be housed at the site. Occupancy of the building is scheduled for August 11, 2026, with Substantial Completion, including site work, scheduled for August 31, 2026.

Project amount: $24,369,198.00

Fund 21, Measure C: $21,749,198.00 (minus the already approved pre-construction)

Amendment

This contract is $5.3 million dollars less than the contract for the just completed two-story building at Montgomery.

F.10, F.11, F12, F13. Approval to file the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Notice of Exemption for the Albert Biella ES ECE Modernization Project, James Monroe TK Buildings Project, Helen Lehman TK Buildings Project, and Santa Rosa High School Parking Lot Improvements and Fencing Project

The project qualifies for a categorical exemption from further CEQA analysis. The filing ensures the District remains in compliance with environmental review requirements under CEQA. 

Notices of Exemption (Albert Biella) (James Munroe) (Helen Lehman) (Santa Rosa High)

F.14. Approval of Contracting with IAG Host for International Hiring Services

The district will save $80,724 this year utilizing this contractor to hire nine teachers. The savings comes from not paying retirement or benefit costs. 

Agreement

SRTA members are concerned about this action on three fronts. 

First, these nine teachers were hired without any input from site staff. There is trepidation around a process which excludes teacher input. Past practice is clearly not sufficient to involve teachers in the hiring process.

Secondly, this contract raises enormous concern about the sustainability of the teaching profession. SRTA has pointed out the need to retain not just attract teachers to be able to meet the need. Improved teacher retention includes treating teachers as professionals, involving them in the decision making processes, reducing administrative burdens, supporting site cultures, and fostering effective leadership.

The last concern is for these teachers who will be in the SRTA bargaining unit, but not receiving negotiated healthcare benefits.

G. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEMS

G.1. (Action) Approval of Resolutions Recognizing…

  1. September as Suicide Prevention Month (Resolution)
  2. September as Attendance Awareness Month. (Resolution)
  3. September 15 to October 15, 2025, as Latinx Heritage Month. (Resolution)
  4. October as LGBTQIA+ History Month. (Resolution)
  5. October 13, 2025, as Indigenous Peoples’ Day. (Resolution) (PD Article)
  6. October 13 through 19 as the Week of the School Administrator. (Resolution)
  7. November 14, 2025, as Ruby Bridges Walk to School Day. (Resolution)
  8. October as Filipino American History Month in Santa Rosa City Schools. (Resolution)
  9. October as Coaches Appreciation Month. (Resolution)
  10. November 3-7, 2025, as the Week of the School Psychologist. (Resolution)
  11. October as Italian Heritage Month. (Resolution)

SRTA members support changes to make board meetings more efficient and effective. 

G.2. (Action) Approval of a Tentative Agreement Between SRCS and Teamsters Local 665 for Successor Contract 2025-2026

This contract has been under development for the past year.

Contract

Appendix

SRTA members celebrate this progress for our lead custodians. 

G.3. (Action) Approval of Provisional Internship Permit Application (PIP) Kelsey Fotouhi

This second PIP of the year will allow the district to fill a Special Education Teacher (SDC-ESN) position at Abraham Lincoln Elementary (1.00 FTE) for the 2025-2026 school year.

PIP

SRTA members realize the difficulty of learning the practice of teaching under the best of situations. Entering the profession without subject matter training or the course work that accompanies an internship or credential program is precarious at best. 

G.4. (Discussion/Action) First Read and Possible Waive of Second Read of BP 4119.24, BP 4119.21, BP1114

SRCS proposes updating Board Policies on social media and teacher-student interactions to ensure a safe, professional, and consistent environment for everyone in our school community. The changes are a proactive response to the evolving digital landscape and are designed to provide clear expectations and protect staff, students, and the district.

The new policies establish clear, consistent guidelines for all staff. This ensures everyone understands what is and isn’t acceptable behavior on social media and other digital platforms, reducing confusion and the risk of non-compliance. These updates provide a clear framework for all professional digital interactions.

BP 4119.24– Maintaining Appropriate Adult-Student Interactions

BP 4119.21 – Professional Standards  

BP 1114 – District-Sponsored Social Media

Updating Board Policy Guidelines

As a system of practice, could staff representatives be invited to the table to discuss changes to board policy that dramatically impact expectations for staff prior to the policies going to the board? 

SRTA members support disciplining and releasing of employees who have seriously broken professional standards. However, there is general concern about stated “ Inappropriate Conduct” that interferes with the “Connections First” mandate of our district while not actually deterring the worst offender.

Does the board really want to deter a teacher giving a student a token gift to honor their birthday? 

When students are part of a teachers’ families social network, is staff expected to withdraw from that network to abide by these standards?

How do you build a real sense of community without sharing personal information?

Using other forms of communications with students besides district email allows for timely responses. 

SRTA members are certainly free to use social media during their break or lunch. Perhaps the language can be changed to something more in line with instructional time with students, not “work hours” which seems to refer to the entire school day. 

“Employees shall not use District property in social media posts without the express permission of the District. This includes, without limitation, the use of District facilities, classrooms or fields as a backdrop.” This goes too far. For instance, teachers should be able to publicly share a group photo of themselves taken at school, with the school logo. Being proud and active should be encouraged and shared with our communities!

Social media standards numbered 10 and 11 appear to repeat numbers 8 and 9.  

G.5. (Discussion/Action) Second Read and Consideration of BP 3100 and BP 3312 and review of AR 3311

The Board Finance Subcommittee reviewed existing fiscal processes. Based on these discussions and an in-depth evaluation, the Subcommittee recommends these updates for Board approval and the review of the Administrative Regulation updates.

BP 3100 – Budget 

The Board shall annually establish budget priorities based on identified district needs and goals and on realistic projections of available funds.

The district budget shall show a complete plan and itemized statement of all proposed expenditures and all estimated revenues for the following fiscal year, together with a comparison of revenues and expenditures for the current fiscal year.

The Board intends to maintain a minimum assigned and unassigned fund balance of 10% of the total restricted and unrestricted general funds. The Board deems this amount to be sufficient to maintain fiscal solvency and stability and to protect the district against unforeseen circumstances.

What is the timeline for the board to establish annual budget priorities based on district goals? 

How does a complete plan and itemized statement differ from the current budget which is undecipherable for most casual readers?

Asserting the desire for a 10% reserve when a 3% is currently unattainable suggests a long term goal. What are the mediating steps to achieve that goal?

BP 3312 – Contracts

Every contract entered into on behalf of the district shall be made available for public inspection, except when the law prohibits disclosure. 

The district has said it is working to become more transparent. Will all contracts continue to be included in the board agenda, or just contracts above the $15,000 amount?  How would the public know a contract even existed if they are not posted in the agenda? Simply posting items on a wall at the DO does not count at transparently providing public notice. 

and review of Administrative Regulation: AR 3311-Bids

Only projects over $15,000 must publicly advertise for bids.

Prequalification required to bid on projects over $1,000,000.

Exceptions are listed for not awarding jobs to the lowest bidder.

Updating Board Policy Guidelines

G.6. (Discussion) Facilities Update

Project Highlights:

  • School consolidation moves were completed at 7 campuses (Albert Biella ES, Brook Hill ES, James Monroe ES, Herbert Slater MS, Santa Rosa MS, Montgomery HS, Santa Rosa HS). In total, an estimated 400 relocations occurred this summer across almost all SRCS sites. Cost: $181,178
  • Infrastructure improvements were completed at multiple sites, including the Piner HS building G courtyard and the James Monroe ES drainage project.
  • District-wide exterior painting (Phase 2) occurred at Abraham Lincoln ES, Rincon Valley MS, and Elsie Allen HS, each finishing under budget. Cost: $1,047,005 Savings: $73,895 (6.6%)
  • Gym Floor Refinishing & Striping was completed at Santa Rosa HS, Montgomery HS, and Rincon Valley MS. Each project was also delivered below contracted costs. Cost: $185,023 Savings: $27,797 (15%)
  • Phase 1 of the district-wide access control project began at four schools (Maria Carrillo HS, Montgomery HS, Santa Rosa HS, Rincon Valley MS) to enhance campus security; completion is scheduled for 2025–2026. Contract Cost: $8,186,523
  • New Facilities:
    • Montgomery HS Two-Story Classroom Building – construction substantially complete, occupied and operational, two months ahead of schedule. Contract Cost: $29,693,927
    • Central Receiving Warehouse – construction complete, pending final punch list items and closeout. Contract Cost: $8,226,756

Work has begun for 2025-2026 projects, including new Transitional Kindergarten (TK) classroom buildings at three sites, a new two-story classroom building at Piner HS, modernization of DeSoto Hall at Santa Rosa HS, and district-wide safety upgrades such as Electronic Access Control and Fencing at all sites.

Annual Report (2025)

Measure C Implementation Plan (2024)

Measure G Implementation Plan (2024)

SRTA members are confused about the access control project. 

Many thought this was a summer project, but it is now stated to be complete this school year. 

How will these mechanisms work?  Will we still have our new keys?

Who will be tasked with adjusting door access on fobs or cards? There are ongoing concerns about district control of bell schedules, and fears of great frustration if this is not controlled at the site level. 

G.7. (Discussion) Updated SRCS Organizational Chart

20262025
Superintendent11
CTO/CBO/Assoc Sup11
Assistant Superintendent22
Executive Director109
Director910
Coordinator85
Program Manager77
Manager67
Total District Administrators4442

Additional information will be provided that explains in better detail the restructuring that has occurred within the District. 

Organizational Chart

Historical SRCS Org Charts

SRTA members feel like cuts at sites were severe, while the district office has actually grown unnecessarily. California has a maximum of 8 administrative employees allowed per 100 teachers in a unified district. If 31 site admin are assumed, the total number of teachers would need to be nearly 938 to justify those positions. SRTA records show about 864 certificated unit members at the moment. (Not all of these are teachers.) It would appear this is further evidence of being overstaffed at the district office. 

Having a chart with names and positions is helpful, but it doesn’t solve the “Who should I call?” problem. 

H.1. Approval of Minutes

August 13, 2025 Minutes and Supporting Documents (Regular Meeting)

J.1. Future Board Discussion Items (not included in this agenda)

SRTA members are encouraged to prepare for the upcoming agenda items.

  • 2025-26 Unaudited Actuals
  • Sufficiency of Textbooks / Instructional Materials (Elementary and Secondary)
  • Appropriations Limitation Recalculation and 2025-26 Estimated Appropriations Limitation Calculation (Gann Limit)

Recently Requested Agenda Items from the Board

Medina- AP instruction data with number of years of experience of 

teachers

Caston- Site funding  finance report with various amounts and sources

-strategy of athletics program across the district, 

-update 3510  policy around reducing waste as a discussion item

SRTA looks to the future scheduling of the following items:

  • Panorama and Youth Truth Survey Data (August 2025)
  • Discussion and update on Reconfiguration and Ad Hoc Committee with SCOE (August 2025)
  • Restorative Practices Data (March 2025)
  • Alternate Education Update (December 2024, Feb 2025) 
    • There is a strong need for Alternative placements for secondary students who need more services than our comprehensive schools are able to provide. How can SRCS meet the needs of these students during these tough financial times? Is there data that the ISP program is sufficient to meet this need?
  • VAPA Program Highlights (Feb 2025)
  • Plan and timeline for implementation of Dr. Gillespie’s recommendations around Special Services (January 2025)
  • First Draft of the District Safety Plan (delayed from September 2024)
  • Board Update of Strategic Goals with input from sites and equity assessment (begun June 2024) 
  • Sharing the Library Master Plan with implementation expectation
  • Officially Closing Learning House, and other sites
  • SRACS Accelerated Charter Material Revision Request (delayed)
  • Plan for Staff Housing support program from the proceeds of Fir Ridge

Until the district makes a decision, the proceeds from the sale of the Fir Ridge property are just sitting and losing value as the cost of housing continues to rise. Getting a program started could help SRCS attract and retain CSEA staff. The potential impact of the funds continues to diminish as time passes.

  • Student Voice Policy

J.3. SRCS Third Interim Letter from SCOE

SRCS is called out for continued deficit spending, and put on warning about cash flow concerns. SCOE awaits a detailed fiscal recovery plan. The ability for the district to continue operations is a concern. The following areas are identified for immediate action:

  • Failure to prioritize expending restricted funds before unrestricted funds
  • Deficit spending in the current or two subsequent fiscal years
  • Failure to decrease deficit spending over the past two fiscal years 
  • Decreasing and/or unstable enrollment and/or average daily attendance (ADA) 
  • Unstable or decreasing projected unrestricted fund balance
  • Identification rate of students as eligible for special education is above the countywide and/or statewide averages

Letter 

SRCS Board Meeting Agenda Analysis – 8/13/2025 and Finance Subcommittee Meeting 8/11.

Board Finance Subcommittee Meeting 
Santa Rosa City Schools
Monday August 11, 2025
Hybrid: Superintendent’s Conference Room (110 Stony Point Road, Suite 210) 
3:30 p.m. 

2. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON AGENDA AND AGENDA ITEMS
Public Comments are only accepted in person. 
Many employees are unable to attend this meeting because school is still in session at 3:30.

3. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION  Conference With Labor Negotiator (Name of designated rep attending: Dr. Vicki Zands (SRCS) ; Santa Rosa Teachers Association, CSEA Santa Rosa 75, and Teamsters Union 665
This seems like something that happens at the regular board meeting. Why would a committee use closed session to conference on negotiations?

4. DISCUSSION / ACTION
a. (Discussion) Update on Board Policies The Board Finance Sub-Committee will discuss updates 3100 Budget, 3312 Contracts, and Administrative Regulation, 3311 Bids. Redline and clean copies are in the full agenda.
b. (Discussion) Fiscal Stabilization No details are provided on this.Board Finance Subcommittee Meeting Schedule for the Remainder of 2025
Monday, September 8, 2025
Monday, October 6, 2025
Monday, November 3, 2025
Monday, December 1, 2025

6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES from June 2

REGULAR BOARD MEETING

Santa Rosa City Schools

August 13, 2025

Hybrid:  Lewis Early Learning Academy (2230 Lomitas Ave.)

4:00 p.m. – Closed Session

6:00 p.m. – Open Session

Hybrid: Zoom / Santa Rosa City Hall

*** streamed ***

Video Board Meetings through this link.

Please take time to review the following abbreviated version of the agenda. Click here to see the entire agenda. It has live links on many items with more information. If you want to comment to the board about any upcoming items, email agendacomments@srcs.k12.ca.us. Please CC wearesrta@gmail.com on your email.

Members attending online are encouraged to add SRTA to the front of their Zoom client name.

Closed Session Items: 

A.1. Public Comment On Closed Session Agenda Items To comment, email Melanie Martin at mmartinsrcs.k12.ca.us.

This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak to the board on Closed Session items only. 

Without specifics on closed session agenda items, it is impossible for the public to know when to provide insights for items being reviewed.

B.1. Student Readmissions (Case Nos: 2023/24-15)

B.2. Public Employee Appointment/Employment (Position to be filled: Public Information Officer, Director, Coordinator, Principal)

B.3. Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release

B.4. Conference With Labor Negotiator (Name of designated rep attending: Dr. Vicki Zands (SRCS); name of organization: Teamsters Union 665)

B.5. Conference With Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation (Case No.24CV-00520 Case name: In Re: Social Media adolescent Addiction/Personal Products Liability Litigation, 23CV-00397 Pienta Case, SCV-272273, Claim 2025-069, OAH 2025050933 Special Services)  

B.6. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Title of employee being reviewed: Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent, Principals, Vice Principals, Assistant Principals, Directors, Coordinators) 

After last year’s experience, It is expected that the performance evaluation process will be revamped to be more transparent, and that stakeholder input will be invited.

RECONVENE TO REGULAR OPEN SESSION (6:00 p.m.)

C.7. Student Board Members Loyalty Oath of Office

SRCS Board initiates Natalia Olivera Gomez (RHS) and  Johnathan Carrillo Poot (EAHS.)

SRTA welcomes these student voices and encourages them to forge a network across the district to represent all students.

D. Reports

SRTA looks forward to a future report on the transitions SRCS is making. There are still so many questions. 

Where are the metrics for evaluating the transitions? 

What are the expected savings on these changes coming from, specifically? Is that being realized?

How much is being spent to make these transitions?

What are the current enrollment numbers? 

What is the process for deciding what to do with the closed sites? 

How and when will decisions for the future be made and shared?

In the board minutes the motion for consolidation states that MHS will have facilities for culinary and woodshop for the 26-27 school year. Where are the plans to facilitate this? 

E. Public Comment on Non Agenda Items

SRTA Members are invited to complete ‘blue cards’ at the board meeting in order to make public comments.  Online comments have been suspended unless a board member is attending remotely. Please be prepared to observe the three minute time limit or the imposition of a possible last minute reduction in the time limit. Comments have been limited to as little as 60 seconds, with a limit on the total time spent on public comments. Only items NOT on the agenda are addressed at this time, with the exception of consent items (See section F.)

Comments are requested at the board meeting to bring a member’s perspective and share real experiences of the impact of district policies and practices on students and staff. 

Speakers are limited to just those in person. Comments are most impactful when they are well spoken, composed and reasonable.

F. CONSENT ITEMS 

All consent items are enacted by the Board in one motion, unless a Board member requests that an item be removed and discussed separately. 

F.2. Approval of Personnel Transactions 

Personnel Transactions 

EdJoin shows a total of 94 current postings for 241 jobs in SRCS. There are for certificated opening postings (fifteen more than last meeting.) There are fifty-one current classified postings for one hundred ninety-six job openings (ninety more than the last meeting). There is one certificated and no classified management positions open. There are 29 coaching positions and one hundred fifty-two assistant positions accepting applications.

SRTA bids farewell to Dan Evans (PTES), Sydney Miller (PHS), Danielle Ullyott  (SPSV), Annamarie Robustellini (SPSV), Cody Martin (BHES), Nathan Murray (HVES), Emma Parks (ABES), Donna Fernandez (PHS) and Anthony Henderson (EAHS) who have all resigned after a combined 29 years of service to our students. 

SRTA congratulates William Kirk (Ed Services), Mary Anna Maloney (LBES) and  Janet Fisher (SRHS) who have announced their retirements as of the end of last year. They take nearly forty-two years of experience and service with them.

Changes to classified staff includes two new hires, five rehires, five resignations and one retirement. They leave taking with them twenty-nine  years of knowledge and service to our staff and students.

There are twenty-eight admin changes, including two resignations, two rehires, and seven new hires.  There is a new Communications Office. Please check the linked report for all the specifics!

F.4. Approval of Donations and Gifts 

Highlights include that Schools Plus gave SRCS $157,000, and the Holler Family Trust gave SRHS $32,000. 

Donations (July 1, 2025, through August 1, 2025)  $192,748.79

Report

SRTA Members are grateful for these donations. 

F.5. Approval of Contracts

Summary

#ProviderCostDescription
Charter
14Code Rev Kids, Inc.$41,000Coding and Robotics for FACS students
20SeeSaw Learning$5,978Multimedia learning tool for FACS students.
23Tina Rogers$3,500Multi cultural art education for FACS students.
District 
1Fagen, Friedman & Fulfrost, LLP$920,000business and legal counsel on Bond related issues
4Zoom.us$11,70020 educational licenses and Webinar for board meetings
5EMS LINQ$48,949Software for Child Nutritional Programs
6California School Boards Association (CSBA) $24,538dues
7California School Boards Association (CSBA) $17,975GAMUT (online board agenda platform)
8Frontline$30,352Staff Absence and Substitute Management (the reduced contract amount looks like SRCS is no longer purchasing all the bells and whistles
9School & College Legal Services (SCLS)$30,000Investigative services for a UCP Complaint
13Summit K12$70,843Curriculum for K-12 newcomers
15JetBrains$366Cross platform tool for data tasks and reports
21HearYou.org$30,000Up to ten Mental health therapy sessions for staff
Elementary
3Community MattersNo Direct CostGrant funding for Safe School Ambassadors at HLES.
11Jack Schreder & Associates, Inc. / Elementary District$7,166Investigation for justifying developer fees.
17All City Management Services$573,901Crossing Guard services. This has been reduced by about $25,000 even though the number of sites served has diminished it states 15 sites are still served.
Elementary
2Angel & Denell NunezNo Direct Costallow rancher to graze cattle on Alba Lane for fire prevention
10Santa Rosa Junior College (ASL Instructors)$110,000May be for 1 hour per week of instruction for students, families and staff. Also states this is for 40 hours per week.
12Jack Schreder & Associates, Inc. / Secondary District$10,789Investigation for justifying developer fees.
16Tradeswomen, Inc.No Direct Costsupport camp set up and Provide a tradeswoman to partner with teacher
18Goodwill Redwood EmpireNo Direct CostJob readiness and service programs
19Sonoma County LibraryNo Direct CostStudent One card allows school ID card to be library card
2210,000 DegreesNo Direct CostEAHS, PHS and SRHS student assistance with financial help for college
24MINGA Inc$96,390Comprehensive digital school management platform for hall passes and more
25Imagine Learning$22,575ISP student learning platform
26Magnolia Global Academy for Leaders, dba Magnolia Project$34,500PD for EAHS and MJr/SrHS CTE Wheel and Career Explorations
27Santa Rosa Junior CollegeNo Direct CostCollege and Career Pathway agreement
28Simulation Curriculum$996Used for SPARQ students at PHS.
29AV Consulting$7,5002 day Leadership Training for PHS students and freshmen

Total value of contracts = $2,099,017.87.

Summary of Contracts

Contracts

F.6. Approval of Contracts – Bond 

#ContractorSiteServiceCost
District
2Quattrocchi Kwok ArchitectsDistrictUpdate Master Plan$185,000
5NorBar ConsultingPHS, SRMS, HLES and JMESHaz Mat Testing$8,306
9Van Pelt Construction ServicesDOManage new DO build$1,977,232
16Miller Pacific Engineering GroupDOGeotechnical and Geohazard review$54,600
Charter
14Kurt Kirtzer Inspection ServicesSRMSInspection for TK Project$96,000
15Crawford and Associates, IncSRMSPavement Coring for TK Project$5,000
Secondary
1Bridges ConstructionSRHSRepair Wall$4,757
6Quattrocchi Kwok ArchitectsPHSPlan for PHS Theater Lights$13,200
10IA Kuster Construction InspectionPHSInspection for New Building$230,500
11Stocksdale Inspection ServicesSRHSFencing and Parking Lot Inspection$28,860
Elementary
3Redwood Moving and StorageJMESFor Consolidation$18,120
4Garland DBSHLESRoof Restoration$69,162
7Adobe Assoc, IncJMESTopographic Map$15,000
8Adobe Assoc, IncHLESTopographic Map$15,000
12Kurt Kirtzer Inspection ServicesJMESInspection for New Building$67,200
13Kurt Kirtzer Inspection ServicesHLESInspection for New Building$81,600
17Grassetti Environmental ConsultingHLESNotice of exemption for CEQA$1,440
18Grassetti Environmental ConsultingJMESNotice of exemption for CEQA$1,440
19Quattrocchi Kwok ArchitectsABESAdditional Design work for ECE Classes$192,822

Measure C = $2,068,134.14

Measure G = $988,105.13

Total =  $3,056,239.27

Summary of Contracts

Contracts 

Measure C and G Implementation Plan 

F.7.  Lease-Leaseback Agreement with Lathrop Construction Associates, Inc. for the Early Childhood Education (ECE) Modernization Project.

Early Childhood Education (ECE) Modernization Project will be located at Albert Biella Elementary School

Measure G: $5,500.00 for Pre-Construction Services.

RFP Q Scoring

Resolution

Facility Lease

Site Lease

F.8. and 9. Belkorp AG purchase of New Mowers and Maintenance Tractor

Our existing John Deere mowers are aged and overworked. These two mowers replace ten-year-old mowers of the same style and size. These machines help to keep our grounds department operating efficiently as they help maintain 400 acres of District property.  We expect, with proper maintenance, these new mowers to last the next ten years or more. 

This purchase would come from restricted maintenance funds. ​​(RRM)  $108,448.99 (includes tax)

New Mower ($23,212)

Large Field Mower  ($74,490)

The thirty-year-old tractor has given out. For the last year, the M&O department has needed to rent a tractor to complete required work across sites. This new tractor is expected to last the M&O team for thirty years. 

The restricted maintenance funds will cover this purchase. RRM funds- $43,243.50 (with tax)

Tractor

SRTA members wonder what the impact of these purchases (F8 and F9) on funds available to make purchases to maintain our classrooms. 

F.10. Approval of the CNS School Nutrition Program Micro-Purchase Self-Certification

Program operators may now self-certify for a micro-purchase threshold, up to $50,000, on an annual basis. 

Certificate

F.11. Approval of Contracting with ValidateMe! for Foreign Transcript Evaluation Services

These services will include evaluations for high school students from various countries, including specialized services for students from Mexico. Procurement services will support the retrieval of academic records when families are unable to provide them. These services are critical to ensuring the accurate placement of newcomer students in core academic courses and language development programs. 

Evaluations include transcript analysis from all countries ($225), Mexico-specific analysis ($200).  Elementary/Middle School $125. Procurement services, when needed, are available at $350 per case. The cost will vary depending on the number of evaluations required and will be covered using general funds.

No proposed quantity is included which is required for a total contract value. 

Quote

Cost of Services

SRTA member counselors have had a difficult time ever since the transcript evaluation process was eliminated with the SOL Counselors. There is an appreciation for addressing this issue. 

F.12. Fox Pacific Academy Contract

To provide a Certified Nursing Assistant Program to fifteen students at EAHS.  Theory Portion of the Course over 13 Saturdays and Sundays from 9 am – 3:30 pm from  9/13/25 to 11/15/25. Clinical Rotations will be over 19 Saturdays and Sundays from 6:30 am – 1:00 pm from 1/10/25 to 5/16/25.

Cost: $5,500 EAHS Foundation

Contract 

F.13. Construction/Program Management Firms Pool

For Counterpoint Construction Services – Santa Rosa, CA. To provide construction and/or program management services for SRCS Bond Projects. 

Invitation to Bid

Request

F.14. Capacity of Interdistrict Transfers for Various Grades, Special Classrooms, and Special Programs.

Outlines each of those capacities in a generalized way which allows the Wellness & Engagement department to then calculate the specifics. Those specifics are determined based on the capacity of each program, grade or school based on capacities established by the State, the Board, by the Agreements with the Associations or by program need. Specific capacities are not included.

Resolution

F.15. Approval of School District Nomination to the Sonoma County School Attendance Review Board (SARB)

SARBs help truant or recalcitrant students and their parents or guardians solve school attendance and behavior problems through available school and community resources. SRCS is asking that Stacy Desideri, Executive Director, Wellness and Engagement be nominated to serve.

Nomination

F.16. Approval of Resolution No. 2025/26-02 to Establish Temporary Inter-fund Transfers

This resolution allows for the temporary transfer of funds from a district fund with available cash reserves to cover any negative cash flow needed for the fiscal year until revenues are received.

Resolution

F.17. Authorizing To Borrow Funds From The Sonoma County Treasury As Needed During The 2025-26 Fiscal Year

This resolution will allow the County Treasury to extend a line of credit to cover any negative cash flow needed for the fiscal year until revenues are realized at a ~3% interest rate. The amount requested cannot exceed 85% of the projected current year property tax revenue. When SRCS has a surplus of funds, i.e. right after property taxes are received, those funds accrue 3% interest from the Sonoma County Treasury. This authorization is for this 2025-26 fiscal year only.  This resolution is presented to the Board for approval every fiscal year.

Resolution

G. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEMS

G.1. (Action) Trustee Area 6 Candidate Interview to Select a Board Member Due to Vacancy

Donna Prak has completed an application to be interviewed. 

SRTA members appreciate the courage required to step up and serve SRCS at this time. 

G.2. (Discussion) Safe Routes to Schools Program Update

These efforts are focused mostly on 2nd – 5th grade, with two middle school components. SRCS accounts for just 9% of student participation in the county. Bike to School Day in May successfully increased participation. 

Presentation

While increasing student safety is a laudable goal, it is concerning that implementation is dependent on site volunteers. If SRCS values this program, district implementation needs to be restructured so it is sustainable.

G.6. (Action) Approval of 2025-26 45 Day Budget Update

Welcome back to Luz Cazares, Interim Associate Superintendent of Business Services/CBO

SRCS is making budget adjustments because the state has passed its budget. SRCS K-6 is expected to qualify for Expanded Learning Grant with enrollment of higher than the newly reduced district wide requirement of 55% of Unduplicated students which are students who qualify as Low income, Multi-Language Learners, and/or Homeless/Foster youth. This will bring an additional $5.4 million to the district this year that hadn’t been budgeted. This increase of 2% reduces the $10.8 million deficit budget to $5.5 million, or about 2.3% of the budgeted expenses.

Presentation

Estimated Actuals and Budget (from June)

Draft of State Forms (from June)

SRTA members are grateful for all efforts that helped the federal government release all budgeted funds to the district. This is an opportunity to focus the efforts of SRCS, and fully support and fund what is the most valuable. There is a need for focused goals with accountable metrics. The days of decisions based on hunches without defined expectations, left in place without evaluating their effectiveness must be over. 

Historically, SRCS has transparently shared funding allocations for sites including Title 1, LCFF, and other site funds like Lottery. It is requested that these amounts be shared shortly. 

Site budgets have been severely diminished. SRTA members feel like they have to choose between having their students do without, or purchasing things themselves. This is unacceptable, even in rough financial times. 

G.4. (Action) Approval of Provisional Internship Permit Application (PIP) Kawainohiaakala Navares

This will allow  SRCS to fill a Biological Science High School Teaching position at Elsie Allen High School (1.00 FTE) for the 2025-2026 school year with a candidate  who has not yet met the subject matter competence requirement needed to enter an intern program. 

PIP Application

G.5. (Action) Approval of Variable Term Waiver for a Pupil Personnel Services Credential for Carlos A Castaneda Avila

This will allow  SRCS to fill a Counselor on Special Assignment (COSA) position covering grade levels 9-12 at Piner High School for the 2025-2026 school year with a candidate who is awaiting the results of his Praxis II Counselor Exam. 

VTW Application

G.6. (Discussion / Action) First Read and Possible Waive of Second Read of Updated Board Policies 

Proposed policies are attached. Redlined versions show the prior policy marked up in red with the proposed changes. The cleaned copy is the resulting proposed policy.

BP 6163.4 – Student Use of Technology Redlined Cleaned Internet access and safety

BP 5116.1 – Interdistrict Open Enrollment  Redlined Cleaned States priorities for allowing students to leave SRCS.

BP 5117 – Interdistrict Attendance Redlined Cleaned States students shall be accepted until limits are full.

BP 5131.8 – Mobile Communication Devices Redlined Cleaned Mobile communication devices shall be turned off during instructional time. Exceptions are enumerated. 

BP 4040 – Employee Use of Technology Redlined Cleaned Employees have no reasonable expectation of privacy even when using their personal devices with district access. SRCS may monitor employee usage of district technology at any time without advance notice or consent and for any reason allowed by law.

G.7. (Action) Approval of California School Employees Association, Chapter 75 24-25 #12 MOU 100 Hours Additional Work Jr/Sr High School Sites

Allocates 100 additional work hours per Junior-Senior High School site. That is 100 total hours  for Santa Rosa and 100 hours for Montgomery. This time will be used to support student registration and related duties due to the transition of students from middle schools to the newly established Junior-Senior High Schools. Were it not for late-year vacancies, these funds would have otherwise been paid in salaries.

Approximate financial impact is $9,302 of unrestricted base general funds for these 200 hours. 

MOU

SRTA members appreciate the efforts of our CSEA staff to make this transition. 

Unfortunately, these efforts were not enough to meet the “cleared and cleaned” facility promise of the transition MOU. 

H.1. Approval of Minutes

June 25,, 2025 Minutes and Supporting Documents 1Supporting Documents 2 (Regular Meeting)

J.1. Future Board Discussion Items (not included in this agenda)

SRTA members are encouraged to prepare for the upcoming agenda items.

  • Approval of Resolution for September as Attendance Awareness Month
  • Approval of Resolution for Suicide Prevention Month
  • Board Policy Updates 
  • Panorama and Youth Truth Survey Data 
  • Discussion and update on Reconfiguration and Ad Hoc Committee with SCOE 

Recently Requested Agenda Items from the Board

Caston – strategy of athletics program across the district, update 3510 policy around reducing waste as a discussion item

SRTA looks to the future scheduling of the following items:

  • Restorative Practices Data (March 2025)
  • Alternate Education Update (December 2024, Feb 2025) 
    • There is a strong need for Alternative placements for secondary students who need more services than our comprehensive schools are able to provide. How can SRCS meet the needs of these students during these tough financial times?
  • VAPA Program Highlights (Feb 2025)
  • Plan and timeline for implementation of Dr. Gillespie’s recommendations around Special Services (January 2025)
  • Public Hearing and Approval of Teamsters Union 665 “Sunshine” Proposal (delayed from Oct 2024)
  • First Draft of the District Safety Plan (delayed from September 2024)
  • Board Update of Strategic Goals with input from sites and equity assessment (begun June 2024) 
  • Sharing the Library Master Plan with implementation expectation
  • Officially Closing Learning House, and other sites
  • SRACS Accelerated Charter Material Revision Request (delayed)
  • Plan for Staff Housing support program from the proceeds of Fir Ridge

Until the district makes a decision, the proceeds from the sale of the Fir Ridge property are just sitting and losing value as the cost of housing continues to rise. Getting a program started could help SRCS attract and retain CSEA staff. The potential impact of the funds diminishes as time passes.

  • Student Voice Policy
  • BEST Plus Update
    • Does SRCS still self identify as a BEST Plus district?

J.3. Williams Settlement Quarterly Report

There was one resolved facility complaint.

Report 

SRCS Board Meeting Agenda Analysis – 6/11/2025.

REGULAR BOARD MEETING

Santa Rosa City Schools

June 11, 2025

Hybrid: Santa Rosa City Hall Council Chambers 

4:00 p.m. – Closed Session

6:00 p.m. – Open Session

Hybrid: Zoom / Santa Rosa City Hall

*** streamed ***

A live link will be posted on the SRCS website.

Board of Education / Video Board Meetings

Please take time to review the following abbreviated version of the agenda. Click here to see the entire agenda. It has live links on many items with more information. If you want to comment to the board about any upcoming items, email agendacomments@srcs.k12.ca.us. Please CC wearesrta@gmail.com on your email.

Members attending online are encouraged to add SRTA to the front of their Zoom client name.

Closed Session Items: 

A.1. Public Comment On Closed Session Agenda Items To comment, email Melanie Martin at mmartinsrcs.k12.ca.us.

This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak to the board on Closed Session items only. 

Without any specifics on closed session agenda items, it is impossible for the public to know when to provide insights for items being reviewed.

SRTA thanks the board for their part in the recent decisions to reinstate site administrators.

B.1. Student Readmissions (Case Nos: 2024/25-10, 2023/24-26, 2022/23-10, 2022-23/31)

B.2. Student Expulsions (Case Nos: 2024/25-21, 2024/25-33)

B.3. Conference With Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation (Case No: 23CV00397)

B.4. Conference With Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation (Number of potential cases: 1)

B.5. Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release

B.6. Conference With Labor Negotiator (Name of designated rep attending: Dr. Vicki Zands (SRCS); name of organization: Santa Rosa Teachers Association, CSEA 75, Teamsters Union 665)

B.7. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Title of employee being reviewed: Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent, Principals, Vice Principals, Assistant Principals, Directors, Coordinators)

RECONVENE TO REGULAR OPEN SESSION (6:00 p.m.)

C.7. Special Presentations for 2024-2025 SRCS Retirees

This year’s retirees represent classified, certificated, and administrative staff. Altogether, our 52 retirees represent 1,083 years of service to our students, staff, and community.

We thank each of them for their dedication, passion, and service:

First NameLast NameCurrent PositionSite/Department
AdeleJohns-DiehlTeacher, ElementarySanta Rosa French American Charter
AnjanaPandyaSpecial Education AssistantPiner High School
AnnHopkinTeacher, ElementaryEducational Services Department
BethLewisTeacher, ElementaryHidden Valley Elementary School
BrianDellerTeacher,High SchoolElsie Allen High School
CatherinePaineTeacher,High SchoolMontgomery High School
CherylMillerElementary School Office ManagerSanta Rosa French American Charter
ChrisBertozziTeacher, ElementaryJames Monroe Elementary School
DanaAlexanderTeacher,High SchoolMontgomery High School
DawnBaskinTeacher, ElementaryAbraham Lincoln Elementary School
DinahCostelloTeacher,High SchoolRidgway High School
DorothyBurgeSecondary 195 day CounselorMontgomery High School
EdwardBenbowTeacher,Middle SchoolHerbert Slater Middle School
EdwardSecheTeacher,High SchoolMontgomery High School
FrankMaynarichStudent Safety AdvisorRidgway High School
GustavoMartinezCustodian II-NightRincon Valley Middle School
HeatherHeckerTeacher, ElementaryAlbert Biella Elementary School
JacquelynCrowTeacher,Middle SchoolSanta Rosa Middle School
JamesSandersTeacher, RSP, Middle SchoolSanta Rosa Middle School
JanFreifeldTeacher,High SchoolElsie Allen High School
JenniferPickellLead Food Service WorkerRincon Valley Middle School
JillJacksonTeacher, ElementaryHidden Valley Elementary School
KarenGuilloryElementary School Technician IIAlbert Biella Elementary School
KarlThammanouvongCustodian II-NightAlbert Biella Elementary School
KatharineNorrisTeacher,Middle SchoolRincon Valley Middle School
KathleenBassiniAdmin Assistant – HSPiner High School
KimberleyCoffey-McKayTeacher, ElementaryHidden Valley Elementary School
LinaHoyos-BerriosTeacher,High SchoolMaria Carrillo High School
LindieNelson-WhiteMiddle School TechnicianRincon Valley Middle School
LorrieClarkeProgram Manager – CertificatedSpecial Services Department
LynnetteCaseyRestorative Response SpecialistPiner High School
MarlaHerron ManzanaresSpecial Education AssistantSanta Rosa Middle School
MatthewBeatonTeacher, RSP, High SchoolSanta Rosa High School
MicheleDossSenior High School Technician IIIElsie Allen High School
MikeEricksonTeacher,High SchoolPiner High School
NikkiWinovichTeacher, ElementaryJames Monroe Elementary School
PamelaWhittakerChild Care Asst-12moProctor Terrace Elementary School
PaulFleischerTeacher,High SchoolElsie Allen High School
PhilipMarshallCustodian II- Night ShiftChild Nutritional Services Department
RachelCarusoneTeacher,Middle SchoolHerbert Slater Middle School
RobinPrinceTeacher,High SchoolMontgomery High School
RosemarieGuerettaProg. Acct. Tech IState and Federal Department
RosemaryHerronNoon/Yard Duty AidesBrook Hill Elementary School
SandraDeasSpecial Education AssistantSteele Lane Elementary School
SandraPetersenElementary School Technician IIJames Monroe Elementary School
SusanFarkasTeacher,High SchoolMontgomery High School
SusanFigoniSpecial EducationJames Monroe Elementary School
TeresaSwensonFood Service Delivery WorkerChild Nutrition Services Department
TeresaGilardoniLibrary Tech IIHilliard Comstock Middle School
TheresaGutscheSpecial Education AssistantMontgomery High School
Tsega YohannesKassaCustodian II- Night ShiftMontgomery High School
TseggaMehariLead Food Service WorkerChild Nutrition Services Department
VictoriaSernaHS Couns Secty/RegistrarMontgomery High School
WendyEberlyTeacher, RSP, High SchoolElsie Allen High School
WilliamEhmannCustodian II- Night Shift

SRTA deeply appreciates the service of all these retirees and wishes them well. As they leave us, we will miss their expertise gleaned from their 1000+ years of service.

D. Reports

D. 7. School Reconfiguration Report

Nothing is attached to this agenda item. 

Where are the metrics for evaluating this transition in progress being shared? How are they being evaluated? 

Where are the updated financials on these changes? How much is being spent to make these transitions? What are the expected savings? What savings actually gained from closing sites and moving classrooms? 

What is the process for deciding what to do with the closed sites? When will these decisions be made and shared?

In the board minutes the motion for consolidation states that MHS will have facilities for culinary and woodshop for the 26-27 school year. Where are the plans to facilitate this? 

For the impacted elementary sites that are gaining students, can specific plans for facilities use be provided to the public? 

E. Public Comment on Non Agenda Items

SRTA Members are invited to complete ‘blue cards.’ Online comments have been suspended unless a board member is attending remotely. Please be prepared to observe the three minute time limit or the imposition of a possible last minute reduction in the time limit. Recently comments have been limited to as little as 60 seconds, with a limit on the total time spent on public comments. Only items NOT on the agenda are addressed at this time, with the exception of consent items.

Comments are requested at the board meeting to bring a member’s perspective and share real experiences of the impact of district policies and practices on students and staff. 

Please commit to speaking to agenda items that impact you or your students. Speakers are limited to just those in person. Comments are most impactful when they are well spoken, composed and reasonable.

F. CONSENT ITEMS

All consent items are enacted by the Board in one motion, unless a Board member requests that an item be removed and discussed separately. 

F.2. Approval of Personnel Transactions 

Personnel Transactions 

EdJoin shows a total of 91 current postings for 139 jobs in SRCS. There are twenty-nine certificated opening postings (seventeen less than last meeting.) There are fifty-eight current classified postings for one hundred six job openings (eight less than the last meeting). There are four certificated and no classified management positions open.

SRTA bids farewell to Amy Waud-Reiter (SRCAS), Amber Ray (SLES), Stacey Olson (MCHS), Patricia Hurtado (EAHS), Monique Ortega (MHS), Christine Tucker (SRCAS), Maria Orozco Ruiz (HVES), Nicole Guest (EAHS), Julia Reilley (EAHS) who have announced their resignations after a combined 35 years of service to our students. 

SRTA congratulates Rachel Carusone (HSMS) and Dorothy Burge (MHS) who have announced their retirements as of the end of the year. They take thirty-four years of experience and service with them.

Changes to classified staff includes two new hires, six resignations and one retirement. They leave taking with them forty-six years of knowledge and service to our staff and students.

In admin moves, we bid farewell to the resigning Mitchell Tucker (LBES), Gabe Albavera (EAHS), Allegra-Anne Buschman (HCMS) and Sarah O’Connor (SRMS) who leave after sixty-one years of service to our district. 

F.5. Approval of Contracts

Summary

#ProviderCostDescription
Secondary
1North Coast Section, CIFNo Direct CostIdentify school sites personnel to serve as voting representatives.
6KYA$33,448.50Artificial turf maintenance for five high school turf fields.
9Career Technical Education Foundation – Sonoma County$20,000.00Golden State Pathways Program (GSPP) Implementation grant form EAHS and PHS included funds for this contract to provide intermediary services,
District 
2Finalsite$27,000.00Website platform service
3Boys & Girls Club of Sonoma-Marin$4,345,396.001486 students at 11 sites (7 elementary, 3 charter and 1 middle) Includes 2 weeks of break programming for 300 students and 4 weeks summer activities for 1000 students for two summers.
4AVID$61,608.00Advancement Via Individual Determination is a college readiness system that is designed to increase school-wide learning and performance at EAHS, MJ/SHS, PHS, HCMS, HLES and CCLA.
5Droplet$6,000.00Software for approval workflows like field trips. Does not address the majority of field trip forms, just the one that impacts the district office.
7Aeries Student Information System$458,946.58student information management (attendance, scheduling, grades, portal access, State test results)
8ParentSquare$84,467.24communication platform

Total value of contracts = $5,036,866.32

Summary of Contracts

Contracts

F.6. Approval of Contracts – Bond

#ContractorSiteServiceCost
District
9Development Group Inc.DOAnnual Network Security$686,489
Secondary
1Brelje & RaceHCMSTopographic and Underground Surveys$25,500
2Brelje & RaceSRMSTopographic and Underground Surveys$26,500
5Greystone WestSRHSManage paving upgrades$5,196
6Greystone WestMHSManage summer portable refresh$10,423
7PCDHSsEvaluate Audio Visual Systems$4,780
12Motive StudioSRHSDesign Fee for DeSoto Revisions$427,500
14RGH ConsultantsSRHSTest backfill and asphalt$11,000
Elementary
3Redwood Moving and StorageABESSite Moving$30,320
4Redwood Moving and StorageBHESSite Moving$30,320
8John StockdaleJMESDrainage Project Quality Control$1,680
10Redwood Moving and StorageBHESMoving Boxes$1,386
11Redwood Moving and StorageABESMoving Boxes$1,386
13RGH ConsultantsJMESTest asphalt$12,500

Measure C = $1,032,904.12

Measure G = $242,075.66

Total = $1,274,979.78

Summary of Contracts

Contracts 

Measure C and G Implementation Plan 

F.7. Approval of Alternate Design Build: James Monroe ES (JMES) Classrooms

Arntz Builders/PBK Architects Progressive Design Build contract for the JMES Transitional Kindergarten (TK) Classroom Buildings Alternate Design Build Project. This is for designing 3 buildings including six classrooms and a courtyard. The baseball field will be relocated.

Alternate Design Build

Agreement & Proposal $973,712 plus $3 million for early procurement.

F.8. Approval of Alternate Design Build: Helen Lehman ES (HLES) Classrooms

Wright Contracting contract for the Helen Lehman ES (HLES) TK Classroom Buildings Alternate Design Build Project. This is for designing 3 buildings including six modular classrooms and a playground.

Alternate Design Build

Agreement & Proposal $471,895 plus $3 million for early procurement.

F.9. Approval of Motive Studio Master Agreement for Architectural Services

Agreement

F.10. Approval of Piner High School’s Leadership Members to Travel to Orlando, FL

to participate in the 2025 National Leadership Conference in Orlando, Florida, July 4–July 9, 2025.

Letter of Intent

Field Trip Request

Schedule

F.11. Approval of Counselor Educator MOU Between San Jose State University and SRCS

MOU

F.12. Approval of Amplify Quotes for the mClass Assessment Tool for Elementary Sites

This is for the mClass DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills) 8th Edition and mClass Lectura as the state-approved diagnostic screener for K-2. It includes an online version for teachers in grades 3-6, ensuring they have access to the latest Acadience (DIBELS) tests administered each trimester.

District Quote Cost: $62,395.48 

CCLA Quote Cost: $3,934.50

SRCSA Quote Cost: $2,195.10

SRFACS Quote Cost: $344.04

F.13. Approval of Contract with Summit K12 for the Secondary Newcomer Summer Program

For the KnowledgeLinks program. 

Quote Cost: $5,423.75

F.14. Approval of Contract for the Fundraising Platform GiveBacks

Givebacks is a district-wide fundraising and donation management platform designed to streamline operations, strengthen compliance, and ensure equitable access to fundraising opportunities. This platform also provides centralized oversight and policy enforcement for Associated Student Body (ASB) clubs, parent organizations, and school-based donation efforts. By addressing long-standing inefficiencies and compliance gaps, Givebacks supports fiscal accountability, reduces administrative workload, and improves transparency across all school sites.

Financial Impact: $8,300 plus 2-10% per transaction

Proposal

Agreement

Data Privacy

F.15. Approval of Revised Job Description for Department Chair/Team Leader

This role provides site-based teacher leadership and collaboration aligned with district and school goals. 

Job Description

There is a plan to provide more meetings and training for department chairs, without supporting any structure for increased capacity to share information for impacting the practices of department members. 

F.16. Approval of Revised Job Description for Elementary Lead Teacher

This role supports site leadership, staff coordination, and emergency preparedness while acting as a liaison between school staff and administration. The updated description reflects a collaborative agreement between SRCS and SRTA for the 2025–2026 school year.

Job Description

SRTA members are concerned with the reasonableness of a teacher to handle individual discipline issues while maintaining the teaching environment for a class of students. This position has grown in responsibility as site admin are off campus far more than they used to be. Teachers step up and perform this job for the good of their site, not because of the stipend.

F.17. Approval of Revised Job Description for Title III Multilingual Learner Facilitator

This role will support multilingual learners (MLs) and strengthen English Language Development (ELD) programs through site collaboration, instructional coaching, and alignment with district and state priorities. This is for one elementary and one secondary position.

From Title 3 Funds.

Job Description

This position appears to be a new district office TOSA. How will this position be implemented for success? How can two people be expected to do the job of the six eliminated EL Specialists? 

F.18. Approval of Revised Job Description for Instructional Strategies Support Specialist

This role is designed to enhance teacher effectiveness and support the implementation of high-impact instructional strategies through job-embedded coaching and collaboration.

From Title 1 Funds.

Job Description

This position appears to be a new district office TOSA. How will this position be implemented for success? This use of Title 1 funds eliminates those funds being available at the site level. 

G. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEMS

G.1. Public Hearing for SRCS LCAP

Here is a summary of the LCAP action plans and the changes incorporated.

Goal 1SRCS will provide student-centered teaching and learning opportunities by increasing programs and services that maximize student growth toward meeting or exceeding standards with an emphasis in the areas of English Language Arts and Math.
Action #TitleDescription24-2525-26Change $Change %
1.1Assessment Systems TK-12Implement comprehensive assessment K-12 with 3 days training for K-6. A new assessment for both ELA and Math is needed in secondary and will be explored in 2025-26 with plans for early implementation.$751,139$1,200,000$448,861+ 60%
1.2Curriculum Supports and College and Career ReadinessResources and training will be provided for the Sonday literacy system and Math Redesign efforts.A 1.0 FTE College and Career Readiness Coordinator and 1.0 FTE College and Career Readiness Senior Secretary will support the development of integrated pathways, early college opportunities, work- based learning, and high- quality Career Technical Education programs. (These are believed to be grant funded positions.)Decrease in College and Career Counselors from 5.2 to 3.0 FTEs.Provide funding to school libraries.Dropping 2.2 FTE while raising the line budget by 28% is confusing.$1,463,158$1,867,500$404,342+ 28%
1.3Expanded Learning Opportunities and Interventions through Summer School and Afterschool ProgramsProvide afterschool and summer programs to build and maintain academic skills, while providing additional experiences that enrich students, preparing them for the next level of their education while supporting their holistic development. Includes four sites granted CCSPP funding for implementation of Community Schools.$3,790,012$3,963,612$173,600+ 5%
1.4School Based Support for SPSA Actions and ImplementationSite SPSA Funds are severely cut.$2,300,768$1,150,384-$1,150,384-50%
1.5Multilingual Learners Site and Staff and Student SupportSRCS will allocate one FTE Multilingual Learner and Equitable Services Coordinator (.6 LCAP and .4 restricted funds.) Eliminates 6 EL Specialists and 1 TOSA. Funding allocation continues for extended pay rates for certificated members participating in site LARC activities.$1,085,613$477,388-$608,225-57%
1.6Comprehensive and Collaborative Supports for StudentsContinued fiscal support of 0.5 FTE school psychologist position and 1 FTE Behavior Specialist.Eliminates 1 FTE Position School Psychologist to support MTSS Counselors.Reduction of MTSS counselors from 6.8 to 5.0 FTEs MTSS Intervention Counselors (secondary)Eliminating 2.8 FTE would seem to save considerably more than $217K.$1,512,964$1,295,000-$217,964-14%
1.7Enrichment Music Programs for Students & Increased Opportunities for CollaborationFunds the elementary music program with 7.4 FTEs (Reduced from 8 FTE)$1,140,171$1,008,025-$132,146-12%
1.8Academic InitiativesConverts Elsie Allen High School from a 7 period day to a 4X4 schedule, reduces extra FTE by unstated quantity.Develop and support Jr/Sr High School Model and support signature programs at secondary schools with 1.0 Director Position (.2 FTE LCAP and .8 FTE A-G).Continue Dual Language Immersion TOSA at EAHS and CCLA.Support the Advancement via Individual Determination (AVID) program for limited participating schools.$933,531$339,000-$594,531-64%
1.9Supports for Increased Inclusive practicesContinue to support general education sections for math and ELA at the secondary level to support ideal ratios (1/3:2/3) in the co-taught classes. Compensate teachers for extra planning time and collaboration of co- teaching teams. Fund the additional 2.0 FTEs needed for additional 10 sections.$300,000$600,000$300,000+100%
1.10NEW Supplemental Materials and Supplies TK-12Provide adaptive/supplemental curriculum, materials and supplies as needed for tiered services TK-12 to ensure that teachers and students have supplemental materials to support district-adopted, standards-based curriculum for all pertinent content areas, including: the core subject areas, CTE, VAPA, Physical Education, summer school and expanded learning programs etc.$0$180,000$180,000+100%
1.11NEW Class size reductionReduce class sizes in targeted grades and courses to provide additional support, specifically: Class Size reduction in elementary grades K-3 and 9th grade for math, ELA and science.$0$6,320,000$6,320,000+100%
Total:$13,277,356$18,400,909$5,123,553+ 39%
Goal 2SRCS, in partnership with our community, commits to developing safe, inclusive, culturally responsive learning environments to promote social-emotional wellness and address the physical needs of students, families, and staff.
Action #TitleDescription24-2525-26Change $Change %
2.1needs of students, families, and staff. QProvides for Panorama wellness survey bi-annually and Youth Truth Survey annually.$51,770$51,770$00%
2.2Mental Health SupportsContinues funding for 14 School-Based Therapists. With no explained change to services, the 60% increase in funding is unsubstantiated.$1,327,030$2,098,150$771,120+ 60%
2.3SEL and Anti Bullying Materials and CurriculumElementary Toolbox resources and professional development. Provides funding for the Panorama Playbook and the StopIT alert system. MCHS Project Wayfinder will now be site funded but the funding for this line is unchanged.$20,600$20,600$00%
2.4Increased Campus Student Engagement staffingRestorative staff of 25 FTEs was revised and the position was renamed to Restorative Intervention Support. The staff of 8 FTEs (a reduction of 17 FTE) will function as a team across multiple school sites. Student Safety Advisors were increased by unknown FTEs of which some unspecified amount will be base funded and some will be LCAP funded.Seven FTE employees will continue to oversee enrichment activities and programs for elementary students.$3,668,661$2,485,750-$1,182,911-32%
2.5Promoting Positive AttendanceContinue 2 FTE Family Engagement Facilitators and a partnership with Seneca and Sonoma County Juvenile Probation, providing 1.0 FTE Keeping Kids In Schools case manager (Grant funded.)$145,000$150,000$5,000+ 3%
2.6Elementary CounselorsAttend to the social, emotional health, and well-being of students who predominantly represent English learners and/or are low income.9 FTE Elementary Counselors (one per school).$1,453,386$1,526,055$72,669+ 5%
2.7Wellness & Engagement administrationMaintain funding to continue 2.0 FTE SRCS administrators for Wellness & Engagement (1.0 FTE Executive Director & 1.0 FTE Coordinator)$389,875$405,323$15,448+ 4%
2.8Family Engagement Facilitators and Multilingual Community EngagementDecrease in FTEs from 31 to 16 FEFs that will be site- situated but centrally supervised.Charter schools will independently fund their own FEF positions.$2,014,725$1,109,489-$905,236-45%
2.9Extracurricular Wellness & EngagementSupport interscholastic athletics, covering organization fees and operational costs.Full time release for Athletic directors at the High Schools 1.0 FTE 0.2 at Middle Schools for a total of 5.8 FTEs.The desire to improve athletic programs across SRCS is not understood by SRTA to be resolved with this increase of release time for ADs.$95,000$995,000$900,000+ 950%
Total:$9,166,048$8,842,137-$323,911– 4%
Goal 3SRCS commits to providing high-quality, relevant staff development that promotes professional growth and collaboration to increase student achievement.
Action #TitleDescription24-2525-26Change $Change %
3.1PD for Safety, Discipline, and Restorative and Culturally Responsive Student SupportAnnual administration professional development in restorative practices, student engagement, safety strategies, and legal mandates like Title IX.$55,000$37,500-$17,500– 32%
3.2Teacher training and collaboration to develop and implement effective strategies for differentiating instruction, aligning instructional approaches, and aligning literacy practices.Provide training on explicit multisensory teaching techniques for reading instruction.Prepare educators for the new California math framework by focusing on robust Elementary Math strategies.Provide additional 7-12 meetings for department chair members focused on essential standards, scope and sequence, and integration of district initiatives like ethnic studies pedagogy.Without any provided time, how will information impact the practice of secondary teachers?$240,000$910,000$670,000+ 279%
3.3Alternative Education Development and Programmatic ImplementationMaintain Alternative Education seats for students for SRCS students who are not finding success in comprehensive schools. The Alternative Education Committee will continue to meet following direction from the Board and Superintendent to develop further alternative education options focused on middle school students who are struggling. Increase Independent Study Program with increase or 1-2 FTE. Further developing best practices at current alternative programs with PD.$315,000$315,000$00%
3.4Provide professional development for StaffSupport professional development for classified staff with 2 PD days.$1,900,778$1,900,778$00%
3.5Centralized support for Professional Development.Maintain Executive Directors in Educational Services and Director of Multilingual Services. (Perhaps 2.5 dropped to 2 FTE)Also includes PD to support achievement for Multilingual or other identified students.$589,840$526,275-$63,565– 11%
3.6Multilingual Learners Curriculum Training, Collaboration and department Professional DevelopmentPD for Multilingual Services staff members will attend professional development$35,000$35,000$00%
3.7Ethnic Studies Interdisciplinary ProgramsEthnic Studies Program Specialist working one full day a week at three high school sites and one middle school site, paid for by school site SPSAs. The district office will direct .2 FTE of the Ethnic Studies Program Specialist work to ensure every site across the district is supported with Ethnics Studies by will collaborating with consultants, organize and communicate with teachers regarding PD participation and release days and extended day pay, and work with our community partners and affinity groups in our Ethnic Studies Community Committee.$200,000$200,000$00%
3.8Multi-tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) Professional DevelopmentTravel and registration costs for MTSS Intervention Counselors to attend professional development.$14,000$14,000$00%
Total:$3,349,618$3,938,553$588,935+ 18%
Staff-to-student ratios by type of school and concentration of unduplicated studentsSchools with a student concentration of 55 percent or lessSchools with a student concentration of greater than 55 percent
Staff-to-student ratio of classified staff providing direct services to studentsWhere are the staffing ratios broken down by position? Can sites depend on these posted staffing ratios?Elementary: 1:16.1Middle: 1:11.9High: 1:25.4Elementary: 1:13.7Middle: 1:14.2High: 1:24.8
Staff-to-student ratio of certificated staff providing direct services to studentsWhere are the staffing ratios broken down by position? Can sites depend on these posted staffing ratios?Elementary: 1:29.3Middle: 1:46.5High: 1:101.0Elementary: 1:28.8Middle: 1:41.3High: 1:90.1
Grand Total:$25,793,022$31,181,599$5,388,577+ 21%

Revision Presentation

LCAP Draft

SRTA members stand firm in that cuts should be made as far away from students as possible.

SRCS would benefit from a clearly defined timeline for annual revisions of the LCAP. This should include both district level and site level processes. 

The stated “Additional Consultation with Employee Organizations: May 13, 2025 (Collab) and May 28, 2025 (Collab)” are not accurate. Sharing a copy of the LCAP in mid May, 2025 does not count as collaboration with bargaining units. This is a serious breach of process with classified and certificated units.

Site level work to create Single Plan for Student Achievement (SPSAs) with the site level funds that are part of the LCAP would also benefit from a defined timeline. This work is for the School Site Council, which meets monthly, and ideally involves input from staff, students, and parents. The worst case scenario is when information is shared just prior to a deadline, and there is no time for site level collaboration to make these decisions. 

With diminishing enrollment and staffing levels, it is reasonable to assume there would be less need for district office positions. That is not the case. This plan makes dramatic cuts at the site level while inflating spending at the central office. This is seen in decreasing site funds by fifty percent while increasing the LCAP budget by twenty-one percent. This dismisses the effective decisions and work at the site level that can not continue with the gutting of site SPSA budgets.

Reading this plan raises many concerns and questions. The community would benefit from transparency around the intent of these changes. 

Sites are not being allowed to use SPSA funds for sections, except when called out above. This is a dramatic shift. Past practice has allowed sites to use their site funds to support their students in the best way possible. 

There is an additional $450,000 (60%) for 7-12 assessments. The process for adopting assessments has not been well vetted in the past which has led to unsuccessful prior implementation campaigns. 

The desire to improve athletic programs across SRCS is not understood by SRTA to be resolved with this increase of release time for ADs. This costs an additional $900,000.

Dropping 2.2 FTE College and Career Counselors while raising the line budget by 28% is confusing.

With no explained change to School Based Therapist services, there is a 60% increase in funding.

Eliminating 2.8 FTE of MTSS Counselors would seem to save considerably more than $217K.

SRTA members await the sharing of the new staffing ratios being utilized by SRCS. Can sites depend on these posted ratios for staffing levels? When will these ratios go into effect?

G.2 – 5. Public Hearing for Charter LCAPs

CCLA LCAP

SRACS LCAP

SRCSA LCAP

SRFACS LCAP

SRTA encourages members at charter sites reviewing their LCAPs. 

What does ‘Local Control” mean with these plans for the charter schools? Where is the line between chater’s determining their own spending plan, and the district office mandating expenses (or red lining initiatives)? Is this all clearly delineated somewhere? Are all charters held to the same requirements? 

G.6. Public Hearing for SRCS 2025-2026 Proposed Budget

Estimated Actuals and Budget

Presentation

Draft of State Forms

SRCS has taken steps to increase utilization of restricted funding. SRTA supports increasing these efforts.

SRCS is supporting mandated spending with general funds and optional funding through supplementary and concentration funds (the LCAP.) SRTA members appreciate this shift. 

The budget cash flow graphic suggests an improving overall trend line, but the Multi Year Projection shows an ever increasing deficit, with doom and gloom three years out with a final overspending amount that is 6% of the total projected income. 

6% seems in the doable ballpark of belt tightening. Historically cuts of this size were handled by nearly across the board cuts to budgets, at the department level. District Office spending needs to be as impacted as much as the site level. 

The Fiscal Stabilization Committee has not met for months. 

The Board’s AdHoc Budget Committee is in its infancy, and still being trained on how finance works. While this work is admirable, how long will it take for the board to be able to actively advise on the budget?

The recent meeting included possible guidelines for recuperating district costs from charter schools. This is definite progress towards transparency. 

There is appreciation for SCOE and FCMAT who appear to be helping with district finances. SRTA Members look forward to a future agenda item that addresses this work.

G.7. (Action) Approval of an Addendum MOU reached with SRCS and SRTA regarding SRTA 24-25 #2 Elsie Allen Senior High School Instructional 4×4 Block Schedule (Bell Schedule)

MOU

SRTA members are alerted that this is being viewed as a pilot, and if successful, other sites can consider adopting the 4×4 schedule. 

G.8. (Action) Approval of an Addendum MOU reached with SRCS and SRTA regarding SRTA 24-25 #3 MOU Organizing Chair

MOU

SRTA is excited to have been granted coverage of a 40% leave for an Organizing Chair by CTA. 

H.1. Approval of Minutes

May 28, 2025 Minutes and Supporting Documents (Regular Meeting)

J.1. Future Board Discussion Items (not included in this agenda)

SRTA members are encouraged to prepare for the upcoming agenda items.

Resolution Recognizing May as the Month of Better Hearing and Speech 

  • Approval of SRCS and Charter LCAP’s
  • Approval of California School Employees Association, Chapter 75 24-25 #10 MOU and Job Description for Wellness and Engagement Family Liaison
  • Approval of California School Employees Association, Chapter 75 24-25 #11 MOU and Job Description for Migrant Education Family Outreach and Support 
  • Panorama and Youth Truth Survey Data 
  • Discussion and update on Reconfiguration and Ad Hoc Committee with SCOE 

Recently Requested Agenda Items from the Board

Maneri – timeline for implementing boys volleyball.

Caston – strategy of athletics program across the district, update 3510 policy around reducing waste as a discussion item

SRTA looks to the future scheduling of the following items:

  • Accept the Measure C, G, I and L Audits and Citizens’ Oversight Committee Annual Report (May 2025)
  • Resolution Recognizing March 31st as Transgender Day of Visibility (March 2025)
  • Restorative Practices Data (March 2025)
  • Alternate Education Update (December 2024, Feb 2025) 
    • There is a strong need for Alternative placements for secondary students who need more services than our comprehensive schools are able to provide. How can SRCS meet the needs of these students during these tough financial times?
  • VAPA Program Highlights (Feb 2025)
  • 2025 Ballot for CSBA Delegate Assembly (Feb 2025)
    • Is the board not casting a vote?
  • Strategic Plan and Equity Survey (Feb 2025)
  • Updated Governance Handbook (January 2025)
  • Plan and timeline for implementation of Dr. Gillespie’s recommendations (January 2025)
  • Public Hearing and Approval of Teamsters Union 665 “Sunshine” Proposal (delayed from Oct 2024)
  • First Draft of the District Safety Plan (delayed from September 2024)
  • Board Update of Strategic Goals with input from sites and equity assessment (begun June 2024) 
  • Sharing the support plans for PIP and Variable Term Waiver hires. (Board request August 24)
  • Sharing the Library Master Plan with implementation expectation
  • Officially Closing Learning House
  • SRACS Accelerated Charter Material Revision Request (delayed)
  • Unification/Redistricting Decision
  • Renaming of Sites Update/Decision
  • Plan for Staff Housing support program from the proceeds of Fir Ridge

Until the district makes a decision, the proceeds from the sale of the Fir Ridge property are just sitting and losing value as the cost of housing continues to rise. Getting a program started could help SRCS attract and retain CSEA staff. The potential impact of the funds diminishes as time passes.

  • Student Voice Policy
  • BEST Plus Update
    • Does SRCS still self identify as a BEST Plus district?

J.3. Family Engagement Facilitator Ratios for 25-26 School Year

This is based on the number of English Learners at a site.

– Sites with more than 300 English Learners receive 1.5 FTE 

– Sites with 50 to 300 English Learners receive 1.0 FTE 

– Sites with fewer than 50 English Learners receive a minimum of 0.5 FTE

Methodology for Assigning FEF 

J. 4. Updated Site Rotation Memo for Student Representative to the Board of Education

The schedule now evenly distributes representation, with all schools on a three year cycle.

Rotation Schedule

SRCS Board Meeting Agenda Analysis – 5/28/2025.

REGULAR BOARD MEETING

Santa Rosa City Schools

May 28, 2025

Hybrid: Santa Rosa City Hall Council Chambers 

4:00 p.m. – Closed Session

6:00 p.m. – Open Session

Hybrid: Zoom / Santa Rosa City Hall

*** streamed ***

A live link will be posted on the SRCS website.

Board of Education / Video Board Meetings

Please take time to review the following abbreviated version of the agenda. Click here to see the entire agenda. It has live links on many items with more information. If you want to comment to the board about any upcoming items, email agendacomments@srcs.k12.ca.us. Please CC wearesrta@gmail.com on your email.

Members attending online are encouraged to add SRTA to the front of their Zoom client name.

Closed Session Items: 

A.1. Public Comment On Closed Session Agenda Items To comment, email Melanie Martin at mmartinsrcs.k12.ca.us.

This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak to the board on Closed Session items only. 

Without any specifics on closed session agenda items, it is impossible for the public to know when to provide insights for items being reviewed.

SRTA supports the board utilizing hard evidence to make decisions. 

B.1. Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release

B. 2. Conference With Labor Negotiator (Name of designated rep attending: Dr. Vicki Zands (SRCS); name of organization: Santa Rosa Teachers Association, CSEA 75, Teamsters Union 665)

B.3. Conference With Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation (Number of potential cases: 2)

B.4. Student Readmissions (5 Cases: 24/25-02, 2022/23-09, 2024/25-05, 2024/25/07, 2024/25-20 )

B.5. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Title of employee being reviewed: Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent, Principals, Vice Principals, Assistant Principals, Directors, Coordinators)

RECONVENE TO REGULAR OPEN SESSION (6:00 p.m.)

C.7. Special Presentations for Student of the Month and Certificated/Classified Employees of the Month 

Brook Hill Elementary School 

  • Madison Schmitt, Student of the Month
  • Vanessa Vargas Mendez, Classified Employee of the Month
  • Jessica Biddulph, Certificated Employee of the Month

Maria Carrillo High School

  • Callie Ritter, Student of the Month
  • Lisa Greenstein, Classified Employee of the Month
  • Trish Terrell, honoring deceased MCHS teacher 

Montgomery High School

  • Lulia Embaye, Student of the Month
  • Jessica Andrade Bernabe, Classified Employee of the Month
  • Morgan Schmitt, Certificated Employee of the Month 

SRTA members are encouraged to celebrate their own by attending this meeting! 

D. Reports

D. 7. School Reconfiguration Report

Nothing is attached to this agenda item. 

Where is information shared from the meetings with the SCOE advisory team?

Where are the metrics for evaluating this transition in progress being shared? How are they being evaluated? 

What are the updates on enrollments? Are families choosing to participate in the 7-12 model? What happens if there is severe under enrollment?

Where are the updated financials on these changes? How much is being spent to make these transitions? What are the expected savings? What savings actually gained from closing sites and moving classrooms? There is perceived value in vacating sites so they can be prepped for other programs. It would be helpful to know that the needs of students currently on these sites are not less valued than the expected future students.

For the consolidated sites, can explicit information about what classes will be where, publicly shared to alleviate the concern that there is not enough space for programs, especially those serving students with disabilities? Which programs are actually being provided to middle school students in the Master Schedule? 

Similarly, for the impacted elementary sites that are gaining students, can specific plans for facilities use be provided to the public? 

D. 8. Special Presentation for Outgoing Student Board Member Zúñiga

SRTA Members thank Omé Zúñiga for his dedication to SRHS and SRCS students. We wish him well in his future endeavours. 

E. Public Comment on Non Agenda Items

SRTA Members are invited to complete ‘blue cards.’ Online comments have been suspended unless a board member is attending remotely. Please be prepared to observe the three minute time limit or the imposition of a possible last minute reduction in the time limit. Recently comments have been limited to as little as 60 seconds, with a limit on the total time spent on public comments. Only items NOT on the agenda are addressed at this time, with the exception of consent items.

Comments are requested at the board meeting to bring a member’s perspective and share real experiences of the impact of district policies and practices on students and staff. 

Please commit to speaking to agenda items that impact you or your students. Speakers are limited to just those in person. Comments are most impactful when they are well spoken, composed and reasonable.

F. CONSENT ITEMS

All consent items are enacted by the Board in one motion, unless a Board member requests that an item be removed and discussed separately. 

F.2. Approval of Personnel Transactions 

Personnel Transactions 

EdJoin shows a total of 100 current postings for 173 jobs in SRCS. There are thirty-three certificated opening postings for forty-six positions (twenty-one more than last meeting.) There are sixty-four current classified postings for one hundred fourteen job openings (five less than the last meeting). There are two certificated and one classified management positions open (the same as last meeting.) 

SRTA bids farewell to Carolina Ortega (HSMS), Angelica Salas de Torres (PHS), Michael Simanek (HSMS), Devin Marvosh (JMES), Stacey Smith (MHS), Eva Brena (EAHS) and Cara Parlato (EAHS) who have announced their resignations at the end of the year after a combined 44.6 years of service to our students. 

SRTA congratulates Kimberley Coffey-McKay (HVES) and Mike Erickson (PHS) who have announced their retirements as of the end of the year. They take sixty-eight years of experience and service with them.

Changes to classified staff includes two new hires, two rehires, and three retirements. They leave taking with them fifty years of knowledge and service to our staff and students.

In admin moves, we bid farewell to the resigning Ryan Thompson (PHS) who leaves after 18 years of service to our district. 

F.3. Approval of Contracts

Summary

#ProviderCostDescription
Charter
10Tina Rogers$3,000.00Dance and music instruction for FACS summer school
Elementary
1Walker Creek Ranch$29,846.00Outdoor Ed for HVES
2Kathleen Farrell$34,000.00one year of Physical Therapy assessments and services to DHH infant program
3Kimberly Imsdahl$20,000.00one year of Occupational Therapy assessments and services to DHH infant program
4School Datebooks$1,332.69provide all HVES 4th, 5th and 6th grade students with a planner
District
6Follett Software, LLC$44,837.88database system to manage library collections, textbooks, and other resources for one year
11Informed K12$72,117.00electronic forms and workflow process to automatically collect signatures, route and track
12Keeping Kids in School$12,500.00student attendance mentor works with students and families and can coordinate with other city and county services
Secondary
5Cyber High$65,139.00online credit recovery platform
7Walsworth$6,600.00EAHS Yearbook support and professional development for students and teachers over the summer
8L’Audio North$4,400.00audio services at the MCHS graduation
9JMA Security$368.00security services for the RHS Graduation
13Let’s Go Learn$2,880.00Reclassification assessment for 7-12 students
14Star View Behavioral Health / South Bay HS$288,380.23addendum brings the total contract amount to $563,380.23 for the placement of one student
15Icing’s / Claire’sNo Direct CostProvide paid and volunteer work for students in the Transition (18-22) Program

Total value of contracts = $585,400.80.

Summary of Contracts

Contracts

This year 838 courses were taken through Cyber High, allowing students to earn a total of 4,190 credits. This platform is a cheap way for students to get credit for retaking a course in order to qualify for a diploma. These courses are qualified as A-G but are believed to be substandard to what students do in SRCS classrooms. 

It is time for automation of the process for collecting overages when there are too many students enrolled in a class. Expecting an overworked teacher to submit detailed paperwork to get paid, when all the information can be pulled from the SIS, is a waste of precious time and energy. A former SRCS administrator said the system was intentionally cumbersome to prevent all teachers from collecting what was owed them. 

F.4. Approval of Contracts – Bond

#ContractorSiteServiceCost
Charter
11Ahlborn Fence & Steel, IncSRCSAFence and gates$22,365
Secondary
2Greystone WestMHS, RVMS, SRHSAddendum Construction Management of gym floor refinishing$12,952
3aGreystone WestRVMS, EAHSAddendum Construction Management of exterior painting$68,299
5Greystone WestMCHS, MHS, RVMS, SRHSAddendum Construction Management of access control$630,362
8UlineSRHSOutdoor tables for 7th/8th$9,640
10UlineMHSOutdoor benches$7,370
12Wright ConstructionSRHSPavement Replacement$22,365
13Wright ConstructionMHSRefurbish 16 portables (paint, floor covering, ceiling tiles, wallcovering)$297,804
District
6U.S. CADDOAnnual Software Subscription$660
9UlineDOWarehouse outdoor lunch tables$2,439
Elementary
1Crawford and Assoc.HLESgeotechnical services for new TK building$38,453
3bGreystone WestALES,Addendum Construction Management of exterior painting$10,164
4Greystone WestJMESAddendum Construction Management of parking ot drainage$37,760
7Crawford and Assoc.JMESgeotechnical services for new TK building$38,453

Measure C = $1,165,765.11

Measure G = $85,185.80

Total = $1,250,950.91

Summary of Contracts

Contracts 

Measure C and G Implementation Plan 

Page 16 of the implementation plan calls out a 5 Step Process. 1: Establish a Project Team 

2: Identify Needs and Priorities 

3: Develop Component Specifications 

4: Implement the Design 

These design phases will be developed with early and frequent outreach to the project team and at-large community stakeholders. With regular check-ins on the project design progress and critical element inclusion, there are ample opportunities for input from the key stakeholders to be discussed and vetted to allow these project-specific solutions and elements to be included in the project design process. The feedback received from the staff, administrators, students, parents, and community members working together to achieve the goals outlined in the project design will be conducted through regular meetings that will be held to review progress, identify challenges, and make adjustments to the design as needed.

 5: Communicate Results 

When does a project qualify for this process?

F.5. Approval of the Services Agreement with SchoolPRPro

This item is to contract with an experienced communication firm to cover for the vacant Information Officer position.

Financial Cost: will not exceed $15,000 

Agreement

F.6. Approval of Architectural Services Firms Pool

The Board will consider approval of the Architectural Service Firms recommended for inclusion in the Architectural Service Firms pool through the Request for Qualification process. The Architectural Service Firms approved will be assigned projects identified through the Measure C and G Implementation Plan.

Scoresheet

Architectural Services

Measure C and G Implementation Plan 

F.7. Approval of the Student Representatives to the Board of Education for 2025/2026 School Year

 For the 2025/2026 academic year, the Santa Rosa City School Board student representative will be from Elsie Allen High School and Ridgway High School.

Rotation (adjusted for clarity):

School SiteSchool SiteRotation Year
Elsie Allen High School Ridgway High School 2025-2026
Piner High School Montgomery High School2026-2027
Elsie Allen High School Maria Carrillo School2027-2028
Piner High School Santa Rosa High School2028-2029
Elsie Allen High School Ridgway High School 2029-2030

Interview Questions

Timeline

Jonathan Carrillo

Natalia Olivera-Gomez

Bylaw 9150 adopted 10/9/24 The adopted policy does not include the rotation of sites dependent on location to Highway 101 as originally presented. It appears this idea was used to create this rotation schedule. 

SRTA members welcome Jonathan Carrillo and Natalia Olivera-Gomez as the newest student board members. We look forward to hearing you represent student voices in board discussions.

There is concern about the posted rotation. With six high school sites, it seems reasonable that all high schools would be on a three year rotation. One site is listed as having a student representative three times in the next five years, while three sites are represented only once in that time frame. Can this schedule be revised?

F.8. Approval of Revised Job Description for Vice Principal for 2025-2025 School Year

The Board will consider approval of the revised Job Description for Vice Principal.

Job Description

F.9. Approval of the New AP Biology Textbook

The Board will consider the approval of the Campbell Biology 12th Edition, AP (2021) published by Pearson for AP Biology classes.

Biology Textbook

F.10. Approval of Resolution 2024/25-129 Authorizing Personnel to Sign Orders on District Funds Accounts

Resolution

F.11. Approval of Resolution 2024/25-130 Contract Establishing SRCS Flex Spending Account and Authorized Signers

The account will be used to manage employee-contributed funds; no district funds will be deposited into this account.

Resolution

Contract

The next two items are problematic for SRTA members. The district office was to cut 2.5 administrators with the PKS reductions. These additional positions replace two of those positions and reconfigures a third position. The end result seems to hold the district nearly harmless from the impact of financial cuts.
School Site SPSA funds have been reduced by about 50% while also holding a large share of special funds such as Title 1 back at the district level. The district has eliminated many site support positions and has denied sites Local Control of these funds by mandating sites to not use SPSA funds for site positions. 
With this lack of site funding, sites need to dig deep to prioritize extremely limited funds while the district office is experiencing no cuts. 
These new positions are not supported by SRTA members. SRCS must keep cuts as far away from students as possible. 

F.12. Approval of Job Description for Director of School Innovation, Engagement and Strategic Outreach

Primary Function: Under general direction of the Assistant Superintendent of Educational Services, serves as District lead to guide, enhance and support the SRCS secondary school administrative teams, faculty and staffs, students and greater communities to ensure success of this new model; to serve as a resource and liaison to district and site personnel during the early and critical transition years; oversee the continued integration to maximize student opportunities; achieve success in the full integration including focus, culture, and community.

Fiscal Impact: Starting Salary $151,422.28, 80% from A-G and 20% from LCAP.

Job Description

A-G Implementation Improvement Grant As written, this grant provides support staff at sites. How can this grant be utilized for a district administrator? Or are there other A-G funds being utilized for this position?

If the district sees this as a full time job, then priorities should shift, to allow a current administrator to take on these duties. There is maybe one person in our district with the five years of successful secondary site administration required, based on recent cabinet decisions. 

F.13. Approval of Job Description for Coordinator of Curriculum and Professional Learning

The Coordinator will lead efforts in designing and delivering professional development, supporting curriculum and instruction initiatives, facilitating assessment programs, and promoting effective teaching strategies. The role also includes support for instructional material adoptions, oversight of curriculum-related programs (such as the NB STEM Residency Program), and collaboration with school leaders and instructional staff to promote student and teacher success.

Fiscal Impact: Starting Salary $135,470, 60% from Title II and 40% from Title I.

Job Description

SRTA members question how this can be a full time position. 

The process for adopting instructional materials must be revisited. There is also the need to prioritize what curriculum we are replacing, as our funds are so limited. Delaying some adoptions so funds are available for sites to purchase materials could be far more important. 

F.14. Approval of Job Description for Coordinator, Multilingual & Equitable Services

Under the direction of the Director of Multilingual & Equitable Services, the Coordinator will lead efforts to implement equity-focused initiatives, support teachers through targeted professional development, and guide practices that close achievement gaps. 

This is a replacement position. Starting Salary $128,215, 57% from LCAP and 43% from Title I

Job Description

SRTA members wonder about equitable practices in this time of limited funding. How is the funding of the Multilingual department being impacted? How much professional development will this position actually be supporting? 

Members are preparing to be overwhelmed next year. Expecting practices to be implemented from professional development feels unconnected to the reality we will be facing with a reduction to site level support next year. 

F.15. Correction to 2025-2026 Classified Employee Calendar

Key corrections to the calendar include: 

  • Addition of columns for Elementary and Secondary School Year employees to reflect their differing non-work days.
  • Renaming the “Paid Days Off” column to “Total Days Off.”
  • Correction of November’s total days off to 4.
  • Designation of December 19, 2025, as a non-work day for Secondary School Year employees.
  • Addition of May 15, 2026, as a District non-work day.
  • Identification of June 4, 2026, as the final workday for Elementary School Year employees.
  • Identification of June 5, 2026, as the final workday for Teachers and Secondary School Year employees.

These updates ensure the calendar aligns with negotiated agreements and provides accurate scheduling information for all impacted employee groups.

Updated Classified Employee Calendar

G. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEMS

G.1. (Action) Resolution Reaffirming Support for LBGTQIA+ Community

This resolution recognizes, celebrates, and builds awareness of the support for our LGBTQIA+ community. The agenda posting includes the following links for resources:

Resolution

G.2. (Discussion) Update on Career Technical Education (CTE) Programs

2024 Data from the CDE Dashboard concerning the College and Career Indicator which is where SRCS is held accountable for the CTE Program. 

The California Dashboard measures College and Career Indicators (CCI). Students can meet the requirement in a variety of ways. SRCS had 577/1956 (29.5%) seniors meet the CCI for 2024. Many of these students met multiple criteria. 

Measure# Students meeting% of completers
CTE Pathway Completion386.60%
Smarter Balanced Assessment30152.20%
College Credit Course10.20%
Advanced Placement24041.60%
International Baccalaureate162.80%
a-g Completion (includes more)47682.50%
State Seal of Biliteracy20535.50%
Total (unduplicated)577100%

There are other College and Career Indicators. Leadership/Military Science, Registered Pre-Apprenticeship, State or Federal Job Program, & Transition Classwork and Work-Based Learning Experiences were not utilized by SRCS students.

Nearly 94% of students with a CTE course graduate. 

About 5% (101/1873) of the unduplicated students taking CTE classes complete a CTE pathway. 

CTE Update includes staff, grants & initiatives, programs by site, enrollment, grade rate of participant, plans for dual enrollment, student organizations, advisory committee, and next steps (• Continued expansion of early college credit options • Increase work-based learning opportunities • Secure a-g approval for remaining CTE courses • Increase CTE Completer and Graduate Response Rates • Expand Industry Certifications • Develop Integrated Pathways • Establish College and Career Readiness Labs for middle school students • Expand CTE promotion and outreach efforts)
Learning Experiences Descriptions of WBL Experiences

High-Quality CTE Describes 12 Essential Elements of a High-Quality Program 

SRTA celebrates our CTE staff. We know our true strength lies in the people who work in these positions, not the program itself. Our students benefit from the soft skills learned from these teachers which translates beyond the scope of any particular CTE pathway into valuable life skills. 

We are suspicious of the college credit course indicator in the CDE data, as we suspect that more than one graduating senior completed two semesters of college coursework with a C- or better. Is there something being done to remedy this issue? 

This presentation does not include the financial picture of the SRCS CTE program. How much are each of the various grants, and what do they specifically provide? What is the total funding of the CTE program for SRCS? How is that funding allocated per site? 

Which programs offer a third year capstone course? How are new CTE pathways chosen? What is the process for approving new courses? What are the priorities and the timeline for the next step items listed? 

G.3. (Action) 2024-25 Third Interim Financial Report and Information on the Governor’s May Revision to the 2025-26 Proposed State Budget

Governors May Revise Summary: The state is worse off than projected.

Implications for SRCS include: 

  • Expect a slight reduction and delay next years’ Prop 98 funding until the beginning of the following year. 
  • Significant decrease in TK funding
  • Elimination of federal Migrant Ed and Title III funding
  • Nearly maintain Student Support and Professional Development grant ($3.7 million)

The third interim shows income of nearly $2 million less than expected from local property taxes, while expenses are nearly $2.2 million more than budgeted. $1.7 million of this is from Services and Other Operating Expenditures. 

The projections for next year show $15 million less for salaries and benefits and $5 million less for Services and Other Operating Expenditures. 

The three year forecast is concerning. SRCS projects overspending income for the next two years.

It appears that SRCS will slowly improve its financial situation, while weathering upcoming cash flow issues by continuing to utilize local borrowing. November of 2025 is projected to require a sum of $50 million in borrowing prior to January’s income from local Property Taxes. 

Presentation
Financial Report

SRTA members appreciate SCOE’s input into this report. 

Can further reductions be made to the Services and Other Operating Expenditures? 

We hope that the use of reserved funds can be maximized to serve our students during these tough times.

G.4. (Action) Approval of District and School Site Safety Plans

The Board will consider approval of elementary, middle, high school, and charter Comprehensive School Safety Plans for the 2025-2026 school year. 

Site safety plans are expected to be created locally, with input from students, parents, staff and administrators while adhering to state and district expectations and recommendations. These annual plans are formally approved by each Site Council. 

 SRCArtsS, ALES, CCLA, EAHS, HCMS, HLES, HVES, JMES, LBES, LEL A, MCHS, PHS, PTES, RHS, RVMS, SLES, FACS, SRHS, SRMS

City Service Signatures

The SRCS community has learned how important it is to have functioning safety plans, at both the district and site level. 

SRTA negotiated for a District Safety Committee as part of our last contract. We had hoped that this would be a place for helpful conversations, agreements, and for the creation of a functioning district template for Site Safety Plans. There is still far to go to achieve these goals. 

Sites are able to have Safety Committees dedicated to this work, but there is no obvious district wide structure to support this work. A First Draft of the District Safety Plan has been delayed since the September 2024 board agenda. 

A timeline that explicitly states the stages these annual site plans are expected to go through would be helpful to ensure that all invested parties are included in the yearly process of evaluating and updating these plans.

G.5. (Action) Declaration of Need for Fully Qualified Educators

The Board will consider approval of the applications for the Declaration of Need for fifty-nine Fully Qualified Educators for 2025-2026.

Elementary Declaration (5 multiple subject, 2 Music and 2 PE positions.)

Secondary Declaration (15 SpEd, 2 Ag, 2 Art, 1 Business, 2 English, 3 Math, 1 music, 2 PE, 2 Biology, 3 Chemistry, 6 Geoscience, 1 Science)

G.6. (Action) Approval of CSEA 75 24-25 #10 MOU and Job Description for Wellness and Engagement Family Liaison

This position is designed to support student well-being and academic success by serving as a key connection between schools, families, and community resources. Works with, maintains, and facilitates student attendance and truancy program. Works with, maintains, and facilitates support of Foster Youth and homeless students. Works with, supports, and facilitates student enrollment at both the site and district levels. The Family Liaison is distinguished from Family Engagement Facilitators or ELL Support Program & Support Technicians in that they engage the entire community to provide additional student support in areas of engagement, attendance, and intervention, including but not limited to unduplicated pupils. The are also responsible for collecting data.

Financial Impact: Unknown. This10 month position starts at $22.38 per hour.

Job Description

G.7. (Action) Approval of CSEA 75 24-25 #11 MOU and Job Description for Migrant Education Family Outreach and Support

This is a new job description for the Migrant Education Family Support (MEFS) position. This role is designed to provide supplemental support and advocacy for migrant students and families, helping them access educational services and resources.

Financial Impact: Unknown. This10 month position starts at $22.38 per hour.

Job Description

G.8. (Action) Approval of 2024/25-128 Resolution to Appoint an Interim District Superintendent Without an Administrative Services Credential

While Lisa August has many years of service to schools, she does not hold an administrative credential. In California a Preliminary Administrative Services Credential (ASC) generally requires a valid teaching credential, and a minimum of five years of full-time teaching experience. This item is to waive the credential requirement as allowed by Education Code 35029.

Resolution

H.1. Approval of Minutes

May 14, 2025 Minutes and Supporting Documents (Regular Meeting)

J.1. Future Board Discussion Items (not included in this agenda)

SRTA members are encouraged to prepare for the upcoming agenda items.

Resolution Recognizing May as the Month of Better Hearing and Speech 

  • Public Hearing for District LCAP
  • Public Hearing for Charter LCAP’s (SRFACS, SRACS, SRCSA, CCLA)
  • Accept the Measure C, G, I and L Audits and Citizens’ Oversight Committee Annual Report
  • Public Hearing for 2025/26 Budget 

Recently Requested Agenda Items from the Board

Maneri – timeline for implementing boys volleyball.

Caston – strategy of athletics program across the district, update 3510 policy around reducing waste as a discussion item

SRTA looks to the future scheduling of the following items:

  • Resolution Recognizing March 31st as Transgender Day of Visibility (March 2025)
  • Restorative Practices Data (March 2025)
  • Alternate Education Update (December 2024, Feb 2025) 
    • There is a strong need for Alternative placements for secondary students who need more services than our comprehensive schools are able to provide. How can SRCS meet the needs of these students during these tough financial times?
  • VAPA Program Highlights (Feb 2025)
  • 2025 Ballot for CSBA Delegate Assembly (Feb 2025)
    • Is the board not casting a vote?
  • Strategic Plan and Equity Survey (Feb 2025)
  • Updated Governance Handbook (January 2025)
  • Plan and timeline for implementation of Dr. Gillespie’s recommendations (January 2025)
  • Public Hearing and Approval of Teamsters Union 665 “Sunshine” Proposal (delayed from Oct 2024)
  • First Draft of the District Safety Plan (delayed from September 2024)
  • Board Update of Strategic Goals with input from sites and equity assessment (begun June 2024) 
  • Sharing the support plans for PIP and Variable Term Waiver hires. (Board request August 24)
  • Sharing the Library Master Plan with implementation expectation
  • Officially Closing Learning House
  • SRACS Accelerated Charter Material Revision Request (delayed)
  • Unification/Redistricting Decision
  • Renaming of Sites Update/Decision
  • Plan for Staff Housing support program from the proceeds of Fir Ridge

Until the district makes a decision, the proceeds from the sale of the Fir Ridge property are just sitting and losing value as the cost of housing continues to rise. Getting a program started could help SRCS attract and retain CSEA staff. The potential impact of the funds diminishes as time passes.

  • Student Voice Policy
  • BEST Plus Update
    • Does SRCS still self identify as a BEST Plus district?

J.3. Facility Update

Update

  • The Facilities team continues to recruit new members for the bond Citizen Oversight Committee (COC). 

Current Projects

District-Wide Electronic Access Controls SRHS, MCHS, MHS, RVMS

Construction of Central Receiving Warehouse

Projects to begin in June

Infrastructure & Drainage, PHS, JMES

Ball Wall and Fencing PHS

Exterior Campus Painting EAHS, RVMS and ALES 

Gym Floor Refinishing SRHS, MHS, RVMS

Projects in Design Phase

TK Classrooms Alternative Design Build SRMS, HCMS

2-Story Classroom Alternative Design-Build PHS

District-Wide Electronic Access Controls PHS, ALES, HLES, JMES, LBES

J. 4-5. School Site Reports and Parent Organization Updates

  1. BHES

SPSA

  1. MCHS

SPSA

Video

  1. MHS

SPSA

Video

Parent Org Report

SRCS Board Meeting Agenda Analysis – 5/14/2025.

REGULAR BOARD MEETING

Santa Rosa City Schools

May 14, 2025

Hybrid: Santa Rosa City Hall Council Chambers 

4:00 p.m. – Closed Session

6:00 p.m. – Open Session

Hybrid: Zoom / Santa Rosa City Hall

*** streamed ***

A live link will be posted on the SRCS website.

Board of Education / Video Board Meetings

Please take time to review the following abbreviated version of the agenda. Click here to see the entire agenda. It has live links on many items with more information. If you want to comment to the board about any upcoming items, email agendacomments@srcs.k12.ca.us. Please CC wearesrta@gmail.com on your email.

Members attending online are encouraged to add SRTA to the front of their Zoom client name.

Closed Session Items: 

A.1. Public Comment On Closed Session Agenda Items To comment, email Melanie Martin at mmartinsrcs.k12.ca.us.

This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak to the board on Closed Session items only. 

Without any specifics on closed session agenda items, it is impossible for the public to know when to provide insights for items being reviewed.

SRTA supports the board utilizing hard evidence to make decisions. 

B.1. Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release

B. 2. Conference With Labor Negotiator (Name of designated rep attending: Dr. Vicki Zands (SRCS); name of organization: Santa Rosa Teachers Association, CSEA 75, Teamsters Union 665)

B.3. Conference With Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation (Number of potential cases: 1)

B.4. Student Expulsions (6 Cases: 24/25-22, 24/25-28, 24/25-29, 24/25-30, 24/25-31, 24/25-32 )

B.5. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Title of employee being reviewed: Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent, Principals, Vice Principals, Assistant Principals, Directors, Coordinators)

RECONVENE TO REGULAR OPEN SESSION (6:00 p.m.)

C.7. Special Presentations for Student of the Month and Certificated/Classified Employees of the Month 

Steele Lane Elementary School 

  • Estefani Castro Hercules, Student of the Month
  • Maria Luna, Classified Employee of the Month
  • Kara Andersen, Certificated Employee of the Month

Santa Rosa Charter School for the Arts 

  • Ethan Renner, Student of the Month
  • Nadia Talbot, Classified Employee of the Month
  • Tina Peretz, Certificated Employee of the Month 

SRTA members are encouraged to celebrate their own by attending this meeting! 

D. Reports

D. 7. School Consolidation / Transition Update

Nothing is attached to this agenda item. 

Where is information shared from the meetings with the SCOE advisory team?

Where are the metrics for evaluating this transition in progress being shared? How are they being evaluated? 

What are the updates on enrollments? Are families choosing to participate in the 7-12 model? What happens if there is severe under enrollment?

Where are the updated financials on these changes? How much is being spent to make these transitions? What are the expected savings? What savings actually gained from simply closing sites and moving classrooms? There is perceived value in vacating sites so they can be prepped for other programs. It would be helpful to know that the needs of students currently on these sites are not less valued than the expected future students.

For the consolidated sites, can explicit information about what classes will be where, publicly shared to alleviate the concern that there is not enough space for programs, especially those serving  students with disabilities?

Similarly, for the impacted elementary sites that are gaining students, can specific plans for facilities use be provided? 

E. Public Comment on Non Agenda Items

SRTA Members are invited to complete ‘blue cards.’ Online comments have been suspended unless a board member is attending remotely. Please be prepared to observe the three minute time limit or the imposition of a possible last minute reduction in the time limit. Recently comments have been limited to as little as 60 seconds, with a limit on the total time spent on public comments. Only items NOT on the agenda are addressed at this time, with the exception of consent items.

Comments are requested at the board meeting to bring a member’s perspective and share real experiences of the impact of district policies and practices on students and staff. 

Please commit to speaking to agenda items that impact you or your students. Speakers are limited to just those in person. Comments are most impactful when they are well spoken, composed and reasonable.

F. CONSENT ITEMS

All consent items are enacted by the Board in one motion, unless a Board member requests that an item be removed and discussed separately.  

F.2. Approval of Personnel Transactions 

Personnel Transactions 

EdJoin shows a total of 87 current postings for 147 jobs in SRCS. There are sixteen certificated opening postings for twenty-five positions (two less than last meeting.) There are sixty-eight current classified postings for one hundred nineteen job openings (eleven more than the last meeting). There are two certificated and one classified management positions open. 

SRTA bids farewell to John Sappington (SRHS), Celeste DiLullo (RHS), Alyssa Esposito (LBES), and Wendy Eberly (EAHS) who have announced their resignations, and to Jan Freifeld (EAHS) and  Dinah Costello (RHS) who have announced their retirements as of the end of the year. They take ninety years of experience and service with them.

Changes to classified staff includes one new hire, four resignations and one retirement. They leave taking with them twenty-four years of knowledge and service to our staff and students.

There are two supervisory resignations of School Based Therapists, with a total of 4 years of service.

In admin moves, we bid farewell to the resigning Director Eduwiges Llamas and Proctor Principal Anna Moore who leave after a combined nine years of service. 

F.5. Approval of Contracts 

Summary

#ProviderCostDescription
Charter
4Sonoma County Office of Education$27,375.00Five (5) Certificated SRCS District employees from Cesar Chavez Language Academy will attend the Footsteps to Freedom tour from July 22 to 29, 2025
8Dr. Jose Medina Educational SolutionsNo Additional Costprofessional development that will provide actionable outcomes that support the instructional needs of Emergent Bilingual Students in our Spanish Dual Language Program at CCLA and EAHS.
Elementary
11Westminster Woods$3,000.00Outdoor Ed for LBES 6th graders.
13Mystery Science$18,645.00online, engaging science lessons for teachers to use with students in grades Kindergarten – 5th grade.
16NatureBridge$22,160.00Outdoor Ed for FACS
18Westminster WoodsNo Direct CostOutdoor Ed for ABES
District
1CDW Education$3,118.50a tool that helps SRCS manage and audit Google Chrome policies in Google Workspace.
2Hewlett Packard Enterprise$4,362.48HPE Tech Care Basic service support for HP Servers.
10Notable Inc. (KAMI)$31,875.00allow students to easily access, engage with and complete PDF assignments in Google Classroom, allowing students to annotate and markup a PDF, they can also make use of the text-to-speech tool.
12North Bay Vision Therapy Center$4,205.00provide vision therapy assessments and services
15GP Environmental Solutions$2,095.00Annual removal and disposal of hazardous medical waste accumulated at all SRCS locations.
Secondary
3Sonoma County Office of EducationNo Direct Costestablishes a process for Information Sharing for Tier 2 Threat Assessment, in which Santa Rosa City Schools staff works with City Services, Sonoma County Office of Education, juvenile justice, and other local agencies to ensure a thorough investigation into student threat assessment
5ImPACT Applications, Inc.$5,000.00The computerized platform provides to assess and manage concussions.
6SportNet Inc.$11,500.00SRCS Athletes and Coaches eligibility management platform.
7Healthy Roster$3,307.50electronic health records (EHR) platform for tracking student athletic injuries.
9Sonoma County Office of EducationNo Direct Costincrease mental health services for students, and district access to high quality mental health providers, at no cost to SRCS.
14American Red CrossNo Direct CostSRHS blood drive on May 9th to support the American Red Cross.
17Sonoma County Office of EducationNo Direct CostSRCS will hire up to 10 Wellness Coaches who will work as Wellness Technicians supporting student physical and behavioral health covered by SCOE until offset by CYBHI fees
19ATL Events$6,857.20Sound system for Piner High School Graduation.

Total value of contracts = $143,500.68.

Summary of Contracts

Contracts

F.6. Approval of Contracts – Bond 

#ContractorSiteServiceCost
Charter
4Dell technologiesCCLAReplace Network Security Video Recorder$13,527
5CDW-GCCLALicense for new Network Security Video Recorder$241
Secondary
3Brelje & RacePHSTopographic and underground survey$10,300
6Redwood Moving and StorageHSMSBoxes for HSMS move to MHS$4,620
7Redwood Moving and StorageSRMSBoxes for SRMS move to SRHS$3,850
8Quattrocchi Kwok ArchitectsPHSDesign new lighting for theater$116,300
9Bay Cities Fire Protection, Inc.RHSFire Flow Test$3,500
10Redwood Moving and StorageHSMSMoving services due to consolidation$42,220
11Redwood Moving and StorageMHSMoving services due to consolidation$5,330
12Redwood Moving and StorageSRHSMoving services due to consolidation$20,101
13Redwood Moving and StorageSRMSMoving services due to consolidation$22,230
18School OutfittersSRHSSinks for SRMS @ DeSoto$6,312
District
1CPIDOFurniture disposal$1,220
2John StockdaleDOChange Order- Additional Inspection$14,840
Elementary
14Brelje & RaceALESTopographic and underground survey$9,400
15Brelje & RaceHLESTopographic and underground survey$15,300
16Brelje & RaceJMESTopographic and underground survey$27,500
17PlaceworksHCMS/SRMSConsult on California Environmental Quality Act requirements for site changes$136,521

Measure C = $364,401.63

Measure G = $88,819.53

Total = $453,221.16

Summary of Contracts

Contracts 

F.7. Approval of Contract for the JMES Parking Lot Drainage Project

Fund 21, Measure G: $629,338.70

Bid Tabulation

Bid Package

Rege Construction

Agreement

F.8. Approval of Resolution 2024/25-114 Amending the District-Wide Electronic Access Control Contract

Design for Phase One of the District-Wide Electronic Access Control Project has been completed. This phase encompasses Rincon Valley Middle School, Maria Carrillo High School, Montgomery High School, and Santa Rosa High School. Amendment No. 1 to the existing Design-Build Agreement, which incorporates the finalized GMPs is now being presented to the Board of Education for approval. This project provides these large sites with new electronic access hardware, all software and hardware needed for all systems, repair and replacement of failed door closures, and repair or replacement of failed doors and frames.

Fund 21 Measure C: $9,005,175.00

Resolution

Amendment No. 1

F.9. Approval for the SRMS/HCMS TK Classroom Buildings Alternate Design Build Project for Flint Design Build LLC 

In order to re-purpose the sites after their closure, it was determined that TK classrooms and playgrounds would need to be built at the sites to be ready for the 2026-2027 school year. 

Fund 21 Measure G: $5,620,000

Proposal

Resolution

Agreement

F.10. Approval of the Contract to KBI Painting, Inc. for the Abraham Lincoln Elementary School Exterior Paint Project

Fund 21 Measure G: $145,200.00

Notice of Intent to Award

Bid Result

Bid

Agreement

F.11. Approval of the contract to George E. Masker, Inc. for the Rincon Valley Middle School Exterior Paint Project

Fund 21 Measure C: $203,500.00

Notice of Intent to Award

Bid Result

Bid

Agreement

F.12. Approval of the contract to KBI Painting, Inc. for the Elsie Allen High School Exterior Paint Project

Fund 21 Measure C: $772,200.00

Notice of Intent to Award

Bid Result

Bid

Agreement

F​​.13. Correction of Car Allowance for District’s Confidential Administrative Assistants

With the original retroactive effective date of January 21, 2025, the Business Services Administrative Assistant would not receive the vehicle allowance for the time served in that role. The revised correction ensures that both positions are properly accounted for and compensated.

The $200 auto allowance for the 12 months is approximately $2,620.13 per employee.

F.14. Approval of Course Proposals

  1. IB Language and Literature SL1 and SL2
  2. IB Language and Literature HL1 and  HL 2
  3. AP Seminar
  4. AP Research
  5. Patient Care

Financial Impact TBD

F.15. Approval of Resolution Authorizing Personnel to Sign Orders on District Funds Accounts

This resolution authorizes removal of Dr. Daisy Morales, as an authorized signer on district accounts. Resolution

F.16. Approval of Reclassification Assessment i-Ready

The Board will consider the approval of i-Ready as a local assessment to determine reclassification eligibility for multilingual learners in grades K-6. Approval will allow i-Ready language arts benchmark scores to be used as evidence of meeting the basic skills requirement for reclassification to Fluent English Proficient (RFEP) status.

Proposed Reclassification

Old Reclassification

G. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEMS

G.1. (Action) Organization of the Board: Election of Open Positions

Board Vice President Maneri’s position needs to be filled by appointment.

G.2. (Action) Filling Vacant Committee Positions: Sonoma County Office of Education (SCOE) AdHoc and Board Policy Subcommittee

Due to the resignation of former Trustee Manieri, vacancies exist on each of these committees. 

SCOE Six by Six Ad Hoc Partnership:
An ad hoc committee of the SRCS board meets periodically to stay informed on six key projects led by SCOE. The committee provides feedback to the County Superintendent and SCOE staff, helping shape potential solutions and keeping the full SRCS board updated on the partnership’s progress.

Board Policy Update Subcommittee:
This subcommittee reviews and updates board policies to ensure legal compliance and alignment with district goals. It aims to enhance clarity and consistency in policy language and supports effective 

G.3. (Action) Resolution Recognizing National School Nurse Day

We thank and appreciate our SRCS School Nurse Team:

Nicholo Atup, Amanda Arend, Cheryl Closser, Heather Ginnever, Elizabeth Munns, Alison O’Herlihy, Jennifer Rodriguez, Sharmagne Sterbens, Sangmo Witzman  

Resolution

Eliminating a nurse in the midst of increasing the number of students requiring their services makes this resolution ring hollow. The ratio for students to nurses for next year will be approximately 2000/1. Organizations like the National Association of School Nurses (NASN) and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommend significantly lower ratios, as pointed out in a report from the California State PTA. The NASN suggests a ratio of 1:750 for general student populations, while the AAP recommends 1:225 for students with daily health needs. With the addition of 2-3 ESN/MAP classes at Elsie Allen, the reopening of the MAP light medical class at Comstock, and additional RISE, CEP, & new PACES classes the demand on nurses will be greatly increased. 

G.4. (Action) Resolution Recognizing May as the Month of Better Hearing and Speech

We are proud to recognize our SRCS Speech-Language Pathologists:

Mikayla Bell, Tina Boaz, Tessa Bronner, Guillaume Burel, Amanda Call, Macey Lomeli, Peter Lounibos, Anna Lundborg, Jamie Mariscal, Mark McLay, Koa Morgan, Jennifer Nevolo-Alwood, Jill Pettit, Nora Pike, Patrick Pike, Steven Schultz, Angie Thompson, Danielle Ullyott, Taylor VanBebber, Anna Weston

Resolution

We continue to be understaffed with SLPs. The last few years we have outsourced some of our kids who receive Speech to online Speech services. Many of our SLPs also have the burden of huge caseloads to absorb the extra kids. How can we attract and retain more SLPs? 

G.5. (Action) Resolution for Mental Health Awareness Month

SRCS is committed to reducing stigma, increasing mental health awareness, and expanding mental health interventions from a culturally conscious lens. Mental Health professionals are a long-standing component of education in Santa Rosa City Schools. Services are provided by counselors, School-Based Therapists, and School Psychologists.  In addition to these specific positions, we recognize that every staff person who engages with students provides positive interactions and promotes positive student wellness. 

Resolution

Additional Information

SRTA appreciates all staff who support the mental health of our students. There is concern that eliminating counselors will result in noticeably less mental health support for students.

G.6. (Action) Resolution No.2024/25-112 Final Recommendation for Reduction or Discontinuance of Certain Particular Kinds of Services for the 2025-26 School Year

SRCS  has determined that at this point in time, 31.7 FTE Certificated SRTA staff, 6.4 FTE Site Administrators and 3.0 FTE District Administrators are the final numbers recommended for reduction or discontinuance. 

An attachment with up to date cuts is expected to be uploaded to the agenda prior to the board meeting.

Feb. Reduction List (The cost savings, if all 164.4 FTE preliminary notices and reductions were to be finalized, would be approximately $21,852,000.)

SRTA members would appreciate transparent communication sharing the vision for the implementation of these cuts. How will students’ needs be met with 22 less counselors?

G.7. (Action) Resolution No. 2024/25-44 Reduction in Classified WorkForce for the 2025-26 School Year

The cost savings, if all 115.18231FTE preliminary notices were to be finalized, is approximately $8,176,000. 

The estimated savings from these reductions will be added to the agenda prior to the 5/14/25 meeting.

Feb Resolution

G.8. (Action) Approval of California School Employees Association, Chapter 75 24-25 #9 MOU Job Description Changes and Layoff Rescissions

The District along with CSEA 75 have negotiated and updated the attached job descriptions:

  1. Restorative & Intervention Support, Previously named Restorative Response Specialist, Per MOU #9 the District shall rescind the layoffs of at least the eight (8) most senior Restorative Response Specialists.
  2. Special Education Technician, Previously named Typist Clerk IV, Per MOU #9 the District shall rescind the layoffs of at least the three (3) most senior Clerk Typist IVs
  3. Special Education Health Aide, Establishment of new classification, placed at Range 25 of the CSEA 75 Salary Schedule
  4. Certified Wellness Coach I, Updating to a 10-month work calendar to meet funding source requirements

For this MOU the following renamed job descriptions will remain in the same range:

  • Restorative & Intervention Support
  • Special Education Technician
  • Certified Wellness Coach I.

The attached CSEA 75 24-25 #9 MOU and applicable job description are pending ratification by the CSEA membership. 

The total cost is not specified. 

CSEA MOU #9

Restorative Intervention Support (Starts at $25.95 per hour.)

Special Ed Technician (Starts at $25.32 per hour.)

Special Ed Health Aide (Starts at $25.32 per hour.)

Certified Wellness Coach (Starts at $25.95 per hour.)

CSEA Salary Schedule

G.9. (Action) Resolution Authorizing The Issuance And Sale Of General Obligation Bonds for Elementary Schools,In An Aggregate Principal Amount Not To Exceed $30,000,000

Measure G (2022) allows the District to issue general obligation bonds in the amount of up to $125,000,000. The District has previously issued $32,000,000 of bonds.

Resolution

Preliminary Official Statement

Bond Purchase Agreement

G.10. (Action) Resolution Authorizing The Issuance And Sale Of General Obligation Bonds for High Schools, In An Aggregate Principal Amount Not To Exceed $100,000,000 

Measure C (2022) allows the District to issue general obligation bonds in the amount of up to $398,000,000. The District has previously issued $104,000,000 of bonds.

Resolution

Preliminary Official Statement

Bond Purchase Agreement

G.11. (Discussion) Deferred Maintenance Plan/Update and Facilities Update

Beyond the bonds which support facility maintenance through upgrades to utilities, building modernization, and removal of deteriorated portables, a Deferred Maintenance Plan is also in place, outlining regular replacement schedules for key systems. Maintaining upgraded facilities helps the maintenance department work more efficiently and reduces the need for emergency repairs.

Facilities Updates Regarding School Closure and Reconfiguration 

• Proposed New 12 Classroom Building at Piner HS 

• Proposed New TK/K buildings at Monroe ES 

• Proposed New TK/K and Classroom Buildings at Lehman ES 

• Secure Fencing at School Site Perimeters 

• Additional Lockers in the Girl’s Locker Room at MHS 

• TK/K Classrooms on the HCMS and SRMS Sites 

• New ECE Interior Restrooms and Play Structures at the Biella Campus 

• Trenching Studies for HVES and PTES Campuses 

• Architectural Planning for 7th and 8th Grade at the SRHS and MHS Campuses 

• Updates to the Facilities Master Plan (FMP) 

• Planning for 7th/8th Grade at EAHS

Deferred Maintenance Presentation

How are decisions made for prioritizing bond projects? Specifically, what is expected to be funded with these funds, and what is the expected timeline?

G.12. (Action) Approval of Superintendent Employment Agreement

To approve the proposed 2025 -2026 contract for Interim Superintendent, Lisa August.

The contract is  not attached. 

H.1-3. Approval of Minutes

April 9, 2025 Minutes and Supporting Documents (Regular Meeting)

April 23, 2025 Minutes and Supporting Documents (Regular Meeting)

May 7, 2025 Minutes (Special Meeting)

J.1. Future Board Discussion Items (not included in this agenda)

SRTA members are encouraged to prepare for the upcoming agenda items.

Resolution Recognizing May as the Month of Better Hearing and Speech 

  • Resolution Reaffirming Support for LGBTQIA+ Community
  • Governor’s May Revision Update
  • Site Safety Plans Report 
    • Will this include recommendations from the District Safety Committee?

Recently Requested Agenda Items from the Board

Maneri – timeline for implementing boys volleyball.

Caston – strategy of athletics program across the district, update 3510 policy around reducing waste as a discussion item

SRTA looks to the future scheduling of the following items:

  • Resolution Recognizing March 31st as Transgender Day of Visibility (March 2025)
  • Restorative Practices Data (March 2025)
  • Alternate Education Update (December 2024, Feb 2025) 
    • There is a strong need for Alternative placements for secondary students who need more services than our comprehensive schools are able to provide. How can SRCS meet the needs of these students during these tough financial times?
  • VAPA Program Highlights (Feb 2025)
  • 2025 Ballot for CSBA Delegate Assembly (Feb 2025)
    • Is the board not casting a vote?
  • Strategic Plan and Equity Survey (Feb 2025)
  • CTE Update (January 2025)
    • Can this be incorporated with the CTE Tech Ed Resolution in future years? Can this item please include both historical and current enrollment numbers and budgets? Can the various grants be explicitly explained including financial resource utilization? Can there also be clear communication of which programs offer a third year capstone course.
  • Updated Governance Handbook (January 2025)
  • Plan and timeline for implementation of Dr. Gillespie’s recommendations (January 2025)
  • Superintendent Morales’ Listening and Learning Tour Update (November 2024)
    • SRTA members would like to understand the expected impact from momentary drop ins, and how this use of time and resources is evaluated.
  • Public Hearing and Approval of Teamsters Union 665 “Sunshine” Proposal (delayed from Oct 2024)
  • First Draft of the District Safety Plan (delayed from September 2024)
  • Board Update of Strategic Goals with input from sites and equity assessment (begun June 2024) 
  • Sharing the support plans for PIP and Variable Term Waiver hires. (Board request August 24)
  • Sharing the Library Master Plan with implementation expectation
  • Officially Closing Learning House
  • SRACS Accelerated Charter Material Revision Request (delayed)
  • Unification/Redistricting Decision
  • Renaming of Sites Update/Decision
  • Plan for Staff Housing support program from the proceeds of Fir Ridge

Until the district makes a decision, the proceeds from the sale of the Fir Ridge property are just sitting and losing value as the cost of housing continues to rise. Getting a program started could help SRCS attract and retain CSEA staff. The potential impact of the funds diminishes as time passes.

  • Student Voice Policy
  • BEST Plus Update
    • Does SRCS still self identify as a BEST Plus district?

J. 3-4. School Site Reports and Parent Organization Updates

  1. SLES

SPSA

Video

Parent Org Report

  1. SRCharterArts

LCAP

Video

Parent Org Report

SRCS Board Meeting Agenda Analysis – 4/23/2025.

REGULAR BOARD MEETING

Santa Rosa City Schools

April 23, 2025

Hybrid: Santa Rosa City Hall Council Chambers 

4:00 p.m. – Closed Session

6:00 p.m. – Open Session

Hybrid: Zoom / Santa Rosa City Hall

*** streamed ***

A live link will be posted on the SRCS website.

Board of Education / Video Board Meetings

Please take time to review the following abbreviated version of the agenda. Click here to see the entire agenda. It has live links on many items with more information. If you want to comment to the board about any upcoming items, email agendacomments@srcs.k12.ca.us. Please CC wearesrta@gmail.com on your email.

Members attending online are encouraged to add SRTA to the front of their Zoom client name.

Closed Session Items: 

A.1. Public Comment On Closed Session Agenda Items To comment, email Melanie Martin at mmartinsrcs.k12.ca.us.

This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak to the board on Closed Session items only. 

Without any specifics on closed session agenda items, it is impossible to know when to provide insights for items being reviewed.

SRTA supports the board utilizing hard evidence to make decisions. 

B.1. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Title of employee being reviewed: Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent, Principals, Vice Principals, Assistant Principals, Directors, Coordinators)

SRTA members are still wondering what the process will be for hiring new administrators. There is a long standing history of hiring committees made up of parents, students (where appropriate), classified, certificated and administrative staff. There have been times when transfers have interrupted that process. 

B. 2. Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release

B.3. Conference With Labor Negotiator (Name of designated rep attending: Dr. Vicki Zands (SRCS); name of organization: Santa Rosa Teachers Association, CSEA 75, Teamsters Union 665)

B.4. Conference With Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation (Number of potential cases: 1)

B.5. Student Expulsions (Case No: 2024/25-29)

RECONVENE TO REGULAR OPEN SESSION (6:00 p.m.)

C.7. Special Presentations for Student of the Month and Certificated/Classified Employees of the Month 

Hilliard Comstock Middle School 

  • Sinai Solorio, Student of the Month
  • Mireya De La Cruz, Classified Employee of the Month 
  • Elizabeth Byer, Certificated Employee of the Month

Rincon Valley Middle School

  • William Moessing, Student of the Month
  • Natalie Long, Classified Employee of the Month
  • Ian Myers, Certificated Employee of the Month

SRTA members are encouraged to celebrate their own by attending this meeting! 

D. Reports

D. 7. School Consolidation / Transition Update

Nothing is attached to this agenda item. That is concerning, as statements were made during the last meeting about transfers being the same as the prior year, and then the Press Democrat article quotes administrators from neighboring districts stating that transfers to their schools from SRCS schools are multiples more. There is a need for honest and transparent communication including real data. 

There are no dates on the SRCS public calendar for May. 

May 14 SRHS/SRMS Empowerment Team. 

The Empowerment Team agendas must be shared out directly with all team members prior to the meetings. Having time to prepare supports making the best decisions.

Where are the promised communications, sharing information from the meetings with the SCOE advisory team?

Where are the metrics for evaluating this transition in progress being transparently shared? Where are they being transparently evaluated? 

What is the guiding principle on enrollment? Is maximizing district enrollment the primary goal?

How many transfer requests the two remaining middle schools are getting? And how many are being allowed?

What is happening with the charter schools and waitlists? What are the metrics used to open a class when there is room? 

What are the updates on enrollments? Are families choosing to participate in the 7-12 model? SRTA members are hearing of new middle school charters being hastily put together for families wanting another option besides the 7-12 model. What happens if there is severe under enrollment?

Where are the updated financials on these changes? How much is being spent to make these transitions? What are the expected savings at this point? Are savings actually gained from closing sites and moving classrooms? 

There is no evidence that the 7-12 sites will have sufficient space for historical levels of students. 

It was clearly stated that no programs would be lost in this model. However current plans show closing middle school programs including Biodiversity, Ethnic Studies, Guitar, Choir, and Culinary. SRTA members have questions about how students will be attracted to sites without these programs. They also want to know who is making the decisions about which classes get cut, and what is being considered in these decisions. There is no transparency, and poor communication about this. 

SRCS must step up and handle things in a way that builds the trust of the community. This requires regular transparency, honest monitoring and clear communication. The weekly emailed list of checked boxes isn’t meeting this need. 

A parent’s view on the district’s LCAP survey:

The way these questions are asked assumes a lot of knowledge on the part of the respondent, from being well versed on the district’s programs, to knowing very specific program-related terms. The questions are couched in language that’s opaque/unclear, and practical examples are not given that would illuminate the reader. They sound good on the surface but don’t really mean anything or have any substance. Simple, straightforward language would go a long way to engage the respondent, and make them actually feel like what was being answered matters. As is, it feels like the district is talking to itself, with no regard to the parent and student populations who they are there to serve.

E. Public Comment on Non Agenda Items

SRTA Members are invited to complete ‘blue cards.’ Online comments have been suspended unless a board member is attending remotely. Please be prepared to observe the three minute time limit or the imposition of a possible last minute reduction in the time limit. Recently comments have been limited to as little as 60 seconds, with a limit on the total time spent on public comments. Only items NOT on the agenda are addressed at this time, with the exception of consent items.

Comments are requested at the board meeting to bring a member’s perspective and share real experiences of the impact of district policies and practices on students and staff. 

Please commit to attending at least one of the next six board meetings this year, and speaking to agenda items that impact you or your students. Speakers are limited to just those in person. Comments are most impactful when they are well spoken, composed and reasonable.

SRTA members are invited to speak to the board about the impact of the lack of district leadership on your students and staff. 

F. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEMS

Only a limited audience even hears the words of these resolution presentations. Actions speak louder than words.

F.1. (Action) Resolution for May as Asian American Pacific Islander Heritage Month

Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities have long contributed to U.S. history, culture, and progress, despite facing discrimination and exclusion. The 2025 AAPI Heritage Month theme, “A Legacy of Leadership and Resilience,” honors the strength and impact of AAPI leaders over time.

Resolution

F.2. (Action) Resolution Recognizing Guest Teacher Appreciation in May 2025

Santa Rosa City Schools is grateful for 329+ dedicated Guest Teachers—some of whom have served for over 25 years, with 11% staying more than a decade. Many retired teachers also return to serve in this vital role. Their flexibility, commitment, and professionalism make them an essential part of our educational team.

Resolution

F.3. (Action) Resolution for Classified School Employee Week May 18-24, 2025

Santa Rosa City Schools joins the California Legislature in honoring  classified employees—essential staff who keep our schools running smoothly every day.  From transportation and meals to technology and campus safety, their dedication supports every aspect of student life.

Resolution

F.4. (Action) Resolution for Teacher Appreciation Week May 5-9, 2025

Teachers shape the future by educating and inspiring the next generation of leaders, innovators, and citizens. They are not only educators but also role models, mentors, and guides who make a lasting impact on students’ lives.

Teaching is a demanding and deeply meaningful profession. Great teachers spark curiosity, build confidence, and help students reach their potential—often becoming one of the most influential figures in a young person’s life.

During Teacher Appreciation Week, we honor their dedication, celebrate their vital role in our communities, and thank them for their invaluable service.

Resolution

F.5. (Discussion) Update on Child Nutrition Services (CNS) Department

This report was delayed from the last meeting. Can presentations be given a time limit to avoid this in the future? 

Goals

1. Hire and retain excellent staff. 

2. Prepare and serve from scratch food that meets students’ needs and reflects the community we serve. 

3. Invest in infrastructure to prepare and serve meals that meet students’ needs. 

4. Nutrition Education and taste testing

5. Local procurement

6. Sustainability and reducing the amount of plastic in schools.

Students need to take produce for a meal to count as complete and be charged. The use of “No Thank You” tables allows undesired food to be available for others. 

Efforts are underway to avoid reheating food items in plastic. There was an approximately 78% increase in participation when food was prepared and served without plastic. This drastic change in a short period is terrifying, as there is a real possibility that there isn’t enough hot food available for students. Offering a cold sunbutter sandwich to a student excited about a hot entree feels like a betrayal and is deeply upsetting for students and staff.  The food we served was not prepared from scratch. However, it was dramatically better than the same food heated and served in plastic.  Concerns were included about the state of site kitchens not allowing for dish washing and increased manpower required to serve food that isn’t packaged.

The CNS leadership team requests everyone interested in joining the Student Nutrition Advisory Committee (SNAC) to share their contact information via the link HERE

Schools that have provided feedback to CNS:

● Biella, Brook Hill, Hidden Valley and James Monroe Elementary Schools

● Hilliard Comstock Middle School 

● Santa Rosa, Piner and Ridgway High School  

Presentation

Additional Information

SRTA supports providing fresh hot meals made without plastic to students and the site kitchen upgrades necessary to support this which should be included in the upcoming revisions to the Facilities Master Plan.  

Did USDA Site Visits happen? What was the result? Was Director Kirby able to attend?

F.6. (Action) Approval of Final Decision of Reclassification for CSEA 75

The Board will consider the Superintendent’s final decision on the reclassification of the following current CSEA 75 classifications with the following financial impacts:

  • Senior Secretary, Range 25 to Senior Secretary-State and Federal Program, Range 28 – approximate financial impact $7,057.71
  • Community Worker, Range 17 to Community Worker, Range 20 – approximate financial impact $4,076.56
  • Administrative Assistant-Middle School, Range 26 to Administrative Assistant-Middle School, Range 27 – approximate financial impact $4,706.78
  • Human Resources Recruiting Technician, Range 29 to Human Resources Recruiting Technician, Range 33 – approximate financial impact $10,520.43
  • Assistant Food Services Transportation Manager, Range 21 to Culinary Coordinator, Range 22 – approximate financial impact $1,598.65
  • Library Technician II – No reclassification recommended

Process

SRTA members appreciate the recognition that we are asking more and more of our staff. 

F7. (Action) Approval of MOU reached with SRCS and SRTA regarding SRTA 24-25 #1 MOU Impacts and Effects of School Consolidation and Closure Transition

For Affected Teachers (Unit Members):

  • Displacement & Transfers:
    • Displaced teachers will follow CBA’s involuntary transfer process, with priority based on seniority.
    • Voluntary relocation waives some transfer provisions and maintains rights.
  • Classroom Sharing: Max of two classrooms per teacher, with proper materials, storage, and prep space provided.
  • Relocation Support: Teachers will receive boxes, 18 paid hours for packing/unpacking, and district moving services.
  • Furniture & Materials: Teachers can request to move furniture and take materials from programs like Donors Choose.

Compensation & Support:

  • Voluntary orientations and trainings paid at the extended day rate.
  • Additional IEP work for transitioning students will be compensated.
  • Cross-site support (within the same campus) is voluntary and paid if pre-approved.

Operational Notes:

  • Schools sharing a campus will vote on their own bell schedules.
  • Final classroom setups and access will be ready by August 1, 2025.

Duration:

  • This MOU is effective through June 30, 2026, and may be updated with mutual agreement.

SRTA MOU #1

School closures have not been handled well in the past, creating deep hurts that have not healed. 

SRTA thanks our negotiating team for consolidating and prioritizing member concerns. We appreciate this MOU, as we try to forge a road through this wilderness. Members are asked to speak up when the unexpected happens, and the team will return to the bargaining table. 

F8. (Discussion) Elsie Allen New School Model Update

The New School Model is a comprehensive school transformation initiative focused on expanding Career Technical Education (CTE), implementing a Graduate Profile, supporting teacher development, and extending the dual immersion pathway from Cesar Chavez Language Academy (CCLA) to Elsie Allen High School (EAHS). 

Two major grants have supported this work: a $380,000 Dual Language Immersion Grant (ending June 30, 2025), which has enhanced biliteracy and academic access for multilingual learners, and a $1.1 million CTE Foundation grant (ending December 31, 2025), which has funded the redesign and expansion of CTE programs and work-based learning at EAHS. The efforts align with the district’s commitment to equity, inclusion, and student success, centered on three EAHS site goals: implementing the Graduate Profile, enhancing student support, and fostering collaborative teacher growth.

Action item L1.8 in the 2024-2025 LCAP to support the New School Model Support $933,531.

That is a total investment of over $2.4 million. 

CTE Foundation Grants: $700,000+ 

Consultation Support Services: $306,293 

Golden State Pathways Program: $746,183 (EAHS and PHS) 

College and Career Access Pathways: $100,000 K12 

Strong Workforce: $64,079 

Dual Language Immersion Grant: $380,000 (EAHS & CCLA)

(The funding sum is $3.2 million- including PHS and CCLA)

EAHS New Model Update

EAHS Graduate Profile

What is the timeline for implementation of the new health science CTE pathway at EAHS? 

How does the new vision knit together with this foundation? What is the plan for training staff on Project or Problem Based Learning?  How and when is the curriculum piloted and adopted and supplies for hands on projects planned for? 

F9. (Action) First Read and Possible Waive of Second Read for BP 5020, BP 5021, BP 5022, BP 5030, BP 5111, BP 5111.1, BP 5112.1, BP 5112.3, BP 5112.5, BP 5113.1, BP 5113

On April 14, 2025, the Board Policy Subcommittee met to review and propose updates to the following Board Policies.

Definitions:

  • Specific Student Populations -English Learners, Foster Youth, Students with Disabilities (SPED), Students with Disabilities (504) and Homeless Youth
  • Demographic Factors: Race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, disability status, English learner status, foster/homeless status, and other relevant demographic factors

Please note, the bold and italicized font on the CLEAN draft of the Board Policy is SRCS specific language or formatting.

BP 5020 Parent Rights and Responsibilities (Clean) (Redline) (Current)

BP 5021 Noncustodial Parents (Clean) (Redline) (Current)

BP 5022 Student and Family Privacy Rights  (Clean) (Redline) (Current)

BP 5030 Student Wellness (Clean) (Redline) (Current)

BP 5111 Admission  (Clean) (Redline) (Current)

BP 5111.1 District Residency (Clean) (Redline) (Current)

BP 5112.1 Exemptions from Attendance (Clean) (Redline) (Current)

BP 5112.3 Student Leave of Absence  (Clean) (Redline) (Current)

BP 5112.5 Open/close Campus  (Clean) (Redline) (Current)

BP 5113.1 Absences and Excuses (Clean) (Redline) (Current)

BP 5113 Chronic Absence and Truancy  (Clean) (Redline) (Current

SRTA members are encouraged to read these redlined versions. Providing support to students is specifically called for in many instances. Will associated ARs be coming that specify who is providing that extra support? 

G.2. Approval of Personnel Transactions 

Personnel Transactions 

EdJoin shows a total of 81 current postings for 139 jobs in SRCS. There are eighteen certificated opening postings for twenty-seven positions (ten more than last meeting.) There are sixty current classified postings for one hundred eight job openings (two more than the last meeting). There are four certificated and no classified management positions open. 

SRTA bids farewell to Brett Bishop (SRCARTS) and Anna Weston (SPSV) who have announced their resignations, and to Heather Hecker (ABES) who has announced her retirement. They take twenty-two and a half years of experience and service with them.

Changes to classified staff includes two new hires, four resignations and two resignations that have been rescinded. They leave taking with them eleven years of knowledge and service to our staff and students.

G.5. Approval of Contracts 

Summary

#ProviderCostDescription
Charter
2Cesar Chavez Foundation$5,000.00Supplemental summer school curriculum for CCLA
Elementary
7Imagine Learning$3,800.001 day TK-1 training on Sonday System, specifically the Let’s Play Learn Kit.
11CHOPS$250.00HLES field trip to CHOPS.
District
4City of Santa Rosa$17,880.00Rent of space for Board Meetings, approx $745 per meeting.
6Simon Group$2,155.202 posters up for six weeks at the SR Plaza promoting summer school.
9Santa Rosa City Recreation & Parks DepartmentNo Additional CostThis addendum shifts the summer schoolsites from ABES and HSMS to JMES and Arts Charter sites.
15Syserco$4,930.00Data submissions for CA required energy benchmark program.
Secondary
1JMA Security$1,104.00EAHS overnight security for graduation set up.
3IlluminatED Collective, LLC$8,000.003 days of PD for the Education Services Team focused on the connection between intention, action and outcomes in master scheduling. A half day is provided to high schools admin teams.
5Schultz Entertainment Experience$1,700.00SRHS photo booth for prom.
8CEV Multimedia$4,012.50Supplemental Spanish CTE Health Pathway online curriculum to be used in the CTE Public and Community Health course.
10Six Flags$6,072.00SRHS May 23rd senior trip to Six-Flags Amusement Park.
12Six Flags$8,712.50CMS May 9th 8th grade trip to Six-Flags.
13Dax Entertainment$3,473.75PHS prom DJ
14School Datebooks Inc.$3,849.99MHS student planners for 7th, 8th, and 9th grade students.

Total value of contracts = $70,939.94

Summary of Contracts

Contracts

The IlluminatED Collective contract is for Master Scheduling. What is the process for allocating sections? For deciding when a class can run and when it can’t ? Who makes this decision? What is considered in making this decision? 

G.6. Approval of Contracts – Bond 

#ContractorSiteServiceCost
Secondary
1Santacruz FlooringSRHSRefinish Gym Floor$63,785
2Santacruz FlooringMHSRefinish Gym Floor$65,378
3Santacruz FlooringRVMSRefinish Gym Floor$55,860
4Matrix HG, IncMHSBACnet Network replace poor installation$74,265
District
5NorBay ConsultingALES, JMES, SRCArts SRMSHazmat Testing -for lead before summer painting$3,900
Elementary
6RGH Geotechnical ConsultantsMHSSoil inspection/geotechnical testing$7,440
7RGH Geotechnical ConsultantsHVES, PTESPeer Review of Trench Studies$10,000
8Miller Pacific EngineeringGroupHVESAP Trench Study of Earthquake fault pre construction$320,000
9Miller Pacific EngineeringGroupPTESAP Trench Study of Earthquake fault pre construction$320,000

Measure C = $267,778.00

Measure G =$652,850.00

Total = $920,628.00

Summary of Contracts

Contracts 

G.7. Establish a Pool of Approved Geotechnical Consulting Firms

This pre-approval will allow SRCS to select firms from the pool to perform required consulting for construction and modernization projects as identified in the Facilities Master Plan (FMP) and Implementation Plan.

Geotech RFQ

Qualification Scoring

G.8. Approval of Contracts for Geotechnical Reporting for TK Projects at HCMS and SRMS

These sites will then be available to house TK-6 programs.  To accommodate the expanded grades at each site, per CDE Title 5 requirements, TK/K classrooms and associated site work will be necessary.   Prior to design of the additional facilities at these sites, a Geotechnical and Geologic Hazard Report must be provided and reviewed by the California Geological Survey (CGS).  Approval of these contracts will allow this preliminary work to be undertaken.

Fund 21 – Measure C $75,506.20

HCMS Report

SRMS Report

G.9. Approval of Resolution 2024/25-110 for the Piner High School 2-Story Classroom Building Alternate Design-Build Project

Based upon current enrollment, additional capacity is needed to house the 7th and 8th graders that will be moving to PHS.  An extremely aggressive schedule is required to add this capacity.

Resolution

Proposal

Agreement

The lack of transparency about bond fund decision making is an enormous issue. How are projects prioritized? What triggers a reassessment of priorities? What is taken into consideration? Who is at that table? 

How is it decided that PHS gets a new building while other campuses are not able to provide sufficient space for current students and supports? 

There is great hesitancy to support moving forward with this item while the 7-12 experiment is in its infancy, and there are signs this is not being well received. 

This major change to the Facilities Master Plan impacts all other sites with the diminishment of available funds. 

G.10. Approval of Revised 24-25 Extra Duty Title and Classes Salary Schedule

The addition of Women’s Flag Football reflects ongoing efforts to expand athletic opportunities and promote equity in extracurricular activities for students. The update to the salary schedule ensures proper compensation for coaching assignments associated with this new sport.

The stipend for the Women’s Flag Football Head Coach will be placed in Class 6 of the Extra Duty Title and Classes Salary Schedule, with a pay range of $5,787.32 to $6,472.67, depending on the coach’s years of experience.

Revised Extra Duty

G.11. Approval of the Establishment of the Heather Hagle Art Scholarship

In recognition of her profound dedication to teaching, and to ensure that her legacy continues to uplift future generations, Ms. Hagle’s mother, Linda Hagle, has generously chosen to establish the Heather Hagle Art Scholarship. The proposed establishment of the Heather Hagle Art Scholarship would award a graduating senior from RHS who is a talented artist $500 to pay for art supplies, advancing their career and their love of art. 

Scholarship

H.1-2. Approval of Minutes

April 9, 2025 Minutes and Supporting Documents (Regular Meeting)

J.1. Future Board Discussion Items (not included in this agenda)

SRTA members are encouraged to prepare for the upcoming agenda items.

  • Resolution Recognizing May as the Month of Better Hearing and Speech 
  • Resolution for Mental Health Awareness 
  • Resolution for School Nurse Day
  • Deferred Maintenance Update from January and March 2025)
  • Resolution Reaffirming Support for LGBTQIA+ Community
  • Governor’s May Revision Update

Recently Requested Agenda Items from the Board

Maneri – timeline for implementing boys volleyball.

Caston – strategy of athletics program across the district, update 3510 policy around reducing waste as a discussion item

SRTA looks to the future scheduling of the following items:

  • Resolution Recognizing March 31st as Transgender Day of Visibility (March 2025)
  • Restorative Practices Data (March 2025)
  • Alternate Education Update (December 2024, Feb 2025) 
    • There is a strong need for Alternative placements for secondary students who need more services than our comprehensive schools are able to provide. How can SRCS meet the needs of these students during these tough financial times?
  • VAPA Program Highlights (Feb 2025)
  • 2025 Ballot for CSBA Delegate Assembly (Feb 2025)
    • Is the board not casting a vote?
  • Strategic Plan and Equity Survey (Feb 2025)
  • CTE Update (January 2025)
    • Can this be incorporated into the CTE Tech Ed Resolution in future years? Can this item please include both historical and current enrollment numbers and budgets? Can the various grants be explicitly explained including financial resource utilization? Can there also be clear communication of which programs offer a third year capstone course.
  • Updated Governance Handbook (January 2025)
  • Plan and timeline for implementation of Dr. Gillespie’s recommendations (January 2024)
  • Superintendent Morales’ Listening and Learning Tour Update (November 2024)
    • SRTA members would like to understand the expected impact from momentary drop ins, and how this use of time and resources is evaluated.
  • Public Hearing and Approval of Teamsters Union 665 “Sunshine” Proposal (delayed from Oct 2024)
  • First Draft of the District Safety Plan (delayed from September 2024)
  • Board Update of Strategic Goals with input from sites and equity assessment (begun June 2024) 
  • Sharing the support plans for PIP and Variable Term Waiver hires. (Board request August 24)
  • Sharing the Library Master Plan with implementation expectation
  • Officially Closing Learning House
  • SRACS Accelerated Charter Material Revision Request (delayed)
  • Unification/Redistricting Decision
  • Renaming of Sites Update/Decision
  • Plan for Staff Housing support program from the proceeds of Fir Ridge

Until the district makes a decision, the proceeds from the sale of the Fir Ridge property are just sitting and losing value as the cost of housing continues to rise. Getting a program started could help SRCS attract and retain CSEA staff. The potential impact of the funds diminishes as time passes.

  • Student Voice Policy
  • BEST Plus Update
    • Does SRCS still self identify as a BEST Plus district?

J. 2. and 3. School Site Reports and Parent Organization Updates

  1. HCMS

SPSA

Video

  1. SRACS

LCAP

Video

  1. SRHS

SPSA

Video

J. 5. Facilities Projects Update

Planning Stage and Upcoming Projects:

District Office & Education Center The RFQ/P process is complete. 

Piner HS Infrastructure & Drainage  scheduled to begin in June

Piner HS Ball Wall and Fencing scheduled to begin in June

James Monroe ES Infrastructure & Drainage it is anticipated that the project will be constructed during the summer of 2025.

Exterior Campus Painting in bid process for summer work

Gym Floor Refinishing proposals on agenda

Current Construction Projects:

District-Wide Electronic Access Controls  DecoTech has been performing off-hours site investigation at SRHS, MCHS and RVMS as part of the design phase. The Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) for the design and construction at all sites is expected to be presented for action on 5/14/25.

Central Receiving Warehouse The prefabricated metal building was delivered in Jan. and the construction team has been erecting the pieces. The exterior skin is being installed along with the stud framing for the interior walls. Once the stud framing is complete rough-ins will begin. Site work will continue through April with irrigation, exterior lighting, and concrete work.

Santa Rosa HS Portable Removal Re-routing the data pathway and the removal of the remaining dilapidated portable building will occur this summer.

Montgomery 2-Story Classroom Building The mechanical equipment is being connected to begin conditioning the interior of the building. Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Sprinkler installation has been completed on the first floor. The elevator hoistway is scheduled to be completed by the end of April. The elevator mechanical room is being roughed in for the required utilities. Installation of all storefront and exterior windows is complete. Exterior stucco installation was completed this month, and exterior painting is scheduled to be complete by the end of the month.

Projects Closing Out:

Classroom Modernization Pilot Facilities scheduled time with each of the classes that occupy the modernized classrooms at SRHS to gather student feedback.

Rincon Valley MS Well The final county permit is anticipated to be issued by the end of April. 

Helen Lehman ES Roofing & HVAC DSA certification is pending.

Luther Burbank ES Roofing & HVAC DSA certification is pending.

Rincon Valley MS Roofing & HVAC DSA certification is pending.

Update

J.6. Williams Settlement Quarterly Report

During the quarter of January 1 through March 31, 2025, the district did not receive any Williams Uniform Complaints.

Report